Principles of Manual Muscle Testing



Principles of Manual Muscle Testing



Muscle Test


The Grading System


Grades for a manual muscle test are recorded as numerical scores ranging from zero (0), which represents no activity, to five (5), which represents a “normal” or best-possible response to the test or as great a response as can be evaluated by a manual muscle test. Because this text is based on tests of motions rather than tests of individual muscles, the grade represents the performance of all muscles in that motion. The numerical 5 to 0 system of grading is the most commonly used convention across health care professions.


Each numerical grade can be paired with a word that describes the test performance in qualitative, but not quantitative, terms. These qualitative terms, when written, are capitalized to indicate that they too represent a score. Qualitative test grades are not quantitative in any manner.


























Numerical Score Qualitative Score
5 Normal (N)
4 Good (G)
3 Fair (F)
2 Poor (P)
1 Trace activity (T)
0 Zero (no activity) (0)

These grades are based on several factors of testing and response that will be elaborated in this chapter.



Overview of Test Procedures


The Break Test


Manual resistance is applied to a limb or other body part after it has completed its range of motion or after it has been placed at end range by the therapist. The term resistance is always used to denote a concentric force that acts in opposition to a contracting muscle. Manual resistance should always be applied in the direction of the “line of pull” of the participating muscle or muscles. At the end of the available range, or at a point in the range where the muscle is most challenged, the patient is asked to hold the part at that point and not allow the therapist to “break” the hold with manual resistance. For example, a seated patient is asked to flex the elbow to its end range; when that position is reached, the therapist applies resistance at the wrist, trying to force the muscle to “break” its hold and thus move the forearm downward into extension. This is called a break test, and it is the procedure most commonly used in manual muscle testing today.


As a recommended alternative procedure, the therapist may choose to place the muscle or muscle group to be tested in the end or test position rather than have the patient actively move it there. In this procedure the therapist ensures correct positioning and stabilization for the test.




Application of Resistance


The principles of manual muscle testing presented here and in all published sources since 1921 follow the basic tenets of muscle length–tension relationships as well as those of joint mechanics.1,2 In the case of the biceps brachii, for example, when the elbow is straight, the biceps lever is short; leverage increases as the elbow flexes and becomes maximal (most efficient) at 90°, but as flexion continues beyond that point, the lever arm again decreases in length and efficiency.


In manual muscle testing, external force (resistance) is applied at the end of the range in one-joint muscles to allow for consistency of procedure. Two-joint muscles are typically tested in mid-range where length-tension is more favorable. Ideally, all muscles and muscle groups should be tested at optimal length-tension, but there are many occasions in manual muscle testing where the therapist is not able to distinguish between Grade 5 and 4 without putting the patient at a mechanical disadvantage. Thus, the one-joint brachialis, hip abductors, and quadriceps muscles are tested at end range and the two-joint hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles are tested in mid-range.


The point on an extremity, or part, where the therapist should apply resistance is near the distal end of the segment to which the muscle attaches. There are two common exceptions to this rule: the hip abductors and the scapular muscles. In the patient who has an unstable knee, resistance to the hip abductors should be applied at the distal femur just above the knee. When using the short lever, hip abductor strength must be graded no better than Grade 4 even when the muscle takes maximal resistance. However, in testing a patient with Grade 5 knee strength and joint integrity, the therapist should apply resistance at the ankle; the longer lever provided by resistance at the ankle is a greater challenge for the hip abductors and is more indicative of the functional demands required in gait. It follows that when a patient cannot tolerate maximal resistance at the ankle, the muscle cannot be considered Grade 5.


An example of testing with a short lever occurs in the patient with an above-knee amputation, where the grade awarded, even when the patient can hold against maximal resistance, is Grade 4. Because the weight of the leg is so reduced and the therapist’s lever arm for resistance application is so short, patients can easily give the impression of a false Grade 5 yet may struggle with the force demands of a prosthesis in the real world. The muscular force available should not be overestimated in predicting a patient’s functional ability in any circumstances such as age or disability.


In testing the vertebroscapular muscles (e.g., rhomboids), the preferred point of resistance is on the arm rather than on the scapula where these muscles insert. The longer lever more closely reflects the functional demands that incorporate the weight of the arm. Other exceptions to the general rule of applying distal resistance include a painful condition to be avoided or a healing wound in a place where resistance might otherwise be given.


The application of manual resistance should never be sudden or uneven (jerky). The therapist should apply resistance with full patient awareness in a somewhat slow and gradual manner, slightly exceeding the muscle’s force as it builds over 2-3 seconds to achieve the maximum tolerable force intensity. Applying resistance that slightly exceeds the muscle’s force generation will more likely encourage a maximum effort and an accurate break test. Critical to the accuracy of a manual muscle test is the location of the resistance and the consistency of application across all patients. (The therapist should make a note of the point of resistance, if a variation is used, to ensure consistency in testing).


The application of resistance permits an assessment of muscular strength when it is applied in the direction opposite the muscular force or torque. The therapist also should understand that the weight of the limb plus the influence of gravity is part of test response. When the muscle contracts in a parallel direction to the line of gravity, it is noted as “gravity minimal.” It is suggested that the commonly used term “gravity eliminated” be avoided because, of course, that can never occur except in a zero-gravity environment. Thus, weakened muscles are tested in a plane horizontal to the direction of gravity; the body part is supported on a smooth, flat surface in such a way that friction force is minimal (Grades 2, 1, and 0). A powder board may be used to minimize friction. For stronger muscles that can complete a full range of motion in a direction against the pull of gravity (Grade 3), resistance is applied perpendicular to the line of gravity (Grades 4 and 5). Acceptable variations to antigravity and gravity-minimal positions are discussed in individual test sections.



Criteria for Assigning a Muscle Test Grade


The grade given on a manual muscle test comprises both subjective and objective factors. Subjective factors include the therapist’s impression of the amount of resistance to give before the actual test and then the amount of resistance the patient actually tolerates during the test. Objective factors include the ability of the patient to complete a full range of motion or to hold the position once placed there, the ability to move the part against gravity, or an inability to move a part at all. All these factors require clinical judgment, which makes manual muscle testing an exquisite skill that requires considerable practice and experience to master. An accurate test grade is important not only to establish a functional diagnosis but also to assess the patient’s longitudinal progress during the period of recovery and treatment.



The Grade 5 (Normal) Muscle


The wide range of “normal” muscle performance leads to a considerable underestimation of a muscle’s capability. If the therapist has no experience in examining persons who are free of disease or injury, it is unlikely that there will be any realistic judgment of what is Grade 5 and how much normality can vary. Generally, a student learns manual muscle testing by practicing on classmates, but this provides only minimal experience compared to what is needed to master the skill. It should be recognized, for example, that the average therapist cannot “break” knee extension in a reasonably fit young man, even by doing a handstand on his leg!


The therapist should test “normal” muscles at every opportunity, especially when testing the contralateral limb in a patient with a unilateral problem. In almost every instance when the therapist cannot break the patient’s hold position when applying maximum resistance, a grade of 5 is assigned. A grade of 5 must be accompanied by the ability to complete full range of motion or maintain end-point range against maximal resistance.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 25, 2016 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Principles of Manual Muscle Testing

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access