The hip region

17 The hip region


Disorders of the hip are common both in children and in adults. Prominent among childhood affections are developmental (congenital) dislocation of the hip and Perthes’ disease (osteochondritis) of the head of the femur. The hip is subject to all types of arthritis, but in adults osteoarthritis is overwhelmingly the most prominent affection.


Practically and economically, injuries and diseases of the hip are important because they so often cause prolonged suffering and serious disablement – even total incapacity. Academically, the region is of interest for several reasons: the mechanics of the joint are complex; it is one of the most difficult joints to examine with accuracy; and – of special significance to students – cases of hip disease are often presented as tests of clinical acumen in the examinations in surgery. Time spent on learning how to examine the hip correctly will usually be well rewarded.



SPECIAL POINTS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF HIP COMPLAINTS




History


The characteristics of hip pain. Pain in the region of the hip is notoriously misleading, for often it is referred from the spine or pelvis and has no connection with the hip joint itself. Therefore one must always be cautious in attributing such pain to a hip lesion without first investigating the possibility of an extrinsic cause.


Pain arising in the hip is felt mainly in the groin and in the front or inner side of the thigh. Pain is often referred also to the knee; indeed pain in the knee is sometimes the predominant feature. In contrast, the ‘hip’ pain that is referred from the spine is felt mainly in the gluteal region, whence it often radiates down the back or outer side of the thigh.


True hip pain is made worse by walking, whereas gluteal pain referred from the spine is aggravated by activities such as stooping and lifting, and it is often eased by walking.


Age incidence of hip disorders. Many of the important disorders of the hip occur in childhood, and often at a particular period of childhood. So true is this with some disorders that the age of the patient at the onset of symptoms affords some indication of the likely nature of the trouble, as shown in Table 17.1. (For ease of memorising, round figures have been given in the table but some latitude must be allowed.)


Table 17.1 Usual age incidence of common hip disorders at time of diagnosis
























Age at time of diagnosis (years) Disease
0–2 Developmental (congenital) dislocation
2–5 Tuberculous arthritis; transient synovitis
5–10 Perthes’ disease; transient synovitis
10–20 Slipped upper femoral epiphysis
20–50 Osteoarthritis (secondary to previous injury or disease)
50–100 Osteoarthritis (primary)



Steps in clinical examination


A suggested routine for clinical examination of the hip is summarised in Table 17.2.


Table 17.2 Routine clinical examination in suspected disorders of the hip


















































































1. LOCAL EXAMINATION OF THE HIP REGION
(Patient supine) Examination for fixed deformity
Position of pelvis Including Thomas’s manoeuvre for detection and measurement of fixed flexion deformity
Determine the lie of the pelvis and set it square with the limbs if possible  
  Movements (active and passive)
Inspection Flexion
Bone contours and alignment Abduction; abduction in flexion
Soft-tissue contours Adduction
Colour and texture of skin Medial (internal) rotation
Scars or sinuses Lateral (external) rotation
Palpation Power (tested against resistance of examiner)
Skin temperature Estimate strength of each muscle group:
Bone contours flexors, extensors, abductors, adductors, rotators
Soft-tissue contours  
Local tenderness  
  Examination for abnormal mobility
Measurement of limb length Test for longitudinal (telescopic) movement
Real or true length: Click test (in new-born)
Measure from anterior superior iliac spine to medial malleolus (patient standing)
  Examination for postural stability
(angle between pelvis and limbs to be equal on each side) Trendelenburg’s test

Gait
‘Apparent’ or false discrepancy:  
Measure from xiphisternum to medial malleolus. (Limbs to be parallel and in line with trunk)  
2. EXAMINATION OF POTENTIAL EXTRINSIC SOURCES OF HIP SYMPTOMS
This is important if a satisfactory explanation for the symptoms is not found on local examination. The investigation should include:



3. GENERAL EXAMINATION
General survey of the other parts of the body. The local symptoms may be only one manifestation of a widespread or generalised disease


Setting the pelvis square


This is an important preliminary step. Determine from the position of the anterior superior iliac spines whether or not the pelvis is lying square with the limbs (Fig. 17.1). If it is not, an attempt is made to set it square. If this is impossible it means that there is incorrectable adduction or abduction at one or other hip (or, rarely, a severe and rigid curvature of the spine): in that event the fact that the pelvis is tilted should be noted and borne in mind during the subsequent steps of the examination.




