Urinary Tract Disorders

Chapter 40 Urinary Tract Disorders




Urogenital health care concerns account for 4.4% of all ambulatory patient visits in the United States, more than half with primary care physicians (Schappert and Rechtsteiner, 2008). Disease in the urogenital system can be categorized as anatomic, functional, infectious, and neoplastic disorders. Although there is inevitable overlap between these categories, as in benign prostatic hyperplasia (neoplastic) causing outflow obstruction and incontinence (functional), this framework is useful for characterizing urinary tract abnormalities.



Evaluation of the Urinary Tract


The urinary system includes the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra; a system history most often focuses on voiding, its primary function. Other issues may include sexual function or areas of overlap with other systems (e.g., abdominal pain). Patients often present with, or are found to have, common concerns specific to the urinary tract (see later discussion). A thorough drug history is critical because many common medications have urologic side effects (Thomas et al., 2003) (see eTable 40-1 online).



Physical Examination


Physical examination is limited with urinary tract disorders, but special techniques are available. Many physical findings are helpful, if present, although their absence does not imply normalcy. For example, a renal bruit may indicate arterial stenosis, but its absence does not rule out the condition. Variations in examiner skill and patient factors also limit the accuracy and reliability of physical findings.


The kidneys are retroperitoneal organs and are difficult to palpate, except in very thin persons and children. The right kidney sits more inferiorly than the left because of the liver. The ureters are nonpalpable but, as with the kidneys, may radiate pain to the flank area. The bladder is typically nonpalpable unless distended with at least 150 mL of urine, and percussion is preferred over palpation for diagnosing distention (Gerber and Brendler, 2007). In women an enlarged bladder may also be noted on bimanual examination.


Pelvic examination is useful for diagnosing cystocele in women. Two fingers can be placed in the introitus and opened to visualize the vaginal cavity. The patient then performs the Valsalva maneuver. The anterior wall dipping down into the vaginal cavity may signify a cystocele. More subtle cystoceles can be detected by placing a lubricated cotton swab in the urethral meatus and having the patient perform the Valsalva maneuver. If the swab moves upward (anteriorly), it may indicate movement of the bladder neck with straining.


Examination of the external genitalia in men may reveal penile lesions, regional adenopathy, or disorders of the scrotum and testicles. Uncircumcised men should have the foreskin retracted to rule out phimosis and visualize the glans. Careful palpation of the testicular complex is needed to detect and differentiate masses and anatomic abnormalities. Digital rectal examination (DRE) can estimate prostate size and detect masses or inflammation. It is usually performed with the patient leaning forward on the examination table with his elbows bent. Prostate tenderness, warmth, or a boggy consistency suggests prostatitis. Prostate enlargement consistent with benign prostatic hyperplasia is typical in older men. Masses or asymmetry may indicate a tumor.



Laboratory Tests



Key Points







Urinalysis


Urinalysis is the most common office laboratory test, with dipstick urinalysis most often used (Cherry et al., 2007). Urinalysis is inexpensive, noninvasive, easily carried out, and could indicate a number of urinary and systemic conditions. Performing urinalysis in otherwise healthy people as a preventive health service is commonplace. However, screening is not recommended in asymptomatic adults for many of the conditions that urinalysis can identify (e.g., asymptomatic bacteruria, bladder cancer; see later). Routine urinalysis lacks evidence of benefit, and guidelines recommend against routine urinalysis as part of adult or child preventive care, suggesting it only be done if clinically indicated (Grenz et al., 2009a, 2009b; Stephens and Wilder, 2003). The American Academy of Pediatrics also no longer recommends urinalysis as part of routine pediatric prevention (AAP, 2007).


Although urinalysis can detect occult disease, most positive results will not yield this outcome; more patients would incur unnecessary or potentially dangerous medical evaluations than would benefit. Thus, the potential value is elusive while there is the possibility of harm. It is important, however, not to confuse broad population screening recommendations with those specific to certain patients or problems. For example, microalbuminuria screening is routine in diabetes care (ADA, 2009).


Physicians should be aware that there is a good chance of false-positive and false-negative results with dipstick tests. Thus, abnormal results are not necessarily indicative of disease and may need confirmatory testing (Gerber and Brendler, 2007; Simerville et al., 2005).




Inspection


Normal urine color varies from clear (dilute) to yellow to deep golden and cloudy. Many substances can cause urine color to appear abnormal (Table 40-1). Cloudy urine may be caused by infection (pyuria), but the most common cause is phosphaturia, in which phosphate crystals precipitate in alkaline urine. Microscopic analysis can differentiate these two entities. A strong or foul-smelling sample does not necessarily indicate infection. Urine odor may change because of dietary intake (e.g., asparagus), medications, illness, or concentration. Fecal odor suggests gastrointestinal-vesical fistula.


Table 40-1 Factors Affecting Urine Color



























Color Causative Factor
Colorless Very dilute urine; overhydration
Cloudy, milky Phosphaturia; pyuria; chyluria
Red Hematuria; hemoglobinuria, myoglobinuria; anthocyanin in beets and blackberries; chronic lead and mercury poisoning; phenolphthalein (in bowel evacuants); phenothiazines (e.g., prochlorperazine [Compazine]); rifampin
Orange Dehydration; phenazopyridine (Pyridium); sulfasalazine (Azulfidine)
Green-blue Biliverdin; indicanuria (tryptophan indole metabolites); amitriptyline (Elavil); indigo carmine; methylene blue; phenols (e.g., IV cimetidine [Tagamet]; IV promethazine [Phenergan]); resorcinol; triamterene (Dyrenium)
Brown Urobilinogen; porphyria; aloe, fava beans, rhubarb; chloroquine, primaquine; furazolidone (Furoxone); metronidazole (Flagyl); nitrofurantoin (Furadantin)
Brown-black Alkaptonuria (homogentisic acid); hemorrhage; melanin; tyrosinosis (hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid); cascara, senna (laxatives); methocarbamol (Robaxin); methyldopa (Aldomet); sorbitol

From Hanno PM, Wein AJ. A Clinical Manual of Urology. Norwalk, Conn, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1987, p 67.



Dipstick Urinalysis












Urine Microscopy


To prepare a urine sample for microscopic analysis, centrifuge 10 mL of urine for 5 minutes at 2000 rpm. After centrifugation, pour off the supernatant and resuspend the remaining sample (0.5-1.0 mL). Place a drop of this sample on the slide and focus up to high power. Samples showing probable skin or vaginal contamination should be retested or a catheterized specimen obtained (Grossfeld et al., 2001a). Sediment counts should be estimated as the average number of elements viewed per high-power field (hpf).













Imaging Studies



Key Points









Common Urinary Tract Concerns



Key Points










Dysuria


Urinary burning or pain most often represents UTI or vaginitis. It is common in middle-aged and/or sexually active women. In men, it is more likely to occur as they grow older (Bremnor and Sadovsky, 2002). Both voiding history and sexual history are essential. Questions regarding vaginal symptoms are important in women. Also, use of medications and personal hygiene products should be reviewed.


Dysuria significantly increases the chance that a patient has a UTI. However, there are many potential causes of dysuria (Box 40-1), and empiric treatment based on this symptom alone leads to unnecessary antibiotic use. Incorporating other symptoms increases the likelihood that a UTI is the cause (see Urinary Tract Infection) (Bent et al., 2002; McIsaac et al., 2002).






Hematuria


Hematuria is often an incidental finding on urinalysis, and evaluation depends on whether it is gross or microscopic and whether it occurs in adults, children, or adolescents. Most patients with hematuria do not have significant pathology, but this depends on the type of hematuria and underlying risk factors. One prospective study found that 61% of patients with hematuria had no finding after evaluation (Khadra et al., 2000).


Gross hematuria is blood in the urine visible to the patient or physician. Microscopic hematuria is the more common entity. Various cutoff points exist; for adults, the American Urological Association (AUA) Best Practice Policy has defined microscopic hematuria as 3 or more (RBCs/hpf (Grossfeld et al., 2001a). In children, clear consensus is lacking, although more than 5 RBCs/hpf found in at least two weekly urine samples is considered abnormal (Dodge et al., 1976; Vehaskari et al., 1979). The reasons for the different definitions may reflect a lower evaluation threshold in adults because of the larger spectrum of potential causes.


