Limited Open Osteochondroplasty for the Treatment of Anterior Femoroacetabular Impingement

CHAPTER 29 Limited Open Osteochondroplasty for the Treatment of Anterior Femoroacetabular Impingement





Pathophysiology


An appropriate relationship between the femoral head–neck junction and the acetabulum is a prerequisite for normal hip function. Normal hip range of motion requires a specific orientation of the acetabulum as well as of the proximal femur. The wide range of motion of normal hip function requires the appropriate orientation of the proximal femur and the acetabulum as well as normal femoral head–neck anatomy. Any deviation from this optimal orientation and alignment of the acetabulum and the femur may result in a decreased range of motion. For example, a decreased head–neck offset (i.e., the distance between the most prominent part of the anterior femoral neck and the articular surface of the anterior femoral head at the widest diameter of the head) results in less clearance between the neck and the bony acetabulum. As a result, the impingement of the femoral neck against the acetabulum and the labrum may occur within the normal range of hip motion. Activities that involve deep hip flexion (e.g., squatting, cycling) may aggravate the symptoms.


FAI has two types that depend on the anatomic location of the abnormality. The abnormality may be on the acetabular side (e.g., acetabular retroversion, coxa profunda) and result in abnormal coverage or overcoverage of the femoral head; this is called pincer-type impingement. If the abnormality is on the femoral side in the form of an aspheric head–neck junction or an abnormal head–neck junction with a decreased head–neck offset (e.g., slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Perthes abnormalities, femoral neck malunions), it is called cam-type impingement. The third type of FAI is a combination of the cam and pincer types of impingements. In all scenarios, the impingement of either the femoral neck or the head–neck junction at the edge of the acetabulum results in repetitive trauma to the labrum. This leads to degenerative tears in the labrum and the disruption of the labrochondral junction, which leads to osteoarthritis of the hip. Although the degeneration starts in the anterolateral joint space, it may also affect the posteroinferior joint space as a result of the levering of the femoral head on the anterior edge of the acetabulum caused by anterior impingement.




History and physical examination


The most common clinical presentation is activity-related groin pain in the young to middle-aged athletic individual. Associated lateral and posterior hip pain is also commonly observed. The symptoms are frequently intermittent, and the intensity ranges from mild to severe. High-demand sport activities that involve running, cutting, pivoting, and repetitive hip flexion (e.g., soccer) frequently exacerabate symptoms. Patients also complain of groin discomfort with prolonged sitting. Mechanical symptoms of locking and catching may also be problematic, and these presumably result from labral disease or unstable articular cartilage flaps. A history of hip trauma, childhood hip disease, and previous surgeries and treatments should be determined. These patients are commonly evaluated by multiple physicians and have been treated for tendonitis and synovitis. However, conservative treatment commonly fails as a result of the persistent structural abnormalities of the joint.


The physical examination starts with an observation of the patient’s gait and sitting posture. Patients with FAI may avoid sitting erect in a chair. These patients may also have an antalgic gait, depending on the extent of the disease, and abductor weakness is common. Previous surgical scars are inspected to clarify the nature of previous procedures and to facilitate preoperative planning. A Trendelenburg test is used to assess abductor strength. During physical examination, the most common finding is the limited internal rotation of the hip, particularly with simultaneous hip flexion. The anterior impingement test is performed by passively flexing (90 degrees to 100 degrees), adducting (10 degrees to 20 degrees), and internally rotating (5 degrees to 20 degrees) the hip. This motion elicits the groin pain by moving the proximal anterolateral part of the femoral neck into contact with the rim of the acetabulum. A positive test can be indicative of anterior FAI. The Patrick test is performed by flexing, externally rotating, and abducting the hip by placing the ipsilateral foot on the contralateral knee. A positive test (i.e., the presence of groin pain) suggests the irritability of the hip joint and intra-articular hip disease. Finally, an examination of the lumbar spine and the entire limb is necessary to eliminate other sources of pain.



Imaging and diagnostic studies


Plain radiographs are the traditional imaging modality for this condition. They can include a standing or supine anteroposterior pelvic view, a cross-table lateral view with 15 degrees of internal rotation, and a Dunn view or a frog-leg lateral view. The rotation and tilt of the pelvic x-ray should be assessed by observing the symmetry of the obturator foramens and the distance of the symphysis pubis to the sacrococcygeal joint, respectively. The normal value for the latter is 47 mm in females and 32 mm in males. Acetabular inclination and femoral head coverage should be evaluated to rule out associated hip dysplasia (i.e., structural instability). Acetabular version can also be assessed by looking for the presence of a crossover sign, which indicates acetabular retroversion. In addition, joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, and periarticular cysts should be noted as indicators of secondary articular degeneration. The cross-table lateral view is helpful to evaluate the femoral head–neck junction. The femoral head–neck offset, the head–neck offset ratio, and alpha angle can be measured with the use of this view. These measurements have been shown to demonstrate abnormal femoral head morphology that is observed with cam-type impingement, and they can also be analyzed with the 45-degree and 90-degree Dunn views or the frog-leg lateral radiograph.


The next step in imaging should be magnetic resonance arthrography. This modality is sensitive for detecting intra-articular abnormalities (e.g., labral tears, chondral defects), and it is also helpful for excluding other diagnoses (e.g., osteonecrosis of the femoral head, stress fracture, neoplasm, infection). When evaluating patients with FAI, a computed tomography scan with three-dimensional reconstruction is informative with regard to the osseous deformity. The contour of the femoral head–neck junction and the extent of the femoral-sided disease can be appreciated in detail. The version of the acetabulum and associated osseous anomalies of the acetabular rim can also be defined.


Finally, diagnostic intra-articular hip injections provide valuable information about the presence or absence of intra-articular disease. Patients with intra-articular hip diseases (e.g., labral tears) usually report significant pain relief after injection. Alternatively, patients who do not have any pain relief should be re-evaluated for other causes of extra-articular hip disease (e.g., abdominal wall hernia, trochanteric bursitis, spinal stenosis).



Surgical treatment


The goal of the surgical treatment of FAI is to restore a more normal bony anatomy while addressing the associated soft-tissue problems (e.g., labral tears, acetabular cartilage lesions). The ideal surgical approach should possess the following properties:






Different surgical approaches have been proposed to reach these goals. Ganz and colleagues popularized surgical dislocation and showed that this technique allowed for the 360-degree evaluation of the femoral head with complete access to the acetabulum. They did not observe any evidence of avascular necrosis after 2 to 7 years of follow up. Murphy and colleagues reported about 23 patients who were treated with open osteochondroplasty; 15 patients did not require further surgery, whereas 1 patient required hip arthroscopy to address a torn labrum. Seven patients were later converted to total hip arthroplasty. Spencer and colleagues reported about 19 patients who had osteochondroplasty or intertrochanteric osteotomy via surgical dislocation, and they concluded that this approach is safe and efficacious for treating FAI. Inferior clinical outcomes were observed among patients who had articular cartilage degeneration. Peters and Erickson reported about 20 patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow up. The authors noted severe acetabular cartilage lesions that were not appreciated on preoperative radiographs or magnetic resonance arthrography in 18 hips. Eight hips demonstrated a progression of arthritis, 3 hips were later converted to total hip arthroplasty, and 1 patient was considering total hip arthroplasty. The authors concluded that the prognosis of FAI largely depends on the status of the acetabular cartilage. Finally, Beck and colleagues reported excellent outcome among 13 out of 19 patients who had an open osteochondroplasty procedure after an average of 4.7 years. In summary, surgical dislocation of the hip seems to be an effective procedure for the treatment of FAI, and it is associated with clinical improvement for most patients.


To avoid the potential complications of surgical dislocation, Pierannunzii and d’Imporzano reported a modified anterior approach without surgical dislocation to address FAI. The authors proposed that this approach is advantageous because there is no risk of interference with the posterior blood supply. In addition, the approach provides direct exposure of the anterolateral head–neck junction. However, this approach relies on imaging for the evaluation of the acetabular cartilage, because it does not allow dislocation of the femoral head. The authors reported about 7 patients; all except 1, who had advanced arthritis, demonstrated significant clinical improvement.


An arthroscopic osteochondroplasty technique was proposed to avoid the potential complications involved with open surgical procedures and to expedite the recovery of the patients. Hip arthroscopy allows the surgeon to evaluate the labral and acetabular lesions with the use of a minimally invasive approach. The impingement can also be evaluated and addressed during the same procedure. However, the learning curve of the arthroscopic osteochondroplasty is steep, and the procedure usually takes longer than an open procedure. In addition, the evaluation of the adequacy of the resection is limited by the technique itself. Guanche and Bare reported about 10 patients who were treated with arthroscopic osteochondroplasty procedures with an average of 16 months of follow up. Eight patients without cartilage lesions did substantially better than the 2 patients who did have associated cartilage lesions.


< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 24, 2016 | Posted by in MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE | Comments Off on Limited Open Osteochondroplasty for the Treatment of Anterior Femoroacetabular Impingement

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access