Seddon
Sunderland
Tissue damage
Recovery
Neuropraxia
Grade 1
Myelin damage, conduction block
Less than 3 months, without surgical intervention
Axonotmesis
Grade 2
Myelin damage, axon damage
Usually recovers without surgical intervention, but slow due to scar tissue
Neurotmesis
Grade 3-Axon continuity is disrupted by loss of endonueral tube, but perineurium is intact
Myelin damage, axon damage, endoneurium
Slow recovery due to scar tissue, depends on the involved fascicles
Grade 4-Neural fascicle is damaged but sheath continuity is maintained
Myelin damage, axon damage, perineurium
Surgical intervention is needed to remove scar tissue and nerve repair
Grade 5-Substantial perineural hemorrhage and scarring occurs
Myelin damage, axon damage, epineurium
Surgical intervention is needed
Nerve Fiber
Each nerve is a cordlike structure that contains many axons, also called nerve fibers. Within a nerve, each axon is surrounded by a layer of connective tissue called the endoneurium. The axons are bundled together into groups called fascicles, and each fascicle is wrapped in a layer of connective tissue called the perineurium, which is a lamellated sheath of considerable tensile strength. Because of the diffusion barrier in the perineurium, the interior of the fascicles, the endoneurial space, is chemically isolated from the surrounding tissues, thereby preserving a specialized ionic environment. Finally, the fascicles are embedded within an epineurium, which is a supporting and protective connective tissue carrying the main supply channels of the intraneural vascular system: the epineural vessels. Usually, several fascicles are grouped together in fascicular bundles constituting well-defined subunits of the nerve trunk. Schwann cells encircle the axonal projections and produce myelin, which facilitates the electrical conduction along the nerve [14, 19].
Nerve fibers can be myelinated or nonmyelinated. In the myelinated fiber, one axon is associated with only one Schwann cell of whose membrane is being wrapped spirally around the axon, producing a sheath of alternating layers of lipid and protein: the myelin sheath. In nonmyelinated fibers, however, one Schwann cell accumulates a great number of axons. The Schwann cells, being arranged in a longitudinal sequence along the axons surface, meet each other at the nodes of Ranvier, where finger-like cellular processes interdigitate. At this location, there is a space between the processes, allowing extracellular ions to reach the axon [17]. This is an important process in the so-called saltatory propagation of impulses from node to node. In between the nodes of Ranvier, the compact myelin and cytoplasm within a Schwann cell are arranged in a series of concentric subcellular compartments surrounding the axon, insulating it both morphologically and physiologically from the endoneurium [46]. The axon has a core of axoplasm surrounded by a continuous plasma membrane: the axolemma. The surrounding concentric layers of Schwann cell cytoplasm and myelin are bound peripherally by a continuous Schwann cell plasma membrane and its basal lamina. In literature, this basal lamina, together with the endoneurial reticular and collagen fibers providing the framework supporting the nerve fiber, has been referred to as the endoneurial tube or endoneurial sheath [31].
Nerve fibers of the PNS are classified according to their involvement in motor or sensory, somatic or visceral pathways [9]. Mixed nerves contain both motor and sensory fibers. Sensory nerves contain mostly sensory fibers; they are less common and include the optic and olfactory nerves. Motor nerves contain motor fibers. Most of the peripheral nerves in body contain both motor and sensory nerve fibers [9].
Ganglia
The cell bodies of peripheral neurons are present in nervous structures called ganglia. There are two types of ganglia: autonomic ganglia and somatic-sensory ganglia. Autonomic ganglia possess sympathetic and parasympathetic postganglionic cells. Two types of somatic sensory ganglia exist: those associated with cranial nerves, i.e., cranial ganglia; and those associated with spinal nerves, i.e., spinal ganglia or dorsal root ganglia. The neurons in dorsal root ganglia are pseudounipolar neurons, and in this type of neurons, one single process, an axon, leaves the cell body and divides into two processes, one projecting to the CNS, and the other projecting to peripheral targets. Dorsal root ganglia neurons innervate muscle spindles and receptors in the skin [14]. The peripheral ganglia also contain glial cells such as satellite cells and Schwann cells (SCs). The glial cells regulate the neuronal environment by supporting and protecting the neurons. They can also produce neurotropic factors in response to neuronal injury. A ganglion also contains blood vessels and fibrobalsts. The entire ganglion is encapsulated in a connective tissue layer, which is continuous with the epineurium of the nerve.
Peripheral Nerve Injury
When a nerve has been injured, the goal of surgical repair is generally to reapproximate the ends of the injured nerve. Sometimes during repair after a nerve injury, a portion of the injured nerve, called a neuroma, needs to be excised, leaving a gap. When the nerve ends cannot be brought together, then a nerve graft may be necessary.
Nerve grafts are generally portions of a sensory nerve that are harvested from another part of the body to be used as graft material. Once the graft is in place, the regenerating nerve fibers grow from the proximal nerve stump, through the graft, through the distal nerve segment into the target muscles. Thus, patients may recover function in muscles following graft repair of nerve injuries. Sural nerve, superficial radial sensory, and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve are common donor nerves for graft material.
Classification of nerve injury was described by Seddon in 1943 and by Sunderland in 1951 [41, 45]. The lowest degree of nerve injury in which the nerve remains intact but signaling ability is damaged is called neurapraxia. The second degree in which the axon is damaged but the surrounding connecting tissue remains intact is called axonotmesis. The last degree in which both the axon and connective tissue are damaged is called neurotmesis. Sunderland in 1951 reclassified nerve injury in detail related more to the anatomy of the nerve (Table 27.1).
Clinical Assessment of Nerve Injury
The location and extent of the injury must be located in the first place in peripheral nerve injury cases. The physical examination includes testing of all muscle groups innervated by related nerve. All modalities of sensory function are tested also. An EMG is performed 2–3 weeks after the injury. If an EMG remains normal in 3 weeks after the injury, then a Sunderland grade I injury is present and full recovery is expected. In the presence of axonal injury, there is spontaneous activity in EMG recordings. The presence or absence of a sensory nerve conduction potential can be used to determine if a lesion is likely to be proximal or distal to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). A lesion proximal to the DRG, such as a brachial plexus avulsion from the spinal cord, will usually not disconnect the peripheral axon from the cell body. No Wallerian degeneration occurs in the sensory portion of the peripheral nerve and the sensory conduction potential remains intact. If, however, the lesion is distal to the DRG, there is sensory axonal Wallerian degeneration and loss of the sensory conduction action potential. The physician must determine if there is a root avulsion, because in that case there is no spontaneous recovery. Physical examination shows decreased or absent power in all muscles innervated by the avulsed root and sensory loss is present in dermatomal distribution.
To assess nerve regeneration clinically, ectopic mechanosensitivity can be used. Tapping regenerating axon of the nerve will produce a paresthesia felt in the distribution normally innervated by the nerve (Tinel’s Sign). The Tinel’s sign should move 1 mm/day distally in accordance with the advancing axonal growth cone. The EMG is more sensitive than physical examination for signs of muscle reinnervation, and it should be repeated when axonal regeneration has reached the target muscle.
Nerve Reconstruction
It is well known that any degree of tension at the suture site may decrease the possibility of nerve healing; the tension diminishes the extrinsic vascular supply and predisposes to failure of the repair by increasing scar formation between the nerve stumps.
To bridge the nerve defects, the interfascicular autologous nerve grafting technique is still considered the “gold standard” but many other different “grafts” have been studied and described to avoid, in particular circumstances and in short nerve gaps, the use of autologous nerves (to avoid donor site morbidity).
Techniques reported below are applied in different situations; different indications can justify to avoid classical nerve graft: kind of nerves (mixed, pure), level and kind (“dominant” hemipulp in sensory nerves in the hand), kind of injury (in emergency (neat/blunt), late reconstruction). The aim of the reconstruction should be the one with the maximum of the results with the minimum harm for the patients. In this small review, we report only the clinical use of these grafts.
Autogenous Nerve Grafts
It is currently accepted that the interfascicular autologous nerve grafting technique is the gold standard for nerve repair in presence of major loss of substance after injury. Nerve grafting provides continuity of the stumps, with minimal or no tension, and supports axonal regeneration by means of the Schwann cells and/or the inner surface of the Schwann cell columns, protecting against surrounding scar tissue formation.
Generally, it is in case of secondary procedures that grafts are mostly needed. In an open injury when the nerve repair was not carried out immediately because of the type of injury (blunt or crush injuries), or the lack of microsurgical expertise, or because of iatrogenic lesions, the nerve stumps retract, requiring secondary grafting. In closed injury, a stretching or blunt trauma often produce a neuroma in continuity that require secondary resection and nerve grafting.
Donor site morbidity is a significant factor when selecting an autologous nerve for grafting. The resulting functional deficit must be acceptable and limited to noncritical sensation areas. The choice of nerve graft is dictated by the length of the nerve gap, the cross-sectional area of the recipient nerve, the available expendable donor nerves for that particular nerve injury, the surgeon’s and the patient’s preference.
Although the sural nerve is the most commonly used autograft, there are many other suitable nerves that can be used as interposition grafts, including: the medial and lateral cutaneous nerves of the forearm, the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve, the terminal branches of posterior and anterior interosseous nerve.
From the technical point of view, stitches (9 or 10–0) or glue are both useful for the coaptation of the fascicles; key points are the trimming of the nerve stumps and the positioning of grafts not only during the suture but also allowing each graft to have optimal contact of the total surface area with the surrounding tissues, then permitting better revascularization of the graft (this technique is preferable especially in large-diameter recipient nerves). No consensus exists on the maximal length that may be bridged with a nerve graft: many successful cases are reported even with 20-cm and longer nerve grafts.
Allogenic Nerve Grafts
During the 1980s and 1990s, many studies have been done on immunosuppressed allografts that functioned as a structural scaffold for regenerating host nerve fibers. As regeneration proceeds, donor antigenic determinants within the allograft, such as Schwann cells, are lost and replaced by host components. Mackinnon and colleagues in 2001 applied allografts in seven patients with a limited period of immunosuppression (6 months of cyclosporine A or tacrolimus and prednisone) [26]. All but one demonstrated a promising recovery in motor and sensory function. No other attempts have been done after that experience.
To avoid immunosuppression, researchers tried to decellularize the nerve allografts, giving the surgeon a scaffold similar to a nerve; methods to decellularize allografts include irradiation, freeze thawing, detergent-processing, and cold preservation. After these procedures in humans, allograft has shown promising outcomes in peripheral nerve repair from 5 to 50 mm in sensory, mixed, and motor nerves [6, 10]. The studies reported in literature are all done with the help of the company producing the allograft. If results are confirmed, this solution could be very useful in nerve gap repair. Concern remains about costs and storage of these allografts.
Nerve Substitutes
Many biological and synthetic conduits have been tested to bridge a peripheral loss of substances, arteries, veins, mesothelial chambers, predegenerated or fresh skeletal muscle, empty artificial tubes, resorbable or not, tubes filled with growth factors and/or Schwann cells. Nerve substitutes are “tubes” that are subdivided in “natural” or “autologous” conduits and “synthetic” conduits. Between synthetic materials in clinical settings, only resorbable conduits are employed at the moment. The maximum gap length to be bridged by tubulization should not exceed 30 mm because beyond that, regeneration capacity clearly deteriorates.
For certain indications, nerve conduits have become a useful tool to avoid donor site morbidity associated with autologous nerve grafting; both biologic or synthetic conduits give reasonable results only on short gaps (not longer than 2–3 cm) and in pure nerves, mostly sensory nerves. Best indications are sensory nerves of the all body, “nondominant” hemipulp in nerves of the hand, emergency reconstruction of blunt injury also for mixed nerves. Nerve tubes have been used for primary as well as secondary reconstruction. No data can suggest a better outcome between different natural or resorbable materials at the moment.
Natural
Autologous materials such as arteries, veins, predegenerated muscle, some in combination with muscle inlays, have been assessed clinically. Most used are veins filled or not with muscle. A recent prospective, randomized study comparing polyglycolic acid and autogenous vein scaffolds for reconstruction of digital nerve gaps showed that recovery after reconstruction with a vein conduit was equivalent to polyglycolic acid conduit repair with fewer postoperative complications [38].
Synthetic
A variety of alternatives to hollow biodegradable nerve conduits have been tested in experimental or clinical settings. Nonresorbable conduits made of silicone, Teflon, or Polysulfone, which can lead to secondary nerve compression and usually prevent nutrient diffusion into the lumen, are no longer employed in clinical setting.
Collagen conduits, polyglycolic acid conduits, polylactid acid conduits, caprolactone conduits, and chitosan conduits are the available materials on the market. No evidence indicates a beneficial use of one over the other at the moment.
End-to-Side Coaptation
The possibility to regain nerve function after damage even if the proximal stump is not available is the aim of this technique, based on the concept that collateral axonal sprouting from a healthy neighbor donor nerve can involve a distal stump of a transected nerve, if these are sutured in end-to-side.
End-to-side coaptation may be an effective means of nerve reconstruction when proximal nerve stump or donor nerves are not available; nevertheless, a discrepancy between experimental and clinical results still exists. It is largely agreed that at present end-to-side neurorrhaphy could not substitute standard techniques in most cases, as brachial plexus repair, but can be considered a valid therapeutic option in selected situations, optionally in combination with other strategies, or in case of failure of other previous attempts of nerve repair or whenever other options are feasible. Reports are done on sensory nerves, sensory nerves in the hand, brachial plexus, facial nerve.
Direct Muscular Neurotization
When the nerve has been avulsed from the muscle, Brunelli utilizes the “direct muscular neurotization” with direct implantation of the nerve into the muscle (a window in the epimisium is done and the fascicle is inserted directly into the muscle).
Restoration of Function in Upper Extremity with Nerve Transfers
Loss of contractility of skeletal muscles and other target organ changes are a major concern in peripheral nerve surgery. Time interval between denervation and reinnervation is a critical determinant of functional outcome. Slow pace of axonal regrowth and immediate changes taking place in target tissues following peripheral nerve injuries make fully satisfactory clinical results unlikely. Repair or reconstruction of peripheral nerve lesions at very proximal levels such as brachial or lumbosacral plexus injuries, results in negligible return of function in extremities. Lessening denervation-reinnervation interval may decrease target tissue changes, and may lead to a better outcome. The concept of transferring healthy peripheral nerves to the distal segments of the proximally injured nerves at a level closer to target tissues is not new, but gaining acceptance only recently. Earlier and pioneering reports on peripheral nerve transfers from healthy muscles to denervated muscles, or from healthy skin to denervated skin indicated favorable outcomes [2, 29, 50–52]. During the last couple of years, exploding number of laboratory and clinical studies with promising clinical outcomes has been reported [48]. Currently, refinement of previously described procedures continues while newer innovative nerve transfers are described.
< div class='tao-gold-member'>
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register a > to continue