Cardiac rehabilitation



Cardiac rehabilitation


Sushma Sanghvi




Background


According to the World Health Organization (WHO), an estimated 17 million people die of cardiovascular disease (CVD) every year of whom 7.2 million die of coronary heart disease (CHD) and 5.7 million die of stroke. CVD is responsible for 10% of disability adjusted life years (DALYs) lost in low- and middle-income countries and 18% in high-income countries.


According to 2008 statistical data from the British Heart Foundation (BHF), CHD causes around 88,000 deaths in the UK every year. It is also the most common cause of premature death (death before the age of 75) in the UK. Eighteen per cent of premature deaths in men and 9% of premature deaths in women are from CHD. Nearly all deaths from CHD are a result of myocardial infarction (MI, heart attack). Around 124,000 people in the UK suffer a MI every year. There are 28,000 new cases of angina and 27,000 new cases of heart failure every year in the UK.


Over the last two decades of the twentieth century in the UK, there was a decline in the death rates from CHD. In a study by Unal et al. (2004), the authors concluded that 58% of CHD mortality decline in the 1980s and 1990s was owing to a reduction in major risk factors, primarily smoking. The remaining 42% of the decline in mortality was explained by treatments, including secondary prevention.


There remains considerable variation in the death rates across the UK. Deaths from CHD are highest in Scotland and the north of England. While deaths from CHD have declined overall, the difference between the most deprived groups and the least deprived groups remains high (5 : 1). South Asians living in the UK (Indians, Bangladeshis, Pakistanis and Sri Lankans) have a higher premature death rate from CHD than average. The death rate is 46% higher in South Asian men and 51% in South Asian women.


The overall burden of CVD is now far greater as a result of more people surviving cardiac illnesses and living much longer than before.


While genetic factors play a part, 80–90% of people dying of CHD have one or more major risk factors influenced by lifestyle. Physical activity, obesity, smoking and diabetes are major risk factors for CHD.


Many people find making significant lifestyle changes difficult, for example, people may be addicted to nicotine. If someone recently admitted to hospital with CHD needs to increase the amount of physical activity they undertake regularly, not only do they need to be well motivated but they and their families need to be confident that the exercise is safe.


Like all major illnesses, CHD has major physical, psychological and behavioural impacts on patients and their families. For some, the psychological consequences can be persistent and disabling. They can also be a barrier to making the lifestyle changes necessary to reduce the subsequent cardiac risk. For example, people with CHD can be afraid to take exercise or participate fully in their daily activities for fear of damaging their heart. After admission to the hospital, maybe following a MI or for coronary revascularisation, the advice and treatment provision in primary care may not always be sufficient. Many people require more intensive help to understand their illness and treatment to attain the lifestyle changes and to regain their confidence so that they can enjoy the best possible physical, mental and emotional health, and return to as normal a life as possible.



What is cardiac rehabilitation?


The WHO defines cardiac rehabilitation as:




Cardiac rehabilitation is a comprehensive intervention that offers education, exercise and psychosocial support for patients with CHD and their families and is delivered by many specialist health professionals. Cardiac rehabilitation can promote recovery, enable patients to achieve and maintain better health, and reduce the risk of death in people who have heart disease.




Research evidence for cardiac rehabilitation


When well provided and when people are offered comprehensive and tailored help with lifestyle modification involving exercise training, education and psychological input, cardiac rehabilitation can make a substantial difference in reducing mortality by as much as 20–25% over three years.


The Cochrane Review 2004 (Jolliffe et al. 2004) (Table 8.1) established the importance of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiac mortality was reduced by 31% in the exercise-only cardiac rehabilitation and by 26% in comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation groups.



The research has been focussed around phase III of rehabilitation and in patients after MI and revascularisation.


Many studies still include only low risk, male, Caucasian, middle-aged MI patients and enroll only a small number of women, the elderly and ethnic minorities. Other cardiac patient groups, such as those following cardiac surgery, heart failure or heart transplantation, are excluded, thereby limiting the generalisability of the results.


Systematic reviews for chronic heart failure have demonstrated that exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation reduces mortality, increases the quality of life and that exercise is safe in this group of patients.



Evidence for physical activity and exercise


The WHO estimates that around 6% of all disease burden and around 30% of CHD burden to be caused by physical inactivity (WHO 2010). Physical activity levels are low in the UK. The Health Survey for England data (2008) show that only 39% of men and 29% of women meet the government guidelines of 30 minutes of moderate physical activity five or more times a week. The proportion of both men and women who met the recommendations decreased with age. Therefore, structured exercise as a therapeutic intervention is essential to the cardiac rehabilitation programme.