Dipstick urinalysis alone is insufficient for diagnosing hematuria, because certain substances (e.g., myoglobin) and test characteristics (e.g., specificity) can cause false-positive results. Thus, microscopic analysis is necessary and inherent in the definition.



Hematuria in Adults




Microscopic Hematuria

Asymptomatic hematuria potentially signals serious urinary tract disease, although there are many causes, often benign. Hematuria may occur in 9% to 18% of normal subjects (Grossfeld et al., 2001a). Most studies evaluating and defining this problem were not performed in typical family medicine populations or are of lower quality, or both. No prospective studies demonstrate an improved outcome from routine screening. For the general population, finding asymptomatic microscopic hematuria carries a predictive value of only 0.5% (Brehmer, 2002). Thus, benefit from routine microhematuria screening is unlikely (Kryszczuk et al., 2004).


Because routine screening is unhelpful, family physicians encountering microhematuria should consider patient risk characteristics and systematic laboratory testing and imaging (Fig. 40-5). The first step in approaching asymptomatic microscopic hematuria is to verify it is a consistent finding. Patients should have repeat urinalysis, and if two separate follow-up samples are normal, no further evaluation is needed. Transient hematuria is not unusual, and serious urinary tract pathology is unlikely in patients younger than 40 years. Furthermore, history or examination may reveal a benign cause—menses, sexual activity, vigorous exercise, viral illness, or trauma. If repeat examination is normal after these considerations, no further examination is needed. A caveat would be the patient at risk for bladder cancer, because intermittent hematuria can precede this finding, and more extensive follow-up may be warranted (Grossfeld et al., 2001b). Family physicians should be cautious not to misattribute certain causes as benign. For example, warfarin (Coumadin) may cause hematuria if the patient is excessively anticoagulated, but it should not cause hematuria within its goal international normalized ratio (INR) range. Hematuria in this setting is often a sign of urologic disease (Culclasure et al., 1994).



If hematuria is consistently found, the next step is to risk-stratify the patient based on history, physical, and baseline laboratory findings. Initial laboratory testing should include urinalysis, urine culture (if indicated), and serum creatinine level. If UTI is present, a repeat examination 6 weeks after treatment is appropriate. High-risk patients are those at increased risk for urologic malignancy—older than 40 years, tobacco history, analgesic abuse, pelvic irradiation, occupational exposures (see Bladder Cancer), prior urologic disease, irritative voiding symptoms, history of UTIs, and cyclophosphamide use (Grossfeld et al., 2001b). These patients should undergo a more thorough evaluation for the cause of their hematuria, whereas lower-risk patients can have a more limited testing battery (Grossfeld et al., 2001a). Hematuria of renal origin may be associated with microscopic red cell casts or dysmorphic RBCs. Other findings may include proteinuria, elevated serum creatinine, or a physical finding such as hypertension or edema. These patients need evaluation for renal disease, including urine protein quantification. Some patients will have risk factors and findings for both renal and urologic disease or may already have a history of chronic kidney disease (CKD), so simultaneous evaluations for both causes may be necessary.


Patients whose initial evaluation does not suggest primary renal disease should undergo urologic evaluation based on their risk category. This includes upper urinary tract imaging, urine cytology, and cystoscopy. There are no prospective outcome data on the impact of imaging on asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. Thus, patient-oriented recommendations are unavailable, and family physicians should consider the advantages and disadvantages of the different techniques (see earlier Imaging Studies) when deciding on the appropriate method. IVU is widely available and less costly, and has a low chance of missing pathology when appropriate follow-up studies are used. CT is a good choice for a broad range of urinary tract disorders. Non-contrast-enhanced scans can be performed initially. If these show calculi in a low-risk patient, no further imaging is needed. Contrast studies can follow in all other cases (Grossfeld et al., 2001b). CT is the modality of choice when other techniques fail to reveal a cause (Lang et al., 2002). Deciding between IVU and CT is challenging because the lower cost of IVU may be offset by the eventual need for CT (McDonald et al., 2006). Radiation exposure must be considered as well. Kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) studies with ultrasound or MRI are alternatives for patients unable to receive radiographic contrast. However, in the case of CKD patients, the risk of nephrogenic systemic sclerosis from gadolinium contrast may also limit use of MRI.


