Relevance and Limitations of Manual Muscle Testing



Relevance and Limitations of Manual Muscle Testing





Relevance and Limitations


Introduction


Manual muscle testing (MMT) is well recognized as the most common strength testing technique in physical therapy and other health professions, having first appeared during the poliomyelitis epidemic in New England before World War I. (See “Brief History of Muscle Testing” in the Introduction). Manual muscle testing serves unique purposes that can vary according to the setting in which it is practiced. Although manual muscle testing is an essential and foundational skill in a therapist’s examination techniques, it also has its limitations. Appreciating these limitations and learning how to compensate for them helps make MMT as relevant today as it was when first conceptualized in the polio era.



The Examiner and the Value of the Muscle Test


The knowledge and skill of the examiner determine the accuracy and defensibility of a manual muscle test. Specific aspects of these qualities include the following:



• Knowledge of the location and anatomical features of the muscles in a test. In addition to knowing the muscle attachments, the examiner should be able to visualize the location of the tendon and its muscle in relationship to other tendons and muscles and other structures in the same area (e.g., the tendon of the extensor carpi radialis longus lies on the radial side of the tendon of the extensor carpi radialis brevis at the wrist).


• Knowledge of the direction of muscle fibers and their “line of pull” in each muscle.


• Knowledge of the function of the participating muscles (e.g., synergist, prime mover, agonist, and antagonist).


• Consistent use of a standardized method for each different test.


• Consistent use of proper positioning and stabilization techniques for each test procedure. Stabilization of the proximal segment of the joint being tested is achieved in several ways. These ways include patient position (via body weight), the use of a firm surface for testing, patient muscle activation, and manual fixation by the examiner.


• Ability to identify patterns of substitution in a given test and how they can be detected based on a knowledge of which other muscles can be substituted for the one(s) being tested.


• Ability to detect contractile activity during both contraction and relaxation, especially in minimally active muscle.


• Sensitivity to differences in contour and bulk of the muscles being tested in contrast to the contralateral side or to normal expectations based on such things as body size, occupation, or leisure work.


• Awareness of any deviation from normal values for range of motion and the presence of any joint laxity or deformity.


• Understanding that the muscle belly must not be grasped at any time during a manual muscle test except specifically to assess muscle mass.


• Ability to identify muscles with the same innervation that will ensure a comprehensive muscle evaluation and accurate interpretation of test results (because weakness of one muscle in a myotome should require examination of all).


• Relating the diagnosis to the sequence and extent of the test (e.g., the patient with C7 complete tetraplegia will require definitive muscle testing of the upper extremity but only confirmatory tests in the lower extremities).


• Ability to modify test procedures when necessary while not compromising the test result and understanding the influence of the modification on the result.


• Knowledge of fatigue on the test results, especially muscles tested late in a long testing session, and a sensitivity to fatigue in certain diagnostic conditions such as myasthenia gravis or multiple sclerosis.


• Understanding of the effect of sensory and perceptual loss on movement.


The examiner also may inadvertently influence the test results and should be especially alert when testing in the following situations:



• The patient with open wounds or other conditions requiring gloves, which may blunt palpation skills.


• The patient who must be evaluated under difficult conditions such as in an intensive care unit with multiple tubes and monitors or immediately after surgery, the patient in traction, the patient for whom turning is contraindicated, the patient on a ventilator, and the patient in shackles or restraints.


• The patient cannot assume test positions, such as the prone position.


• The therapist must avoid the temptation to use shortcuts or “tricks of the trade” before mastering the basic procedures lest such shortcuts become an inexact personal standard. One such pitfall for the novice tester is to inaccurately assign a muscle grade from one test position that the patient could not perform successfully to a lower grade without actually testing in the position required for the lower grade.


For example, when testing trunk flexion, a patient just partially clears the scapula from the surface with the hands behind the head (the position for the Grade 5 test). The temptation may exist to assign a grade of 4 to this test, but this may “overrate” the true strength of trunk flexion unless the patient is actually tested with the arms across the chest to confirm Grade 4.


The good clinician never ignores a patient’s comments and must be a good listener, not just to the patient’s questions but also to the words the patient uses and their meaning. This quality is the first essential of good communication and is the primary means of encouraging understanding and respect between therapist and patient. The patient is the best guide to a successful muscle test.




Influence of the Patient on the Test


The intrusion of a living, breathing, feeling person into the testing situation may distort scoring for the unwary examiner. The following circumstances should be recognized:



• There may be variation in the assessment of the true effort expended by a patient in a given test (reflecting the patient’s desire to do well or to seem more impaired than is actually the case).


• The patient’s willingness to endure discomfort or pain may vary (e.g., the stoic, the complainer, the high competitor).


• The patient’s ability to understand the test requirements may be limited in some cases because of comprehension and language barriers.


• The motor skills required for the test may be beyond those possessed by some patients, making it impossible for them to perform as requested.


• Lassitude and depression may cause the patient to be indifferent to the test and the examiner.


• Cultural, social, and gender issues may be associated with palpation and exposure of a body part for testing.


• The size and noncompatibility between big and small muscles can cause considerable differences in grading, though not an individual variation (e.g., the gluteus medius versus a finger extensor). There is a huge variability in maximum torque between such muscles, and the examiner must use care not to assign a grade that is inconsistent with muscle size and architecture.



Use of Manual Muscle Testing in Various Clinical Settings


Manual muscle testing is used in many different types of health care settings. In this section, we will discuss some of the more common applications of MMT in various clinical and therapeutic settings, with emphasis on the specific challenges often seen in each. The reader should be aware that the examples provided here are not limited to these settings only.



Acute Care Facilities


Often patients seen in acute care facilities are either acutely ill or are postoperative patients. In the acutely ill patient, manual muscle testing may be used to assess the patient’s mobility status in order to inform a discharge plan. A manual strength exam performed as part of a general assessment may provide information concerning the amount of assistance the patient requires and whether the patient will need an assistive device. Assessing the patient’s strength to help ensure safe transfers from bed to chair, to a standing position, or on and off the toilet is an essential part of the acute-care patient management process. A strength assessment may also inform the therapist of the patient’s ability to follow directions and/or to verbalize concerns such as following a stroke or in the presence of delirium or other cognitive loss.1,2


Strength assessment may also indicate the presence of pain before full-body movements such as transfers. Strength assessment could take the form of active movement followed by resistance, such as in a manual muscle test or in a 10-repetition maximum such as in a seated shoulder dip.


Strength assessment in the postoperative patient informs the therapist of the integrity of the patient’s nervous system. The therapist may be the first person requiring the patient to move actively after surgery, and thus may be the first one to observe the patient’s ability to contract a muscle. Although this scenario is rare, clearly the consequences of assuming an attitude of “all is well” and finding out during a transfer that the patient cannot use part of an extremity would have avoidable consequences. Strength testing in this scenario might take the form of isometric contractions, especially if there are contraindications to joint movement, suspected postsurgical pain as in a newly repaired fractured hip, or in restricted range of motion such as in a total hip arthroplasty. If testing is done in a manner that differs from the published directions, documentation should describe how the test was performed. For example, if isometric testing was done at the hip because the patient was not permitted to move the hip through full range after a hip arthroplasty, the therapist should document the test accordingly: “Patient’s strength at the hip appeared to be under volitional control, but pain and postsurgical precautions prevented thorough assessment.”


Key movements that should be assessed for viability and for the strength necessary to perform transfers or gait include elbow extension, grip, shoulder depression, knee extension, hip abduction, ankle plantar, and dorsiflexion. Functional tests that might be useful in assessing the patient include gait speed, chair stand, timed transfer, or the timed up-and-go test (see Chapter 9).


Special considerations for the acute care setting may include the patient’s rapid fluctuations in response to medications, illness, or pain. Reassessment may be necessary when any changes in strength are documented along with therapist’s insights into why the changes are occurring. Clearly, strength gains are not possible in the short time a typical patient is in acute care, but rather should be attributed to increased confidence in moving, less pain, better understanding of the movement to be performed, motor learning, and so forth.



Acute Rehabilitation Facilities


Strength assessment in the acute rehabilitation setting may be performed as a baseline assessment to determine progress over time and to identify key impairments that affect the patient’s mobility-related and other functional goals. Knowledge of community-based norms for mobility such as chair stands, distance walked, stair climbing speed, floor transfer ability, and gait speed will inform the therapist’s clinical decision-making. (See Chapter 9 for a more complete description of these tests.) A standard manual muscle test and/or a 10-repetition maximum (10-RM) strength assessment are other methods used to assess relevant strength abilities.


As in the acute care setting, assessment of strength for mobility tasks is critical in the acute rehabilitation setting. Recognition of key muscle groups in specific mobility tasks, such as the plantar-flexors in gait speed, is key to informed clinical decision-making.


Special considerations for the acute rehabilitation setting often include rapid change over a short period. Positive changes may be attributed to increased comfort and less pain, less apprehension, neuroplasticity, and a change in medications. Negative changes may be attributed to a decline in medical status, pain, or depression, for example. Muscle fatigue resulting from poor fitness and excessive sedentary behavior or general body fatigue related to frailty or post–acute care implications may affect the perception of strength. The patient may not be able to assume a proper test position because of postsurgical restrictions or a lack of range of motion, requiring the therapist to do a strength-screen rather than a strength test. This screen cannot serve as an accurate baseline because of the lack of standardization. Functional testing may be more informative and accurate in these situations. The therapist should take special care to document any deviations from the standardized manual muscle test.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 25, 2016 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Relevance and Limitations of Manual Muscle Testing

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access