Carpal Tunnel Release
Edward Diao, MD
Dr. Diao or an immediate family member is a member of a speakers’ bureau or has made paid presentations on behalf of Stryker; serves as a paid consultant to or is an employee of Conextions, Exsomed, and Zimmer Biomet; has received research or institutional support from the National Institutes of Health (NIAMS & NICHD); and serves as a board member, owner, officer, or committee member of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.
INTRODUCTION
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common condition, with a 1% to 5% incidence in the adult population. Making an accurate diagnosis of CTS is a critical aspect of successful management and treatment because many other conditions can mimic CTS. The surgeon should not confuse a vague symptom of arm numbness with CTS.
CTS is associated with pain in the distal third of the forearm and the volar wrist area. Characteristic paresthesias occur in the median nerve distribution, involving the thumb, the index finger, the long finger, and the radial portion of the ring finger. However, this anatomic distribution may not occur if there is more proximal nerve compression, multiple nerve compression, or an innervation anomaly such as a Martin-Gruber anastomosis.
The carpal tunnel compression test, in which the examiner exerts finger pressure over the wrist and the median nerve, is useful.1 A combination of a positive Tinel sign, the Phalen maneuver, and carpal tunnel compression, with appropriate negative aspects of the physical examination to screen for alternative conditions, has been shown to be both sensitive for and specific to CTS, as proved by electrodiagnostic testing.
Once a diagnosis of CTS has been made, nonsurgical treatment is recommended. This may include activity modification, the use of wrist braces, the use of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids, and a trial of cortisone and local anesthetic injection into the carpal canal.
If nonsurgical treatment fails and the patient presents with significant symptoms, carpal tunnel release (CTR) should be considered. CTR has evolved over the years from a standard open procedure with a long palm and forearm incision to limited incision and endoscopic techniques. These treatments are effective, but there are also reports of complications with all of the treatments. The key objective of the surgery is to completely divide the transverse carpal ligament without injury to the nerve. It is now well established that for index CTS surgery, internal neurolysis is not considered helpful and can be deleterious. Identification and knowledge of the anatomy in this area and the ability to differentiate the median nerve from the palmaris longus and the flexor tendons are key regardless of surgical technique and are based on the surgeon’s knowledge and experience with the particular anatomy of the region affected by CTS.2
PATIENT SELECTION
The diagnosis of CTS is confirmed by a combination of the presence of classic clinical symptoms and signs and positive nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyographic (EMG) studies. If the NCS or EMG findings are negative, at least one trial of corticosteroid injection should be given to evaluate the clinical response. The surgeon should confirm that a trial of nonsurgical treatment has been undertaken without a cure and also confirm that differential diagnoses have been considered.
The presence of other conditions will affect the overall results of CTS treatment; this needs to be discussed with the patient before, not after, surgery. In fact, the surgeon should strongly consider delaying CTS treatment to control or improve other conditions that may be amenable to nonsurgical treatment, such as tendinitis of the wrist, forearm, or elbow.
If the above conditions are met, CTR should have good to excellent results in more than 95% of cases.2 In the case of recurrent CTS, the key to success is patient selection. Although there are scant data to correlate the preoperative evaluation with results, the patient’s clinical course and response to nonsurgical treatment along with the interpretation of electrodiagnostic studies and MRI should be carefully considered before revision surgery.
OUTCOMES
Good or excellent results can be expected in more than 95% of patients.2 The randomized, double-blinded multicenter study from Trumble et al2 compared open and single-portal endoscopic CTR and showed statistically significant improvements in the endoscopic group between 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively in terms of pain and hand strength, compared with that of the open group, and equivalent good results in both groups at 1 year.
Stütz et al3 reported on a retrospective series of 200 patients who underwent a secondary exploration during a 26-month period at a single institution for persistent or recurrent CTS symptoms after CTR. There were 108 cases of incomplete release of the transverse carpal ligament (TCL). Twelve patients had evidence of median nerve laceration during the index procedure; 46 patients had scarring of the nerve to surrounding tissues; and in 13 patients, the cause of the problem could not be determined.
Varitimidis et al4 reviewed 22 patients (24 wrists) who underwent revision open CTR after an initial endoscopic CTR and who had persistent CTS. Twenty-two patients had incomplete TCL release. One patient had a partial and another patient a complete median nerve transection. One patient had a Guyon canal release instead of a CTR. Twenty patients returned to work, 15 at the previous level and five at lighter duty. The two patients with nerve injuries continued to do poorly, with one requiring a vein-wrapping procedure.
ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC TESTING
Electrodiagnostic testing can be helpful in confirming the diagnosis of CTS and potentially eliminating secondary diagnoses. The earliest signs of CTS are generally an increase in sensory and motor latency followed by an increase in distal motor latency. Sometimes, a decrease in amplitude is a soft indicator of peripheral neuropathy. The degree of delay in latency and the degree of decrease in amplitude has some rough correlation with the severity of the neuropathy. Conduction velocity can be a helpful parameter. As the velocity moves from a normal conduction velocity of 50 mps (m/s) to 60 mps down toward a conduction velocity of 30 mps, the trend is highly suggestive of peripheral neuropathy.
EMG of median nerve-innervated thenar muscles is helpful in that denervation patterns can be seen in cases of axonal degeneration with positive sharp waves and fibs highly suggestive of a chronic axonal neuropathy. The evaluation of the ulnar nerve at the wrist and the peripheral nerves across the elbow and the forearm can be also performed if there is clinical suspicion of this.
It should be noted that there is disagreement between the electrodiagnostic disciplines and the hand surgery disciplines regarding the sensitivity and the specificity of electrodiagnostic tests. It would be prudent for the physician to not use an NCS and EMG test as an initial screen for diagnosis of CTS. Rather, a careful history and physical examination should take a primary role in the diagnosis of CTS, with electrodiagnostic testing taking a secondary or supportive role in making the diagnosis. The false-positives in NCS- and EMG-diagnosed CTS derive from the fact that many of the conditions noted earlier are not particularly sensitive to electrodiagnostic testing, even if they are screened for. At the same time, there is a population of patients who exhibit all the signs and symptoms of CTS as a discrete diagnosis but have normal NCS and EMG findings, thus having a false-negative result in electrodiagnostic testing.5 These patients, whose histories and physical examinations have findings consistent with CTS, should be considered to have the diagnosis of CTS despite the negative electrodiagnostic studies. The surgeon should be careful to reevaluate these patients at multiple intervals if they are being treated nonsurgically and such treatment has failed, particularly if surgical treatment is being contemplated.
PROCEDURE
Patient Positioning
CTR surgery is performed with the arm outstretched on a hand table.
Pneumatic tourniquet use facilitates the accurate identification of critical anatomic structures.
Loupe magnification is recommended.
Anesthesia can be by general anesthesia or regional anesthesia, such as an axillary block or Bier block.
VIDEO 37.1 Carpal Tunnel Release. Edward Diao, MD (3 min)
Video 37.1
Surgical Technique
General Principles
The goal of CTR surgery is to decompress the median nerve at the carpal canal by completely dividing the TCL to allow the carpal tunnel to expand.
Approach
A volar approach is used, but incision position and length vary. The locations of critical deep structures are inferred using superficial landmarks and a line drawn down the axis of the fourth ray and another drawn obliquely across the palm in line with the ulnar border of the abducted thumb (Kaplan cardinal line) (Figure 1).
Open Carpal Tunnel Release
Exposure
The skin incision location is marked, beginning at the intersection of the Kaplan cardinal line and a line drawn along the radial border of the fourth ray and ending at the wrist flexion crease. A longitudinal hypothenar crease is used if available (Figure 2).
The incision may be placed anywhere along this mark, depending on the surgeon’s preference. I prefer the midpoint of the proximal third of the palm (Figure 3, A). The incision should be long enough to allow full access to the proximal to distal extent of the TCL to ensure full TCL division. This generally can be achieved without having the incision extend proximal to the wrist flexion crease.
The line is dissected with the incision using a scalpel or scissors, through the subcutaneous fat and the palmar fascia down to the TCL (Figure 3, B). Frequently, the palmaris brevis muscle is encountered directly superficial to the TCL. It is incised and “feathered” from the ligament to enable adequate visualization of the TCL.
The TCL is incised over a small segment, avoiding injury to deep structures. The contents of the carpal canal will have a characteristic appearance due to the tenosynovium. An instrument such as a mosquito clamp or a Carroll elevator is placed into the carpal canal, just deep to the TCL (Figure 3, C). This defines the undersurface of the TCL, the location of the hamate hook, and the proposed direction for release.