Arthroscopic Repair of Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
Craig C. Akoh, MD
Matthew J. White, MD
Geoffrey S. Baer, MD, PhD
Dr. Baer or an immediate family member serves as a paid consultant to or is an employee of Conmed and serves as a board member, owner, officer, or committee member of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Neither of the following authors nor any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this chapter: Dr. Akoh and Dr. White.
PATIENT SELECTION
Rotator cuff surgery is one of the more common procedures performed by orthopaedic surgeons. As knowledge of the anatomy and function of the rotator cuff improves, more sophisticated methods have been developed to repair this musculotendinous construct. Partial-thickness articular-surface rotator cuff repair and transosseous-equivalent repair represent two techniques that expand the treatment options for rotator cuff damage.
Indications
The indications for partial-thickness articular-surface rotator cuff repair and transosseous-equivalent repair are similar. The patient should have documented clinical findings in the presence of radiographically confirmed rotator cuff injury and should have undergone a concerted attempt at nonsurgical modalities such as rest, activity modification, medication, and physical therapy. Keener et al stated that partial-thickness rotator cuff tears progressed in size on serial ultrasonography evaluation in 44% of cases at a median time of 3.3 years.1 Additionally, 46% of partial-thickness tears developed pain and dysfunction. Failure of nonsurgical treatment necessitates further treatment in the form of open or arthroscopic surgery. Subsequent decisions are based on the intraoperative findings. Fukuda et al2 demonstrated that partial-thickness rotator cuff tears have a poor healing capacity, which may limit the success of nonsurgical treatment. These tears also tend to progress when treated with acromioplasty alone. On the other hand, results of repair for these tears have been excellent, especially in young patients.3 Acute full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff should be managed surgically. For both full- and partial-thickness chronic tears, nonsurgical treatment should be used initially. In patients who report continued pain despite these nonsurgical measures, some authors recommend surgical repair of the tear regardless of size.4
Contraindications
Contraindications to the surgical repair of rotator cuff tears are limited to patients in poor medical health and patients who cannot perform the necessary postoperative rehabilitation.
PREOPERATIVE IMAGING
Each patient should have a shoulder series of plain radiographs. At our institution, we obtain AP, Neer AP, outlet, and axillary views of the affected shoulder. These views will demonstrate possible fracture, bony abnormality, acromion type, or, in some cases, humeral subluxation/escape. If suspicion exists about a full- or partial-thickness rotator cuff tear, advanced imaging such as an MRI can be obtained (Figure 1, A and B). Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) is an additional option. In a recent meta-analysis, MRA showed excellent diagnostic capabilities for both full- and partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.5 One of the newer modalities for detecting shoulder pathology is ultrasonography (Figure 1, C). Ultrasonography allows for dynamic evaluation of the rotator cuff in clinic, and it is a less expensive alternative to MRI for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. However, ultrasonography is highly operator-dependent and may not be available to all surgeons.
PROCEDURE
Room Setup/Patient Positioning
We prefer to perform shoulder arthroscopy with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. A standard arthroscopic pump is used for fluid control, and balanced suspension of the operative arm is maintained using an arm holder positioned at the distal portion of the operating table. The operative arm is placed in approximately 20° of forward flexion and 20° to 40° of abduction with the assistance of a 5- to 10-lb weight.
Special Instruments/Equipment
Instruments typically needed include a burr or curet for footprint decortications, an arthroscopic shaver, an array of graspers, a spinal needle, variously sized arthroscopic cannulas, a knot pusher, and arthroscopic scissors. Also needed is a suture punch for antegrade suture passing, a looped tissue penetrator for retrograde suture passing, or a suture lasso device for antegrade or retrograde passing.
VIDEO 1.1 Repair of Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears. Richard Angelo, MD (15 min)
Video 1.1
Surgical Technique
Diagnostic Arthroscopy
The bony landmarks should be marked before incision because this provides a visible layout for portal positioning. We typically use the standard posterior and anterior portals as well as combinations of anterolateral and lateral portals and, occasionally, a Neviaser portal. The posterior portal is established first, approximately 1 cm medial and 2 cm inferior to the posterolateral corner of the acromion, in the “soft spot.” Once this viewing portal is established, we place an anterior portal through the rotator interval using an outside-in technique with a spinal needle and standard arthroscopic cannula. We then perform a systematic glenohumeral inspection to examine for other shoulder pathology. Once this inspection is performed, we turn our attention to the articular aspect of the rotator cuff.
Certainly, large full-thickness rotator cuff tears are much easier to see. When inspecting the cuff from the articular surface, the surgeon can rotate the arm so that the entire undersurface of the cuff can be visualized from anterior to posterior. In addition, the arthroscope can be switched to the anterior portal for a different viewing perspective. A 70° arthroscope also may be used to improve visualization of far anterior or far posterior tears. In the case of a partial-thickness articular-surface tear, taking the arm out of traction and increasing abduction and/or rotation often helps with visualization of the tear. Gentle débridement of frayed tissue with a shaver may make it easier to see the edges of intact tendon. If the margins of a tear can be appreciated, then a probe of known size can be used to estimate the depth of the tear and guide treatment. At this point, it is best to evaluate the nature of the tissue on the bursal side of the rotator cuff. A spinal needle can be placed percutaneously through the cuff pathology and then monofilament suture passed through and retrieved through the anterior portal in the glenohumeral joint (Figure 2). This makes it easier to locate the affected portion of cuff from the subacromial side. At this point, the arthroscope and instruments are transitioned into the subacromial space. The lateral portal is placed using the outside-in localization of the spinal needle. This portal provides an excellent working position for a shaver or radiofrequency wand. A thorough bursectomy is performed, being diligent to débride far enough laterally to delineate the rotator cuff tear. Subacromial decompression should be performed only if acromial pathology is noted. Without the bursa obstructing the view, the rotator cuff can be inspected further. A full-thickness tear will be quite apparent, and the repair can begin. If a partial-thickness tear is present, the surgeon can identify the monofilament suture that was previously placed. The bursal side of the cuff is inspected. If this tissue is intact, then the tear is treated as a partial-thickness articular-surface tear.
Repair of Partial-Thickness Articular-Surface Tears
For partial-thickness articular-surface rotator cuff tears, our treatment is guided by the Ellman classification
system6 (Table 1). A partial-thickness articular-surface tear less than 3 mm deep is considered an A1 tear and can be treated with débridement alone. A full-radius shaver works well for débriding degenerative and frayed tissue without damaging intact tendon. If the tear is between 3 and 6 mm (<50%), then treatment options include simple débridement or intratendon repair. An intratendon repair can be a favorable way of using intact tissue to the surgeon’s advantage because it provides a road map for cuff placement and decreases the amount of tissue that must heal. Our technique for intratendon repair, described below, has been described previously by other surgeons.9
system6 (Table 1). A partial-thickness articular-surface tear less than 3 mm deep is considered an A1 tear and can be treated with débridement alone. A full-radius shaver works well for débriding degenerative and frayed tissue without damaging intact tendon. If the tear is between 3 and 6 mm (<50%), then treatment options include simple débridement or intratendon repair. An intratendon repair can be a favorable way of using intact tissue to the surgeon’s advantage because it provides a road map for cuff placement and decreases the amount of tissue that must heal. Our technique for intratendon repair, described below, has been described previously by other surgeons.9