Cystoscopy is necessary to rule out bladder cancer confidently because no imaging study is adequate for evaluation. Urine cytology is often performed with cystoscopy and has a sensitivity of 40% to 76% for bladder cancer. A positive finding is diagnostic, but a negative finding does not rule out disease. Thus, in high-risk patients, cytology is used adjunctively and in follow-up. Cystoscopy is optional in low-risk patients because it is unlikely to yield a definitive finding. These patients should undergo urine cytology. Furthermore, if they develop any high-risk characteristics, they should undergo cystoscopy (Grossfeld et al., 2001b). Urine tumor markers are available but not yet validated for routine use (Cohen and Brown, 2003).


A cause for hematuria is often not found even after a complete evaluation. Isolated hematuria is asymptomatic microscopic hematuria with a normal urologic evaluation and no signs of systemic disease or microscopic evidence of intrinsic renal disease (the definition slightly differs for children). The prognosis is good, although some studies indicate a high proportion of renal abnormalities (e.g., IgA nephropathy). Thus, surveillance for signs of renal disease is appropriate (Grossfeld et al., 2001b). Also, up to 3% of patients with initially negative workups are later found to have a urinary tract malignancy. High-risk patients should have periodic follow-up with focused history, blood pressure, urinalysis, and urine cytology for up to 3 years. This regimen can also be considered for low-risk patients (see Fig. 40-5). Evaluation and treatment of symptomatic microscopic hematuria is directed at the condition. However, family physicians should consider the underlying risk of urinary tract abnormalities when deciding on follow-up. For example, a patient with a symptomatic kidney stone may have microhematuria. Although this provides the most likely explanation for the bleeding, if the patient has a background risk for malignancy (e.g., smoking) or renal disease, repeat urinalysis is needed to ensure resolution.



Hematuria in Children and Adolescents


Hematuria is a relatively common finding in children, with an estimated prevalence of 0.5% to 2% of asymptomatic school-age children (Dodge et al., 1976). Those with hematuria and proteinuria, particularly when associated with hypertension, edema, or urinary casts, need aggressive evaluation for underlying glomerular disease or uropathy. The vast majority of children with hematuria, however, present with isolated hematuria. This is typically detected on a random urine sample obtained in the context of a routine physical examination but may also present as asymptomatic gross hematuria. In children, the term isolated refers to the complete absence of symptoms, significant past medical or family history, physical examination findings, or other abnormalities on urinalysis. This distinction often separates those children with benign processes from those with underlying pathology.


Once the diagnosis of hematuria has been confirmed and a complete history obtained and physical examination performed, a staged evaluation should ensue (Fig. 40-6). Significant underlying renal or urologic disease is highly unlikely in children with isolated microscopic hematuria (Bergstein et al., 2005). A more thorough evaluation is indicated for asymptomatic macroscopic hematuria.



The most common glomerular diseases associated with isolated hematuria are subclinical postinfectious glomerulonephritis, IgA nephropathy, and Alport’s syndrome. In the absence of proteinuria or more advanced disease, there is no treatment given for these conditions. Yearly follow-up with blood pressure and urinalysis is indicated for all forms of persistent hematuria.


Hypercalciuria may or may not be associated with pain. The exact mechanism by which hypercalciuria causes hematuria is unproven but probably secondary to crystalluria (Stapleton, 1994). Hypercalciuria is generally defined by a urinary calcium excretion higher than 4 mg/kg/day or a random urine calcium/creatinine ratio higher than 0.2. Higher excretion rates are expected in infants and toddlers. Patients with documented hypercalciuria should undergo a renal ultrasound to rule out nephrocalcinosis or significant stone disease. The treatment is to increase fluid intake and restrict dietary sodium (<3 g/day) while maintaining the recommended daily allowance of calcium (Srivastava and Alon, 2005). This dietary intervention may lower the urine calcium concentration and ultimately result in resolution of the hematuria. A thiazide diuretic should be considered if there is evidence of nephrocalcinosis or nephrolithiasis.



Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms


Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are the symptoms traditionally associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Many subcategories of LUTS exist, but the two most prominent are storage and voiding symptoms (Box 40-3). Voiding symptoms imply obstruction, but physical obstruction may not be responsible. In men with BPH, for example, detrusor overactivity, neurologic disorders, or age-related smooth muscle dysfunction may be the cause. Thus, LUTS should shift attention toward a larger symptom complex with many potential causes. This is particularly important when dealing with urinary tract disorders such as BPH, incontinence, and overactive bladder.




Nocturia


Nocturia describes waking at night to urinate. It is more common in older adults, but no population data define a normal range for any group; therefore the complaint implies a deviation from a perceived norm. Furthermore, the primary complaint often centers on the sleep disturbance rather than on urination. It may represent frequent nocturnal urination or excessive nocturnal urine production (nocturnal polyuria). Although often thought of as a prostatic symptom, it is common in both men and women. The many secondary causes in addition to local causes include prostatic hyperplasia and bladder dysfunction (Box 40-4). In patients with prominent lower urinary tract symptoms, the problem is compounded by urination difficulty. Furthermore, studies in older adults indicate that nocturia/LUTS increases risk of falling (Parsons, et al., 2009). Age-related variations in arginine vasopressin secretion may play a role in nocturnal polyuria (Weiss and Blaivas, 2000).



Treatment centers on the underlying cause, and a voiding diary may aid clinical decisions. Prostate hyperplasia or bladder dysfunction often receives first attention. Treating BPH may help, although BPH often does not result in true physical obstruction, and epidemiologic data have indicated that nocturia is common in men without prostatic obstruction. Thus, family physicians should consider the contribution of nocturnal polyuria. For example, patients with chronic heart failure and leg edema may benefit from fluid restriction and napping with leg elevation during the day. Treating obstructive sleep apnea helps alleviate the increased urine production resulting from increased atrial natriuretic peptide production. Behavioral interventions include avoiding excess nighttime alcohol or fluid intake and afternoon napping. Adjusting diuretic doses so they are given earlier in the evening should negate medication effects during sleep (Weiss and Blaivas, 2000).



Proteinuria


The kidneys normally excrete a small amount of protein daily, usually glycoproteins. Only very small amounts of globulins, light-chain proteins, or albumin are released. Functional proteinuria may result from physiologic changes in glomerular filtration, as occurs with exercise (Venkat, 2004). However, consistent albuminuria implies glomerular or tubular dysfunction.


The urine dipstick is the most convenient measurement, but a more accurate test is the Upr/UCr ratio, obtained by dividing the random urine sample protein level by the urine creatinine level (both in mg/dL). This ratio has proven correlation with 24-hour excretion rates (Ginsberg et al., 1983). Thus, random urine samples are the best way to identify and follow proteinuria, and 24-hour collections are usually not needed (Levey et al., 2003) (Table 40-3). However, results from those with low or high levels of muscle mass may not correlate as well with 24-hour measurements (Venkat, 2004).


Table 40-3 Proteinuria Values















Test Protein Value
Dipstick

UPr/UCr

24-hour urine assay


Urine protein/creatinine ratio.




Proteinuria in Children and Adolescents


Most proteinuria in children is transient when followed up with weekly urine sample testing. Persistent proteinuria found in at least two of three weekly urine samples warrants further evaluation to identify those children who may have chronic renal disease.


Proteinuria in children may be classified as functional, isolated, or symptomatic. Functional proteinuria may occur with fever or exercise. Isolated proteinuria is defined by the absence of abnormal history, physical examination findings, symptoms, or other urinary abnormalities. The most common cause of this form is benign orthostatic proteinuria, defined by normal protein excretion overnight or in the supine position. The initial evaluation for isolated proteinuria involves obtaining a first-morning urine sample for protein and creatinine as well as a formal urinalysis for microscopy review (Hogg et al., 2000). The absence of morning proteinuria, as evidenced by normal UPr/UCr, supports the diagnosis of benign orthostatic proteinuria. A more accurate assessment is a split 24-hour urine collection for protein. Benign orthostatic proteinuria may be transient or fixed and in either case has an excellent prognosis (Springberg et al., 1982). In contrast, nonorthostatic isolated proteinuria with a duration of 1 year or longer may represent significant renal pathology (Trachtman et al., 1994). Thus, these patients need yearly or twice-yearly clinical follow-up with assessment of blood pressure, renal function, serum albumin, urine microscopy, and urine protein.


