Work-Related Carpal Tunnel Syndrome




Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common entrapment neuropathy, and its risk of occurrence in the presence of repetitive, forceful angular hand movements, or vibration, is common. It is critical to make the diagnosis based on appropriate clinical history and findings and with corroborating electrodiagnostic studies. Conservative management should be undertaken with the goal of maintaining employment; surgical decompression can be highly effective, particularly if undertaken early on.


Key points








  • Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy, and it is associated with a large disease burden in workers’ compensation systems.



  • The diagnosis in workers’ compensation systems should depend on the presence of specific symptoms, signs, and abnormal results of nerve conduction tests consistent with a case definition for the presence of CTS.



  • Strong evidence associates the occurrence of CTS with forceful, angular, and repetitive hand use, or with vibration; CTS is less likely to occur in typists or data entry operators but may occur with intensive computer use of at least 12 to 20 h/wk.



  • Conservative management in the workers’ compensation system should be effective enough to maintain employment; surgical decompression is highly effective and should be entertained in workers who cannot remain at work with conservative management. Patients should continue to work until decompression is undertaken.






Introduction


CTS is the most commonly diagnosed entrapment neuropathy, and it is associated with a large disease burden in the workers’ compensation system. The annual incidence in the general population has been reported to be approximately 1 in 1000. The incidence of CTS in Washington (WA) workers’ compensation population peaked at approximately 2.73 per 1000 in the mid-1990s. One study estimated 4 to 10 million cases of CTS in the United States in 2005 ; in 2010, 5 million workers were estimated to have CTS. Among commonly performed ambulatory surgical procedures of the upper extremity, CTS release was twice as frequently as rotator cuff repair ( Table 1 ). The highest prevalence of CTS procedures in this study, reflecting a much higher rate among women and in people aged 45 to 64 years, also likely reflects similar representations of case demographics in workers’ compensation systems.



Table 1

National estimates of upper extremity ambulatory surgery procedures, 2006




















Procedure Number of Procedures Rate/10, 000 Among Those Aged 45–64 y
Carpal tunnel release 576,924 37.3
Rotator cuff repair 272,148 21.1
Shoulder arthroscopy 257,541 17.1

Adapted from Jain NB, Higgins LD, Losina E, et al. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal upper extremity ambulatory surgery in the United States. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:4; with permission.




Introduction


CTS is the most commonly diagnosed entrapment neuropathy, and it is associated with a large disease burden in the workers’ compensation system. The annual incidence in the general population has been reported to be approximately 1 in 1000. The incidence of CTS in Washington (WA) workers’ compensation population peaked at approximately 2.73 per 1000 in the mid-1990s. One study estimated 4 to 10 million cases of CTS in the United States in 2005 ; in 2010, 5 million workers were estimated to have CTS. Among commonly performed ambulatory surgical procedures of the upper extremity, CTS release was twice as frequently as rotator cuff repair ( Table 1 ). The highest prevalence of CTS procedures in this study, reflecting a much higher rate among women and in people aged 45 to 64 years, also likely reflects similar representations of case demographics in workers’ compensation systems.



Table 1

National estimates of upper extremity ambulatory surgery procedures, 2006




















Procedure Number of Procedures Rate/10, 000 Among Those Aged 45–64 y
Carpal tunnel release 576,924 37.3
Rotator cuff repair 272,148 21.1
Shoulder arthroscopy 257,541 17.1

Adapted from Jain NB, Higgins LD, Losina E, et al. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal upper extremity ambulatory surgery in the United States. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:4; with permission.




Establishing work relatedness


CTS may result from numerous conditions, including inflammatory or noninflammatory arthropathies, recent or remote wrist trauma or fractures, diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypothyroidism, pregnancy, and genetic factors.


Risk for CTS strongly increases with age and among perimenopausal women for unclear reasons. In the unusual instance that CTS is acutely, traumatically induced, for example, a patient has both CTS and concomitant trauma (fracture or dislocation), the patient may require prompt carpal tunnel release (CTR).


Work-related activities may also cause or contribute to the development of CTS. To establish a diagnosis of work-related CTS, all of the following are required:



  • 1.

    Exposure: workplace activities that contribute to or cause CTS


  • 2.

    Outcome: a diagnosis of CTS that meets the diagnostic criteria under “Making the Diagnosis”


  • 3.

    Relationship: generally accepted scientific evidence, which establishes on a more probable than not basis (greater than 50%) that the workplace activities (exposure) in an individual case contributed to the development or worsening of the condition (outcome).



Several recent meta-analyses and studies have summarized the now well-known risks of work-related CTS involving activities requiring extensive, forceful, repetitive, or prolonged use of the hands and wrists, or exposure to vibration, particularly if these potential risk factors are present in combination (eg, force and repetition or force and posture). The risks associated with computer, keyboard, or mouse use are most likely to be present only with long durations of exposure or at least 12 to 20 h/wk of intensive exposure. Negative studies have generally not measured exposures at this level of detail.


Usually, one or more of the following work conditions occurring on a regular basis could support work relatedness:



  • 1.

    Forceful use, particularly if repeated


  • 2.

    Repetitive hand use combined with some element of force, especially for prolonged periods


  • 3.

    Constant firm gripping of objects


  • 4.

    Moving or using the hand and wrist against resistance or with force


  • 5.

    Exposing the hand and wrist to strong regular vibrations


  • 6.

    Intensive computer, keyboard, or mouse use of at least 12 to 20 h/wk



The types of jobs most mentioned in the literature or reported in the WA workers’ compensation data as being associated with CTS are listed in Table 2 . This list is not an exhaustive one and is meant only to be a guide in the consideration of work relatedness.



Table 2

Work exposures and the probability of work relatedness




















Exposure Examples of Types of Jobs Probability of Work Relatedness
Combinations of high force with high repetition and awkward posture, regular strong vibrations Seafood, fruit, or meat processing or canning; carpentry; roofing; drywall installation; boat building; book binding High, relative risk >4
Medium to high force, high repetition, or awkward posture alone, on a nearly continuous basis Dental hygienists, wood products production Medium, relative risk 2–4
Low force or medium to low repetition alone, on an intermittent basis Computer or keyboard use Low, relative risk <2




Making the diagnosis


Symptoms and Signs


A case definition for the presence or absence of CTS requires both appropriate symptoms and abnormal nerve conduction velocity (NCV) tests for the diagnosis. Appropriate symptoms include numbness, tingling, or burning pain in the volar aspects of one or both hands, especially noted after work or at night. Nocturnal symptoms are prominent in 50% to 70% of patients. Patients frequently awaken at night or early morning and shake their hands to relieve these symptoms. These symptoms may be reported to be involving the entire hand or be localized to the thumb and first 2 or 3 fingers. A hand pain diagram has been validated for use in localizing sensory symptoms of CTS (appended to the end of this guideline).


If the nerve symptoms are prominent only in the fourth and fifth fingers, a different diagnosis (eg, ulnar neuropathy or C8 radiculopathy) should be considered. Although burning pain is often prominent in the hands and palm side of the wrists, an aching pain may radiate to the medial elbow region or more proximally to the shoulder. Proximal symptoms, especially tingling in the radial part of the hand, combined with lateral elbow pain should raise questions about a possible C6 radiculopathy.


Signs present on physical examination are frequently absent or nonspecific. Hoffmann-Tinel sign (paresthesias radiating in a median nerve distribution with tapping on the wrist or over the median nerve) and Phalen sign (paresthesias radiating in a median nerve distribution within 60 seconds of sustained flexion of the wrist) are frequently described but by themselves are not sensitive or specific for the diagnosis of CTS. The presence of these signs may corroborate the presence of other clear neurologic symptoms. Likewise, nonspecific symptoms, (eg, pain without numbness, tingling, or burning; dropping things) by themselves are not diagnostic of CTS. Signs that occur as CTS becomes more severe include decreased sensation to pin or light touch in the first 3 digits or weakness or atrophy of the muscles of the thenar eminence (especially the abductor pollicis brevis). Unlike Tinel or Phalen signs, the presence of thenar atrophy or weakness may suggest more acute or advanced nerve injury and perhaps the need for more aggressive treatment.


Every effort should be made to objectively verify the diagnosis of CTS before considering surgery. Although some evidence is conflicted, it has been suggested that patients who have undergone carpal tunnel surgery with normal or near-normal presurgical nerve conduction test results have poorer outcomes than those with electrodiagnostic evidence of median nerve entrapment across the carpal tunnel. In rare cases, a steroid injection can be administered into the carpal canal as a therapeutic and diagnostic challenge test. Patients noting a dramatic improvement in symptoms for weeks or months after the injection, but then having recurrence of symptoms, may be considered candidates for surgical CTR. Patients with a negative response may be referred to an appropriate specialist (eg, neurologist, orthopedist, or physiatrist) for further diagnostic evaluation if warranted or be followed up for a 12-month period to monitor for neurologic findings that may develop.


If CTS is not documented by clinical criteria and NCV testing, other clinical problems potentially related to work exposures (eg, tendonitis), should be investigated and treated appropriately. It would also be important to rule out other neurologic causes of tingling in the hands. Referral to an appropriate specialist (neurologist, physiatrist) would be prudent in such cases.


CTS is a common physiologic condition in pregnancy ; this is theorized to be due to increased plasma volume and fluid retention that raise the pressure within the carpal tunnel. The symptoms of CTS often improve after childbirth. If they do not, other causes should be pursued.


Electrodiagnostic Studies


Nerve conduction velocity


An easy-to-use worksheet for interpreting electrodiagnostic studies is available at the end of this guideline. The worksheet should be used only when the main purpose of the study is to evaluate a patient for CTS. It is critical to conduct NCV testing in the following situation:



  • 1.

    The diagnosis of CTS is being considered


  • 2.

    Patient is on time loss for more than 2 weeks


  • 3.

    Carpal tunnel decompression surgery is requested



Conceptually, validation of the clinical diagnosis of CTS depends on the finding of slowing of sensory and/or motor fibers of the median nerve across the carpal tunnel. The nerve conduction study methods used to test for slowing should not be affected by temperature (either the temperature should be maintained over 32°C or tests that are not influenced by temperature should be used). These electrodiagnostic studies (EDS) should have a high specificity, good sensitivity, and high degree of reliability. Such tests should also minimize the possibility of age or polyneuropathy creating a misleading or false-positive result; this can often be accomplished by comparing the median nerve to another nerve across the same distance across the wrist.


NCV tests are highly sensitive and specific for CTS. If the patient has a positive clinical picture of CTS but the NCV results are negative, the physician should investigate other competing clinical diagnoses such as pronator syndrome, cervical radiculopathy, or tendonitis. Less than 10% of patients with clinical CTS have normal NCV results. In these cases, the treating physician should be sure that the most sensitive and specific NCV tests are done. If not, a request for these tests should be made. In some cases of suspected CTS, the NCV tests can be repeated. However, unless there is a significant intervening event or a substantial change in the clinical assessment, there should be a delay of at least 1 year before repeating the NCV test, because it is unlikely that a difference will be seen at a shorter time interval.


NCV techniques along with their reference values and their upper limits of normal cut points used to corroborate a diagnosis of CTS include the following:




  • Median motor distal latency (8 cm)




    • Note: If median motor distal latency is abnormal, then ulnar motor distal latency at 8 cm must be within normal limits (≤3.9 ms)



    • Less than 4.5 ms




  • Median sensory distal latency 8 cm recorded (palm to wrist) or 14 cm recorded (index, long, or ring finger to wrist)




    • If either of these tests is used alone, at least one other sensory nerve in the ipsilateral hand should be normal



    • Less than 8 cm



    • Less than 14 cm




  • Median − ulnar motor latency difference (abductor pollicis brevis [APB] vs abductor digiti minimi [ADM]) (8 cm)




    • Less than 1.6 ms




  • Median − ulnar sensory latency difference to digits (14 cm), index or long finger compared to ulnar recorded at the small finger, or median − ulnar difference recorded at the ring finger




    • Less than 0.5 ms




  • Median − ulnar sensory latency difference across the palm (8 cm)




    • Less than 0.3 ms




  • Median − radial sensory latency difference to the thumb (10 cm)




    • Less than 0.6 ms




  • Combined sensory index (CSI)




    • The CSI is calculated by adding the 3 latency differences above: CSI = (median latency at 14 cm − ulnar latency at 14 cm) + (median latency at 8 cm across palm − ulnar latency at 8 cm across palm) + (median latency to thumb at 10 cm − radial latency to thumb at 10 cm)



    • Less than 0.9 ms




These upper limit cut points are derived from published literature. The limits for sensory latencies are chosen for high specificity (ie, few false-positives).


In all cases, and particularly in cases with borderline NCV results, control for skin temperature should be documented. In general, the above-referenced values hold for skin temperature in the range of 30°C to 34°C. Lower temperatures are associated with falsely slowed NCV results.


The department’s (Washington Department of Labor and Industries) policy on EDS follows that of the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine. The department does not cover portable NCV tests.


Needle electromyography


Needle electromyography (EMG) sometimes has a role in the electrodiagnostic evaluation of CTS. If the clinical presentation is classic for CTS symptoms and no other signs and/or symptoms, and the result of nerve conduction study is entirely normal, no needle EMG or only limited EMG studies are acceptable. However, there are circumstances in which it would be reasonable to do needle EMG during an evaluation of CTS:



  • 1.

    Results of nerve conduction studies are abnormal in a manner indicating CTS and the patient demonstrates wasting or clinical weakness of the thenar muscles, or the median motor nerve conduction study is significantly abnormal


  • 2.

    The electromyographer suspects another possible diagnosis or a neuropathic process other than, or in addition to, CTS (eg, diabetes)


  • 3.

    There is a history of an acute crush injury or other major trauma to the distal upper extremity


  • 4.

    There are proximal symptoms (eg, neck stiffness, radiating pain) that suggest cervical radiculopathy may be present.



Quantitative sensory testing


The department does not cover quantitative sensory tests. Several tests of sensory function (vibration, temperature, pressure) have been reported in the scientific literature to be useful in investigational settings to differentiate between patients with and without neuropathy. However, because these techniques cannot localize peripheral nerve lesions, they are not useful for diagnosing specific entrapment neuropathies.


Other Diagnostic Tests


Some studies have suggested that magnetic resonance neurography and ultrasonography may have utility in the diagnosis of CTS. However, these tests have not been shown to be more accurate than EDS in high-quality studies. The department does not cover these services.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 17, 2017 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on Work-Related Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access