Hip Arthroscopy



Hip Arthroscopy


Vonda Wright

Antonia Chen



The arthroscopic approach to hip pathology is rapidly becoming an accepted and common tool in the orthopedic surgeons’ armamentarium. Improvements in instrumentation, technique, and surgeons’ experience have made the minimally invasive treatment of multiple hip derangements possible. This chapter provides the novice hip arthroscopist with a detailed description of the indications, operative setup, and technique for performing hip arthroscopy.


BACKGROUND, PRESENTATION, AND INDICATIONS FOR HIP ARTHROSCOPY

Although rapidly gaining in popularity, hip arthroscopy is not a new procedure. For decades, few surgeons approached the hip arthroscopically as the procedure itself requires significant technical acumen and definitive diagnosis of hip pathology is sometimes difficult. The clinical symptoms and physical finding associated with hip pain may be varied and subtle. Diagnosis is often delayed by an average of 21 months as patients are referred to an average of 3.3 health care providers before reaching a hip arthroscopist. During that period, they have often undergone a variety of treatments including physical therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory or narcotic medications, or other surgery including spine, ovary, or hernia exploration.

Not all pain believed to be emanating from the hip is actually intra-articular hip pain. The numerous anatomic structures in the vicinity of the hip joint may confuse the clinical presentation. Presentation of intraarticular hip pain is most commonly groin pain with or without radiation to the knee, pain localized by the patient with his or her hand encircling the lateral hip above the greater trochanter with the thumb posterior and fingers in a C-shape (C-sign), mechanical clicking or pinching in the groin, or pain with sitting and getting in and out of the car. The presence of mechanical symptoms in addition to groin pain is a favorable prognostic factor with more than 85% improvement postoperatively (34) Intra-articular hip pain is not lateral pain over the greater trochanter, buttock/posterior leg pain or palpable hip girdle tenderness (Table 45.1).

Proper patient selection is paramount in achieving a successful outcome from arthroscopic hip surgery. In addition to the history and physical, a focused exam, as summarized in Table 45.2, provides valuable clues for localizing pathology.

Perhaps the most important tools in evaluating the hip are plain radiographs. Table 45.3 summarizes important radiographs and the measurements they provide.

In addition, the Dunn or elongated-neck lateral (performed with the hip in 90 degrees of flexion and 20 degrees of abduction) may be used to further identify femoral neck offset. The False profile radiograph, with the patient rotated 65 degrees and the beam perpendicular to the hip, demonstrates anterior osseous coverage of the hip.

When history, physical and plain radiographs indicate intra-articular pathology, the final two steps in preoperative diagnosis are MR Arthrogram (MRA) and diagnostic injection with analgesics (Figs. 45.1, 45.2 and 45.3). Soft tissues of the hip should be visualized using MRA in most clinical settings. Figures 45.4, 45.5 and 45.6 demonstrate common MRA views. While some institutions report the ability to visualize these structures adequately without the addition of contrast, in most settings, the addition of contract is vital. MRA has 90%/91% sensitivity and accurate for detecting hip pathology, while plain MRI has only 30%/36% sensitivity and accuracy (1). Finally, confirmation of intra-articular pathology as the source for hip pain is obtained via intra-articular injection. At the time of MRA, a mixture of lidocaine (6 mL 1%), marcaine (6 mL 0.25%), and kenalog (80 mg) is injected into the joint. The patient is then asked to perform the activities that normally cause pain to the hip and report the degree of relief from these symptoms within the first 3 hours following injection. The amount of relief from
this diagnostic injection within the first 3 hours following injection is 90% predictive of the relief the patient can expect postoperatively.








TABLE 45.1 Summary of Hip Symptoms Associated with Labral Tears




























































Onset of symptoms


Insidious


61%



Acute


30%



Trauma


9%


Intensity


Moderate/severe


86%


Location


Groin


92%



Ant. thigh/lateral hip/buttock


Quality of pain


Sharp


86%



Dull


80%



Combination sharp/dull


70%



Activity related


91%



Night pain


71%



Mechanical symptoms


53%-77%



Pain during walking


70%



Pain during pivot


70%


Source: Adapted from J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;88-A:1450.









TABLE 45.2 Focused Physical Exam of the Hip



































Exam Name


Exam Indication


Gait


Antalgic—pain/trendelenberg—gluteal weakness


Trendelenberg sign


Gluteal weakness


Palpation (groin, lateral hip, buttocks)


Intra-articular pathology generally not palpable


Strength (hip flexors/abd/add)


Thomas sign


Tight hip flexors


Range of motion


Flex—FAI, ER—tight hip capsule, IR—OA


Log roll/heel strike


Intra-articular pathology/fracture


Scour test


Labral tear


FADIR


Impingement ± popping/clicking


FABER (location important)


SI joint/iliopsoas/FAI









TABLE 45.3 Radiographic Evaluation of the Hip








































Radiograph


Measurement


AP WB pelvis


CEA—dysplasia




<20 under coverage




20-40 normal




>40 pincer lesion



Tonnis angle




<10 degrees normal




>10 degrees increased lateral contact pressures



Cross over sign—anterior rim crosses in front of posterior rim indicating retroversion of the acetabulum


AP hip


Cross table lateral


CAM—decreased femoral neck offset


Hip arthroscopy is indicated when patients present with persistent pain that is unrelieved by thorough physical therapy and reproducible by physical exam, are nonresponsive to conservative measures, and have documentation of intra-articular pathology by MRA and positive relief from intra-articular injection within the first 3 hours after injection.







FIGURE 45.1 AP pelvis without crossover sign.






FIGURE 45.2 A: AP hip with normal CEA B: AP hip with Pincer lesion.






FIGURE 45.3 Cross table lateral with CAM lesion.

In recent years, much focus has illuminated the pathology behind labral tears. Though the pain associated with a torn labrum is often the inciting reason patients seek medical care, labral pathology itself is the consequence of the primary underlying hip derangement. These pathology include femoral acetabular impingement (FAI), major or athletic hip trauma, capsular laxity/hip hyper mobility, hip dysplasia with a shallow center edge angle (CEA) of <20 degrees and subsequent hypertrophic labrum, iliopsoas impingement and snapping over the anterior pelvic rim and DJD with degeneration of the labrum as well as the cartilage. Detailed coverage of several of these topics appears in subsequent chapters and will be described in brief here.







FIGURE 45.4 MRA axial oblique with labral tear.






FIGURE 45.5 MRA coronal.


Femoral acetabular impingement

First described in 1965 (25), FAI describes the repetitive abutment and subsequent microtrauma between the femoral neck and acetabular rim (Table 45.4). The impingement occurs as the femoral neck CAM lesion flexes against a normal or overhanging (high CEA) acetabulum and pushes the labrum up and away from the acetabular edge. This leads to labral tearing or fraying and is thought to eventually peel back the acetabular cartilage at the area of impact leading to early arthritis. The concept of optimal femoral neck offset is well known from the arthroplasy literature with too little offset leading to hip instability, with the head levering out of the cup, impingement, and wear. Historically, surgical management of FAI included periactabular osteotomy (30) and surgical dislocation (28). Now, FAI, including osteoplasty of the acetabular rim and femoral CAM lesion, is performed arthroscopically as described in following chapters.


Acetabular Dysplasia

Acetabular dysplasia is a part of a continuum of developmental disorders that includes FAI. While severe dysplasia cannot be treated by arthroscopy alone and requires open osteotomy, mild and moderate dysplasia may be.
Acetabulum with CEA of 16 to 28 degrees is amenable to arthroscopic labral surgery (20). With the dysplasia, the labrum becomes hypertrophic in the anterior and superior regions and is more susceptible to tearing (14). In these cases, the labrum is repaired back down to acetabular rim. Developmental dysplasia is also associated hypertrophy of the ligamentum teres and increased wear with time causing impingement and pain. Débridement of the ligamentum and repair of the labrum in dysplasia demonstrate improved clinical outcomes (6

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 13, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Hip Arthroscopy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access