Rotator Cuff Repair Part II. Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair
Neal S. ElAttrache MD
Maxwell C. Park MD
Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair
The authors’ preferred method depends on several factors when considering arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, particularly of the supraspinatus: (a) patient age, (b) size of tear, (c) degree of retraction, (d) chronicity of tear, and (e) tissue quality.17,18 Other factors contribute to healing potential over a repaired rotator cuff footprint. For example, increasing the contact area and pressure distribution between tendon and tuberosity may help to optimize healing potential; in addition, repair strength may influence healing, particularly in the immediate postoperative period. Such parameters can be influenced by technique.17,19,20,21,22,23 Park et al.22 have found that a transosseous-equivalent repair using suture-bridges (Fig. 9-7) can improve pressurized contact area (Fig. 9-8) and overall pressure at a repaired rotator cuff insertion.
Park et al.23 have also demonstrated that a transosseous-equivalent repair utilizing four-suture-bridges has an ultimate failure strength significantly stronger than a double-row repair; the gap formation was found to be similar to the double-row repair. Kim et al.20 have also shown that a double-row repair can be significantly stronger than a single-row repair, with suture anchors that are double-loaded for the lateral row. Notably, the maximum force that can be generated by the adult supraspinatus is 302 N3. The yield failure load for all repairs has exceeded this number, except for the single-row repair with double-loaded suture anchors, which on average showed a yield failure load of 265 N7; this would be sufficient for a 50% tear (maximal supraspinatus force estimated to be 151 N).
Given the above considerations, our approach to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is guided by the size of tear in the anterior-posterior direction. Given the adult rotator cuff footprint is roughly 24 mm in the anterior-posterior direction,24,25 we simplify the approach by dividing tear size into fourths: 6 mm, 12 mm, 18 mm, and 24 mm; the estimated footprint dimension in the medial-lateral direction is 12 mm.24,25