Pathologic proteinuria, whether isolated or symptomatic, occurs in the setting of a variety of glomerular and tubulointerstitial diseases (Box 40-5). Some children may present with the nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, edema). Depending on the degree of proteinuria and the results of the initial laboratory evaluation, a renal biopsy may be indicated (Fig. 40-8).





Anatomic Disorders



Key Points







Anatomic urinary tract disorders involve various congenital and acquired abnormalities, most notably of the external genitalia. Testicular disorders are seen more often than abnormalities of the penis, particularly undescended testes. Anatomic derangements of the bladder, ureter, and kidney are often only discovered incidentally or during an evaluation for UTIs, voiding problems, CKD, or pain possibly related to the urinary tract. For example, posterior urethral valves cause vesicoureteral reflux and may contribute to recurrent UTIs (see Urinary Tract Infections in Children).


Scrotal masses are frequently encountered in family medicine. Anatomic causes of scrotal masses are not limited to the urinary tract, and neoplastic and infectious causes are also in the differential diagnosis (Table 40-4). Scrotal or testicular pain, the so-called acute scrotum, implies a more urgent or emergent cause (e.g., testicular torsion). Because the history and physical examination may not be adequate to differentiate certain conditions (e.g., epididymo-orchitis from testicular torsion), adjunctive imaging such as ultrasound is often used.


Table 40-4 Selected Differential Diagnosis of Scrotal Masses with Physical Findings

































Abnormality Physical Finding
Epididymitis, orchitis Tender mass
Hydrocele Transilluminates
Inguinal hernia Does not transilluminate
Testicular torsion Pain and loss of cremasteric reflex
Torsion of the appendix testis Blue dot sign
Trauma Tender scrotum, edema, trauma history
Tumor Solid mass
Spermatocele Nontender cystic mass
Varicocele Bag of worms appearance




Hypospadias


Hypospadias, in which the urethra opens on the underside of the penis, is infrequently seen (Fig. 40-9). However, it is important that hypospadias is recognized early, preferably at the initial newborn examination. It can occur with or without chordee (curvature). Circumcision should be withheld and a urology consultation obtained. Hypospadias must be differentiated from ambiguous genitalia, which implies an intersex disorder. Epispadias, in which the meatus is located on the dorsal surface of the penis, is uncommon and is usually associated with extrophy of the bladder.








Testicular Disorders



Testicular Torsion


Although occasionally seen in the newborn male, testicular torsion is an acquired condition seen during puberty and is an emergency. It usually presents with abrupt onset of severe scrotal pain, at times waking the patient up in the early morning. Associated signs and symptoms include fever, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Intermittent testicular torsion has been described. On physical examination, the testis may lie in a more horizontal position, caused by a lack of normal attachment to the tunica vaginalis (“bell clapper” deformity), and demonstrate a loss of the cremasteric reflex. The diagnosis of testicular torsion can be made by physical examination or with the assistance of color Doppler ultrasound; however, physical examination is unreliable for ruling torsion in or out (Schmitz and Safranek, 2009). Timeliness of the diagnosis is critical, because testicular viability declines to 0% if detorsion occurs 24 hours after the onset of symptoms (Brenner and Ojo, 2004). Testicular torsion can occur in systemic illnesses, such as Henoch-Schönlein purpura, or can mimic the symptoms of other conditions, such as appendicitis or nephrolithiasis.


Torsion of the appendix testis presents similar to testicular torsion, although the symptoms are not as severe. The classic patient is a boy age 7 to 12 years. Palpation of the testis is normal except for a small, tender, palpable mass located on the superior or inferior pole. The cremasteric reflex is intact. The “blue dot” sign may be present and represents the compromised appendix testis as viewed through the scrotum. Diagnosis is generally made clinically and treatment is supportive, including analgesia and scrotal elevation. It is not unusual for the pain to last 5 to 10 days, but chronic pain may occur and warrants urology consultation.


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 3, 2016 | Posted by in MANUAL THERAPIST | Comments Off on Urinary Tract Disorders

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access