Deep Dry Needling of the Hip and Pelvic Muscles

Chapter 11

Deep Dry Needling of the Hip and Pelvic Muscles

Blair H. Green; Jan Dommerholt


The pelvis is the region of the body bound by the innominate bones, sacrum, and coccyx. Within this bony framework lie the contents of the pelvic floor. The pelvic floor is comprised not only of muscular structures, but also all of the structures in the pelvic cavity (Hartman & Sarton, 2014). The muscles of the abdominal–pelvic region serve many roles, including control of the urinary and anal sphincters, sexual arousal and orgasm, support for the pelvic viscera, local spinal stability, and motor control. Muscles contributing to pelvic girdle pain may not be limited to the intrinsic muscles of the pelvic floor.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists describes chronic pelvic pain (CPP) as pain located in the pelvis, abdominal wall at or below the umbilicus, lumbar, sacral, and buttock regions (Vercellini et al., 2009). Several pain syndromes are included within the CPP terminology, including bladder pain syndrome, endometriosis pain syndrome, interstitial cystitis, prostatic pain syndrome, dysmenorrhoea, and vulvodynia (Fall et al., 2010). CPP remains a somewhat enigmatic diagnosis. Pastore and Katzman (2012) commented that 40% of all laparoscopies are performed to determine a cause of CPP. Vleeming and colleagues (2008) suggested that, from a biomechanical point of view, there is a connection between chronic sacroiliac dysfunction and CPP, which is evidenced by many patients with SI pain, who also suffer from CPP. In addition, Vleeming and colleagues (2008) reported that the prevalence of pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy is 20%. According to Zondervain and colleagues (2001), the lifetime occurrence of CPP is 33%. In a recent study researchers found a significant relationship between the presence of spine and hip movement diagnoses and pelvic floor muscle diagnoses (Wente & Spitznagle 2017). Cohen and colleagues (2016) described the relationship between pelvic floor muscle dysfunction in males with sexual dysfunction, chronic prostatitis, and CPP. These authors found a significant overlap of signs and symptoms of these disorders with a common thread of muscular dysfunction in the muscles of the pelvic floor, which implies that treating these muscles may result in improved function in men with chronic pelvic pain, chronic prostatitis, and sexual dysfunction (Cohen et al., 2016).

Moreover, pelvic floor muscle dysfunction is associated with impairments of the lumbar spine and hip regions. A functional relationship exists between the pelvic floor, diaphragm and transverse abdominus (Sapsford et al., 2001; Hodges et al., 2014). Smith and colleagues (2006) reported that the association between incontinence and low back pain is greater than the association between low back pain and body mass index. Several studies reported an association between hip pathology, including end-stage hip osteoarthritis and femoroacetabular impingement, and pelvic floor disorders such as vulvodynia and urinary incontinence (Podschun et al., 2013; Baba et al., 2014; Tamaki et al., 2014; Prather & Camacho-Soto 2014; Coady & Futterman, 2015).

Pain from visceral organs is often similar to myofascial pain and described as a poorly localised, dull, aching pain. Both myofascial and visceral pain are known causes of secondary hyperalgesia or referred pain. Of interest is that visceral-induced referred pain can persist even after the dysfunctions or the disease has been resolved. For example, referred pain from kidney stones to the quadratus lumborum muscle may continue to cause low back pain even after the kidney stones are no longer present. Little is known about the referred pain from muscles to the viscera, although there is an established somatovisceral pathway. A study of injections of an acidic saline solution in the gastrocnemius of a rat caused more distention of the colon and increased muscle activity in the ipsilateral external abdominal oblique muscle (Miranda et al., 2004; Peles et al., 2004); however, it is not known whether such patterns are common. Luz and colleagues (2015) found that lamina I of the spinal cord is the first site in the central nervous system in an animal model at which somatic and visceral pathways converge onto individual projection and local circuit neurons, explaining potential somatovisceral interactions. Abdominal and pelvic TrPs may be secondary to visceral disease or dysfunction through a visceral–somatic convergence pathway; however, myofascial impairments, including myofascial trigger points (TrPs), are also common pain contributors to CPP (Pastore & Katzman 2012) and other types of pelvic floor dysfunction (Doggweiler-Wiygul, 2004).

Clinical relevance of trigger points in syndromes related to the pelvis

Myofascial dysfunction is one of the most common contributing factors to pelvic pain (Itza et al., 2010). Patients with visceral pain and cutaneous hyperalgesia in the abdominal wall are likely to present with abdominal TrPs (Giamberardino et al., 1999; Jarrell, 2011). Close to 90% of patients with interstitial cystitis, pelvic pain, and incontinence present with myofascial pain and TrPs (Wesselman, 2001; Fitzgerald & Kotarinos, 2003; Pastore & Katzman, 2012). Jarrell (2011) described abdominal TrPs in patients with endometriosis. TrPs are also a common finding in patients with provoked vestibulodynia, which is another type of a CPP disorder (Hartman & Sarton, 2014). Moldwin and Fariello (2013) found that TrPs are associated with high tone pelvic floor dysfunction. Men with chronic prostatitis and CPP presented with pain in the scrotal, perineal, inguinal, and bladder areas in 54% of cases, and 88% of the cases had myofascial pain (Zermann et al., 2001). TrPs in the puborectalis, pubococcygeus, and rectus abdominus muscles reproduced penile pain 75% of the time, whereas TrPs in the external oblique elicited suprapubic, groin, and testicular pain in 80% of the cases (Anderson et al., 2009). Another study showed that 78.5% of patients with interstitial cystitis had myofascial pain, and 67.9% of those patients had six or more identifiable TrPs (Bassaly et al., 2010). TrPs were most commonly found in the obturator internus, puborectalis, iliococcygeus muscles, and the arcus tendineus. Farrell and colleagues (2016) studied the effects of physical therapy for chronic scrotal content pain and found that manual physical therapy reduced pain levels in 50% of patients with a complete resolution of pain in 13% of the patients. The number of patients taking pain medication reduced from 73.3% to 44%. Pelvic floor tension and myofascial pain and tenderness are commonly seen with scrotal pain.

Clinical practice guidelines and recent literature support the treatment of TrPs as part of a multidisciplinary approach to treating patients with pelvic floor dysfunction. The European Association of Urology and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada recommend that TrPs be considered in the diagnosis of pelvic pain (Jarrell et al., 2005; Fall et al., 2010), which is supported in studies by Jarrell, who demonstrated that abdominal TrPs have a 93% positive predictive value for visceral disease, particularly CPP (Jarrell, 2011; Jarrell et al., 2011). The presence of abdominal TrPs along with abdominal and perineal cutaneous allodynia discriminated visceral from somatic sources of pain (Jarrell et al., 2011). However, of interest is that in spite of the recommendations, obstetrics and gynaecology residency training programs rarely include the examination of the pelvic floor muscles (Bonder et al., 2017). The American Urological Association (2014) lists release of TrPs as a second-line treatment for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), after self-care and patient education (Qaseem et al., 2014), whereas the Canadian Urological Association considers that ‘looking for tenderness, spasm/tight bands, and/or trigger points, is important for both diagnosis and treatment recommendations’ as part of the mandatory physical examination of patients with IC/BPS (Cox et al., 2016). IC/BPS is defined as ‘an unpleasant sensation (pain, pressure, discomfort) perceived to be related to the urinary bladder, associated with lower urinary tract symptoms for more than 6 weeks duration, in the absence of infection or other identifiable causes’.

Fitzgerald and colleagues (2013) utilised TrP treatment in addition to other specific manual therapy techniques to treat women with IC/BPS and compared this approach with generalised massage. Their findings demonstrated greater reduction in pain and urinary urgency in the myofascial group. Other studies demonstrated similar results incorporating TrP release into a comprehensive plan to address pelvic floor dysfunction (Weiss, 2001; Anderson et al., 2009). Goldstein and colleagues (2016) recommend physical therapy treatment to the pelvic floor, including internal muscle treatment, for the treatment of vulvodynia. Several studies have confirmed that physical therapy interventions are useful in the treatment of patients with sexual dysfunction such as erectile dysfunction (Lavoisier et al., 2014; Pelayo-Nieto et al., 2015; Yüksela et al., 2015; Bechara et al., 2016; Rudolph et al., 2017).

Pain in the pelvic girdle may be referred from other muscles in the spine and hip regions. Examination of the patient with pain or other symptoms in the pelvis should include an assessment of the lower thoracic and lumbar segments, the sacroiliac and hip joints, and the pubic region. Careful consideration should be given to muscle, fascia, and nerves in addition to the joints of these regions. Muscle or fascia innervated by the 10th thoracic to the sacral segments can refer pain to the lower abdomen, pubic region, groin, buttocks, and ischial tuberosities (Baker, 1993; Brookhoff & Bennett, 2006; Longbottom, 2009). Treatment of TrPs in the pelvic floor muscles as well as the spine, hips, and lower extremities is an integral part of any physical therapy plan of care to address pelvic pain and dysfunction.

Clinical relevance of trigger points in syndromes related to the hip and thigh

Several studies have reported that TrPs in hip muscles such as the gluteus medius or piriformis can be involved in patients with low back pain. Teixera and colleagues (2011) identified the presence of active TrPs in the gluteus medius and the quadratus lumborum muscles in 85.7% of patients suffering from postlaminectomy pain syndrome. Iglesias-Gonzalez and colleagues (2013) found that active TrPs in the gluteus medius and piriformis were present in almost 35% of patients with nonspecific low back pain. TrPs in the gluteus muscles have been identified in 76% of patients with lumbar radiculopathy (Adelmanesh et al., 2015), and their presence has been considered a highly specific indicator of radiculopathy with a specificity of 0.91 and a sensitivity of 0.74 (Adelmanesh et al., 2016).

There is a lack of studies investigating the effects of dry needling (DN) in the hip muscles. Rainey (2013) reported a case report study of a patient with low back pain who received DN into the lumbar multifidus and gluteus maximus and gluteus medius muscles with a positive outcome on pain and related disability. Huguenin and colleagues (2005) observed that DN of the gluteal muscles was effective for decreasing symptoms and tightness in athletes with posterior thigh pain; however, no changes in the straight leg raise test were found. Anandkumar (2017) recently described the positive effects of DN of the quadratus femoris muscle in a case report of a patient with posterior thigh pain managed unsuccessfully with other conventional treatments.

Due to the interregional dependence principle, the hip and the knee are clearly interconnected. In fact, several hip muscles can refer pain to the knee. Roach and colleagues (2013) found an increase in the prevalence of TrPs in the gluteus medius and quadratus lumborum muscles in patients with patellofemoral pain. Additionally, the role of TrPs in knee pain syndromes has been recently confirmed. Torres-Chica and colleagues (2015) observed that the referred pain elicited by active TrPs of the knee muscles reproduced symptoms in individuals with postmeniscectomy knee pain. The review of Dor and Kalichman (2017) concluded that there is preliminary evidence suggesting a potential role of TrPs in knee osteoarthritis, but more research is clearly needed. In fact, one study included in this review found that the higher number of active TrPs was associated with higher intensity of ongoing knee pain in a sample of elder people with knee osteoarthritis (Alburquerque-García et al., 2015). This hypothesis is also supported by a case series showing that the combination of TrP DN and therapeutic exercises was effective for improving pain, range of motion, and related disability in patients who had chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty (Núñez-Cortés et al., 2017). Similarly, Mayoral and colleagues (2013), in a double-blind study, reported that a single DN treatment under anaesthesia reduced pain in the first month in patients receiving a total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis. The randomised clinical trial conducted by Espi-López and colleagues (2017) showed that the inclusion of three sessions of DN into the vastus medialis and lateralis muscles in a manual therapy and exercise program did not result in improved outcomes for pain and disability in individuals with patellofemoral pain at the 3-month follow-up. It is important to consider that only two muscles received the needling intervention, explaining the lack of effects. In fact, a recent randomised, controlled trial observed that application of DN into TrPs on the vastus medialis combined with a rehabilitation protocol was effective for increasing range of motion and function in subacute patients with surgical reconstruction of complete anterior cruciate ligament rupture (Velázquez-Saornil et al., 2017).

Hamstrings injuries also represent a significant problem for the population. Some case reports have observed that the combination of DN with eccentric exercises of the lower extremity was effective for pain and function outcomes for the treatment of hamstring tendinopathy (Jayaseelan et al., 2014) or hamstring strain (Dembowski et al., 2013). However, these results were not replicated in posterior clinical trials. Geist and colleagues (2016) analysed the effects of DN into a sample of asymptomatic individuals with hamstring extensibility deficits and observed that DN did not result in increased extensibility beyond that of stretching alone. It should be noted that the authors did not mention TrPs in the hamstring muscles. (Geist et al., 2016). Similarly, Mason and colleagues (2016) also did not observe any significant effect on hamstring range of motion after application of two session of DN compared with sham needling in a young active population with nontraumatic knee pain.

Dry needling of the abdominal, hip, pelvis, and thigh muscles

Some of the muscles on the hip and pelvis are covered in other chapters. The abdominal muscles are discussed in Chapter 10. The referred pain patterns are mostly based on the descriptions by Simons and colleagues (1999), with substitutions and additions by Dalmau-Carola (2005) and Longbottom (2009).

Hip Muscles

Gluteus maximus muscle

Fig. 11.1
Fig. 11.1 Dry needling of trigger points in the gluteus maximus muscle: A. upper fibres; B. lower fibres.

  •   Precautions: Avoid needling the sciatic nerve. The depth of penetration is dependent on the amount of adipose tissue.

Gluteus medius muscle

Fig. 11.2
Fig. 11.2 Dry needling of trigger points in the gluteus medius muscle.

  •   Precautions: There are deep branches of the superior gluteal vessels and nerve between the gluteus medius and minimus muscles, but these cannot be always be avoided. The depth of penetration is dependent on the amount of adipose tissue.

Gluteus minimus muscle

Fig. 11.3
Fig. 11.3 Dry needling of trigger points in the gluteus minimus muscle.

  •   Precautions: There are deep branches of the superior gluteal vessels and nerve between the gluteus medius and minimus muscles, but these cannot be always be avoided. The depth of penetration is dependent on the amount of adipose tissue.

Tensor fascia latae muscle

Fig. 11.4
Fig. 11.4 Dry needling of trigger points in the tensor fascia latae muscle.

  •   Precautions: None

Iliacus muscle

Fig. 11.5
Fig. 11.5 Dry needling of trigger points in the iliacus muscle.

  •   Precautions: To avoid penetration of the peritoneum, direct the needle towards the inside surface of the ilium.

Obturator internus muscle

Fig. 11.6
Fig. 11.6 Dry needling of trigger points in the obturator internus muscle.

Fig. 11.7
Fig. 11.7 Dry needling of trigger points in the obturator internus muscle with intrarectal palpation.

  •   Precautions: Avoid needling towards the pudendal or Alcock canal containing the pudendal and obturator nerve and vessels.

Obturator externus/gemellus inferior and superior muscles

Fig. 11.8
Fig. 11.8 Anatomy of the hip external rotators. (Used with permission from: Tamaki et al. (2004). An Anatomic Study of the Impressions on the greater trochanter: bony geometry indicates the alignment of the short external rotator muscles. The Journal of Arthroplasty 29, 2473–2477.)

  •   Function: The obturator externus muscle is often described as an external rotator of the hip along with the gemelli muscles, obturator internus, and quadratus femoris muscles; however, a recent biomechanical study showed that the obturator externus muscle is a primary flexor and adductor of the extended hip (Vaarbakken et al., 2015). It is actually not clear to what degree the obturator externus muscles contribute to external rotation and stability of the hip.
  •   Innervation: The obturator externus muscle is innervated by the posterior branch of the obturator nerve from L3-L4, the gemellus superior muscle by branches of the obturator internus nerve form L5-S2, and the gemellus inferior muscle by branches of the quadratus femoris nerve from L4-S1.
  •   Referred pain: Referred pain patterns from this muscle are not described in detail but are generally thought to include the proximal posterior thigh, hip, and groin and a sciatic-type referral pattern.
  •   Needling technique: The patient is positioned in the sidelying position with the involved side up and a pillow between the knees. Palpate the muscle just medial to the greater trochanter. Insert the needle perpendicular to the muscle surface directly towards the TrP. The obturator externus muscle is found deeper and more posterior to the trochanter (Fig. 11.9).

Fig. 11.9
Fig. 11.9 Dry needling of trigger points in the obturator externus/gemelli muscles.

  •   Precautions: Avoid needling the sciatic nerve.

Quadratus femoris muscle

Fig. 11.10
Fig. 11.10 Dry needling of trigger points in the quadratus femoris muscle.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Oct 7, 2019 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Deep Dry Needling of the Hip and Pelvic Muscles
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes