Cumulative Trauma Disorders



Cumulative Trauma Disorders


Philip Chiou

Joanne Borg-Stein



Cumulative trauma disorders (CTDs) are injuries to the nervous and/or musculoskeletal system attributed to repetitive physical tasks, poor sustained posture/biomechanics, vibrations, and/or repetitive forceful exertions (1). It has also been called repetitive strain injury, overuse injury syndrome, cumulative movement disorder, and repetitive motion injury. CTD is an umbrella term that includes multiple specific diagnoses and nonspecific conditions affecting primarily the upper limbs, shoulder, neck, and lower back. Furthermore, within each of these body regions, there can be multiple types of CTDs that involve pathology of the tendons, joints, muscles, or nerves. Among the most common CTDs are lumbar back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), epicondylitis, neck pain, and de Quervain’s tenosynovitis. Although the workplace is the most common setting for development of CTD, these disorders can arise in any setting with prolonged exposure to the aforementioned mechanical stressors.

The mainstay of CTD management involves ergonomic interventions to correct underlying postural and mechanical causes. Treating symptoms without modifying the workplace is the primary reason for recurrence of CTD and magnifies the overall economic burden caused by these disorders. In addition to ergonomic interventions, treatment can include physical therapy, orthotic devices, anti-inflammatory medication, muscle relaxants, pain medications, steroid injections, and surgical interventions in select cases. Psychosocial factors play a significant role in disability resulting from CTD and must be addressed as well.


EPIDEMIOLOGY AND ECONOMIC COSTS

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were 357,160 total recorded cases of musculoskeletal disorders in 2006 that resulted in time away from work. CTDs account for approximately 56% to 65% of all occupational injuries (2). There are several diagnoses that are due to cumulative trauma, with the most common being low back pain (LBP), CTS, and neck/shoulder pain. Repetitive motion injuries as a group had a median of 19 missed workdays (BLS, 2006; http://www.bls. gov/). Based upon these numbers, CTDs are commonplace and constitute a large portion of occupational injuries.

The economic costs of CTDs are enormous. Total U.S. annual cost estimates have ranged from $13 to $20 billion (3). Estimating cost is a challenge since CTDs can encompass varying diagnostic entities from one study to the next. Additionally, it can be difficult to attribute the cause of workplace injuries to repetitive stresses versus acute overexertion over a brief time period since there are no clear cut temporal definitions currently used in the literature.


PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Although many hypotheses have been put forth, the pathophysiology of CTDs is not completely understood. Cumulative biomechanical stresses can result in tissue alteration in tendons, muscles, joints, and nerves over time. In soft tissues, damage is marked by inflammation, collagen deposition, and tissue contraction, which can in turn lead to pain or loss of motion. One hypothesis to explain the origins of myalgia is that prolonged muscle contractions lead to decreased local blood flow, deoxygenation, and metabolite buildup that manifest as muscle fatigue and soreness (4). The mechanism for tendon-related disorders may be related to inflammation and hypoxia. It has been demonstrated that repeated mechanical stresses release prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) from human fibroblasts in vivo (5). Exposure of rabbit patellar tendons to PGE2 resulted in degenerative changes. Therefore, tendon pathology may result from prolonged or recurring inflammation. Another possible precipitant is hypovascularity, which may predispose tendons to hypoxic degeneration and subsequent tendinopathy. Regardless of cause, tendinopathies have been shown to have disordered collagen arrangement and increased proteoglycan ground substance (6). The most common site of overuse injury is the osteotendinous junction (7). When referring to the general term tendinopathy, it is important to make the distinction between tendonitis, an acute inflammatory process, versus tendinosis, a chronic, degenerative process of the tendon.


PSYCHOSOCIAL

Several studies show that psychosocial factors contribute to disability in CTD, especially in cases involving cervical or lumbar spine pain. CTDs are costly to both employers and employees. They result not only in time lost from work but also in decreased productivity and poor employee morale, which in turn leads to further disability (8). Studies have identified job dissatisfaction (9, 10) as a significant risk factor for the
development of LBP. One study analyzed industrial insurance data to demonstrate a positive correlation between low income and divorce with chronicity of LBP (11). Dersh et al. found that 56% of patients with occupational LBP had major depression, while 11% had an anxiety disorder (12).

Although less studied, there is evidence to suggest that psychosocial factors play an important role in the severity or chronicity of CTDs that are unrelated to spine pain. One study used patients’ self-report of upper extremity symptoms to show a positive correlation between depression and severity of carpal tunnel, de Quervain’s tenosynovitis, lateral elbow pain, and trigger finger (13). Another study found job strain to adversely affect successful return to employment in CTS patients (14).

The correlation between significant psychosocial stressors and disability from CTD introduces the question of which issue arises first. A recent epidemiologic study suggested that most patients with occupational LBP found that most psychiatric disorders appear only after the onset of work injury (15). Nonetheless, these factors have been shown in several pain conditions as contributing to chronicity even if they are a secondary process. Overall, there is increasing evidence that these issues should be addressed appropriately for optimal recovery. In evaluating new CTD patients, clinicians should screen for psychosocial factors and psychiatric comorbidities and consult relevant mental health practitioners if indicated.


ERGONOMICS

According to the International Ergonomics Association Council of 2000, ergonomics is “the scientific discipline concerned with the understanding of interactions among humans and other elements of a system, and the profession that applies theory, principles, data and methods to design in order to optimize human well-being and overall system performance.” It requires an understanding of human abilities and the limitations imposed by the work environment, machines, tools, and specific job tasks (4).

Several elements contribute to occupational CTD, including forceful exertions, repetition of a work task, awkward biomechanical postures, and vibration (1). The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), a division of the U.S. Department of Health, reviewed the epidemiological evidence for each of these physical work factors for the major CTD subtypes. A brief summary of these findings is presented below. It is important to note that many CTDs will involve a combination of these factors.


Repetition or Prolonged Activities

Repetitiveness is commonly cited as an occupational factor leading to CTD of the upper extremity (8). It can be defined as cyclical or repeated motions requiring contraction of the same muscles to mobilize joints. The NIOSH conducted a 1997 review that found moderate evidence for repetition as a cause of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in neck and shoulder pain, CTS, and hand/wrist tendonitis. It did not find sufficient evidence in LBP or epicondylitis (1).


Forceful Exertions

There is epidemiologic evidence to support the role of forceful exertions in the workplace in contributing to neck, lumbar back, elbow, and hand/wrist pain. Ergonomic design plays a critical role as force requirements may increase based upon several factors including poor body mechanics, high torque or speed of power tools, and friction between objects and the worker (16).


Posture

Improper postural mechanics during the performance of a task appears to play a significant role in the development of CTD, especially those involving the spine and upper extremities. Sustained wrist and forearm flexion-extension or radial-ulnar deviation may induce friction between tendons and adjacent anatomic surfaces. A good example of this is frequent radial deviation of the wrist and subsequent development of de Quervain’s tenosynovitis.


Vibration

Another frequently mentioned risk factor in CTD is vibration (17). Exposure to vibration occurs in a variety of contexts: using power tools, holding an object as it is processed in a machine (e.g., wood in a power saw), or using percussion tools (e.g., hammering a nail). Vibration has been implicated as the cause of Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS).


CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS

As the various CTDs of the upper extremity and spine are discussed, emphasis is placed on anatomy, pathophysiology, incidence, clinical diagnosis, and management. There are some common trends in CTDs. In general, the pathophysiologic mechanisms of these disorders are not completely understood. The evidence for cumulative trauma in the pathogenesis of these conditions is discussed, and summary is provided in Table 36-1. Diagnosis of these conditions is typically made primarily based upon clinical history and exam, with supportive studies such as imaging or electrodiagnosis used in equivocal cases. Table 36-2 provides a summary of specific exam maneuvers suggestive of a certain CTD. Management begins with relative rest and workplace modification including ergonomic interventions. Conservative treatments include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), therapeutic heat/cold, and physiotherapy consisting of stretching and strengthening of relevant muscle groups. Other modalities such as myofascial release, deep friction massage, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), acupuncture, ultrasound, and iontophoresis are not well described in the literature. Steroid injections can be utilized in some conditions when the above treatments fail. Finally, surgery can be performed in refractory cases.









TABLE 36.1 Evidence for Causal Relationship Between Cumulative Trauma and Various Neuromusculoskeletal Conditions


































































Condition


Level of Evidence


Spine



Neck pain


II



Low back pain


I


Shoulder



Rotator cuff tendinopathy


II



Impingement


IV



Bicipital tendinopathy


IV


Elbow



Epicondylitis


II


Hand



Trigger finger


II



de Quervain’s tenosynovitis


II



Hand-arm vibration syndrome


I


Nerve entrapment syndromes



Carpal tunnel syndrome


I



Cubital tunnel syndrome


II



Thoracic outlet syndrome


IV


Level of evidence grading: Because it is unethical to perform controlled trials exposing subjects to cumulative trauma, the following modified grading system is used:
I: Highly supportive evidence from well-designed cohort or cross-sectional studies.
II: Highly supportive evidence from well-designed case-control studies or moderately supportive evidence from cohort or cross-sectional studies.
III: Supportive evidence from case report(s) or series.
IV: Supportive expert opinion.



Neck

The cervical spine is a complex structure consisting of eight individual motion segments, beginning with the articulation of the occiput on C1 (atlas) and ending with the articulation between C7 and T1. Cervical nerve roots exit bilaterally through intervertebral foramen to innervate the myotomes and dermatomes of the head, neck, and arms. The cervical musculature controls head movement and provides stability. Pain in the neck area can arise from overwork of the musculature, impingement of cervical nerve roots, or degenerative arthritis of the spine. Neck pain is commonly encountered in jobs requiring prolonged posturing of the neck, forceful exertions, and highly repetitive tasks with static postural loads. Because major neck muscles extend to the shoulder or base of the skull, shoulder pain and headache are commonly associated. Tension neck syndrome involves persistently stiff neck muscles resulting in aching discomfort at the base of the neck, upper back, and suboccipital region.








TABLE 36.2 Special Diagnostic Tests Associated with CTD







































Cumulative Trauma Disorder


Diagnostic Test


Carpal tunnel syndrome


Phalen’s: wrist flexion to 90 degree maintained for 60 s.



Tinel’s: tapping of median nerve at carpal tunnel.


Cubital tunnel syndrome


Tinel’s: tapping of ulnar nerve at cubital tunnel in flexed elbow.


Thoracic outlet syndrome


Adson’s: abduction and external rotation of the shoulder of affected side. Loss of radial pulse indicates positive test.



Roo’s: alternating finger extension and flexion to form a fist for 60 s while patient’s shoulders are held in abduction and elbow in 90-degree flexion. Reproduction of paresthesias or inability to perform maneuver on affected side indicates positive test.


Impingement


Neer’s: pain with full passive shoulder flexion.



Hawkins’: internal rotation and abduction of shoulder with elbow flexed at 90 degrees.


Supraspinatus tendinopathy


Empty can test: resistance to shoulder extension with the subject’s elbow fully extended and the fist directed such that the thumb is pointing toward the ground.


Bicipital tendinopathy


Speed’s: resisted shoulder flexion with the arm in supinated position and the elbow flexed at 15 degrees.


de Quervain’s tenosynovitis


Finkelstein’s: passive ulnar deviation of the hand with the thumb fully flexed in a closed fist.


Lateral epicondylitis


Cozen’s: resistance of wrist extension and radial deviation with the subject’s arm in pronated position.


Poor neck posture has been strongly associated with occupational neck pain and appears to be the most significant factor in work-related neck disorders. Specifically, prolonged neck flexion or extension in combination with arm elevation is problematic. Mayoux-Benhamou and Revel used electromyography (EMG) to demonstrate improved neck muscle efficiency with neutral head position as compared to the flexed or extended position (18). Other studies have found associations between forward head posture and headaches (19), overhead arm tasks and radiating neck pain (20), and simultaneous head extension and arm elevation with neck/shoulder pain (21). The literature has also identified certain occupations involving overhead work with a higher incidence of neck pain. Neck symptoms were reported in 62% of dental hygienists and 66% of sewing machine operators with more than 15 years of experience (22, 23). Significant symptoms related to the neck have also been reported in dentists, meat carriers, miners, heavy labor workers, iron foundry workers, and civil servants (24).

Repetition and high exertional loads are important factors in neck pain as well. A cross-sectional study of 82 female assembly line workers who were exposed to repeated intermittent
neck flexion and shoulder abduction revealed an odd ratio (OR) of 4.6 for any neck/shoulder diagnosis and OR of 3.6 for diagnosis of neck tension syndrome (25). A smaller, but more quantitative, study measured trapezius activity on surface EMG in order to demonstrate that increased frequency of sustained, low muscle activity was positively correlated with neck discomfort in workers (26). For forceful exertions, the trapezius is the major muscle of the neck utilized to carry out work involving high forces. One longitudinal study found that workers with a reduced static trapezius load had less shoulder pain at 2-years follow-up (27). Another study found that postal workers, who carry heavy shoulder bags, consistently reported greater shoulder/neck disability compared to gas meter readers who perform a similar amount of walking as postal workers (28). This was the case after controlling for age, work years, and previous lifting work.

Management of neck pain involves avoiding prolonged static postures and introducing dynamic and varied work tasks (29). Exercise therapy for mechanical neck disorders has short-term benefits in terms of pain and function (30). Although no specific exercises can be clearly recommended over others based upon evidence, a reasonable regimen would include neck retraction exercises, stretching of the anterior shoulder capsule and pectoralis muscles, and strengthening of the trapezius and rhomboids. In general, treatments for neck pain arising from cumulative trauma have not been well studied, and management principles have been extrapolated from general mechanical neck pain studies. Pharmacotherapy can include NSAIDs, muscle relaxants, and opioids for severe pain. Manipulation alone is not helpful but may have benefit in conjunction with exercise therapy (31). There is moderate evidence for a lack of efficacy of botulinum toxin injections in chronic mechanical neck pain according to a recent systematic review (31). The therapeutic value of TENS, biofeedback, and acupuncture remain unclear. For further details regarding cervical spine pain, refer to Chapter 32.


Shoulder

The shoulder is a complex structure that affords great mobility at the expense of stability. Its stability can be divided into static and dynamic components. Statically, the bony glenoid, cartilaginous labrum, glenohumeral ligaments, and joint capsule provide moderate stability. Dynamically, the rotator cuff muscles and biceps tendon function to assist with shoulder stability. The most frequent CTDs of the shoulder are rotator cuff tendinopathy (especially involving the supraspinatus), biceps tendinopathy, and shoulder impingement.

The rotator cuff consists of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, and teres minor and resides in the subacromial space, which is defined by the acromion, subacromial bursa, and coracoacromial ligament above; the coracoid process at the medial border; and the humeral head below. The rotator cuff plays an especially important role in the case of overhead elevation of the arm, which requires tonic contraction to keep the humeral head anchored in the shallow glenoid fossa (32). This explains why rotator cuff tendinopathy is particularly common in laborers who work with their arms overhead or athletes who throw repeatedly (7).

A disorder that often accompanies rotator cuff tendinopathy is impingement syndrome, in which there is progressive encroachment of the rotator cuff tendons in the subacromial space due to intrinsic or extrinsic sources (33). Intrinsic causes include trauma or degeneration of the rotator cuff with instability or laxity of the shoulder complex. The laxity results in cephalad migration of the humeral head resulting in impingement. Extrinsic causes include bony changes to the acromion, coracoid, acromioclavicular joint or greater tuberosity, cervical nerve root compression, and other systemic conditions, including rheumatic disorders. Acromial morphology (type I flat, type II curved, type III hooked) is another factor that can predispose one to impingement (34). Individuals with a hooked acromion are most likely to develop rotator cuff abnormalities. The positioning of the rotator cuff has also been reported as having a relationship to rotator cuff pathology. Rathbun and Macnab report the “wringing out” phenomenon, whereby a hypovascular region in the supraspinatus tendon is created when the arm is held in adduction (35). Overall, shoulder impingement, a mechanical compression process, often leads to rotator cuff tendinopathy, which can lead to further impingement.

The individual with rotator cuff tendinopathy or impingement syndrome will report pain deep within the shoulder or posteriorly, with referral to the deltoid muscle insertion region. There may also be loss of strength and motion secondary to the pain. The discomfort is worsened by activities at shoulder level or above. Pain will occasionally occur at night while resting on the involved shoulder, perhaps from a concomitant subacromial bursitis. On physical examination, a positive Hawkins’ or Neer’s sign is suggestive of impingement. Hawkins’ test involves passive internal rotation and abduction of the shoulder while the elbow is flexed at 90 degrees. Neer’s test involves forward shoulder flexion until the arm is overhead while simultaneously maintaining light pressure on the acromion. Other tests include diagnostic injection of local anesthetic into the subacromial space, which should provide temporary pain relief and improved ROM in these conditions. The differentiation of rotator cuff tendinopathy and impingement is often difficult. A helpful clinical maneuver to differentiate these conditions is to assess isometric strength testing of the rotator cuff muscles (i.e., resisted external rotation of shoulder or abduction), which should produce moderate to severe pain in rotator cuff tendonitis, but minimal discomfort in a pure impingement syndrome. Further evaluation can include imaging such as x-rays or MRI/MR arthrography, which may show narrowed subacromial space, calcified tendons, or partial tears.

Bicipital tendinopathy is another condition that can result from repetitive strain and overhead reaching. Patients typically complain of anterior shoulder pain localized to the region of the bicipital groove. On examination, a positive Yergason’s or Speed’s manuever (36) along with pain during active elbow flexion may be important clues. Diagnostic injection with local anesthetic or MRI may confirm this clinical diagnosis. Since other shoulder pathology frequently occurs in concert, the
clinician should also investigate for rotator cuff tendinopathy, impingement, or shoulder instability.

There have been numerous studies illustrating the association between repetitive movements and/or exertional force and shoulder pathology. Chiang et al. found an OR of 1.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.5) among fish-processing workers’ repetitive upper limb movement and shoulder girdle pain (37). Another cross-sectional study of fish industry workers revealed that repeated arm elevations and shoulder abductions as documented on videotape were significantly associated with shoulder and neck pain (25). Welch et al. noted a prevalence of 32% incidence of rotator cuff injury in sheet metal workers, with most occurring from overhead duct work (38). Other at-risk occupations for shoulder pain include electricians (39), garment workers (40), hospital workers (41), and construction workers (42). Herberts et al. reported 18% of shipyard welders and 16% of steel plate workers had rotator cuff pathology (especially supraspinatus tendonitis) (43). Overall, rotator cuff injury has been reported as the third most common diagnosis encountered in workers, accounting for 8.3% of cases (44).

In the industrial setting, treatment of shoulder impingement and tendinopathy emphasizes avoiding awkward postures and decreasing overhead work, especially tasks involving shoulder internal rotation. One study found that postural alterations could improve the range of shoulder motion at which pain was experienced, in spite of having no overall effect on pain intensity in symptomatic impingement patients (45). Acute interventions include NSAIDs, ice, and pain management. If persistent, corticosteroid injections into the subacromial space can be utilized. Range-of-motion exercises involving both the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic articulations will decrease the likelihood of asynchronous motion leading to impingement. Strengthening exercises should focus on the rotator cuff muscles and scapular stabilizers.


Elbow


Epicondylitis

The lateral and medial epicondyles serve as the origins of the musculature for the forearm and wrist. Lateral epicondylitis (also termed tennis elbow) and medial epicondylitis (also termed golfer’s elbow) are overuse syndromes of these muscles. Of these two disorders, lateral epicondylitis is more common and usually involves the extensor carpi radialis brevis and less commonly the extensor carpi radialis longus, extensor digitorum communis, or extensor carpi ulnaris. Medial epicondylitis typically involves the pronator teres and flexors carpi radialis and ulnaris.

Epicondylitis begins as an inflammatory reaction within the tendinous origin and progresses to microtears that heal through fibrosis and granulation tissue production. It is common in both sports as well as in occupations such as gardening, dentistry, meat processing (46), cashiers, and carpentry. It is an overuse syndrome precipitated by repetitive contraction of the wrist flexors/extensors or pronators/supinators, such as in hand gripping, twisting or screwing motions, hammering, assembling small parts (47), or swinging sporting equipment. Any contraction of muscle can be either concentric, which results in muscle shortening, or eccentric, which results in muscle lengthening. Between these two contractions, eccentric muscle overload results in higher muscle tension and appears to be more likely to cause injury than concentric contractions (48).

The diagnosis of epicondylitis is based on history and physical examination. Patients with lateral epicondylitis typically report focal lateral epicondylar pain, pain with resisted wrist extension and radial deviation, and possibly weakness of hand grip due to muscle fatigue and discomfort. Medial epicondylitis presents with focal pain at the medial epicondyle, pain with resisted wrist flexion and radial deviation, and possibly decreased hand grip strength. In both lateral and medial epicondylitis, there should be normal elbow range of motion; otherwise, elbow pathology should be investigated. In equivocal cases, further diagnostic workup may include local anesthetic injection or imaging. An anesthetic block in either the lateral or the medial epicondyle will confirm the diagnosis. MRI evaluation showing distinct signal intensity changes and contrast enhancement can be correlated with fibrovascular proliferation and fatty degeneration of the common extensor tendon. Minor signal intensity changes without contrast enhancement correlate with fibrosclerotic degeneration and intratendinous cartilage formation (49). MRI will also be helpful in distinguishing epicondylitis from other conditions such as stress fractures, ligament and tendon injury, and nerve entrapment (entrapment of the posterior interosseous nerve may mimic lateral epicondylitis) (50). Diagnostic ultrasound is an emerging diagnostic tool in epicondylitis that may also provide information about disease severity (51).

Treatment of epicondylitis begins with relative rest and ergonomic improvements in tool or sporting equipment design. Medical care for epicondylitis often begins with activity restriction, icing, and anti-inflammatory medication. In terms of anti-inflammatory medications, both oral and topical medications have shown short-term pain improvement (52). Prior to progressive strengthening exercise, the patient should work toward obtaining pain-free movements in wrist flexion/extension and pronation/supination. Strengthening regimens begin with light concentric exercises for all motions about the wrist and forearm, including grip strength. The program is then advanced to include eccentric exercises as well as more workspecific activities. In a small pilot study, an eccentric exercise program demonstrated significantly reduced symptoms compared with concentric strengthening in lateral epicondylar pain (53). Return to limited work activities can be attempted when strength is 80% of that in the noninvolved side. Work volume should not increase by more than 5% per day (54).

Studies involving local corticosteroids have yielded conflicting results. Many studies have shown improvement of symptoms in the acute period but no differences in outcomes at 1 year. One study actually found 1-year outcomes to be better in patients treated with physical therapy or a “wait and see” approach (55).

May 25, 2016 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on Cumulative Trauma Disorders

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access