If the history indicates that there is possibly instability, an examination to detect the exact location and degree of this is performed. It is important to make this supplementary examination only when symptoms and signs found in the routine clinical assessment indicate ligamentous instability to be the cause of disability. Indeed, it is important to realize that not every lengthened ligament leads to problems.1 If the athlete’s muscles are strong enough to provide dynamic stability, a slightly unstable knee will not cause trouble. Conversely, it is quite possible that an athlete with slight laxity of one or more ligaments has a chronic painful lesion as well. If the diagnosis of the latter is missed because the routine functional examination is not performed, it may well be that the patient is sent for surgery, which will solve the slight instability but does not cure the main problem. Knee instability is the result of loss of static and dynamic function. Stability depends on the tautness of the ligaments, congruency of joint surfaces, effectiveness of the menisci and the well-balanced action of all musculotendinous units acting across the knee joint. Of these structures, muscles and tendons play a central role in joint stabilization. They are said to be the ‘first defenders’ in distortion and loading situations.2 • mild/1+ = 5 mm or less separation of joint surfaces • moderate/2+ = between 5 and 10 mm separation Instability may be classified as straight or rotatory. This is defined as an increased range of angular movement in the frontal plane, i.e. valgus/abduction or varus/adduction movement (Fig. 2), or an increased range of gliding movement in the sagittal plane, i.e. the simultaneous forward or backward gliding movement of the tibial condyles in relation to the femoral condyles (Fig. 3). This implies increased rotation movement of the tibia on the femur. The posterior cruciate ligament, located in the centre of the joint, is the fundamental stabilizer and is the axis of the joint, both in flexion–extension and in rotation. Consequently, this ligament is always intact in rotatory instabilities; from the moment the ligament is completely torn, there is no longer a centre of rotation and any kind of straight instability can result.3,4 There are three types of rotatory instability: • Anteromedial rotatory instability: there is an abnormal forward gliding movement of the medial tibial plateau with respect to the medial femoral condyle, while the lateral tibial plateau retains a relatively normal relationship with the lateral femoral condyle (Fig. 4b). • Anterolateral rotatory instability: there is an abnormal forward gliding movement of the lateral tibial plateau with respect to the lateral femoral condyle, while the medial tibial plateau retains a relatively normal relationship with the medial femoral condyle (Fig. 4c). • Posterolateral rotatory instability: there is an abnormal backward gliding movement of the lateral tibial plateau with respect to the lateral femoral condyle. Again, as in anterolateral rotatory instability, the medial tibial plateau remains in normal contact with the corresponding femoral condyle (Fig. 4d). In acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament this test is preferred to the anterior drawer test in the 90° flexed position because muscle defence by the hamstrings may prevent the forward movement of the tibia and give rise to a false-negative result.5 Liljedahl et al6 found only 3 of 35 patients to have a positive anterior drawer test in 90° of flexion, whereas with anaesthesia 31 and on arthrography 29 were positive. The posterior drawer test, which includes palpation of the tibia–femur step-off, was recently demonstrated to be the most sensitive and specific clinical test for posterior cruciate ligament deficiency (accuracy 96% with a 90% sensitivity and a 99% specificity).8 The test demonstrates an anterolateral rotatory instability because of a tear in the middle third of the lateral capsular ligaments. Frequently, the anterior cruciate ligament and/or menisci are also ruptured and increase the instability.9 Bach et al10 found that the degree of pivot shift, probably because of the role of the iliotibial band, strongly correlates with the position of the hip and knee joint. They advised 30° of hip abduction and 20° of tibial external rotation as the position in which instability is most clearly demonstrated.
Disorders of the inert structures
Ligamentous instability
Ligamentous instability
Types of instability
Degree of instability
Classification of instability
Straight instability
Rotatory instability
Functional examination
Tests
Lachman test
Anterior drawer test in external and internal rotation
Posterior drawer test
‘Jerk’ test and pivot-shift test