Chapter 1 What’s in a Word?
Adjustment, manipulable subluxation, manipulation, manual therapy, mobilization, subluxation, subluxation complex, subluxation syndrome
After reading this chapter you should be able to answer the following questions:
Question 1 | Did the term subluxation originally come from the chiropractic profession? |
Question 2 | What is the definition of the word subluxation? |
Question 3 | Is more than one definition of subluxation practical? |
Question 4 | Explain the following issues related to the use of the word subluxation: |
The word subluxation has been daubed in a kaleidoscope of colors and embodied with a multitude of meanings by chiropractors during the past 100 years. To some, it has become a holy word,1 to others, an albatross to be discarded.2 Currently, subluxation continues to be the most loved and hated, hotly debated, and consecrated term used by chiropractors. To add to the confusion, more than 100 synonyms for subluxation have been used (Table 1-1). If the term has become so “overburdened with clinical, political, and philosophical meaning and significance for chiropractors, that the concept that once helped to hold a young besieged profession together”1 now divides and keeps it quarreling over basic semantics, why do we persist in using it? The obvious answer is provided by Terrett3: The concept of vertebral subluxation is central to chiropractic.
Synonym | Author | Year |
---|---|---|
Aberrant motion | Gatterman | 1992 |
Abnormal joint motion | Lantz | 1989 |
Gatterman | 1992 | |
Acute cervical joint lock | Haas, Peterson | 1992 |
DeBoer, Hansen | 1993 | |
Acute locked back | Wark | 1831 |
Lantz | 1989 | |
Apophyseal subluxation | Hadley | 1936 |
Articular derangement | Dishman | 1985 |
Articular dyskinesia | Slosberg | 1993 |
Blockage | Kunert | 1965 |
Blocking | Kunert | 1965 |
Good | 1985 | |
Cervical joint dysfunction | Salem Indust. | 1992 |
Chiropractic subluxation | Biedermann | 1954 |
Brantingham | 1988 | |
Chapman-Smith | 1993 | |
Chiropractic subluxation complex | Dishman | 1985 |
Brantingham | 1988 | |
Delayed instability | Pate | 1993 |
Derangement | Collings | 1960 |
Dysarthritic lesion | Dalgleish | 1960 |
Dysarthrosis | Dishman | 1985 |
Dysfunctional joint | Slosberg | 1993 |
Dystopia | Gongal’skii, Kuftyreva | 1992 |
Erratic movement | Watkins | 1968 |
Facet joint dysfunction | Darrer | 1993 |
Facet syndrome | Mooney, Robertson | 1976 |
Facet synovial impingement | Collins | 1951 |
Facilitated segment | Dishman | 1985 |
Fanning of interspinous space | Pate | 1993 |
Fixation | Homewood | 1963 |
Functional block | Dishman | 1985 |
Functional spinal lesion | Crawford | 1992 |
Slosberg | 1993 | |
Hyperemic subluxation | Hill | 1949 |
Hypermobility | Gatterman | 1992 |
Hypomobility | Brantington | 1988 |
Gatterman | 1992 | |
Incomplete articular dislocation | Hubka | 1990 |
Instability of the posterior ligament complex | Pate (Cheshire) | 1992 |
Intersegmental instability | Pate | 1993 |
Intervertebral blocking | Brantingham | 1988 |
Intervertebral disrelationship | Watkins | 1968 |
Joint aberration | Hubka | 1990 |
Joint bind | Good | 1985 |
Joint dysfunction | Northrup | 1975 |
Kinetic intersegmental subluxation | Haldeman | 1975 |
Kinetic subluxation | Watkins | 1968 |
Less than a locked dislocation | Watkins | 1968 |
Liga tights | Watkins (Smith) | 1992 |
Locked facet | Wood | 1984 |
Locking | Brantingham | 1988 |
Manipulable lesion | Haldeman | 1979 |
Manipulable joint lesion | Brantingham | 1988 |
Manipulable lesion | Hubka | 1990 |
Mechanical disorder | Dishman (Suh) | 1985 |
Mechanical musculoskeletal dysfunction | Boissonault, Bass | 1990 |
Metameric dysfunction | Lohse-Busch | 1989 |
Misalignment | Haas, Peterson | 1992 |
Sinh | 1993 | |
Motion restriction | Hubka | 1990 |
Motor unit derangement complex | Vance, Gamburg | 1992 |
Neuroarticular dysfunction | — | — |
Neuroarticular subluxation | — | — |
Neuroarticular syndrome | — | — |
Neurobiomechanical (lesion) | Dishman | 1985 |
Neurodysarthritic (lesion) | Dalgleish | 1960 |
Neurodysarthrodynic (lesion) | Dalgleish | 1960 |
Neurofunctional subluxation | — | — |
Neurologic dysfunction | Watkins | 1968 |
Neuromechanical lesion | — | — |
Neuromuscular dysfacilitation | Slosberg | 1993 |
Orthospondylodysarthritics | Dalgleish | 1960 |
Osteologic lesion | Collins | ? |
Osteopathic articular lesion | Halliday | 1936 |
Osteopathic lesion | Brantingham | 1988 |
Osteopathic spinal lesion | Collins | ? |
Paravertebral subluxation | Haldeman | 1975 |
Partial fixation | Watkins | 1968 |
Posterior facet dysfunction | Haldeman | 1975 |
Primary chiropractic lesion | Gatterman | 1990 |
Pseudosubluxation | Pate | 1990 |
Reflex dysfunction | Salem Indust. | 1992 |
Restriction | Good | 1985 |
Slosberg | 1993 | |
