Total Ankle Arthroplasty
Roger A. Mann
James DeOrio
Jeffrey A. Mann
INTRODUCTION
First-generation total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) produced a rather disappointing long-term survival despite various designs. Earlier designs, including cemented, uncemented, constrained, and unconstrained types, had high failure rates compared with hip and knee replacements. However, newer prostheses that have shown lower failure rates with longer-term follow-up have given hope for longer survival rates. The Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) was developed by Dr. Hakon Kofoed, an orthopedic surgeon in Denmark in 1981 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8). It consists of three parts: a tibial tray, a mobile polyethylene bearing, and a talar cap (Fig. 35.1). He initially developed the prosthesis in which the tibial tray was cemented. In 1986, he modified it to a press-fit component and the prosthesis has remained unchanged since that time. The prosthesis is made of cobalt chrome with titaniumsprayed porous-coated bone contact surface and press-fit over precisely cut bony surfaces (9, 10 and 11).
INDICATIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS
The indication for the procedure is end-stage ankle arthritis. Relative indications are a patient over the age of 50, who is not involved in heavy labor and who has realistic activity and sports expectations.
The absolute contraindications should be closely adhered to since failure to do so will likely result in premature failure of the prosthesis. These include the following:
Avascular necrosis of the talus
Nonachievable plantigrade foot
Previous ankle joint osteomyelitis with an elevated sedimentation rate
Poor soft tissue envelope
Severe neuromuscular disorder
Neuropathic ankle joint, for example, insulin-dependent diabetic, Charcot Marie Tooth (CMT) disease
Severe osteoporosis
Relative contraindications that mean that a good result is more difficult to achieve include the following:
Previous ankle arthrodesis
Excessive coronal plane deformity, that is, greater than 25°
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
The consideration of ankle replacement surgery begins with a careful history, including details of previous treatment. If there was a previous infection, it is important to determine the severity, prior treatment of the infection, and whether or not there has been any recurrence. If the patients have any significant medical problems, they should receive preoperative clearance from their primary care physician. Assuming the patient is in reasonably good health, the remainder of the patient encounter involves the evaluation of the lower extremity. This begins with examination of the patient standing,
walking, and observing the alignment of the lower extremity. A severe varus or valgus deformity of the knee would be a relative contraindication to the procedure until it has been corrected, after which ankle joint replacement could be considered. The weight-bearing varus/valgus alignment of the hindfoot also needs to be noted.
walking, and observing the alignment of the lower extremity. A severe varus or valgus deformity of the knee would be a relative contraindication to the procedure until it has been corrected, after which ankle joint replacement could be considered. The weight-bearing varus/valgus alignment of the hindfoot also needs to be noted.
FIGURE 35.1 STAR TAA components: tibial tray, mobile bearing of polypropylene, talar cap. Components porous coated. |
With the patient seated, the active and passive range of motion of the ankle, subtalar, and transverse tarsal joints needs to be ascertained. The motor function is assessed at the same time. The neurovascular status of the foot is evaluated, and if there is any question about the vascular status of the foot, an arterial Doppler study should be obtained.
The skin needs to be carefully evaluated to be sure that an adequate soft tissue envelope is present. Large adherent scars, particularly about the anterior aspect of the ankle, are a relative contraindication since primary soft tissue healing is a very critical part of the ankle replacement. If there are any questions regarding the quality of the skin, consultation with a plastic surgeon prior to surgery is advised. The ligamentous integrity of the ankle also needs to be assessed, looking for moderate to severe instability, which may require correction at the time of the insertion of the prosthesis by performing a medial release and/or ligament reconstruction.
Weight-bearing radiographs are obtained consisting of an AP, lateral, and oblique ankle x-ray and the Saltzman tibial calcaneal view. Besides the obvious osteoarthritis of the ankle joint, the severity of any coronal plane deformity is noted since correction of more than 25° may be a relative contraindication to the procedure unless other procedures accompany the STAR either before or concomitantly to correct the deformity (12, 13 and 14). In the sagittal plane, anterior or posterior subluxation of the talus is not uncommon and can usually be corrected. The subtalar and transverse tarsal joints are assessed for osteoarthritis, but are rarely a contraindication to the ankle replacement surgery. Consideration can be given at the time of surgery to fuse these joints if they are a source of significant pain.
The overall posture of the foot needs to be very carefully assessed. This begins with the alignment and mobility of the subtalar joint and the alignment and mobility of the forefoot. It is absolutely essential that a plantigrade foot is present under the STAR prosthesis at the conclusion of surgery. Otherwise, failures will occur as a consequence of misaligning the joint. One also needs to determine the alignment of the foot once the ankle coronal plane deformity has been corrected. This can be extremely challenging. The question arises as to whether or not the coronal plane deformity should be corrected before or after the ankle prosthesis has been inserted. As a general rule, a plantigrade foot should be created prior to the insertion of the prosthesis, but occasionally it can be carried out simultaneously or afterward. The important point is that a nonplantigrade foot applies abnormal stress to the prosthesis that will eventually result in failure, requiring either a revision or a fusion.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
The procedure is carried out with the patient under adequate anesthesia in the supine position with the patient’s heel at the end of the operating table. A popliteal block with a catheter is used to control postoperative pain. Bolsters are used under the ipsilateral hip in order to align the patella so that it is parallel to the floor. This places the ankle into satisfactory alignment. A thigh tourniquet is used.
An incision approximately 20 cm long is centered over the ankle joint just lateral to the tibialis anterior tendon (Fig. 35.2A). The incision is deepened through the skin and subcutaneous tissue to the deep fascia. Undermining of the skin is kept to a minimum. As the incision is deepened along the lateral aspect, a branch or two of the superficial peroneal nerve passes across the distal portion of the incision. These are marked in the above picture in blue. These can usually be identified and freed up sufficiently that they can be retracted out of harm’s way.
The deep fascia is next incised over the full length of the incision, and the interval between the tibialis anterior and extensor hallucis longus (EHL) is developed. The neurovascular bundle is identified along the lateral aspect of the tibialis anterior in the proximal third of the wound and gently teased off of the tibialis anterior muscle belly. This can often be done by blunt dissection. Following this, the neurovascular bundle along with the EHL tendon is retracted laterally.
The full length of the incision is developed to the skeletal plane, and a special effort is made to elevate the soft tissues over both the medial and lateral malleolus. This is extremely important in the patient with deformity and/or a great deal of osteophyte formation. It is also important to free the tissues distally so that when the cutting jigs are placed into the ankle joint, excessive stress is not placed upon the skin edges (Fig. 35.2B). Once the synovial tissue has been removed and the joint adequately exposed, a small cut is made vertically from the medial gutter of the ankle joint superiorly for about 6 mm to relieve any stress riser on the medial malleolus.
A saw is used to remove the anterior lip of the tibia connecting it medially to the vertical cut just described (Fig. 35.3A). The amount of bone removed here is determined by placing a Freer elevator into the joint, palpating the apex of the concavity, and removing sufficient bone so the joint can be observed.
A 6-mm straight osteotome is now inserted into the medial gutter to act as a guide to the rotation of the ankle joint. A 3.2-mm self-drilling pin is then placed into the anterior tibial tubercle through a short incision (Fig. 35.3B). The alignment of this pin should be parallel to the osteotome in the ankle joint and perpendicular to the tibia or slightly plantar flexed to later force the alignment guide down against the tibia. This pin should be drilled until the posterior cortex of the tibia is encountered.
The tibial alignment guide is placed over the pin in the tibial tubercle and the distal cutting jig screwed onto the alignment guide (Fig. 35.4A). The bottom of the distal cutting guide is placed at the level of the tibial plafond. The superior proximal portion of the guide is placed approximately one fingerbreadth above the tibial tubercle and the guide superimposed over the long axis of the tibia in correct varus/valgus alignment. A single vertical pin is then inserted into the block on the guide to act as a pivot so that the varus/valgus alignment of the guide can be adjusted with the aid of fluoroscopy.
Tibial alignment guide block is fixed to the tibia by the pins in the block (Fig. 35.4B). The gap between the fixed portion of the guide and the moveable distal portion should be approximately 10 to 12 mm to allow for distal-proximal adjustment to occur. The medial/lateral alignment of the cutting guide is set so that the vertical slot of the cutting block passes along the lateral aspect of the medial malleolus. A pin will be inserted into the medial side of the cutting guide as demonstrated above, but that pin is not secured until the correct depth of the tibial cut has been determined.
The tibial cutting guide should be parallel to the long axis of the tibia in the anterior/posterior view as mentioned. The sidebar should be parallel to the intramedullary axis of the tibia (Fig. 35.5). The sidebar is held in place and confirmed by fluoroscopy. Lateral fluoroscopic radiograph demonstrating the sidebar superimposed and parallel to the intramedullary axis of the tibia.
The fluoroscopic image demonstrates that correct varus/valgus alignment of the distal tibial guide has been achieved (Fig. 35.6A). Figure 35.6B demonstrates the “angel wing” that has been placed into the distal tibial cutting guide. The angel wing enables the surgeon to visualize the line of resection. When this angel wing image is as thin as possible, this is the actual line of resection. The knobs on the angel wing protrude 5 mm above and below the line of the guide. Five millimeters should be removed from the distal tibia; therefore, the bottom of the knobs should be lined up with the proximal most portion of the tibial plafond. The angel wing also allows you to confirm a slight anterior proximal opening of the distal tibial cut. Manual traction is applied to the ankle to see whether or not one has a tight or a loose ankle.
If the ankle is tight, then slightly more bone, about 1 to 2 mm, should be removed to permit adequate visualization of the joint and make placement of the prosthesis easier. In the sagittal plane the angel wing is angled slightly proximally anteriorly producing a cut that is open anteriorly, 2° to 3°.
Once the determination for the thickness of the tibial cut has been made, the cutting block is fastened to the tibia using three to four pins. It is important that pins are placed along the medial and lateral aspects of the capture guide to prevent damage to the malleoli. With a sagittal saw, a contained cut is then produced through the distal tibia (Fig. 35.7AStay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree