Obstetrics

Chapter 21 Obstetrics




Chapter contents























Key Points




The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) describes the specialty of family practice as the enhanced expression of general medical practice that is uniquely defined within the context of the family. Providing care across the continuum of the family life cycle, the family physician provides care to the pregnant woman as part of the full expression of the field. The family physician incorporates a comprehensive approach to maternity care that includes the assessment and management of psychosocial and biomedical risk factors. The family physician provides care to patients with low-risk pregnancies and equips them to birth their children without unnecessary interventions.


The family physician brings a unique approach to the management of the pregnant woman, who is often a healthy individual undergoing a natural process. This approach is patient centered, prevention oriented, educational, and noninterventional. Nationwide, approximately 29.6% of all family physicians provide routine obstetric services as part of their hospital care (AAFP, 1998). This number has been steadily declining, with regional variations reflecting the needs of the population and local attitudes. The majority of family physicians do not desire to practice obstetrics because of lifestyle issues, increasing costs of malpractice insurance, and difficulty obtaining hospital privileges. However, the family physician may be asked to counsel or care for the pregnant woman, even if not part of daily practice. It becomes incumbent on the individual practitioner to have a fundamental knowledge and appreciation of the field of obstetrics, including the obstetric emergency. Given that the family physician may be the sole provider of obstetric services, particularly in rural or underserved areas, the need to maintain the knowledge and skills to treat the problems and emergencies unique to obstetrics becomes increasingly important. The Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics (ALSO) course developed in 1990 effectively incorporates the techniques of other established life support courses as it applies to obstetric care.


For the successful practice of obstetrics, it is imperative for the family physician to practice in concert with an obstetric specialist. A collaborative relationship among obstetricians, family physicians, and in some cases, nurse midwives is essential for provision of consistent, high-quality care to pregnant women. Access to reliable consultation and suitable referral facilities for the complicated patient will optimize patient care and outcomes.


The integration of prenatal care into the clinical practice of the family physician not only reflects the full scope of the field but also provides a continuous infusion of pediatric patients into the practice. It serves as a model for the training of medical students and residents interested in the practice of obstetric care in the context of family practice.


This chapter provides an overview of the field of obstetrics that includes prenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care of the pregnant woman. An evidence-based approach to areas of controversy and empiric practice is used while addressing the unique needs of family physicians, emphasizing their contribution and role in the research and development of the obstetrics literature.



Woman and Child Health


The health of a nation is often reflected in the health of its mothers and newborns. The World Health Organization (WHO) often uses a nation’s maternity and neonatal morbidity and mortality statistics as a proxy for the health status of its population. It is an important summary reflecting social, political, health care delivery, and medical outcomes in a geographic area. The United States, despite its economic wealth and medical resources, consistently ranks poorly in such measures as maternal and infant mortality rates. In 2005 in the United States, 28,384 infants died before reaching their first birthdays, an infant mortality rate (IMR) of 6.9 per 1000 live births. Despite a more than 9% reduction in IMR between 1995 and 2005, the United States ranks 30th, after such select countries as Japan, the Scandinavian countries, and Canada (Box 21-1). In 2005, the U.S. IMR was more than three times as high as that in Singapore (2.1 per 1000 live births), the country with the lowest reported IMR. This number reflects in part the continuing disparities in health access and delivery for U.S. citizens (National Center for Health Statistics [NCHS], 2009).



The causes of infant mortality are multiple, with birth defects being the leading cause, with a 2005 rate of 134.6 per 100,000 live births. Preterm birth (birth at <37 completed weeks of gestation) or low birth weight (LBW) is the second leading cause of infant mortality in the United States. Preterm birth rates differ by race; during 2003–2005 (average), IMR (per 1000 live births) in the United States was highest for black infants (13.3), followed by Native Americans (8.4), whites (5.7), and Asians (4.8) (NCHS, 2010). This persistent disparity contributes to the relative high IMR in the United States compared with similarly developed countries. Other causes of infant mortality include sudden infant death syndrome, respiratory distress syndrome, and maternal pregnancy complications. These five causes accounted for more than half of all infant deaths in 2005 (Fig. 21-1). Despite gains, the rate of preterm birth, birth defects, and LBW remain relatively constant. This indicates a need for further health initiatives to address the health needs of the pregnant woman and the unborn.




Preconception Counseling



Key Points




Ideally, women should plan pregnancy and discuss this plan with their physicians. Often, however, this option is not considered. It becomes the task of the physician to anticipate the potential and discuss preparation for pregnancy just as for methods of birth control. Primary care physicians are in the best position to anticipate the need for this counseling, being most aware of ongoing medical problems and social concerns of the women in their care. Indeed, the practice of preconception care has been formally recommended since at least 1989 (Caring for Our Future, 1989). However, we believe that preconception care, in particular education, should begin at the time a woman reaches reproductive age, not only when she announces the desire to become pregnant.


The preconception period is an ideal time for education and counseling regarding cessation of cigarette, alcohol, or drug use. Often, the incentive of a healthier pregnancy is sufficient impetus for change in behavior. Although many women are able to cease cigarette, alcohol, or drug use during the pregnancy, the majority will resume use after delivery or breastfeeding. This is an opportune time for the family physician to reinforce further health-conscious behavior.


The preconception use of folic acid supplementation was formally recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 1991 and others (American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Genetics, 1999). Evidence supports a reduction in neural tube defects by 50% when folic acid stores are replenished before pregnancy (Milunsky et al., 1989). It is now recommended that all reproductive-age women take 0.4 mg of folic acid daily (CDC, 1992). This is easily accomplished by prescribing prenatal vitamins before pregnancy as well as throughout gestation. Alternately, over-the-counter (OTC) vitamins can also be used because many now contain this higher amount of folic acid. For couples with one or more children with a neural tube defect or a family history, there should be a referral for specific counseling. From 2 to 4 mg of folic acid daily is recommended for these women at least 1 month before pregnancy and during the first 3 months of pregnancy.


Many genetic disorders are now amenable to prenatal diagnosis through direct analysis of the underlying mutations, analysis of their protein products, or abnormal metabolites. Genetic counseling should include a systematic assessment of family history of both parents. This can be through a targeted questionnaire or formal genetic counseling by a genetic counselor or geneticist (Box 21-2). The family physician should be aware of the ethnic makeup of the practice and especially familiar with disorders in these groups (Table 21-1). When targeted screening reveals an area of potential concern, formal genetic counseling should be obtained. With advances in discovery of the genetic basis for many diseases, the list of disorders amenable to prenatal diagnosis grows daily.



Table 21-1 Genetic Screening/Teratology Counseling



























Ethnic Group Higher Risk Carrier Frequency
Caucasian Cystic fibrosis 1 in 25
African American

1 in 12
Southeast Asian Alpha thalassemia 1 in 20
Mediterranean (Italian, Greek) Beta thalassemia 1 in 25
Ashkenazi Jewish










Nutrition


There is sufficient data to confirm that poor nutrition during the prenatal period is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome, specifically intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and preterm delivery. Specific nutritional guidelines have been developed based on a woman’s prepregnancy weight or, more specifically, her body mass index (BMI) (Table 21-2). Caloric intake of an extra 300 kcal daily is sufficient for adequate maternal weight gain and fetal growth.



