Pathogenesis and Treatment of Patellar Tendinopathy



Fig. 28.1
Characteristic microscopic images of patellar tendinopathy. Neovessels (black dotted arrows) in the peritenon (a) and increased number of cells in the damaged tendon (b) stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)





28.2 Staging and Treatment


Regarding the staging classification in patellar tendinopathy, Blanzina et al. (1973) reported the first classification, which has been used over 40 years. Except for stage 4, which is complete tendon rupture, they classified three stages based on symptoms and dysfunction. In the twenty-first century, Cook and Purdam et al. (2009) classified tendinopathy into three stages, namely, reactive tendinopathy, early or late tendon disrepair, and degenerative tendinopathy. This classification was based on microstructural changes of the damaged tendon; thus, it can indicate the degree of microstructural damage that requires treatment intervention. They divided these three stages into two groups. For the tendinopathies in the first group, including reactive tendinopathy, only load management was enough for healing, whereas for the tendinopathies in the second group, including degenerative tendinopathy, treatment intervention, including eccentric exercise, should be applied. If the tendinopathies in the second group were resistant to eccentric exercise, more-invasive treatments such as extracorporeal shockwave therapy and surgery are necessary.


28.3 Pathomechanism of Patellar Tendinopathy


Patellar tendinopathy is one of the most popular tendinopathies. Generally, the region of pathological change in patellar tendinopathy is the posteromedial tendon substance at the insertion to the inferior patellar pole (Johnson et al. 1996; Lavagnino et al. 2008; Khan et al. 1996) (Fig. 28.2). This region specificity is closely related with the mechanical and structural characteristics of the patellar tendon. First, the proximal patellar tendon cross-sectional area (CSA) was smaller than the mid- or distal tendon CSA (Kongsgaard et al. 2007). Therefore, the force per unit area at the proximal patellar tendon was larger than that at the mid- or distal tendon. This is one of the reasons for the tendency of patellar tendinopathy to occur at the proximal tendon attachment to the patella. Second, some reports investigated the mechanism of pathological changes in the posterior potion of the proximal patellar tendon (Basso et al. 2002; Dillon et al. 2008; Pearson and Hussain 2014; Hansen et al. 1985). In both cadaveric and experimental studies, mechanical stress was higher at the posterior region than at the anterior region of the proximal tendon owing to the lever arm (Basso et al. 2002; Dillon et al. 2008). The finite element model findings also showed maximum strain at the classical tendinopathy lesion, at the posterior region of the proximal patellar tendon attachment to patella (Lavagnino et al. 2008). Moreover, regarding the mechanical properties of the proximal tendon, posterior fascicles were markedly weaker and micro-damages are likely to occur at the posterior tendon (Hansen et al. 1985). Finally, the reason why most tendinopathy lesions are located at the medial side was explained in the study on regional structural differences at the enthesis of the proximal patellar tendon. Toumi et al. (2006) reported that bone quality, trabecular thickness, and uncalcified fibrocartilage were greatest medially and that the subchondral plate was thinner laterally. These results indicate that mechanical stress at the proximal patellar tendon enthesis is greater on the medial than on the lateral side, leading to the tendency of exposure with overload on the proximal medial tendon. Overall, the posteromedial site of the proximal patellar tendon has weak mechanical properties with large mechanical stress, which explains why the lesion of proximal patellar tendinopathy occurs at the posteromedial portion.

A432377_1_En_28_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 28.2
Magnetic resonance images of the lesion of patellar tendinopathy. A lesion of proximal patellar tendinopathy at the posteromedial portion with signal change and tendon thickening (white arrows and arrowheads). Sagittal planes of T1- (a) and T2*-weighted images (b) and axial plane of T1- (c) and T2*-weighted images (d)


28.4 Treatment of Patellar Tendinopathy


Although many treatment methods are available for patellar tendinopathy, evidence-based therapies are limited. Therefore, no consensus has been reached on the appropriate use of these therapies. According to a recent systematic review (Larsson et al. 2012), only eccentric exercise has strong evidence for patellar tendinopathy. Moderate evidence was found on heavy slow resistance training as an alternative to eccentric exercise. Moreover, evidence is limited for sclerosing injection, shockwave therapy, and surgery (Table 28.1).


Table 28.1
Evidence for each therapy for patellar tendinopathy (Larsson et al. 2012)


















Quality of evidence

Therapy

Strong evidence

Eccentric exercise

Moderate evidence

Heavy slow resistance training

Limited evidence

Sclerosing injection

Shockwave therapy

Surgery


28.4.1 Eccentric Exercise


Many reports on eccentric exercise have been published, and these reports support the existing evidence of the effectiveness of eccentric exercise. Some reports showed that treatment with eccentric exercise had significantly better clinical results than treatment with concentric exercise (Jonsson and Alfredson 2005; Stasinopoulos and Stasinopoulos 2004; Cannell et al. 2001). In these reports, 80–100% of patients with eccentric exercise were satisfied and could return to sports within short-term follow-up. Regarding its mechanism, eccentric exercise could act both metabolically and mechanically (Maffulli and Longo 2008; Maffulli et al. 2004). However, only a few studies investigated the mechanism of eccentric exercise in detail (Boesen et al. 2006; Wasielewski and Kotsko 2007; Graham et al. 2000). Eccentric exercise affected tendons metabolically, increasing cross-linking among collagen fibers and thereby improving the elasticity and tensile strength of the patellar tendon (Graham et al. 2000). This exercise also affected tendons mechanically, stopping blood flow and reducing neoangiogenesis, similarly to sclerosing therapy during deep flexion of joints (Boesen et al. 2006; Wasielewski and Kotsko 2007).

The most widely used eccentric exercise protocols for patellar tendinopathy consisted of three sets of 15 repetitions performed twice daily with a 25° decline board (Wasielewski and Kotsko 2007). However, the most effective treatment protocol, including sets, repetitions, motion speed, and times per day, remains unknown (Pearson and Hussain 2014). How patients engage in sports activities during treatment with eccentric exercise is also unclear. Whether they should continue to participate in sports activities with limitation or discontinue sports activity completely remains to be clarified. To decide on the best eccentric exercise protocol, more randomized controlled trials are needed.


28.4.2 Heavy Slow Resistance Training


Kongsgaard et al. (2010) found that heavy slow resistance training (HSR) improved the clinical outcome of patellar tendinopathy at 12 weeks after training. They reported that these improvements were associated with normalization of fibril morphology due to new fibril production promoted by HSR. In a recent systematic review (Malliaras et al. 2013), the clinical result after HSR was equivalent to that after eccentric exercise for patellar tendinopathy. However, the definitive superiority of HSR to eccentric exercise was not proven.


28.4.3 Sclerosing Agents


Only few cases of patellar or Achilles tendinopathy treated with sclerosing agents have been reported (Lind et al. 2006; Ohberg and Alfredson 2002; Alfredson and Ohberg 2005; Hoksrud et al. 1738). Sclerosing therapy for Achilles tendinopathy reduces pain and restores function owing to its effect on new vessels and nerve destruction. Therefore, authors concluded that this treatment should be applied for advanced chronic tendinopathy with neovessel formation and neural ingrowth (Lind et al. 2006; Ohberg and Alfredson 2002). For patellar tendinopathy, however, these effects of sclerosing agents have not been confirmed, with good clinical results in >80% of patients with patellar tendinopathy at 6–12 months after injection of sclerosing agents (Alfredson and Ohberg 2005; Hoksrud et al. 1738).


28.4.4 Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy


Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was initially used for treatment of patellar tendinopathy in 2001, and its use has gradually widely increased (Leal et al. 2015). According to the previous studies, symptoms improved after ESWT in 61–77% of patients (Leal et al. 2015; Taunton et al. 2003; Zwerver et al. 2010). Compared with the clinical results after surgery, those at 24 months after ESWT treatment were equivalent (Peers et al. 2003). However, the success rate of conventional conservative treatment for tendinopathy including eccentric exercise was over 80%, and thus ESWT should not be used as a first-line therapy for tendinopathy.


28.4.5 Surgical Treatment


Various open and arthroscopic procedures have been described in the operative treatment of patellar tendinopathy. Smillie (1962) published the first report on open surgical treatment with drilling multiple holes into the inferior pole of the patella. Following this report, Blazina et al. (1973) reported about open excision of the extra-articular inferior pole of the patella and reinsertion of the patellar tendon. Thereafter, open resection procedures of the damaged portion of the patellar tendon without an osseous procedure were reported (Fritschy and Wallensten 1993; Verheyden et al. 1997; Ferretti et al. 2002). One procedure was removal of the pathological tissue in a longitudinal strip (Fritschy and Wallensten 1993; Verheyden et al. 1997) and another was to excise only tissue identified as abnormal (Ferretti et al. 2002). Followed by open excision of damaged tendon, arthroscopic procedure to stimulate the healing response of patellar tendon was reported by Romeo et al. (Romeo and Larson 1999) Thereafter, various arthroscopic procedures have been developed. The most common procedure was debridement of the patellar tendon. Additional arthroscopic procedures include denervation or resection of the inferior patellar pole and synovectomy (Romeo and Larson 1999; Kelly 2009; Ogon et al. 2006).

The surgical success rate for patellar tendinopathy was 60–90% (Brockmeyer et al. 2015). According to the latest systematic review, the average success rate of open surgery was 87% and that of arthroscopic surgery was 91% (Brockmeyer et al. 2015). The average return-to-sport rate was 78.4% after open surgery and 82.3% after arthroscopic surgery. These were not statistically significantly different. However, the average time to return to sport after arthroscopic surgery was significantly shorter than that after open surgery (3.9 vs 8.3 months). Moreover, the average duration of symptoms after arthroscopic surgery was significantly shorter than that after open surgery (14.5 vs 25.8 months).

The long-term clinical results after surgery for patellar tendinopathy were evaluated in a few reports (Pascarella et al. 2011; Maffulli et al. 2014). Pascarella et al. (2011) showed significant improvements in Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment Patellar (VISA-P) score at 1 and 3 years after arthroscopic surgery, from the preoperative scores. These improvements in score were maintained within 5–10 years after surgery. A study on the long-term clinical results after open surgery reported excellent or good results, with a VISA-P score of 91% and return-to-sport rate of 86.3% (Maffulli et al. 2014). The two studies suggested that the efficacy of both open and arthroscopic surgeries for patellar tendinopathy could continue throughout a long-term follow-up period.


28.4.6 Other Treatments


In addition to the abovementioned evidence-based therapies, many other therapies are available but without consensus for their use. However, some therapies, including hyaluronic acid (HA) and corticosteroid injections, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and load management, are considered relatively useful and reasonable for tendinopathy under limited conditions such as short-term period or acute phase.

Recently, studies on treatment using HA have been reported. These studies showed improvement of pain and knee function in short-term follow-up and no serious adverse events during the study period (Kumai et al. 2014; Muneta et al. 2012), although the number of reports is not enough to provide firm evidence. Considering its efficacy and safety, HA injection should be applied for patellar tendinopathy at least once during treatment with eccentric exercise.

Corticosteroid injections have also short-term effects on tendinopathy at relieving pain, reducing swelling, and improving function (Rees et al. 2014). However, corticosteroid injections increased the risk of tendon rupture and conferred greater risk of long-term recurrence (Khan et al. 1998). Therefore, corticosteroids should be used with caution in the management of tendinopathy in the acute phase.

A Cochrane review of interventions for treating acute and chronic Achilles tendinopathy also found weak evidence of a moderate effect of NSAIDs on acute tendon pain (McLauchlan and Handoll 2001). However, administration of NSAIDs showed no effect to promote tendon healing, and the management of patellar tendinopathy was controversial (Rees et al. 2014).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 6, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Pathogenesis and Treatment of Patellar Tendinopathy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access