Footwear assessment

CHAPTER 9 Footwear assessment





Introduction


Podiatrists and other healthcare professionals often condemn the footwear worn by patients. However, it is important to first consider just why the individual patient is wearing the shoes they have chosen. What are the criteria identified by the patient as being of significance in the choice of their footwear and what previous experience has affected their footwear selection? There is little doubt that footwear can be a mechanical and sometimes a chemical irritant to feet, but it can also be used as a therapy to reduce morbidity, and to improve foot health, mobility and quality of life.


Why do we wear shoes? The classic answer is ‘protection’. In inclement conditions it is evident that footwear will provide a barrier against the cold and wet. In rough terrain soling will minimise trauma and the risk of damaging the integrity of skin. However, even when conditions are fair, we still wear shoes. Perhaps the major influences are not only climatic and not solely related to underfoot surfaces but also related to fashion, peer pressure and habit. In warmer climates, such as the Mediterranean regions, fishermen may be seen walking barefoot comfortably during the day, without sustaining damage to their feet, but then during the evening they may choose to wear shoes/sandals. Their feet develop a layer of physiological callus to provide a natural protection against walking on firm surfaces, but the shoes or sandals they chose to wear out of work form part of their social dress code. The clinician should determine the importance of footwear style to a patient’s body image and take this into account when making footwear recommendations. The eventual footwear prescription derived in consultation with the patient may well be a compromise, but it should be a compromise that the patient will find acceptable and one which will minimise damage to foot health.



What do patients want from their footwear?


Patients may subconsciously use a list of preferential features which may include:



Before beginning to consider the suitability of the footwear presented by the patient we need to establish the type of footwear normally worn by the patient for the large part of the day and identify why they chose that particular style and material. It is also advisable to identify whether they have had any bad footwear experiences. For example have they been persuaded to buy ‘sensible’ footwear only to find that it was expensive and did not improve their foot comfort or their foot health? The purpose for which the footwear is to be used is significant and we should consider whether it is essentially designed to be smart or casual, for work or for a special occasions, regular use or a specific activity.


It is also useful to determine how a patient evaluates the fit of a shoe. They would probably consider a well-fitting shoe to be one which:



The patient’s perspective may be summarised in the word ‘comfort’. Comfort is a term which relates to a lack of discomfort or pain and is directly related to sensitivity levels. It seems that in comparison with the hand, the foot has much lower sensitivity. Table 9.1 shows the differences in two-point discrimination at specific distances on sites on the hand and foot when monofilaments are applied (Goonetilleke & Luximon 2001).


Table 9.1 Sensitivity to Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments and two-point discrimination at points in the hand and foot























Site Touch sensitivity measured with Semmes–Weinstein monofilament (in mg) Two point discrimination (in mm)
Middle finger 6.8 2.5
Palm 20.1 11.5
Sole 35.9 22.5
Hallux 36.7 12.0

Comfort may mean different things to different people. Is it the right feel? The absence of discomfort or pain? When patients like a particular footwear style and want to wear a favourite pair of shoes they can block the pain sensation. Feet and shoes are different shapes and when we put shoes onto our feet we are generally trying to fit an irregular shaped object into a more regularly shaped piece of footwear. However, if we try to replicate the actual individual foot shape into a shoe this will also give rise to problems as the foot undergoes changes in shape on weightbearing, with temperature change, impact, oedema and so on. For a shoe to fit, it ought to allow a certain ‘feel’ against the foot so that the wearer knows they have a shoe on their foot, but it should not cause any discomfort, pain or trauma. Neither should it require the foot to do any additional work in the form of gripping to make the shoe stay on the foot. The shoe should be secure at locations on the foot where deformations during gait will not be significantly large. Such positions will depend on shoe design and include: the grip around the heel, waist-girth, and the height of the shoe matching that at the midfoot. Forward movement of the foot should be restricted by a secure fastening across the instep.



Parts of the shoe


















The last


The last is the model form (Fig. 9.2) around which the shoe is made. Lasts are usually made of polyurethane, although wooden lasts may be used for high-quality, high-cost bespoke footwear.



Last measurements and sizing


The length of the last will equate with the finished length of the shoe that is made on it. The foot width and girth measurements are taken at several points. The widest point on the last will equate with the width of the foot at the metatarsophalangeal joints. The width from medial to lateral across the plantar surface of the heel directly beneath the malleoli will also be transferred to the measurement at the corresponding point on the last. Girth measurements are taken at a minimum of five points on the foot to correspond with last dimensions. These points include the circumference of the foot at the metatarsophalangeal joints, the circumference of the foot immediately behind the metatarsal heads (known as the waist measurement), and the circumference of the foot at the instep – in the position of the cuneiform bones. Girth measurements will also be taken from the back of the heel at the plantar/retrocalcaneal border to the dorsal surface of the ankle joint and from the same point at the back of the heel to the point at which the instep girth was taken. These measurements are known as the short and long heel measurements, respectively (see Fig. 9.6B).








The ideal shoe – the clinician’s perspective



What to advise patients about footwear


The first and probably most evident feature is that footwear should fit the feet they are intended for. The length of the shoe should accommodate the longest part of the foot always remembering that digital formulae are not standard and that in some patients one or more of the lesser toes may be longer than the hallux. Length should then be subdivided into the length from the heel to the first metatarsophalangeal joint and the length from the first metatarsophalangeal joint to the toes (Fig. 9.4).



All feet are different and even if the overall shoe length is correct the treadline of the shoe may not correspond with the metatarsophalangeal joints. This will result in the foot trying to flex at a point where the shoe is designed to limit flexion. If the treadline of the shoe is too far proximal for foot flexion the shoe will acquire additional toe spring from the foot flexion point and the vamp will crease excessively. If it is too far distal the toe spring of the shoe will be depressed by the foot and lead to cramping of the toes. The heel to ball measurements vary amongst manufacturers and it is often worthwhile trying various shoes to ensure that the heel to ball length is adequate.


Shoe width increases incrementally with length and patients with wide feet often choose shoes that are too long for them to obtain adequate width. This also means that the metatarsophalangeal joints will be positioned proximal to the shoe treadline and shoe flexion will not correspond to foot flexion and the shoe will acquire additional toe spring and the vamp will crease. If the shoe contains a shank, the shank may break through the outersole. This is because the relationship between the heel height and the treadline has been changed as the foot requires the shoe to flex in a more proximal position than it was designed to do (Fig. 9.5).



The shoe should be of correct width and girth at the metatarsal heads and of correct girth at the instep. Several other girth measurements need to be matched if the shoe is to fit properly (Fig. 9.6). The long heel measurement is perhaps one of the most important in obtaining a good fit and it dictates the positioning of the instep fastening. It is also necessary to remember that the shoe needs to change shape with the foot in gait. The time of the day when taking measurements is also important since normal daytime changes result in a 3% increase in foot volume (Janisse et al 1995) and vigorous exercise can cause an increase in foot volume by 8% (Merriman & Tollafield 1997). The shoe should be large enough to allow for changes in dimension as the day progresses and should also allow for changes in volume required by variation in hosiery, activity, or to accommodate dressings/padding where needed. If the patient needs to wear orthoses, the shoe needs to be able to accommodate them. The shoe should be of adequate width and depth and there should be no localised tight spots. The heel of the shoe should be broad based for stability on heel contact. There should be a functional fastening to hold the foot back in the shoe and to prevent impaction of the toes against the front of the shoe. The topline of the shoe should fit snugly and should not gape. It should not irritate the malleoli or Achilles tendon.



Shoe style


There are seven basic shoe styles (Fig. 9.7). The choice of shoe style should be based on the fact that the foot changes in dimension during the various stages of the gait cycle. If the shoe is to be large enough to accommodate the fully loaded foot then it will need to be strapped or laced onto the foot otherwise it will fall off during the swing phase of the gait cycle when the foot is unloaded and of different dimension. Slip-on or court shoes will need to be wedged onto the foot and if they are to stay on the foot during the swing phase they will be too small for the fully loaded foot. They only stay on the foot by a gripping action of the toes. This can lead to the development of corn or callus on prominent toe joints and in some cases can lead to toe deformities through the constant clawing action. Functional straps or laces provide a mechanism for holding the foot back in the shoe and minimising the forward slip of the foot into the toe space of the shoe causing compression of the forefoot.



The heel is the first part of the foot to contact the ground during gait and the heel of the shoe needs to form a firm base for ground contact and for stability in gait. The heel part of the upper (the quarter) needs to be firm to hold and contain the soft tissue surrounding the calcaneus. If this fails the soft tissue will be exposed to excessive tensile stress during heel contact, or splaying over the edge of an open-backed sandal or mule-style shoe, and can result in heel callus or fissures.


The heel height should ideally be about 2.5 cm but no more than 4 cm. The higher the heel the greater the forward displacement of body mass onto the metatarsal heads. An elevated heel also has the effect of changing the body’s centre of gravity, and to compensate for this the ankles plantarflex (passively) and there is reduced supination at push off. In addition, the stance knee and hips flex resulting in reduced swing knee flexion (De Lateur et al 1991, Esenyel et al 2003, Gefen et al 2002, Lee et al 1990). There may then be a compensatory action in the lumbar spine. This can lead to discomfort and to arthritic changes in the affected joints. The same basic principles apply to children’s footwear with one additional feature, that of growth allowance. The amount of growth allowance will depend on the child’s foot length. This will be less in small sizes and up to 14 mm in larger children’s sizes.


Footwear should allow free movement of the toes and should be of good fit with adequate length and with quarters of adequate height and shape to grip the heel. It should have good contact with the surface of the foot, and should cradle the foot at this point. The shoe should absorb humidity, limit any increase in foot temperature and be of low weight. In 2002 Brazil became the first country to develop norms for footwear comfort and identified the following factors (World Footwear 2006):


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 10, 2016 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on Footwear assessment

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access