Patient groups in cardiac rehabilitation


Typically, patients following an acute MI and coronary artery by-pass graft (CABG) surgery have been referred for cardiac rehabilitation. The National Service Framework recommends that cardiac rehabilitation should be available to people manifesting CHD in various forms. Many more groups are now included in both comprehensive and exercise-based rehabilitation.






Special needs groups


An important drawback in most research is the lack of female and elderly patients, and patients’ ethnic backgrounds are rarely reported. These under-represented groups need special attention.



Women

Incidence of CHD tends to be higher in men; however, this difference decreases with increasing age. According to the BHF statistics 2010 (BHF 2010), every year 44,000 women in the UK have a MI. Uptake of cardiac rehabilitation among women is low. When women attend cardiac rehabilitation programmes, the outcomes are as good as, or better than, for men. Their need may be greater as they suffer greater loss of function in relation to return to work, activity and sexuality, and experience high levels of anxiety and depression. More gender-specific information, individualised and flexible programmes, and suitable environment are required to address the specific needs of this group.




Ethnic groups

The incidence of CHD is much higher in some ethnic communities (e.g. South Asians). It has been suggested that people from ethnic minorities are less likely to be referred and join cardiac rehabilitation programmes. While planning strategies for rehabilitation for ethnic groups, their heterogeneity and cultural and linguistic needs must be acknowledged. When a behavioural change is required, it is crucial that the message is clearly understood. Knowledge of the cultural influences on physical activity and dietary practices would be beneficial to the patient. Similarly, awareness of health education material in appropriate languages can enhance the quality of service. It will help to involve health professionals from similar cultural backgrounds to develop and evaluate progress.


A variety of settings appropriate to the targeted communities can be used, for example community centres, temples, mosques, churches, health centres, etc. Involvement of the family and the younger generation is vital.



Other groups


For these groups, individualised assessment and risk stratification is essential.







Provision in the UK and cost-effectiveness


The overall level of provision of cardiac rehabilitation programmes in the UK has increased rapidly in the last 20 years. Current data from the National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation reveal the number of programmes at 395. The national service framework for CHD has advocated the use of disease registers in primary care to provide long- term follow up of patients with CHD and has set standards and milestones for secondary prevention.


There are huge variations in programme types, duration, frequency and intensity of exercise training. Many centres are delivering the service in primary care, and menu-based programmes are provided by a multi-disciplinary team.


A UK estimate suggests a cost of £6900 per Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) and a cost per life year gained of £15,700 three years after cardiac rehabilitation. This offers good value compared with many other treatments currently provided by the National Health Service (NHS).



Components of cardiac rehabilitation





Operation and delivery


It transpires that cardiac rehabilitation is really a continuum of care from the time the patient is admitted until discharge and extends to outpatient care, as well as long-term follow-up in the community. Patient care is shared with the cardiology team, of which cardiac rehabilitation forms an essential part. Cardiology management includes patient assessment and risk stratification (predicting the likelihood of recurrence of cardiac events and disease prognosis). The patient also undergoes diagnostic tests and drug therapy, and may need revascularisation, such as angioplasty or a bypass grafting as appropriate.


Traditionally, cardiac rehabilitation is divided into four phases, progressing from the acute hospital admission stage to long-term maintenance of lifestyle change.








Cardiac rehabilitation team


The cardiac rehabilitation package individualised for each patient requires expertise and skills from a multi-disciplinary collaborative team of professionals (Figure 8.4). The team includes a cardiologist and staff from nursing, physiotherapy, dietetics, pharmacy, occupational therapy and psychology with training in cardiac rehabilitation. Continuation of care in the community involves the primary healthcare team that is the general practitioner and cardiac nurse, phase IV exercise specialist and a link from a local cardiac patient support group (Figure 8.3).





The role of the physiotherapist


Physiotherapists have the knowledge, assessment skills and clinical reasoning, combined with evidence-based approach to treatment, to undertake the rehabilitation management of patients with multi-pathology problems. Physiotherapists are also trained to run group sessions and classes. Hence, the role of the physiotherapist within the multi-disciplinary team should focus on exercise prescription, training and education in phases I–III. The modification in exercise prescription needs to be discussed with medical and nursing team members. In a group setting where exercise is delivered to CHD patients, teamwork and liaison with other team members who are aware of patients’ clinical and psychosocial issues is essential.



Professional development


The Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Cardiac Rehabilitation (ACPICR) recommends that physiotherapists wishing to specialise in this area should refer to the ACPICR competences for the exercise component of phase III cardiac rehabilitation and the Skills for Health: Coronary Heart Disease document (ACPICR 2008). They should consider undertaking professional development in exercise physiology and exercise prescription in cardiovascular disease. Use of clinical and cardiac networks to share experiences, for example interactive CSP (www.csp.org.uk), is recommended.



Benefits of exercise training



Research confirms that exercise training improves physical performance (exercise tolerance, muscular strength and symptoms), psychological functioning (anxiety, depression and well-being), and social adaptation and functioning in cardiac patients (Tables 8.2 and 8.4). It shows a reduction in mortality, morbidity, recurrent events and hospital readmissions. It is also found to have a positive impact on patients’ physical ability to exercise (Table 8.3). Therefore, exercise training as a therapeutic intervention is central to the cardiac rehabilitation programme.






Physiological adaptations to exercise training in healthy individuals and coronary heart disease patients


In healthy individuals physiological adaptations to aerobic exercise training are central (cardiac) and peripheral (skeletal muscle and vascular).



Adaptations at submaximal level of aerobic exercise


Adaptations at the submaximal level of aerobic exercise are reduction in heart rate (HR) owing to a decrease in sympathetic activity and increase in parasympathetic activity (vagal tone). The stroke volume increases owing to greater left ventricular filling and an increase in left ventricular mass. A decrease in the resting HR and blood pressure (BP) implies reduced myocardial oxygen demand. Also, the period of diastole is increased allowing greater time for blood to flow into the coronary circulation.


Cardiac output [CO = HR (heart rate) × SV (stroke volume)] must always match metabolic demand, but does so with reduced HR and increased stroke volume. Systolic BP (SBP) decreases and there is redistribution of blood flow to trained skeletal muscle and other tissues. Circulating catecholamines decrease and the arterio-venous oxygen difference increases.





Increase in VO2 max


Oxygen consumption (VO2) is expressed either in absolute terms as litres per minute (L.min−1) or relative to body weight as mL per kg per minute (mL.kg−1.min−1). VO2 max is the highest rate of oxygen consumption attainable during maximal exercise. Aerobic training increases VO2 max.


In relative terms, an individual walking at 4 miles per hour uses 17.5 mL of oxygen per kg of bodyweight per minute. In absolute terms, a man weighing 70 kg will use 1225 mL or 1.2 L per minute.



In CHD patients, the increase in VO2 max is predominantly a result of peripheral adaptations. Central changes are associated with long periods of high intensity training. Although central changes have been shown with high intensity training in CHD patients in some studies, in the conventional cardiac rehabilitation programmes this regime is not suitable. Physical performance improvements are better seen in patients with low exercise tolerance.




Assessment for exercise prescription


A thorough assessment is essential in order to plan an individualised and safe exercise prescription for cardiac patients and should include the following:





Exercise prescription: The FITT principle


To develop an individual exercise training programme, factors known as the FITT principles are considered.



Frequency, time and type or modes of exercise are explained later in the chapter with activities in different phases of cardiac rehabilitation.



Intensity of exercise


The risk of developing arrhythmias or adverse events such as an acute MI is increased in cardiac patients with vigorous activity. Low-to-moderate intensity exercise training can produce beneficial changes in functional capacity, cardiac function, coronary risk factors, psychosocial well-being and possibly improve survival in patients with CHD. For patients with low functional capacity, frequent and short duration exercise stimulus incorporated throughout the day may be advisable.


Intensity is prescribed and monitored by several methods which can be used independently or in combination with one another.



Heart rate


Each individual patient should have his/her training HR calculated based on thorough assessment and risk stratification. The training intensities for most patients range between 60% and 75% of the maximum HR for the majority of the population group. The more complex patient will require lower intensities (40–50%); hence, appropriate adjustments to these calculations will be required.


In ideal circumstances, when available, the training HR is obtained from a maximum or symptom limited exercise ECG test (exercise tolerance test (ETT)). The training HR should be set at 60–75% of maximal HR or 20 beats below the HR at which the symptoms appeared, and should be monitored throughout the exercise session. However, ETT information is not always available to the cardiac rehabilitation team and other methods for determining the training intensity are used frequently.


Using HR in isolation as a measure of exercise intensity has a number of limitations; hence, other methods of monitoring intensity should be used in addition. This includes the use of validated rating of perceived exertion scale (RPE) and direct clinical observation for signs of exertion.


Heart rate can remain one of the appropriate intensity markers, even when patients are influenced by chronotrophic medication, such as beta-blockers. In this instance, the resting HR and the maximal HR are reduced by 20–40 beats per minute and the target HR can be recalculated on this basis.



Age-adjusted predicted maximum heart rate formula

This formula uses a predicted maximum heart rate based on age (220 – age) and, as such, can have an error margin of as much as ± 10 beats per minute.


A percentage of this predicted maximum is selected based on the assessment findings.


Jan 7, 2017 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on Cardiac rehabilitation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access