What’s in a Word?

Chapter 1 What’s in a Word?




Key Words







The word subluxation has been daubed in a kaleidoscope of colors and embodied with a multitude of meanings by chiropractors during the past 100 years. To some, it has become a holy word,1 to others, an albatross to be discarded.2 Currently, subluxation continues to be the most loved and hated, hotly debated, and consecrated term used by chiropractors. To add to the confusion, more than 100 synonyms for subluxation have been used (Table 1-1). If the term has become so “overburdened with clinical, political, and philosophical meaning and significance for chiropractors, that the concept that once helped to hold a young besieged profession together”1 now divides and keeps it quarreling over basic semantics, why do we persist in using it? The obvious answer is provided by Terrett3: The concept of vertebral subluxation is central to chiropractic.


Table 1-1 Subluxation Synonyms to 1993
















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Synonym Author Year
Aberrant motion Gatterman 1992
Abnormal joint motion Lantz 1989
Gatterman 1992
Acute cervical joint lock Haas, Peterson 1992
DeBoer, Hansen 1993
Acute locked back Wark 1831
Lantz 1989
Apophyseal subluxation Hadley 1936
Articular derangement Dishman 1985
Articular dyskinesia Slosberg 1993
Blockage Kunert 1965
Blocking Kunert 1965
Good 1985
Cervical joint dysfunction Salem Indust. 1992
Chiropractic subluxation Biedermann 1954
Brantingham 1988
Chapman-Smith 1993
Chiropractic subluxation complex Dishman 1985
Brantingham 1988
Delayed instability Pate 1993
Derangement Collings 1960
Dysarthritic lesion Dalgleish 1960
Dysarthrosis Dishman 1985
Dysfunctional joint Slosberg 1993
Dystopia Gongal’skii, Kuftyreva 1992
Erratic movement Watkins 1968
Facet joint dysfunction Darrer 1993
Facet syndrome Mooney, Robertson 1976
Facet synovial impingement Collins 1951
Facilitated segment Dishman 1985
Fanning of interspinous space Pate 1993
Fixation Homewood 1963
Functional block Dishman 1985
Functional spinal lesion Crawford 1992
Slosberg 1993
Hyperemic subluxation Hill 1949
Hypermobility Gatterman 1992
Hypomobility Brantington 1988
Gatterman 1992
Incomplete articular dislocation Hubka 1990
Instability of the posterior ligament complex Pate (Cheshire) 1992
Intersegmental instability Pate 1993
Intervertebral blocking Brantingham 1988
Intervertebral disrelationship Watkins 1968
Joint aberration Hubka 1990
Joint bind Good 1985
Joint dysfunction Northrup 1975
Kinetic intersegmental subluxation Haldeman 1975
Kinetic subluxation Watkins 1968
Less than a locked dislocation Watkins 1968
Liga tights Watkins (Smith) 1992
Locked facet Wood 1984
Locking Brantingham 1988
Manipulable lesion Haldeman 1979
Manipulable joint lesion Brantingham 1988
Manipulable lesion Hubka 1990
Mechanical disorder Dishman (Suh) 1985
Mechanical musculoskeletal dysfunction Boissonault, Bass 1990
Metameric dysfunction Lohse-Busch 1989
Misalignment Haas, Peterson 1992
Sinh 1993
Motion restriction Hubka 1990
Motor unit derangement complex Vance, Gamburg 1992
Neuroarticular dysfunction
Neuroarticular subluxation
Neuroarticular syndrome
Neurobiomechanical (lesion) Dishman 1985
Neurodysarthritic (lesion) Dalgleish 1960
Neurodysarthrodynic (lesion) Dalgleish 1960
Neurofunctional subluxation
Neurologic dysfunction Watkins 1968
Neuromechanical lesion
Neuromuscular dysfacilitation Slosberg 1993
Orthospondylodysarthritics Dalgleish 1960
Osteologic lesion Collins ?
Osteopathic articular lesion Halliday 1936
Osteopathic lesion Brantingham 1988
Osteopathic spinal lesion Collins ?
Paravertebral subluxation Haldeman 1975
Partial fixation Watkins 1968
Posterior facet dysfunction Haldeman 1975
Primary chiropractic lesion Gatterman 1990
Pseudosubluxation Pate 1990
Reflex dysfunction Salem Indust. 1992
Restriction Good 1985
Slosberg 1993
Sectional subluxation Haldeman 1975
Segmental dysfunction Pate 1993
Segmental vertebral hypomobility Dishman 1985
Simple joint and muscle dysfunction without tissue damage Mootz 1993
Slipping sacroiliac joints Trostler 1938
Soft tissue ankylosis Watkins 1968
Somatic dysfunction Northrup 1975
Spinal boo boo Rearing 1992
Spinal hypomobilities Innes 1993
Spinal irritation Wark 1831
Spinal joint blocking Good 1985
Spinal joint complex Dalgleish 1960
Spinal joint stiffening Bourdillon 1982
Spinal kinesiopathology Johnson 1985
Spinal subluxation Haldeman 1975
Spondylodysarthritic lesions Dalgleish 1960
Sprain Palmer 1910
Stable cervical injury of the spine Pate (Harris) 1993
Static intersegmental subluxation Haldeman 1975
Structural disrelationship Watkins 1968
Subluxation Hieronymus 1746
Subluxation complex Faye 1986
Subluxation complex myopathy Peterson 1993
Subluxation syndrome Gatterman 1992
Total fixation Watkins 1968
Vertebral displacement Kunert 1965
Vertebral dysfunction Littlejohn 1992
Vertebral dyskinesia Dishman 1985
Vertebral locking Stoddard 1969
Vertebral subluxation complex Faye 1976
Vertebral subluxation syndrome Lantz 1989

The names in parentheses are original authors cited by others.


Note: Subsequent to publication of this table in 1995, Rome has identified 296 synonyms for subluxation. (Rome PL. Usage of chiropractic terminology in the literature: 296 ways to say “subluxation.” Chiropractic Technique 1996;8:49-60.) Do I hear 500?


Modified from Rome P, Terrett A.


The notion that changing the word subluxation to another term will somehow change the clinical, political, and philosophical connotations is simply not rational. Changing the term used for the articular lesion treated by chiropractors (subluxation) does not eradicate the clinical, political, and philosophical issues that surround the construct—it evades them.2,3 We have found it expedient to clearly and simply define the term subluxation and to objectively address issues surrounding the construct. The conceptual definition of subluxation has been the foundation on which chiropractic science has stood. It is time to provide an operational definition of subluxation by identifying the testable components of misalignment, aberrant motion, and dysfunction included in the definition. With these components delineated, we can examine current data and further study the topic of our discourse.



Defining Subluxation


The definitions of subluxation and related terms used in this book were developed by consensus methods that used an algorithm developed by Gatterman and Hansen4 (Figure 1-1). These terms were agreed on through both nominal and Delphi methods that included broad geographic, philosophical, and political representation. This project was funded and supported by the Consortium for Chiropractic Research (CCR). Included in the 60-member Delphi panel were members of the American Chiropractic Association (ACA) Council on Technique, which adopted the terms in 1993. Subsequently, the House of Delegates of the ACA endorsed the terms that are now included in a number of leading chiropractic textbooks.59 The field of terms includes subluxation, the articular lesion that is less than a dislocation; manipulable subluxation, a lesion amenable to chiropractic manipulation; subluxation complex, the theoretical model that describes the widespread effects of subluxation; and subluxation syndrome, the clinical manifestations that include the associated symptoms and physical signs of a subluxation. Each term is expanded on in relation to the principles of chiropractic, and support for these principles is the subject matter of this text. Essential for the definition of subluxation has been clarification of the terms motion segment and spinal motion segment. Definitions of therapeutic procedures used by chiropractors include the terms manual therapy, manipulation, mobilization, and most important, adjustment. To arrive at consensus for terms commonly used by chiropractors, the origin of each term was examined relative to the concepts that underlie the profession. (See Figure 1-1.)




Origin of the Word Subluxation


The root words for the term subluxation come from a combination of the Greek sub and lux, meaning “less than a dislocation.” In 1746 Hieronymus10 identified characteristics of a subluxation, stating the following:



His characterization does not differ significantly from the consensus definition of the nominal and Delphi panels of the CCR that defined subluxation as follows:


subluxation a motion segment in which alignment, movement integrity, and/or physiologic function are altered although contact between the joint surfaces remains intact.


Subsequent to the conclusion of the CCR consensus process, Swere11 suggested that the word “partially” be added for clarity:


subluxation a motion segment in which alignment, movement integrity, and/or physiological function are altered although contact between the joint surfaces remains partially intact.


The CCR definition of subluxation allows for physiologic dysfunction, which was described in 1821 by Harrison12 as follows:


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 30, 2016 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on What’s in a Word?

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access