The practice of prenatal supplementation of vitamins and minerals is widespread, although many nutritionists believe it is unnecessary. Only the following two supplements are recommended in an adequately nourished female with a singleton pregnancy:




However, because many U.S. women do not consume adequate vitamins and minerals (Block and Adams, 1993), and specific assessment of nutritional intake is often difficult, supplements are now widely used. Recommended daily allowances for pregnant women have been established and continue to be reevaluated (Table 21-3). Care must be taken to avoid toxicity of the fat-soluble vitamins, in particular vitamin A (retinol), where “more” is not necessarily better. Daily doses of retinol greater than 10,000 IU, approximately 3000 retinol equivalents (RE), have been associated with birth defects (Rothman et al., 1995). Women who do not consume sufficient milk products may benefit from calcium supplementation. This can easily be accomplished by prescribing an antacid that is made of calcium carbonate, most easily taken in chewable form. This will not only replenish calcium stores but also treat reflux esophagitis, which often occurs in the latter half of pregnancy.



Recent data suggest that supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids, specifically docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) plus eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), may be beneficial (Dunstan et al., 2008). Both DHA and EPA may be beneficial for fetal brain development and are found in large amounts in wild fish. However, increased fish intake in pregnancy is not recommended because of the risk of increased mercury ingestion. Therefore, supplementation would be required. Large, well-controlled studies are needed before recommendation in pregnancy, but supplementation may be considered on an individual basis. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA, 2004) has formally warned women of childbearing age, pregnant and lactating women, and young children to avoid eating swordfish, shark, king mackerel, and tilefish and to consume no more than one 6-ounce can of albacore tuna per week. In all pregnant women, nutritional risk factors should be addressed, including low starting BMI, prior LBW infants, adolescence, religious and cultural dietary restrictions, medical illnesses requiring dietary manipulation, substance abuse, and eating disorders (Kolasa and Weismiller, 1995). Certain woman may benefit from formal dietary counseling from a dietician/nutritionist.





Medical Risk Assessment


The preconception period is the ideal time to assess and counsel the prospective pregnant woman regarding medical disorders or risks she may encounter during the pregnancy. Of medical problems that have substantial impact on the fetus, hypertensive disorders and diabetes are among the most common.


Hypertension may have many effects on the pregnancy depending on the degree of abnormality. Fetal effects range from none to increased miscarriage, IUGR, abruptio placentae, and fetal death. Underlying blood pressure disorders should be treated appropriately before pregnancy. Some hypertensive, reproductive-age women are treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. This class of therapeutics can cause significant risk to the developing fetus. These medications should be stopped and alternate medications started if needed. Women with preexisting hypertension should be referred for concurrent care with a physician experienced in managing hypertension in pregnancy.


Diabetes can also have many effects on the developing fetus. The preconception control of the maternal metabolism, reflected as normal blood glucose values before and after meals and normal hemoglobin A1c, has been shown to decrease the incidence of diabetes-associated embryopathy to almost that of a nondiabetic pregnant woman (Mills et al., 1988). Women with preexisting diabetes should be referred for specialized care if pregnancy is contemplated.


Less attention is directed to emotional and psychiatric disorders. Pregnancy may be a stressor that precipitates an acute event or worsens ongoing anxiety or depression. This is more likely in the postpartum period.




Routine Prenatal Care


In most Western countries, women attend between 7 and 11 prenatal visits, although recent data suggest that a reduced number of antenatal visits could be introduced into clinical practice without adverse effect to the mother and child (Carroli et al., 2001). Obstetric care provided by obstetricians, family physicians, and midwives has been found to be equally effective; however, patients were slightly more satisfied by the care provided by midwives and family physicians (Villar et al., 2004). Prenatal care services typically include screening and treatment for medical conditions and identification and interventions for behavioral risk factors associated with poor birth outcomes (e.g., smoking, poor nutrition).


One of the most important goals of prenatal care is recognizing which women have high-risk pregnancies and triaging these women to appropriate care (Kontopoulos and Vintzileos, 2004). It is important to identify the women at risk for adverse outcomes and refer them to appropriate specialty care. Adequate prenatal care has been shown to increase the chances that a woman has a healthy pregnancy and baby.



First Prenatal Visit


The first prenatal visit is one of the most important, particularly if the woman has not had preconception care (Box 21-3). The first prenatal visit should occur shortly after the woman discovers she might be pregnant and should be viewed as a continuation of preconception counseling. Home pregnancy test kits have a sensitivity and specificity of at least 95%; many can detect pregnancy by the fifth menstrual week. The most important aspects of the first prenatal visit include education, risk assessment, appropriate laboratory testing, and establishment of gestational age.



Education is an important component of prenatal care, particularly for women who are pregnant for the first time. Frequency of prenatal visits should be explained, with information about the physiologic changes that occur during pregnancy. Preparation for the birthing process is a key theme around which to discuss care issues and choices such as breastfeeding. Structured educational programs to promote breastfeeding have unclear effectiveness. Pregnant women should be counseled about the risks of possible teratogens, including smoking, alcohol, and drug use, including exposure to medications, prescriptions, OTC drugs, and herbal remedies. Good handwashing is always encouraged because this is one of the best ways to avoid community-acquired infectious diseases. Appropriate immunizations such as influenza and novel influenza A (H1N1) virus should be offered. Common exposures such as workplace conditions and use of hot tubs and saunas should be explored. Exercise should also be encouraged if there is no obstetric contraindication (Box 21-4). Intercourse during pregnancy should be actively addressed because some women are reluctant to discuss this topic even with their physician. Sexual activity can generally continue during pregnancy except for few situations, such as placenta previa and preterm labor. Counseling regarding sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and their avoidance should occur. Nutrition should be individualized, with an estimate of desirable weight gain given to the pregnant woman.



The estimated date of delivery (EDD) should be calculated by accurate determination of the last menstrual period (LMP). The first day of the LMP is a good clinical sign from which to calculate EDD, remembering that it must be adjusted for cycles shorter or longer than 28 days. The EDD can be calculated by Nagle’s rule, that is, subtracting 3 months and adding 7 days to the first day of the LMP. EDD should then be extended by the number of days longer than a 28-day cycle or shortened by the number of days shorter. This approach should be considered if there is uncertainty about the LMP.


The physical examination during the first prenatal visit should include careful assessment of uterine size. If there is a discrepancy between menstrual age and uterine size, ultrasound should be considered early in the pregnancy to resolve the issue of dating. Recent evidence suggests that early sonography provides more accurate dating, which is important for timing screening tests and interventions and for optimal management of complications such as post-term pregnancies (Neilson, 2004). Late ultrasound, after 24 weeks, is not as sensitive for confirming gestational age. Additionally, any irregular bleeding or abdominal pain should prompt the practitioner to obtain sonographic confirmation of viability of the pregnancy as well as its normal intrauterine location.


A history and directed physical examination should be performed to detect conditions associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The first prenatal examination provides an opportunity for cervical cancer screening with a Papanicolaou (Pap) test in women who have not been screened recently. However, Pap tests performed in pregnant women may be less reliable. Risk factors should then identify other testing that might be done at this time, including blood glucose, sickle cell screening, Tay-Sachs screening, and surveillance for other infectious diseases.


Routine fetal heart auscultation, urinalysis, and assessment of maternal weight, blood pressure, and fundal height generally are recommended, although the supportive evidence varies (Kirkham et al., 2005). Women should be offered ABO and Rh blood typing and screening for anemia during the first prenatal visit. Genetic counseling and testing should be offered to couples with a family history of genetic disorders, a previously affected fetus or child, or a history of recurrent miscarriage. All women should be offered prenatal serum marker screening for neural tube defects and aneuploidy. Women at increased risk for aneuploidy should be offered amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Counseling about the limitations and risks of these tests, as well as their psychologic implications, is necessary. Folic acid supplementation beginning in the preconception period and early pregnancy reduces the incidence of neural tube defects. Laboratory testing during the first prenatal visit consists of assessment of hemoglobin and hematocrit to identify anemia; blood D(Rh) type; serologic tests for syphilis, and rubella immunity; hepatitis B, and urinalysis. Testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection should be offered and highly recommended because perinatal transmission can be decreased with appropriate medical intervention. During the pelvic examination, a Pap smear (if not done in past 6 months) as well as cultures for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia should be taken.



Follow-up Prenatal Visits


According to the report of the Expert Panel on Prenatal Care (Rosen et al., 1991), low-risk primigravid women should have at least 10 prenatal visits; low-risk multiparous women should have at least eight visits. Again, however, data suggest that antenatal visits could be reduced without adverse effect to the mother and child (Carroli et al., 2001). Women with psychosocial issues or pregnancy complications should be seen more frequently. In the first two trimesters, prenatal visits may be 5 to 6 weeks apart if no problems have been ascertained. Frequency of visits should increase after 30 weeks, with weekly visits after 37 weeks. Specific recommendations are noted in Table 21-4. Routine visits for low-risk women should be scheduled at times that recommended laboratory testing could be accomplished. Prenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities is available in the first trimester between 10 weeks, 2 days and 13 weeks, 6 days. Structural defects of the fetus (in particular neural tube defects) and karyotypic abnormalities in the form of alpha-fetoprotein based tests (Quad screen, see below) can be obtained at 16 to 18 weeks. Screening for gestational diabetes is recommended at 26 to 28 weeks of gestation, as well as screening for anemia with a hemoglobin or hematocrit. Antibody screening, Rh0(D) immune globulin (RhoGAM) prophylaxis for D-negative mothers, and repeat testing for infectious diseases for at-risk mothers are recommended at this time.


Table 21-4 Expert Panel Recommendations for Visits throughout Pregnancy








































































































Activity Week/Trimester
Check for any exposure to infection.
Physical Examination
Blood pressure 24
Weight Each visit
Fundal height/growth 16
Fetal lie/presentation/engagement/heart rate 24
Cervical examination 41
Laboratory Tests
Hemoglobin/hematocrit 24-28
Rh sensitivity 26-28
Diabetic screen 26-28
Repeat syphilis Third trimester
Repeat gonococcal and HIV 36
Serum alpha fetoprotein 14-16
Ultrasound∗ When indicated
Health Promotion Activities
Teratogen avoidance Each visit
Safer sex Each visit
Maternal seatbelt use Each trimester
Smoking cessation Each trimester
Work/nutrition counseling Each visit
Signs of preterm labor Second/third trimester
Physical/emotional changes First/third trimester
Sexuality counseling Last half of pregnancy
Fetal growth/development Each visit
Self-help for discomforts Each visit
General health habits Each visit
Breastfeeding 26
Infant car seat safety Each visit
Childbirth/parenting classes 32
Family roles adjustment 38
Information about laboratory tests Before testing
Birth plan Third trimester
Labor (when to call/where to go) Third trimester

HIV, Human immunodeficiency virus.


Accepted by panel but not specifically reviewed.


That week and each week thereafter.


For some.


From Rosen M, Merkatz I, Hill J. Caring for our future: a report by the expert panel on the content of prenatal care. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:785.


At 36 weeks’ gestation, rectocervical cultures for group B streptococci (GBS) should be obtained. If cultures are positive, antibiotic prophylaxis during labor is given. For women without a penicillin allergy, penicillin (5 million units, then 2.5 million units IV every 4 hours) is administered during labor. If there is a penicillin allergy, sensitivities to clindamycin and erythromycin should be obtained and one of these agents used. If the organism is resistant to these antibiotics, women with a serious penicillin allergy should receive vancomycin; women with a minimal reaction from penicillin (e.g., rash) should receive a first-generation cephalosporin intravenously during labor (ACOG, 2002a, Schrag et al., 2002). Women with GBS bacteruria or a prior child affected with GBS sepsis should be treated during labor without screening cultures.


The clinical components of routine prenatal visits are controversial. Most guidelines recommend routine assessment with fundal height and maternal weight and blood pressure measurements, fetal heart auscultation, urine testing for protein and glucose, and questions about fetal movement. The assessment of uterine growth and size should be performed at every prenatal visit. Documentation of fetal heart tones is also recommended with each prenatal visit. Before 12 weeks’ gestation, the size of the uterus is estimated by bimanual pelvic examination. The ability to assess the presence of fetal heart tones using Doppler ultrasound before 12 weeks is variable. After 12 weeks and before 20 weeks, adequate uterine growth is assessed by location of the uterine fundus in the lower abdomen (Fig. 21-2). Fetal heart tones should be reliably heard during this period. At 20 weeks of gestation, most women have a palpable fundus at the umbilicus. After 20 weeks, fundal height is measured using the distance from top of the symphysis pubis to top of the fundus. The number of completed weeks of gestation should equal this measurement in centimeters (±2 cm). This measurement should be performed as accurately as possible. The most common reasons for inconsistency between menstrual age and fundal height is an inaccurate menstrual-age assignment and inaccurate measurements caused by maternal obesity. Larger-than-expected fundal height may also be caused by multiple gestation, uterine fibroids, polyhydramnios, or a large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetus. Smaller-than-expected fundal height should warrant an exploration for etiologies such as oligohydramnios, IUGR, and fetal demise.



By 30 weeks’ gestation, the fetus is large enough that it can be palpated through the maternal abdomen. Position of the fetus should be documented at this and subsequent visits. This is easily done in most women by Leopold’s maneuvers (Fig. 21-3). The first maneuver involves palpation of the uterine fundus to identify the fetal part that is there. The palpating hands then glide downward laterally to perform the second maneuver, location of the fetal back. In the third maneuver the hands are cupped around the presenting part at the level of the symphysis pubis to determine the presenting part as well as its degree of descent into the pelvis. If the presenting part is cephalic, the fourth maneuver will determine its degree of flexion. The examiner now turns 180 degrees to face the mother’s legs, and the cephalic prominence is palpated. Another aid in ascertaining the position of the fetal back is the location of the fetal heart tones by Doppler sonography or auscultation. These sounds are best heard through the fetal back; in the left lower uterus in left occiput anterior, transverse, and posterior positions of the fetal head; and the right lower uterus in right occiput positions. The evidence supporting the previous practices is variable but continues as the standard of care (Kirkham et al., 2005).



By the end of gestation, the practitioner as well as the woman should know the presentation of the fetus. This avoids emergent management when she presents in labor with a nonvertex presentation. Internal digital cervical examination can also verify presentation of the fetus and may be done when needed. Unless indicated, however, routine cervical examination to determine cervical readiness for labor need not be done until 41 weeks’ gestation.



Prenatal Genetic Diagnostic Testing


If specific risk factors for fetal abnormalities are identified in the mother, appropriate counseling and specific diagnostic testing should be offered. The most common reason to offer prenatal genetic diagnosis is advanced maternal age; a somewhat linear increase in nondisjunction in meiosis increases the risk of a conception with aneuploidy (abnormal chromosome number). This is one reason why older women have a higher rate of spontaneous first-trimester miscarriage. It is also why older women are more likely to give birth to a child with a chromosomal abnormality, most often Down syndrome (trisomy 21).


Women of advanced maternal age are those 35 or older at the anticipated birth of their baby. This group of women should be given specific counseling and offered diagnostic testing in the form of amniocentesis or CVS to ascertain the well-being of their fetus.



Amniocentesis


Genetic amniocentesis is typically performed at 14 to 20 weeks of gestation but can also be done any time after 20 menstrual weeks. After ultrasound examination of the fetus and placenta, an area of skin overlying a pocket of amniotic fluid is cleaned with iodine solution. With ultrasound guidance throughout the procedure, a 22-gauge spinal needle is used to remove 20 mL of amniotic fluid. Special care is taken to avoid the fetus, umbilical cord, and the large placental vessels. In experienced hands, the pregnancy loss rate attributed to the procedure is about 1 in 300. The entire testing time for a chromosomal analysis is about 10 to 12 days. Alternately, the supernatant may be assayed for metabolites to diagnose other disorders that run in the family if identified on counseling. Earlier amniocentesis (at 11 to 13 weeks) has been successfully performed but is not recommended any longer because of the recent initial reports regarding a slightly higher rate of clubfoot in these newborns.





Maternal Biochemical Screening


Low-risk women can be offered screening for genetic abnormalities of the fetus by biochemical testing in the first or second trimester and ultrasound nuchal translucency screening (first trimester) and targeted ultrasound evaluation of fetal anatomy, best done at 18 to 20 weeks’ gestation. The general consensus is that women of any age should have access to any screening or diagnostic testing (as previously described) if they choose to accept the underlying risks.


Biochemical testing is the measurement of certain chemicals in the mother’s blood found to be predictive of fetal abnormality. The quadruple screen is a maternal blood test in which one maternal sample drawn at 15 to 20 weeks (but most sensitive at 16 to 18 weeks) is assayed for alpha fetoprotein, estriols, and beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Normal ranges vary for each gestational week. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) elevations can result from open neural tube defects such as spina bifida or anencephaly, when the protein leaks from the fetal tissue into the amniotic fluid through the amniochorion and into the maternal system. A lower-than-expected MSAFP suggests Down syndrome. The addition of β subunit of hCG and estriols has improved sensitivity for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities (Table 21-5). This test should be offered to any pregnant women with appropriate counseling regarding sensitivity and specificity. Women with abnormal tests should be referred for targeted ultrasound and possibly amniocentesis.



First-trimester ultrasound and biochemical screening are now available for clinical use, specifically the “First Trimester Screen” performed between 10 weeks, 2 days and 13 weeks, 6 days of gestation. Testing involves an ultrasound measurement of the nuchal translucency (lymphatic fluid at fetal neck) (Fig. 21-4) and laboratory measurement of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and β subunit of hCG. The First Trimester Screen has about 85% sensitivity for Down syndrome detection at 4% false-positive rate. Several tests are also available that combine a first-trimester screen with a second-trimester screen for even higher sensitivity. Physicians should become familiar with the sensitivity, specificity, and availability of the test most suitable for their practices.





Drug and Chemical Exposures in Pregnancy


Pregnant women frequently ask about the effect of drug and other chemical exposures on the unborn infant, whether environmental, OTC, or prescription. Many of these are everyday exposures at the workplace, in the community, or as a result of medical treatment and management. The consequences can range from the most innocuous to actually jeopardizing the pregnancy. The physician should be prepared to answer these pregnancy-related questions and advise their patients appropriately.


The consequences of a chemical exposure may be related to the nature of the agent and the timing, dose, and duration of the exposure. The effect can range from minor morphologic abnormalities and growth deficiency to severe malformation and loss of the pregnancy. Thalidomide has obvious effects on the fetus, causing a third of fetuses to have limb reduction defects. Furthermore, the effect of a drug may be subtle or delayed (Welch et al., 1993). Diethylstilbestrol (DES) is associated with the development of uterine structural abnormalities and clear cell carcinoma of the vagina in daughters whose mothers took this medication.


Much of the knowledge about chemical exposures and effects on reproduction and fetal development comes from research on experimental animals. This poses great uncertainty given genetic variability and species-specific responses. Given these limitations, the health care provider must carefully weigh the evidence before using a drug. To help the practitioner classify a drug for use, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA, 1980) developed a risk factors index. The abbreviated definitions of these categories are as follows:







This classification is an oversimplification, and the individual practitioner will need to weigh the available data in the management of the pregnant woman. Few absolutes are possible in the field of human teratology; however, current recommendations for common drug categories in pregnancy are summarized in Table 21-6. It is important to emphasize that it is difficult to demonstrate an actual cause-effect relationship between a specific drug and an adverse pregnancy outcome. At no time, however, should a drug be considered safe because no data exist.


Table 21-6 Drugs and Exposures in Pregnancy























































Agent Recommendation Comments
Antihistamines Acceptable Most are category B.
Decongestants Acceptable Pseudoephedrine preferred.
Cough medication with guaifenesin Acceptable
Acetaminophen Acceptable Preferred analgesic and antipyretic.
Aspirin Avoid Increases risk of bleeding; no benefit in preeclampsia; may be prescribed in low doses for specific conditions.
NSAIDs Avoid Premature closure of ductus arteriosus.
Cephalosporins Acceptable
Sulfonamides Avoid in third trimester. Kernicterus in newborn.
Tetracyclines Avoid Discoloration of teeth.
ACE inhibitors Avoid Stillborn, renal abnormalities, renal failure in newborn.
Immunizations Avoid live, attenuated viruses. Measles, mumps, rubella.
Allergy shots Acceptable Alteration in maintenance dose may be necessary.

ACE, Angiotensin-converting enzyme; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.


Modified from Hueston WJ, Eolers GM, King DE, McGlaughlin VG. Common questions patients ask during pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 1995;51:1465-1470.



Infections in Pregnancy


Although a woman is subject to many of the same infections during pregnancy as when not pregnant, specific infectious diseases have implications on fetal development and complications of pregnancy, such as premature labor and premature rupture of membranes. Certain infections in pregnancy can be teratogenic to the fetus, particularly if infections occur in the first trimester. These agents have been given the acronym of TORCH for toxoplasmosis, other (e.g., syphilis), rubella, cytomegalovirus, and herpesvirus. Although not teratogenic, HIV may be transmitted to the fetus and may be lethal in the child.



Toxoplasmosis


The causative agent of toxoplasmosis is Toxoplasma gondii, a parasite that usually infects rodents. Based on serologic studies, approximately one third of reproductive-age women have had toxoplasmosis. In the United States, maternal infection is thought to occur in about 0.5%. Congenital toxoplasmosis can only occur when active infection occurs during pregnancy. Recognizable damage to newborns is estimated to occur in about 1 in 10,000 births; incidence of infected but asymptomatic newborns is unknown. Maternal infections that occur in the first trimester are more likely to cause abortion and significant fetal damage. Infections later in pregnancy tend to be asymptomatic at birth.


A pregnant woman can contract toxoplasmosis by eating raw meat containing the cysts of the organism or by fecal-oral transmission of the oocytes from an infected cat. Cats that are fed cooked or canned food are most often not infectious. Those that obtain rodents from the wild are more at risk. Pregnant women should avoid changing cat litter and handling cats, particularly those cats allowed to roam outdoors. Maternal toxoplasmosis may be asymptomatic or may present as a mononucleosis-like syndrome. Congenital disease ranges from overwhelming, including seizures, microcephaly or hydrocephaly, chorioretinitis, hepatosplenomegaly, jaundice, microphthalmia, and cataracts, to less symptomatic, which usually involves chorioretinitis. Prenatal ultrasound or postnatal brain scan can also show intracranial calcifications. The placenta should be examined pathologically for cysts of T. gondii (Beasley and Egerman, 1998).


The diagnosis of toxoplasmosis is serologic, looking for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Some assays have a high level of false-positive results. Laboratories well versed in performing these serologic tests should be used. Pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine can treat women who acquire the infection prenatally. Effectiveness of treatment protocols for prevention of congenital infection appears variable (Wallon et al., 1999). Screening of all pregnant women is not recommended at this time.


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 3, 2016 | Posted by in MANUAL THERAPIST | Comments Off on Obstetrics

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access