Sectional subluxation | Haldeman | 1975 |
Segmental dysfunction | Pate | 1993 |
Segmental vertebral hypomobility | Dishman | 1985 |
Simple joint and muscle dysfunction without tissue damage | Mootz | 1993 |
Slipping sacroiliac joints | Trostler | 1938 |
Soft tissue ankylosis | Watkins | 1968 |
Somatic dysfunction | Northrup | 1975 |
Spinal boo boo | Rearing | 1992 |
Spinal hypomobilities | Innes | 1993 |
Spinal irritation | Wark | 1831 |
Spinal joint blocking | Good | 1985 |
Spinal joint complex | Dalgleish | 1960 |
Spinal joint stiffening | Bourdillon | 1982 |
Spinal kinesiopathology | Johnson | 1985 |
Spinal subluxation | Haldeman | 1975 |
Spondylodysarthritic lesions | Dalgleish | 1960 |
Sprain | Palmer | 1910 |
Stable cervical injury of the spine | Pate (Harris) | 1993 |
Static intersegmental subluxation | Haldeman | 1975 |
Structural disrelationship | Watkins | 1968 |
Subluxation | Hieronymus | 1746 |
Subluxation complex | Faye | 1986 |
Subluxation complex myopathy | Peterson | 1993 |
Subluxation syndrome | Gatterman | 1992 |
Total fixation | Watkins | 1968 |
Vertebral displacement | Kunert | 1965 |
Vertebral dysfunction | Littlejohn | 1992 |
Vertebral dyskinesia | Dishman | 1985 |
Vertebral locking | Stoddard | 1969 |
Vertebral subluxation complex | Faye | 1976 |
Vertebral subluxation syndrome | Lantz | 1989 |
The names in parentheses are original authors cited by others.
Note: Subsequent to publication of this table in 1995, Rome has identified 296 synonyms for subluxation. (Rome PL. Usage of chiropractic terminology in the literature: 296 ways to say “subluxation.” Chiropractic Technique 1996;8:49-60.) Do I hear 500?
Modified from Rome P, Terrett A.
The notion that changing the word subluxation to another term will somehow change the clinical, political, and philosophical connotations is simply not rational. Changing the term used for the articular lesion treated by chiropractors (subluxation) does not eradicate the clinical, political, and philosophical issues that surround the construct—it evades them.2,3 We have found it expedient to clearly and simply define the term subluxation and to objectively address issues surrounding the construct. The conceptual definition of subluxation has been the foundation on which chiropractic science has stood. It is time to provide an operational definition of subluxation by identifying the testable components of misalignment, aberrant motion, and dysfunction included in the definition. With these components delineated, we can examine current data and further study the topic of our discourse.
Defining Subluxation
The definitions of subluxation and related terms used in this book were developed by consensus methods that used an algorithm developed by Gatterman and Hansen4 (Figure 1-1). These terms were agreed on through both nominal and Delphi methods that included broad geographic, philosophical, and political representation. This project was funded and supported by the Consortium for Chiropractic Research (CCR). Included in the 60-member Delphi panel were members of the American Chiropractic Association (ACA) Council on Technique, which adopted the terms in 1993. Subsequently, the House of Delegates of the ACA endorsed the terms that are now included in a number of leading chiropractic textbooks.5–9 The field of terms includes subluxation, the articular lesion that is less than a dislocation; manipulable subluxation, a lesion amenable to chiropractic manipulation; subluxation complex, the theoretical model that describes the widespread effects of subluxation; and subluxation syndrome, the clinical manifestations that include the associated symptoms and physical signs of a subluxation. Each term is expanded on in relation to the principles of chiropractic, and support for these principles is the subject matter of this text. Essential for the definition of subluxation has been clarification of the terms motion segment and spinal motion segment. Definitions of therapeutic procedures used by chiropractors include the terms manual therapy, manipulation, mobilization, and most important, adjustment. To arrive at consensus for terms commonly used by chiropractors, the origin of each term was examined relative to the concepts that underlie the profession. (See Figure 1-1.)
Origin of the Word Subluxation
The root words for the term subluxation come from a combination of the Greek sub and lux, meaning “less than a dislocation.” In 1746 Hieronymus10 identified characteristics of a subluxation, stating the following:
Subsequent to the conclusion of the CCR consensus process, Swere11 suggested that the word “partially” be added for clarity:
The CCR definition of subluxation allows for physiologic dysfunction, which was described in 1821 by Harrison12 as follows: