Tennis Elbow: Complications of Surgical Treatment and Salvage Procedures for Failed Surgery



Fig. 15.1
Photograph of a right elbow showing an exposed radiocapitellar joint and a mobilized anconeus muscle flap. The muscle flap is used to cover the soft tissue defect and joint



Debridement procedures are expected to lead to a satisfactory result in up to 90 % of patients over time [1, 10, 11, 13, 23, 2936]. In a prospective cohort study of 63 patients undergoing open tennis elbow release surgery, Verhaar et al. [37] found residual pain over the lateral epicondylar region in 40 % of patients at 6 weeks, 24 % at 1 year, and 9 % at 5 years. Coleman et al. [38] studied 171 elbows at 10 years after open tennis elbow surgery and found good to excellent outcomes in approximately 94 % of patients. Using arthroscopic methods to debride the ECRB tendon origin, several authors have reported symptomatic improvement in 93–100 % of patients after 2 years [4, 36, 3941].

There are few studies comparing the various surgical approaches for tennis elbow. Szabo et al. [42] studied arthroscopic, percutaneous, and open techniques and, after 2 years, they found no statistical differences in failure rates between the treatment groups. Conversely, Solheim et al. [43] followed 305 elbows over 3 years and found that arthroscopic release of the ECRB tendon origin resulted in a significantly greater improvement in QuickDASH scores when compared to open release surgery, but with no difference in complications.



Modes of Failure


Morrey proposed three categories of failure following primary surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis [1]. A growing body of literature supports a fourth category, which includes misguided rehabilitation, patient noncompliance, workers’ compensation, and psychological disorders. This fourth category was originally included as a subtype in Morrey’s Type 1 failure group.


Type 1 Failure—Inaccurate or Concomitant Diagnosis


Type 1 failure occurs when an inaccurate initial diagnosis is made or a concomitant diagnosis contributing to symptomatology persists [1]. As the underlying source of pain is not sufficiently addressed at the time of surgery, the patient will report lingering elbow pain that is comparable to discomfort experienced before surgery [1, 30]. Causes for Type 1 failure include nerve irritability, a synovial plica, osteoarthritis, osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum, a snapping triceps tendon, lateral ligament insufficiency, an anconeus compartment syndrome, and an osteoid osteoma of the capitellum (Fig. 15.2).

A312380_1_En_15_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 15.2
a, b The photographs show radiocapitellar arthritis that can lead to persistent pain after tendon debridement surgery (Type 1 failure)

Radial tunnel syndrome, signifying irritability of the posterior interosseus nerve (PIN) in the proximal forearm without a clearly identified impinging structure, is the most common cause of Type 1 failure [1, 9, 13, 30, 39, 40, 4449]. Werner et al. [46] found that 13 % of failures after tennis elbow surgery were due to this condition. Lateral elbow pain from entrapment of the PIN by a ganglion cyst has also been reported [50]. Other potential neurological causes of lateral elbow pain include cervical radiculopathy, brachial plexopathy, and entrapment of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve or the posterior brachial cutaneous nerve [27, 51].

A synovial plica represents a focal thickening of synovial tissue [1, 30, 48, 52]. Patients may describe a snapping sensation or pain in the elbow with inclusion of the redundant tissue in the radiocapitellar joint [52]. Underlying structural defects in the radiocapitellar joint such as osteoarthritis and OCD of the capitellum can lead to discomfort, clicking, and catching sensations [1, 13, 30, 39, 40, 47, 48, 53]. Sasaki et al. [54] arthroscopically investigated the correlation of radiocapitellar cartilage integrity with lateral epicondylitis and detected cartilage defects in the capitellum and radial head in 65 and 81 % of elbows, respectively. Other authors have found intraarticular pathology in 11–69 % of patients with lateral epicondylitis [4, 13, 40, 42, 55] (Fig. 15.3).

A312380_1_En_15_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 15.3
a, b Arthroscopic views of a synovial plica in the anterolateral aspect of the radiocapitellar joint before and after debridement

Snapping triceps syndrome involves painful translation of the lateral margin of the triceps tendon over the lateral epicondyle during elbow flexion [56]. Patients with a cubitus valgus deformity of the elbow may be particularly susceptible to this condition. A less common cause of Type 1 failure includes lateral ligament insufficiency with varus posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow [1, 35]. Painful instability may develop following trauma or insidiously, as has been reported in patients with a preexisting cubitus varus deformity, and after local steroid injections into the common extensor tendon origin [47, 57, 58] (Fig. 15.4).

A312380_1_En_15_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 15.4
a, b, c Varus posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow can be a source of persistent pain. The anteroposterior fluoroscopic images show normal radiocapitellar joint alignment without applied stress and widening of the radiocapitellar joint space with varus stressing of the elbow, suggestive of lateral ligament incompetence. The patient eventually required lateral ligament reconstruction using a palmaris longus tendon autograft

Very infrequent causes of lateral elbow pain include a muscle compartment syndrome (e.g., anconeus muscle) or an osteoid osteoma [1, 14, 44, 59]. The possibility of an osteoid osteoma should be considered in a younger patient with atypical pain, especially at night [60].


Type 2 Failure—Inadequate Debridement of Tendinous Tissue


Type 2 failures result from inadequate debridement of pathological tissue from the common extensor tendon origin [1]. Patients will typically describe residual pain at the same site as being less severe or different in character from their pain experienced before surgery [1, 30]. This scenario may require revision debridement to address the problem.


Type 3 Failure—Iatrogenic


Type 3 failures result from the introduction of new pathology following surgical intervention [1]. Patients may describe a myriad of upper extremity symptoms including pain, numbness, weakness, joint laxity, stiffness, swelling, and catching.

Injuries to the radial nerve, the posterior interosseus nerve, and the anterior interosseous nerve have been reported [41, 61]. Formation of a troublesome synovial fistula can result from extensive debridement of the extensor origin and joint capsule [33, 47]. Overly aggressive removal of tissue may also lead to disruption of the lateral collateral ligament complex and varus posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow (Figs. 15.5 and 15.6).

A312380_1_En_15_Fig5_HTML.jpg


Fig. 15.5
Photograph of a right elbow showing aggressive debridement of the common extensor origin and resultant detachment of the lateral collateral ligament complex origin from bone. The ligament complex requires reattachment or reconstruction to avoid symptomatic varus posterolateral instability of the elbow


A312380_1_En_15_Fig6_HTML.jpg


Fig. 15.6
a, b Varus posterolateral instability of the elbow can result from aggressive debridement of the common extensor origin and detachment of the lateral collateral ligament complex from bone (Type 3 failure). The lateral fluoroscopic images show normal alignment of the radial head and capitellum without stressing the joint and posterior subluxation of the radial head with lateral pivot shift testing

Less common etiologies of Type 3 failure include infection and osteophyte formation [62]. Growth of an osteophyte at the lateral epicondyle may lead to a snapping sensation with joint motion [62]. Elbow pain, swelling, and stiffness in the presence or absence of systemic symptoms may be indicative of a deep joint ­infection.


Type 4 Failure—Rehabilitation and Patient-Related Factors


Misguided rehabilitation and patient noncompliance have been conjectured as the most common causes of persistent lateral elbow pain after tennis elbow release surgery [1, 13]. Studies have shown higher levels of pain and longer periods of convalescence in patients receiving workers’ compensation benefits when compared to patients not receiving benefits. Das De et al. [63] recently proposed psychological dysfunction as a primary etiology for lateral epicondylitis. In a cross-sectional study of persons with an upper-extremity-specific disability, these authors found that lower preoperative DASH scores correlated significantly with anxiety, depression, and kinesiophobia in patients undergoing treatment for lateral epicondylitis [63].


Patient Evaluation


The patient history is paramount in deciphering the cause of persistent or new symptoms after tennis elbow release surgery. Failure may be related to one or more problems in more than one category. The patient is asked to describe the symptoms and make a comparison to those experienced before surgery [30]. An inquiry is also made into precipitating, aggravating, and relieving factors. The presence of night pain may be indicative of osteoarthritis, OCD of the capitellum, an osteoid osteoma, or a septic joint [1, 30].


Physical Examination


The physical examination for failed tennis elbow surgery includes inspection and palpation of the elbow, and assessments of elbow motion, strength, and stability. An evaluation of the cervical spine and peripheral nervous system are also important for diagnosis. Ideally, the examiner’s findings are compared with the findings recorded before the index operation.

A visible elbow deformity such as cubitus varus may be indicative of preexisting varus posterolateral instability [57, 64]. Lateral joint swelling may result from infection or a synovial fistula. A high index of suspicion is necessary to diagnose infection, as ongoing therapy with a nonsteroid antiinflammatory drug, narcotic pain medication, and/or an oral antibiotic may delay diagnosis.

Tenderness over the arcade of Frohse suggests irritability of the posterior interosseus nerve, while pain over the radiocapitellar joint suggests OCD of the capitellum, a synovial plica, or arthritis [55]. Extensor origin tenderness may result from incomplete debridement of the ECRB tendon or formation of a neuroma, osteophyte, or synovial fistula. Lateral elbow pain with resisted forearm supination and wrist extension may also indicate inadequate debridement. Pain with the arm in terminal extension and full supination may represent a plica in the radiocapitellar joint [48].

Decreased range of motion may be seen with arthrofibrosis, arthritis, intraarticular loose bodies, and OCD of the capitellum [55]. Pain throughout an arc of elbow motion is associated with generalized arthritis, whereas pain at the end range of elbow motion is seen in conjunction with impinging osteophytes. Decreased strength and/or a sensory disturbance may provide clues into a neurological deficit.

Elbow stability should be evaluated in all patients. Varus stress and lateral pivot-shift testing may elicit pain and a sensation of giving way in cases of lateral ligamentous insufficiency [64]. Comparing joint laxity between the symptomatic and asymptomatic elbows under fluoroscopic imaging can be particularly useful in equivocal circumstances.


Selective Local Anesthetic Injections


Local anesthetic injections are potentially both diagnostic and therapeutic. Lidocaine, with or without a corticosteroid product, can be injected in the area of maximum pain. Relief of pain after injection over the lateral epicondyle may represent incomplete debridement of the ECRB tendon or neuroma formation of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Tags:
Jun 3, 2017 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Tennis Elbow: Complications of Surgical Treatment and Salvage Procedures for Failed Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access