Chapter 2 Anatomy, embryology and neurophysiology
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
MEN DID NOT BUILD MEN
We have the solution and not the problem.
Humans are the most recent species to appear on Earth and the only one able to understand the great complexity of all biological systems. The comprehensive approach that we advanced many years ago presupposes that the technical specifications of organs and functions correspond to a logic and intelligent program of construction. Therefore it is necessary to begin observation of a function by identifying the technical requirements necessary to achieve it, like an engineer investigating a machine that he did not design. After that, moving to the anatomical solution allows us to validate it and to appreciate the choice of biocomponents and the organization of command and control systems. In other words, this approach, going from function to morphology, can be compared to the inverse dynamics used in mechanics. In fact being obliged, after collecting scientific data from the observation of a biological problem, to formulate an explanatory theory, it is very important for us to keep in mind that a logical plan of construction exists and that this is no place for fantasy or personal feelings. At the present time we have measurement technology available for evaluating any kind of biological, physical or chemical phenomenon. In the clinical field, however, the situation can be a little bit different: sometimes a good clinical result indicated by a patient and partially validated by a physician may generate an interpretation lacking in precise scientific proof. The empirical practice of medicine is full of such interpretations which do not change the results but which can form the basis for a more or less convincing education program. Nevertheless, a hypothesis remains a hypothesis until it has been scientifically validated. This rigorous approach is mandatory when we are examining a clinical therapy such as auriculotherapy. We will try later to integrate the clinical data obtained for this technique within an acceptable functional scientific framework, leaving some doors open for future investigation.
TRANSMISSION AND PROCESSING OF NEURAL SIGNALS
Transmission and processing of neural signals occur in two conditions: first there is a direct nervous conduction along the fibers by a depolarization wave traveling from one node of Ranvier to another at a velocity that depends on the diameter of the myelin sheath. The maximum speed is in the order of 120 m/s corresponding to the largest sensory fibers of 25 μ diameter. Second, this neural conduction, neuron to neuron, is also regulated by the synaptic doors using neurotransmitters as keys for opening them and passing through. This technical originality, introducing a chemical code to facilitate or inhibit a signal, explains the clinical importance of neurochemistry as crucial to the understanding of nervous function. In addition there are some specific sites within the central nervous system responsible for the secretion of specific neurotransmitters, such as the monoaminergic centers (noradrenergic, serotoninergic and dopaminergic) in the brainstem and the cholinergic centers. The neuromodulation produced by all these neurotransmitters uses, like the endocrine glands, the circulation of the blood and also the cerebrospinal fluid. The action can be slower than direct nervous conduction and in most cases is more prolonged in time.
Regarding the general organization of the sensory inputs, it is important to remember that the different sensory fibers coming from different types of receptors with their different calibers are the dendritic expansions of the first neuron of the sensory pathway located in the spinal or cranial ganglion outside the central nervous system. There are more skin receptors than sensory fibers conveying the signal, which is the expression of a peripheral sensory convergence still not fully understood: is it the same type of receptor on the same fiber or different types? In addition, in their distribution, spinal and cranial nerves have a cutaneous and muscular territory and also, by sympathetic or parasympathetic fibers, a visceral territory, the main conscious expression of which is logically manifested on the skin by projected pain, according to its poor representation within the conscious somatosensory cortex. This central neural interference mechanism between different kinds of input has to be explained by the organization of the spinal and thalamic relays described later. This is therefore the neurophysiological justification for the dermatological metameric reflexes with an important sympathetic component provoked by pinching the skin in relation to visceral dysfunction, described after Head1 by Jarricot,2,3 which also exists at the level of the auricle. In addition, reflex activity needs to be defined from the physiological point of view. It is the result of the conjunction between a stimulus and a reaction.
The domain includes all the visceral organs located within the trunk, all the digestive glands and all the arterial vessels equipped with a contractile system allowing regulation of the blood flow. The best indicator of the equilibrium between the two opposite components of the vegetative nervous system is the iris in the anterior chamber of the eye, which has a smooth sphincter innervated by the parasympathetic system (myosis) and a dilatator radial muscle innervated by the sympathetic system (mydriasis). The intercommunication between the two big systems is made at the highest level in the brain, mainly by the hypothalamus. This center, which represents only 4 g of neural substance, plays a powerful role in the control of specific functions such as hunger, thirst, temperature, aggression, sexual behavior and the whole of the endocrine system through its rich vascular and nervous connections with the hypophysis (pituitary gland). Its influence on the cardiovascular and digestive systems and its connection with the central nucleus of the amygdala make it an important component of the limbic system, particularly the part concerning emotional expression. Finally, it will be necessary to associate these two cerebrospinal and vegetative systems when looking for the particular physiology of the ear pavilion. The vascular reaction perceived in the pulsations of the radial artery after its manipulation corresponds to a non-specific vegetative vascular reflex existing in all cutaneous territories.
MORPHOGENESIS OF THE HEAD
The important point is to remember that every visceral arch will have a skin cover from ectoblast, skeleton and muscles from mesoblast building the splanchnocranium, and a specific cranial nerve from brainstem having motor, sensory and vegetative fibers innervating the territory (Fig. 2.1). Inside, the separation between the respiratory and digestive visceral tubes organizes the mandatory aero-digestive crossroads within the pharynx, allowing first the larynx to inject sounds into the mouth to be ‘masticated’ as phonemes and second, food to be injected into the esophagus without entering the respiratory tract, explaining the crucial role of the soft palate. The appropriate nomenclature is as follows: