Diagnosis and Management of the Septic Joint



Fig. 9.1
Clinical appearance of ankle joint sepsis The clinical appearance of a septic right ankle and the contralateral unaffected limb are seen. The classical clinical presentation consists of a relatively rapid onset of ankle pain, decreased joint range of motion, swelling, and warmth under 2 weeks in duration. However, presentation can be variable and often does not include all of these features. Thus maintaining a low index of suspicion for joint sepsis is important in a patient presenting with some of these features




Table 9.1
Risk factors for joint sepsis





















Rheumatoid arthritis

Prosthetic joints

Low socioeconomic status

Intravenous drug use

Alcoholism

Diabetes

Recent corticosteroid injection

Ulceration


Laboratory studies can aid in establishing the diagnosis of pyarthrosis. Peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) have been shown to provide minimal diagnostic value. WBC counts greater than 10,000/μL, ESR over 30 mm/h, and CRP more than 100 mg/L have been shown to exhibit only a mildly increased likelihood of septic arthritis [15, 16]. Dissimilarly, diagnostic arthrocentesis is important in establishing a diagnosis. The technique for performing ankle arthrocentesis is displayed in Fig. 9.2. The synovial fluid white cell count (WCC) has proven to be an effective marker, with the likelihood of joint sepsis increasing markedly as the synovial WCC rises [9]. However, Li and colleagues cite a synovial WCC as low as 17,500/mm3 in providing diagnostic sensitivity of 83 % and specificity of 67 % [17]. A synovial WCC of >50,000/mm3 is a threshold above which increases the likelihood of subsequently confirmed cases [3]. Similarly, positive synovial fluid culture has been shown to exhibit a sensitivity of 75–95 % in a septic joint [18]. Thus the ultimate “gold standard” diagnosis currently rests on the clinical acumen of an experienced physician considering all available clinical and laboratory findings [5].

A323604_1_En_9_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.2
Ankle joint aspiration is typically approached from the anterior medial side of the ankle joint. Site markings similar to an arthroscopic anteromedial portal are used. The joint line is marked by palpation. The anteromedial puncture is made just medial to the tibialis anterior tendon which is lateral to the greater saphenous vein and adjacent saphenous nerve (a). The foot is held dorsiflexed at 90° while an 18-gauge needle is introduced into the ankle joint. This technique protects the cartilage on the talar dome from injury during insertion of the large-bore needle (b). The needle enters the joint at approximately 45° with the intention of entering the anterior joint capsule recess. Joint distention is oftentimes present with infection making entrance into the joint much easier. Vacuum is then applied through the 12-mL syringe. The tip of the needle frequently becomes obstructed with synovial tissue. A slight pullback or withdrawal technique allows uncorking of the needle at which point several milliliters of yellow, purulent and often watery fluid is aspirated. Normal synovial fluid is typically clear to slightly yellow in appearance while fluid concerning for infection may exhibit a more turbid, discolored, or frankly purulent appearance (c). Bloody-appearing fluid with initial aspiration may indicate hemarthrosis; aspirate that becomes increasingly bloody in appearance during aspiration is more likely due to injection-induced hemarthrosis. The specimen for synovial crystal analysis and culture are initially placed in a preservative-free tube (indicated by the red-top tube). One milliliter of aspirate is preferred. An additional milliliter of joint aspirate is then placed into a tube containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (indicated by the lavender-top tube) for synovial white cell count. Less than 1 mL of volume or dilution with saline will compromise the cell count. The synovial white cell count may have to be foregone if a very small quantity of fluid is obtained as the ankle joint does not typically yield a high volume of joint aspirate

Differential diagnoses that should be considered with a painful, erythematous ankle are numerous. Klippel developed an extensive list of differentials for acute monoarthritis that can be seen in Table 9.2 [19]. Common differentials that will be encountered in the ankle are trauma, gout, extra-articular infection, hemarthrosis, and post-corticosteroid injection flare. It should be noted that certain differentials are also risk factors for joint sepsis and can be present in tandem with one another. Thus the definitive diagnosis of a differential does not necessarily rule out concomitant infection. One common example is acute gout; simply establishing the diagnosis of gout does not effectively rule out simultaneous infection. Similarly, patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at higher risk for developing joint sepsis because of the systemic disease process as well as immunosuppressive drug therapy used to manage the disease [20, 21].


Table 9.2
Differential diagnosis for acute monoarthritis









































Infection (bacterial, fungal, mycobacterial, viral, spirochete)

Rheumatoid arthritis

Gout

Pseudogout

Apatite-related arthropathy

Reactive arthritis

Systemic lupus erythematosus

Lyme arthritis

Sickle cell disease

Dialysis-related amyloidosis

Transient synovitis of the hip

Plant thorn synovitis

Metastatic carcinoma

Pigmented villonodular synovitis

Hemarthrosis

Neuropathic arthropathy

Osteoarthritis

Intra-articular injury (fracture, soft tissue injury, osteonecrosis)


Adapted from Klippel et al. [19]

In general, joints that exhibit inflammation and arthritis secondary to a number of different entities are at higher risk for sepsis. Robust vascular supply is often appreciated in hypertrophic synovial tissue that forms in an inflamed or arthritic joint. These vessels lack a basement membrane and thus allow blood-borne bacteria easier passage into the joint. Any condition that leads to acute or chronic joint inflammation like arthritis, bone spurs, ankle instability, rheumatoid arthritis or gout may therefore predispose to joint sepsis (Fig. 9.3).

A323604_1_En_9_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.3
Hypertrophic synovial tissue has robust vascular supply that predisposes to hematogenous joint sepsis. These vessels lack a basement membrane which allows bacteria circulating in the blood to cross into the joint. Any condition that leads to acute or chronic joint inflammation like arthritis, bone spurs, ankle instability, rheumatoid arthritis or gout therefore may predispose to joint sepsis



Medical and Surgical Treatment


Prompt and effective treatment of a patient diagnosed with a septic ankle joint serves to lower the potential for morbidity. There have traditionally been few recommendations regarding medical and surgical management. The consensus put forth by the British Society for Rheumatology recommends immediate antibiotic therapy and removal of purulent material from the joint space [14]. This consensus has been consistent with the recommendations put forth by several other studies as well [2224]. Staphylococci and streptococci have been reported as the most common pathologic organisms in joint sepsis [4, 6, 2527]. Staphylococcus aureus has been reported as the most common pathogen, followed by Streptococcus and, rarely, gram-negative rods [4]. While the typical patient without risk factors for gram-negative or resistant bacteria can be treated with the appropriate parenteral penicillin or clindamycin, those considered high-risk for such colonization, such as the diabetic patient, should receive the appropriate empiric therapy. Interdisciplinary management with the involvement of Infectious Disease is often prudent to effectively manage the patient with pyarthrosis.

The means by which the joint is to be evacuated has been a source of debate between the two options of serial joint aspirations versus arthroscopic or open surgical intervention. However, a number of sources recommend immediate arthroscopic irrigation and debridement [1, 2834]. Given the relatively high mortality rate and potential for morbidity with pyarthrosis, surgical intervention should be performed in an urgent or emergent fashion.

Arthroscopic surgery for pyarthrosis is typically performed under general anesthesia without regional or local anesthetic. External distraction is not used to avoid further disturbance to the edematous soft tissues in the region. Standard anteromedial and anterolateral ankle portals are used as described by Ferkel [35]. The use of lactated Ringer’s solution without impregnated antibiotics or antiseptics is well described and is our preference [1]. Use of 3 L unimpregnated lactated Ringer’s solution followed by 6 L impregnated with 50,000 units of Bacitracin powder per bag have also been described [34]. Antiseptics are discouraged when healthy cartilage remains due to concerns of chondrotoxicity [1]. A 2.7 mm or 4.0 mm arthroscope is utilized based on surgeon preference. The 4.0 mm arthroscope may allow for more timely debridement and quicker passing of fluid through the joint but may create difficulty in accessing the joint without distraction, particularly in the patient with osteoarthritis-related joint narrowing. When creating the standard portals for joint access, the anteromedial portal is established first followed by the anterolateral portal with the aid of transillumination (Fig. 9.4a). Intraoperative fluoroscopy can be utilized to help determine the appropriate level for portal placement, which is often more challenging in the septic ankle due to the degree of swelling and extensive internal joint derangement (Fig. 9.4b). When introducing the camera into the joint, difficulty visualizing the articular surface should be anticipated due to a commonly high degree of synovitis with pyarthrosis. The anterolateral portal is then made immediately lateral to the extensor digitorum longus tendon. Care is taken to avoid the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve, which can sometimes be visualized with transillumination. An alternate technique involves palpating the nerve on the unaffected limb as the location of this nerve is typically consistent on the contralateral limb [36]. A doppler ultrasound can be used to assess the location of the perforating peroneal artery which is often non-palpable (Fig. 9.4c). After inserting the camera into the medial portal and establishing a lateral portal, a shaver is placed in the anterolateral portal to assist in evacuating fluid for arthroscopic lavage of the joint. In order to maintain continuous egress of fluids, the shaver often needs to remain running as hypertrophied synovial tissue will otherwise obstruct a standard suction tip. High-volume joint lavage allows for arthroscopic inspection and debridement of hypertrophied synovial tissue while passing fluid through the joint. The surgeon should anticipate difficulty finding the shaver and visualizing the joint in advanced cases of joint sepsis. Because the anterior joint recess is frequently filled with hypertrophied tissue, initial blind debridement may be necessary while being careful to orient the shaver away from the articular surface (Fig. 9.5). At this time a pre-debridement synovial culture and biopsy are obtained.

A323604_1_En_9_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.4
Establishing arthroscopy portals. (a) A standard anteromedial portal is created just medial to the tibialis anterior tendon. The portal is lateral to the greater saphenous vein and saphenous nerve. Difficulty is oftentimes encountered with palpating anatomic structures when infection is present. Anterior synovial hypertrophy and localized soft tissue edema largely precludes identification of sensory nerves. Making the portal close to the tibialis anterior is therefore best to avoid the nerve and vein. Identifying the tibialis anterior in pre-op while the patient is awake allows more accurate delineation of tendon location. Making the portal medial to the tibialis anterior also protects the dorsalis pedis artery. (b) Determining the joint level can be difficult with an edematous ankle, so fluoroscopy is often valuable in determining the joint line prior to incisious. (c) The anterolateral portal is made immediately lateral to the extensor digitorum longus tendon and medial to the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve. If not able to be visualized clinically in the superficial tissues, the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve can at times be visualized with transillumination. Alternately, the location of this nerve is typically consistent between sides so it is possible to palpate the nerve on the unaffected limb to determine its location in relation to the planned portal on the affected side [36]. A doppler ultrasound can be used to assess the location of the perforating peroneal artery (indicated by red arrow), which is not always protected by the overlying tendinous structures


A323604_1_En_9_Fig5_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.5
Arthroscopic debridement. Once both portals are established, a shaver is placed in the anterolateral portal, which assists in evacuating fluid upon arthroscopic lavage of the joint. Running the shaver during lavage helps maintain continuous egress of fluids. Hypertrophy of the synovial tissue will otherwise obstruct a standard suction tip. High-volume joint lavage is time consuming but allows the opportunity for arthroscopic inspection and debridement of hypertrophied synovial tissue. The surgeon should expect difficulty finding the shaver and visualizing the joint in advanced cases of joint sepsis. The anterior joint recess is frequently filled with hypertrophied tissue; blind debridement may be necessary, with care being taken to orient the shaver away from the articular surface of the joint

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 18, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Diagnosis and Management of the Septic Joint

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access