Common Foot and Ankle Infections: Diagnosis and Management

Chapter
13



Common Foot and Ankle Infections: Diagnosis and Management


Modern-day infections are different with respect to type of organisms, resistance pattern, pattern of presentations, and unique state of immune compromised cases!


Introduction


Fig. 13.1 shows armamentarium of clinicians to battle with modern-day infections.



How Foot and Ankle Infections Are Different?


Foot infections are different from infections elsewhere in the body owing to the specific anatomic and physiologic features of the foot. These features cause easy spread of infection which is explained in Fig. 13.2.



Pathogenesis of Foot and Ankle Infections


Pathogenesis of infections of foot and ankle is illustrated in Flowchart 13.1.



Flowchart 13.2 displays causes and conditions that predisposes host to infection.



Flowchart 13.2 Reasons for predisposition to infections.


Spectrum of Infections


The foot can be affected by a wide range of conditions ranging from a relatively mild foreign body granuloma to a limb- or life-threatening gangrene.


Etiologies: Traumatic or nontraumatic.


Either of the etiologies can result in the following:


Cellulitis


Fasciitis


Osteomyelitis


Infective arthritis


Soft-tissue infections can be following:


Ingrowing toe nail


Paronychia


Erythrasma


Foreign body impaction


Puncture wounds


Cellulitis


Peripheral vascular disease (PVD)


Bone infection (osteomyelitis): Acute, chronic, or posttraumatic. Osteomyelitis may be pyogenic or tubercular in nature.


Diabetic foot: A variety in itself.


Usual bacteria that cause infection in the foot include:


Staphylococcus aureus


Group A Streptococci


Pseudomonas aeruginosa


Uncommon pathogens or conditions such as actinomycosis, nocardiosis, and fungi need to be kept in mind.


Diagnosis


To reach at correct diagnosis, proper history of the patient along with evaluation of the signs and symptoms should be carried out.


History


A detailed history is essential, more so in foot infections. A trivial trauma thought to be insignificant by the patient could be significant in the context of the clinical scenario.


Details of the type of trauma (low or high energy) and the environment in which it occurred (e.g., farm yard) could give a clue regarding the organism that one is dealing with.


Medical history to rule out compounding factors such as diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and smoking.


Symptoms


Pain: For example, throbbing pain suggests case of pyogenic infection or inflammation


Swelling


Constitutional symptoms such as fever, nausea, or vomiting are indicative of septicemia or bacteremia


Discharge: Look for color and presence of bone pieces


Signs


Redness


Edema: Leads to loss of skin wrinkles


Sinus: Probe the sinus to feel the base and confirm whether it is bony or soft tissue. Palpating bone when probing the lesion is highly specific and has a high positive predictive value for diagnosis of osteomyelitis.


Discharge: Smell and color of discharge can give an indication of the organisms involved (Fig. 13.3).



Neurovascular examination is necessary to diagnose associated neuropathy and vascular disease.


Pain in the presence of neuropathy is indicative of underlying infection.


Investigations


The following investigations are to be carried out prior to starting the treatment.


Hematology


CBC may not be raised in severe infection or diabetes


ESR and CRP are indicators of infection and are also used to assess improvement after antibiotics and/or debridement


Liver and renal functions must be assessed prior to starting antibiotics.


Serum albumin levels are necessary to correct malnutrition.


Plain Radiograph


Might show increased soft tissue shadow


Gas could be due to gas gangrene


Foreign body could be seen. For example, radiopaque objects such as metal, gravel, and glass can be identified easily with plain films


Osteolytic lesions in bone, periosteal reaction, sequestrum, involucrum, etc., indicate osteomyelitis. Changes are seen after 2 weeks of infection


Ultrasonography


Radiolucent objects such as glass, rubber, and wood could be seen easily


It helps to define the extent of abscess


MRI


It is the most sensitive investigation. One study demonstrated MRI to be significantly more sensitive and accurate, with equal specificity in comparison to plain radiographs, technetium-99m MDP, and gallium-67 scans in osteomyelitis. With bone infection, marrow is replaced by fluid and inflammatory cells, which are displayed as regions of reduced signal intensity on T1-weighted images and as increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences


It best detects changes in soft tissues


Extent of involvement of muscles, ligaments, joints, and fascial planes could also be assessed


It differentiates viable tissue from necrotic tissue


General consensus exists that MRI is a superior study to CT scan when assessing for nonviable tissue or drainable fluid collections


CT scan


It is ideal for detecting bony changes


It also detects cortical breaks and osteolytic lesions


It is useful in involucrum and sequestrum


It can detect pus pocket within the medullary canal


It delineates abscess cavity


It detects gas in deep tissues in cases of gas gangrene or necrotizing fasciitis


Scintigraphy


Scintigraphic studies can be useful in the diagnosis of bone infections in the foot, bone infection versus soft tissue infection, and bone infection versus Charcot osteoarthropathy


The three common nuclear medicine studies in this group include the radioactive forms of technetium, gallium, and indium


Technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate (MDP)


MDP detects infection 24 to 48 hours after its onset


It is a three-phase test


Uptake in all three phases indicates osteomyelitis


No or minimum uptake in last phase suggests soft tissue infection


This is not very specific as high uptake is seen following surgery, following trauma, bone tumors, and Charcot’s osteoarthropathy


Gallium-67


Gallium accumulates in bone


It is false negative in case of antibiotics administration


It is false positive in case of soft tissue infection, hematoma, fracture, surgery, and tumor


Leukocyte-labeled indium-111


This is more sensitive and specific


It cannot detect chronic osteomyelitis


It is time consuming (3 days)


Leukocyte-labeled technetium-99m hexamethyl propylamine oxime (HMPAO)


HMPAO is completed in 3 to 4 hours


It is useful in differentiating osteomyelitis from postfracture or postsurgical state


It is useful in differentiating osteomyelitis from Charcot’s osteoarthropathy


Wound Culture


Deep tissue sample is ideal for culture


Superficial swab is contaminated with normal flora and hence should be avoided.


Biopsy is also very useful for diagnosing bone infections. Bone biopsy remains the standard criterion in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis


Gram and Zeil–Neihlson staining can help in starting empirical antibiotics


Various culture media are used to identify the organism


Management of Infections


Flowchart 13.3 gives a brief overview of the surgical management of infections of foot and ankle.



Flowchart 13.3 Overview of the surgical management of infections.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 18, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Common Foot and Ankle Infections: Diagnosis and Management

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access