Surgical Treatment of Basal Joint Arthritis of the Thumb



Surgical Treatment of Basal Joint Arthritis of the Thumb


Edward Diao, MD


Dr. Diao or an immediate family member is a member of a speakers’ bureau or has made paid presentations on behalf of Stryker; serves as a paid consultant to or is an employee of Conextions, Exsomed, and Zimmer Biomet; has received research or institutional support from the National Institutes of Health (NIAMS & NICHD); and serves as a board member, owner, officer, or committee member of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.



INTRODUCTION

Arthritis of the basal joint of the thumb is a common debilitating condition; 42% of adult women and 26% of adult men have radiographic evidence of arthritis of this joint. Symptomatic hand osteoarthritis is estimated to occur in 2.4% of all adults, including 26% of women and 13% of men aged 65 years or older;1,2 radiographic signs of hand osteoarthritis were found in 78% of men and 99% of women in this age group.3 In a cadaver study, eburnated bone was found in 50% of the female specimens.4

Historically, trapezium resection alone or in combination with tissue interposition has been the treatment of symptomatic basal joint arthritis. In the 1970s, Eaton and Littler5 described the use of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon to reconstruct the volar beak ligament of the symptomatic hypermobile trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint. This procedure appeared to work best for symptomatic basal joints without significant arthritis (Eaton stage I). In 1987, Carroll6 advocated fashioning the FCR tendon into a ball, or “anchovy,” to replace the excised trapezium as part of his reconstruction. Alternative procedures using hemiresection of the trapezium and adaptations of this original FCR technique also have been described by Eaton et al.7

Based on the previous work of Eaton and Littler,5 Burton8 described ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) arthroplasty in the 1980s and reported long-term follow-up in 1995.9 In Burton’s method, the surgeon harvests half the FCR and places drill holes first at the center of the articular surface of the thumb metacarpal base and then at the dorsal metaphysis of the metacarpal, approximately 1 cm proximal to the articular surface. These drill holes are connected to form a bone tunnel through which the free end of the FCR is passed in an antegrade direction to support the base of the thumb metacarpal. The surgeon then brings the free end or tail of the tendon around from the dorsal exit of the bone tunnel back under the articular surface and sutures it to itself, providing further support for the base of the thumb metacarpal. The remaining tendon is fabricated to form an interposition much like Carroll’s “anchovy.” It is then sutured together and placed in the arthroplasty space resulting after trapezium resection.8

In the early 1980s, Thompson10 described a technique for reconstruction of the arthritic basal joint using a bone tunnel similar to that used in LRTI arthroplasty in the metacarpal base. Thompson’s and Burton’s methods can be distinguished by differences in the tendon graft; in Thompson’s technique, the donor is the abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon; in Burton’s, it is the FCR. Thompson’s technique requires the surgeon to harvest and detach half the APL at the musculotendinous junction, leaving its insertion at the dorsal base of the thumb metacarpal intact. Using the same two bone holes and creating a bone tunnel similar to that in the LRTI procedure, the surgeon passes the free end of the APL retrograde through the dorsal metacarpal hole to emerge from the articular surface hole. At this point, Thompson devises an oblique bone tunnel from the trapezial facet of the proximal index metacarpal, exiting in a dorsal-ulnar orientation from the dorsum of the index metacarpal. The APL tendon passes through the second bone tunnel and is woven into the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) tendon for stability. This technique was first devised as a means to salvage failed reconstructions with silicone implants, but subsequently it became a primary procedure for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Part of the appeal of this procedure is the ability to directly provide tension in the ligament reconstruction by applying tension on the free end of the APL tendon graft that emerges from the dorsum of the index metacarpal. Tension can be transmitted through the weave to the ECRB and secured with sutures.

Since 1989, I have been using a variation of Thompson’s APL suspensionplasty.11 In this modification, the harvesting of the APL and the creation of the bone tunnel in the thumb metacarpal follow the methods described. The variation lies in the index metacarpal bone tunnel. Instead of creating this tunnel obliquely at the original trapezial/first metacarpal facet joint in the proximal portion of the
index metacarpal, a bone hole is made in the palmar portion of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the index metacarpal. The drill or awl is then directed dorsally, allowing it to emerge from the dorsum of the proximal index metacarpal. This variation results in a more desirable placement of the bone tunnel, with stronger cortical bone at the tunnel’s borders and, most importantly, a more distal suspension point for the APL ligament reconstruction. The APL is anchored through a tendon weave with the ECRB.


PATIENT SELECTION

As in any surgical procedure, patient selection is important. Candidates for this surgery include patients who have been diagnosed with Eaton stage II, III, or IV basal joint arthritis and in whom symptoms have not been relieved by nonsurgical management with splints, NSAIDs, cortisone injections, or activity modifications.


PREOPERATIVE IMAGING

Radiographic staging is a useful tool in preoperative assessment and surgical planning. The radiographic stage correlates poorly with the patient’s symptoms, however; essentially, the sole indication for surgical reconstruction of the arthritic basal joint is pain.9 Furthermore, plain radiographs accurately predict involvement of the scaphotrapezial (ST) joint only two-thirds of the time.12 If the surgeon does different procedures for stage III and IV disease, final determination of which procedure to use should be reserved until intraoperative assessment of the ST joint is made by arthrotomy and direct visualization and palpation with a blunt instrument such as a dental probe.


Feb 2, 2020 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Surgical Treatment of Basal Joint Arthritis of the Thumb

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access