Open and arthroscopic instrumentation for instability repair

CHAPTER 4 Open and arthroscopic instrumentation for instability repair





Introduction


Management of glenohumeral instability is a common, complex problem with a spectrum of pathology ranging from acute, traumatic dislocation to atraumatic, multidirectional instability. In most cases, once nonoperative management fails to resolve the patient’s symptoms, surgical stabilization is indicated.1,2 Both open and arthroscopic techniques have been used with success in the surgical treatment of symptomatic glenohumeral instability. For each operative approach, proper patient positioning, surgical technique, and instrumentation are paramount to enable the surgeon to effectively manage various types of pathology involving the bone, tendon, labrum, and capsule. This chapter reviews these elements, providing an overview of the preparation and operative setup for open and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization.



Anesthesia


Both open and arthroscopic stabilization procedures can be performed under general anesthesia, regional anesthesia (interscalene block; Fig. 4-1), or a combined approach. The choice is based on patient preference, the anesthesiologist, the surgeon, and planned patient positioning. A combination of general and regional anesthesia has the benefits of reducing the need for inhalational agents, helping maintain the mean arterial pressure between 70 and 90 mm Hg for intraoperative visualization, and assisting with postoperative pain control. Additionally, it obviates the worry of the difficulty associated with the intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia with the patient in the lateral decubitus or beach chair position, which may become necessary.



Regional anesthesia via an interscalene technique allows for the successful neural blockade of the upper extremity, including the supraclavicular, suprascapular, axillary, and radial nerves during shoulder surgery. Successful placement of the block is highly technique dependent and the anesthesiologist may employ a nerve stimulator or ultrasound to help accurately localize the placement of the local anesthetic solution (Fig. 4-2). Although the exact combination of local anesthetics varies depending on the anesthesiologist, institution, and anticipated duration of the surgical procedure, the interscalene technique has been found to be an effective method of regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery. Brown et al compared interscalene block to general anesthesia for use in shoulder surgery and found that interscalene block was safe and effective, provided excellent intraoperative analgesia and muscular relaxation, and resulted in fewer postoperative side effects and hospital admissions.3 Limited potential complications of the interscalene block include injection-associated brachial plexopathy, peripheral neuropathy, pneumothorax, and cardiac arrhythmias.4 Recent studies of regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery have reported complication rates ranging from 1.1% to 3.7%.46



Although many cases can be completed under regional anesthesia only, general anesthesia may offer some additional advantages. In our experience, patient positioning in the lateral decubitus position is poorly tolerated in the awake patient and may be an indication for a general anesthetic. In addition, the interscalene block will not cover the region around the axilla, which is T1 sensory-innervated, and may result in pain during open procedures. Finally, the ability to provide complete paralysis during procedures performed under a general anesthetic may facilitate retraction and exposure during open surgery. In these cases, we prefer to use a combined approach with both general and regional anesthetic, which allows decreased intraoperative use of inhalational agents and effective postoperative pain control.



Examination under anesthesia


With the patient supine on the operating room table, before positioning, an examination under anesthesia (EUA) is performed on both shoulders, allowing for an assessment of range of motion and stability (Fig. 4-3). The findings of the EUA can help support the preoperative diagnosis and the planned operative approach.7,8 Range of motion is assessed by bringing each shoulder into maximal forward flexion and internally and externally rotating the shoulder with the arm both at the side and at 90 degrees of abduction. Anterior and posterior translation of the humeral head on the glenoid can be evaluated with a load-shift test, in which the shoulder is abducted to 60 degrees in neutral rotation, and an axial load combined with anterior or posterior translation force is applied to the proximal humerus.9,10 The observed translation is recorded and compared to the opposite side. The amount of humeral head translation during these provocative maneuvers can be graded on a three-grade scale (Table 4-1).11 Grade I translation is one in which the humeral head translates to but not over the glenoid rim. Grade II instability describes translation of the humeral head over the rim of the glenoid followed by spontaneous reduction when the load is removed. Translation of the humeral head over the glenoid rim, which becomes locked and irreducible denotes Grade III instability.



Table 4-1 Three-grade Scale for Anterior and Posterior Translation of the Humeral Head on the Glenoid During the Examination Under Anesthesia















Grade Characteristics
I Humeral head translates to, but not over, the glenoid rim
II Humeral head translates over the glenoid rim
III Humeral head translates over the glenoid rim and becomes locked and irreducible

Posterior stability can be further assessed by forward flexing the shoulder to 140 degrees, which allows the greater tuberosity to clear the acromion, and adducting to 15 degrees as a posteriorly directed force is applied. Finally, an inferiorly directed force on the humerus can be applied to assess for the presence of a sulcus sign. Given that the rotator interval tightens normally in external rotation, the sulcus sign should be performed in both the neutral position and in external rotation to evaluate for pathologic laxity. In all cases, shoulder translation in all quadrants should be compared to the opposite extremity, which may provide further insight into the normal state for an individual patient.







Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization


As techniques and instrumentation have evolved and surgical experience has increased, the arthroscopic management of glenohumeral instability has expanded. Compared to traditional open techniques, arthroscopic shoulder stabilization allows for smaller incisions; decreased soft-tissue dissection; improved visualization of glenohumeral anatomy and pathoanatomy; reduced perioperative morbidity and postoperative pain; and perhaps, easier postoperative rehabilitation.9,12 Recent studies have demonstrated that the arthroscopic treatment of instability has clinical outcomes that are equivalent to open repairs.9,1318




Arthroscopy equipment setup


Once the patient is prepped, positioned, and draped, the necessary equipment for the arthroscopic procedure is set up (Fig. 4-4). The arthroscopic tower containing the monitor, light source, control box, and shaver power source is positioned on the side opposite to the operative site. The fluid irrigation pump and the control box for the radiofrequency device also are placed on the opposite side of the patient. A Mayo stand is positioned distally, above the patient’s waist, serving to hold the instrumentation that will be used frequently during the operative procedure. Finally, the surgical scrub technician’s back table is positioned behind the surgeon and his or her assistant for easy access.



Fluid management for the arthroscopic procedure is controlled by the fluid irrigation pump or through a gravity-driven system, which infuses sterile saline into the glenohumeral joint. Our preference is to use a pump system to maintain hemostasis and distention, and to improve visualization. In general, the fluid pressure within the joint is kept between 35 and 45 mm Hg. While intermittent increases in fluid pressure may be required for visualization purposes, extended periods of increased pressure can lead to fluid extravasation into the soft tissues, causing swelling and distortion of normal anatomy. Adequate hemostasis is critical to maintaining visualization during the procedure and can be facilitated by maintaining a mean arterial blood pressure of 70 to 90 mm Hg and the addition of epinephrine to the fluid bags. At our institution, we employ 1.5 ampules of 1:1000 epinephrine added to each 5-L bag of irrigation fluid.



Skin marking and portal placement


Following patient positioning and prepping of the surgical field, the superficial bony shoulder anatomy is marked out with a surgical marking pen, helping to guide the later placement of arthroscopic portals. Important anatomic landmarks to identify include the coracoid process, clavicle, acromioclavicular joint, and outline of the acromion process, paying close attention to the anterolateral and posterolateral corners of the acromion (Fig. 4-5).


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 21, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Open and arthroscopic instrumentation for instability repair

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access