Measuring the length of the limbs


Methods of measuring the lower limbs are often confusing to the uninitiated, but it is important that they should be properly understood. Accuracy in measurement is of more than academic significance; it is of practical importance when corrective operations or adjustments to the shoes are contemplated. Limb length can be measured clinically within an error of one centimetre. If greater accuracy is needed, radiographic measurement (scanography) is recommended.


It is necessary to measure, first, the real or true length of each limb. Secondly, it is necessary to determine whether there is any ‘apparent’ or false discrepancy in the length of the limbs from fixed pelvic tilt (Fig. 17.2). Whereas it is always necessary to measure the true length, it is necessary to measure ‘apparent’ discrepancy only when there is an incorrectable tilt of the pelvis.



Measurement of true length. Ideally it would be desirable to measure from the normal axis of hip movement – that is, the centre of the femoral head – but since there is no surface landmark at that point it is impracticable to do so clinically. The measurement is therefore taken from the nearest convenient landmark – namely, the anterior superior spine of the ilium. Distally, measurement is usually made to the medial malleolus.


It should be noted that the anterior superior spine is well lateral to the axis of hip movement. This is of no consequence if the angle between limb and pelvis is the same on each side. But it will render the measurements fallacious if the angle between limb and pelvis is not the same on each side. This will be understood best by reference to Fig. 17.3A. It will be seen that abduction of a limb brings the medial malleolus nearer to the corresponding anterior superior spine, whereas adduction of the limb carries the medial malleolus away from the anterior superior spine. Thus if measurements are made while the patient lies with one hip adducted and the other abducted (a common posture in cases of hip disease) inaccurate readings will be obtained: the length will be exaggerated on the adducted side and underestimated on the abducted side.



The rule is, therefore, that to obtain an accurate comparison of their true length by surface measurement the two limbs must be placed in comparable positions relative to the pelvis. Thus if one limb is adducted and cannot be brought out to the neutral position, the other limb must be adducted through a corresponding angle by crossing it over the first limb before the measurements are taken (Fig. 17.3B). Similarly, if one hip is in fixed abduction the other must be abducted through the same angle before the measurements of true length are made.


Fixing the tape measure at the anterior superior spine. A flat metal end (as found on the ordinary tailor’s measure) is essential. The metal end is placed immediately distal to the anterior superior spine and is pushed up against it. The thumb is then pressed firmly backwards against the bone and the tape end together (Fig. 17.4). This gives rigid fixation of the tape measure against the bone and minimises any error in measurement.



Taking the reading at the medial malleolus. The tip of the index finger is placed immediately distal to the medial malleolus and pushed up against it. The thumb nail is brought down against the tip of the index finger so that the tape measure is pinched between them (Fig. 17.5). The point of measurement is indicated by the thumb nail.



Determining the site of true shortening. If measurements reveal real shortening of a limb it is necessary to determine whether the shortening is above the trochanteric level (suggesting an affection in or near the hip), or below the trochanteric level (suggesting a disorder of the limb bones).


Shortening above the greater trochanter. Tests for shortening above the trochanteric level are: the measurement of Bryant’s triangle, Nelaton’s line, or Schoemaker’s line.


In modern practice these tests are seldom used, since the information they provide can be supplied from simpler clinical observations or more accurately from radiographic measurements. They all depend on comparing the relative distance between the tip of the greater trochanters and the iliac crests. This can be quickly achieved with the patient supine, by using both hands with the thumbs placed on the greater trochanters and the tips of the index fingers on the anterior superior iliac spines. Any discrepancy between the two sides should then become apparent.


Shortening distal to the trochanter. True shortening is sometimes caused by an abnormality below the trochanteric level, such as a congenital defect of development, impaired epiphysial growth, or a previous fracture with overlapping of the fragments. To investigate this possibility individual measurements should be made of the femur (tip of greater trochanter to line of knee joint) and of the tibia (line of knee joint to medial malleolus) on each side and by flexing the knees to 90 ° and observing whether the shortening lies above the knee or below it (Gallenzi test).


Measurement of ‘apparent’ discrepancy in limb length. ‘Apparent’ or false discrepancy in limb length is due entirely to incorrectable sideways tilting of the pelvis (Fig. 17.2A). The usual cause is a fixed adduction deformity at one hip, giving an appearance of shortening on that side, or a fixed abduction deformity, giving an appearance of lengthening. Exceptionally, fixed pelvic obliquity is caused by severe lumbar scoliosis.


To measure apparent discrepancy the limbs must be placed parallel to one another and in line with the trunk. Measurement is made from any fixed point in the midline of the trunk (for example, the xiphisternum) to each medial malleolus (Fig. 17.6).



If there is a discrepancy of true length it must be allowed for when ‘apparent’ discrepancy is determined. As already noted above, there is no need to measure for apparent discrepancy if the pelvis lies square with the limbs, as determined from the position of the two iliac crests.



Examination for fixed deformity


Contracture of the joint capsule or of muscles may cause fixed deformity at the hip, preventing its being placed in a neutral position. Fixed flexion, fixed adduction, and fixed lateral rotation are common in some forms of arthritis.


Fixed adduction deformity. This is detected by judging the relationship between pelvis and limbs. It will already have been noted at an earlier stage of the examination. If fixed adduction is present the transverse axis of the pelvis (as indicated by a line joining the two anterior superior spines) cannot be set at right angles to the affected limb, but lies at an acute angle with it.


Fixed abduction deformity. The angle between the transverse axis of the pelvis and the limb is greater than 90 °.


Fixed flexion deformity. This is determined by a manoeuvre known as Thomas’s test.


Principle of Thomas’s test. If there is a fixed flexion deformity at the hip the patient compensates for it, when lying on the back, by arching the spine and pelvis into exaggerated lordosis, as shown in Fig. 17.7A. This allows the affected limb to lie flat on the couch. To measure the angle of fixed flexion deformity it is necessary to correct the lumbo-pelvic lordosis. This is done by flexing the pelvis (and with it the lumbar spine) by means of the fully flexed sound limb (Fig. 17.7B).



Technique of the manoeuvre. One hand is placed behind the lumbar spine (between it and the couch) to assess the degree of lumbar lordosis. If there is no lordosis when the affected limb lies flat on the couch there can be no fixed flexion deformity and there is no need to proceed with the test. If there is excessive lordosis, as indicated by arching of the back (Fig. 17.7A), it is corrected in the following way: The sound hip is flexed to the limit of its range. The limb is then pushed further into flexion, thereby rotating the pelvis on a horizontal transverse axis until the arching of the spine is obliterated. During this manoeuvre the thigh of the disordered limb, if in fixed flexion, is automatically raised from the couch as the lumbar lordosis is reduced (Fig. 17.7B). The angle through which the thigh is raised from the couch is the angle of fixed flexion deformity.


Fixed rotation deformity. The most reliable index of the rotational position of the thigh is the patella, which normally points forwards when the hip is in the neutral position. If there is fixed lateral rotation or fixed medial rotation the limb cannot be rotated to the neutral position, with the patella directed forwards. The angle by which it falls short of the neutral when rotated as far as possible is the angle of fixed rotation deformity.



Movements


The accurate determination of hip movements demands much care, because restriction of hip movement is easily masked by movement of the pelvis. It is therefore essential to place one hand upon the pelvis to detect any movement there, while the other guides and supports the limb.


Flexion. The range of hip flexion is best demonstrated by flexing the hip and knee together; not by lifting the leg with the knee straight. Movement of the pelvis is best detected by grasping the crest of the ilium (Fig. 17.8). Only in this way is it possible to distinguish between true hip movement and the false flexion imparted by rotation of the pelvis. The normal range of true hip flexion is about 130 °, but it varies according to the build of the patient.



Abduction. The limb to be tested is supported by one hand while the other hand bridges the pelvis from anterior superior spine to anterior superior spine (Fig. 17.9). In this way true abduction at the hip can be differentiated from the false abduction that is imparted by tilting of the pelvis. The normal range of true abduction at the hip is 30 ° to 35 ° (more in children).



Abduction in flexion. This is often the first movement to suffer restriction in arthritis of the hip. The patient flexes his hips and knees by drawing the heels towards the buttocks. He then allows the knees to fall away from one another towards the couch (see Fig. 17.11B). The normal range is about 70 ° (90 ° in young children).



Adduction. The limb to be examined is crossed over the other limb. Again care must be taken to differentiate between true adduction and the false movement imparted by tilting of the pelvis. The normal range of adduction is about 25–30 °.


Lateral rotation and medial rotation. Judge the range by an imaginary pointer thrust axially into the patella, not by the position of the foot. The normal range both of medial and of lateral rotation is about 40 °.


Extension. Contrary to what has often been written, the range of extension at the hip is nil. Extension of the hip joint beyond the neutral position is prevented by the strong anterior capsule and reinforcing Y-shaped ligament. Seeming backward movement of the thigh is in fact contributed entirely by rotation of the pelvis and extension of the spine, not by extension at the hip joint proper.




Examination for postural stability: the Trendelenburg test


The Trendelenburg manoeuvre is a test of the stability of the hip, and particularly of the ability of the hip abductors (gluteus medius and gluteus minimus) to stabilise the pelvis upon the femur when the subject is standing upon the one leg.


Principle of the test. Normally, when one leg is raised from the ground the pelvis tilts upwards on that side, through the action of the hip abductors of the standing limb (Fig. 17.10A). (This automatic mechanism allows the lifted leg to clear the ground in walking.) If the abductors are inefficient they are unable to sustain the pelvis against the body weight and it tilts downwards instead of rising up on the side of the lifted leg (Fig. 17.10B).



Technique. Stand behind the patient. Instruct him first to stand upon the sound limb and to raise the other from the ground. Having thus got the idea of what he is required to do, he should now stand on the affected leg and lift the sound leg from the ground. By inspection, or by palpation with a hand upon the iliac crest, observe whether the pelvis rises or falls on the lifted side. Remember that the limb upon which the patient stands is the one under test. If the pelvis rises on the opposite side (normal) the test is negative (Fig. 17.10A). If it falls, the test is positive (Fig. 17.10B); in other words the abductor muscles are incapable of stabilising the pelvis upon the femur.


Causes of positive Trendelenburg test. There are three fundamental causes:





Sometimes two of these factors may operate together: for instance, in a case of upward dislocation of the hip there may be an unstable fulcrum as well as approximation of the origin of the abductor muscles to their insertion.





Imaging


Radiographic examination. Plain radiographs should include an antero-posterior projection showing the whole pelvis with both hips, and lateral films of each hip separately. It is recommended that the lateral films be obtained by slightly abducting the affected hip and directing the X-ray beam horizontally beneath the opposite flexed thigh. In special cases there is a place for arthrography (that is, radiography after the injection of radio-opaque fluid into the joint). When there is a possibility that the symptoms may be referred from the back radiographs of the spine and sacro-iliac joints must be obtained.


Radioisotope bone scanning. This is of value especially in the diagnosis of inflammatory lesions in or about the hip. It may also be helpful in the early detection of metastatic neoplastic deposits in the pelvis or upper end of the femur.


Computerised tomography (CT scanning) provides clear cross-sectional images of the pelvis or thigh and is useful in special circumstances. For instance, it can show accurately the orientation (degree of anteversion) of the acetabulum or of the neck of the femur. Or it may be used to outline bony or soft-tissue tumours in or about the pelvis or hip (see Fig. 2.3, p. 15).


Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is of particular value in showing the extent of soft-tissue changes – for instance in the case of an invasive tumour. It may also allow early detection of bone necrosis in the femoral head.


Ultrasound is now used increasingly in babies and young infants for the detection of developmental dysplasia before ossification of the femoral head allows radiological assessment.


Arthroscopy. Arthroscopic inspection of the interior of the hip is a useful supplementary method of investigation in adults, and it is now used increasingly in diagnosis and treatment.




CONGENITAL DISLOCATION OF THE HIP


This is a spontaneous dislocation of the hip occurring either before or during birth or shortly afterwards. In Western races it is one of the commonest of the congenital skeletal deformities affecting 1 in 1000 neonates: it is also of special importance because neglect or inefficient treatment incurs the penalty to the patient of lifelong crippling.


Cause. Much remains to be learnt, but it now seems to be clear that a number of factors are concerned in the causation – some genetic and some environmental. One such abnormality acting alone may not always be sufficient in itself to bring about dislocation, and it may well be that a combination of factors is often at work.








Pathology. The femoral head: In a case of persistent dislocation the bony nucleus appears late and its development is retarded. The femoral head is dislocated upwards and laterally from the acetabulum. The femoral neck: In most cases the neck is anteverted (directed forwards) beyond the normal angle for infants of 25 °. The acetabulum: The ossific centre for the roof of the acetabulum, like that for the femoral head, is late in developing. The bone slopes upwards at a steep angle instead of forming a nearly horizontal roof for the acetabulum. The cartilaginous part of the roof is often well formed at first, but if the dislocation is allowed to persist development does not proceed normally, and the socket assumes a shallow contour with steeply sloping roof. The fibro-cartilaginous labrum: The peripheral labrum which normally increases the depth of the developing acetabular socket is often folded into the cavity of the acetabulum to become a ‘limbus’ and may impede complete reduction of the dislocation The capsule: This is gradually elongated as the femoral head is displaced upwards.


Clinical features. Girls are affected six times as often as boys. In one-third of all cases both hips are affected. Unless it is specially looked for in infancy – as it always should be – abnormality may not be noticed until the child begins to walk. Walking is often delayed, and there is a limp or a waddling gait.


On examination at that time, the main features in unilateral cases are asymmetry (notably of the buttock folds), shortening of the affected limb (Fig. 17.11A), and restricted abduction in flexion. In bilateral cases the striking features are widening of the perineum and marked lumbar lordosis. The range of joint movements is full except for abduction in flexion, which is characteristically slightly restricted (Fig. 17.11B). In most cases the affected limb is abnormally mobile in its long axis (telescopic movement).


Imaging. Plain radiographs show three important features (Fig. 17.12):






These changes are not always shown conclusively before the age of 4 months.


Arthrography (radiography after injection of opaque fluid into the joint) is useful in showing the outline of the cartilaginous elements of the joint.


Ultrasound scanning allows the position of the femoral head and acetabular socket to be determined in the new-born, when radiographic examination tends to be inconclusive.


Diagnosis. In the new-born. Nearly always – though there are a few exceptions—dislocation or instability of the hip may be detected in the first few days of life by the diagnostic screening tests of Barlow or Ortolani (Fig. 17.13). In both tests the surgeon faces the child’s perineum and grasps the upper part of each thigh between fingers behind and thumb in front, the child’s knees being fully flexed and the hips flexed to a right angle (Fig. 17.14). While each thigh in turn is steadily abducted towards the couch the middle finger applies forward pressure behind the greater trochanter (Ortolani), and alternately the thumb, placed anteriorly, applies backward pressure while the thighs are adducted (Barlow). One of two abnormal states may be detected:





Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 5, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on The hip region

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access