Spinal Infections


119 Spinal Infections


Stuart D. Kinsella MD MTR, Lauren B. Barton BS, and Andrew J. Schoenfeld MD MSc


Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA


Clinical scenario



  • A 40‐year‐old man with a history of chronic liver disease and intravenous drug use (IVDU) presents to the Emergency Department with neck pain, midthoracic back pain, and fevers.
  • He denies radiating pain, numbness, or weakness.

Importance of the problem


The incidence of vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) and spinal epidural abscess (SEA) are presently on the rise. An aging population with associated co‐morbidities, increased IVDU, and the prevalence of spinal instrumentation are among the reasons thought to explain the elevated rates of these spinal infections.1–5 The incidence of VO has been reported to be 2.2–7.4 per 100 000 population per year,6–8 and the incidence of SEA has been reported to be 0.2–2.8 per 10 000 hospital admissions per year,9,10 or 1.8 per 100 000 persons per year.11


Top three questions



  1. What are the typical presentation, examination findings, and imaging characteristics of patients with VO/epidural abscess?
  2. What is the evidence for operative compared to nonoperative management for patients with VO/epidural abscess?
  3. What is the prognosis for patients with VO and epidural abscess, including post‐treatment morbidity?

Question 1: What are the typical presentation, examination findings, and imaging characteristics of patients with VO/epidural abscess?


Rationale


In order to assess treatment options and prognosis, one must first have the correct index of suspicion for VO and epidural abscess. Understanding the characteristic presentation of the problem permits accurate diagnosis.


Clinical comment


VO and SEA are serious conditions with significant morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, the diagnosis is often difficult, and as a result delayed, which only increases morbidity and mortality.12–14 It is essential to understand typical presentation, examination findings, and imaging characteristics in order to correctly diagnose the condition when present and provide efficient management.


Available literature and quality of the evidence



  • Level I: 0 studies identified.
  • Level II: 0 studies identified.
  • Level III: 3 systematic reviews of retrospective observational studies, 1 retrospective case series study.

Findings


A systematic review and meta‐analysis of 12 retrospective studies considering the medical and surgical management of SEA found IVDU to be the most frequently reported risk factor (22%), and diabetes (27%) and hepatic disease to be the most commonly reported co‐morbidities. The most common symptoms were back pain (67%), motor weakness (52%), and fever (44%). There were significantly more patients with back pain, fever, and motor weakness compared to historical data.15 The grade of recommendation from this systematic review is low given the retrospective nature of the studies reviewed.


A systematic review of 14 retrospective studies found that back pain was the most common presenting symptom (85% of patients), followed by fever (60%), and neurologic deficit (34%). In the five studies that included duration of symptoms, the mean time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis ranged from 11 to 59 days. Paraspinal or epidural abscesses were found in 44% of cases of VO.16 A recent retrospective observational study over a 12‐year period found local tenderness in <20% of cases of VO.17,18 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of VO, with sensitivity/specificity >90%.1,3,4,18 The systematic review found MRI to have a sensitivity and specificity of 94% but also noted that plain radiography revealed abnormalities in 89% of cases, though other reviews note its limited utility in early disease.1,11 Notably, 6% of patients demonstrated continuous lesions spanning multiple levels, and 3% had skip lesions.16 The grade of recommendation from this review is low based on the low levels of evidence of the included studies.


A retrospective case‐control study of 233 adult patients with SEAs who underwent entire spinal imaging over an 18‐year period at a tertiary referral healthcare system found 22 patients with skip lesions. Three risk factors were identified: delay in presentation (>7 days), concomitant area of infection outside the spine, and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >95 mm/h at presentation. The predicted probability for the presence of skip lesions was 73, 13, 2, and 0% with the identification of 3, 2, 1, and 0 risk factors, respectively.19 The grade of recommendation from this single retrospective study is low based on the retrospective nature of the study.


Resolution of clinical scenario



  • Axial pain, fever, and neurologic findings are the most common presenting symptoms, but they are not specific, and often not all found at the same time (grade of recommendation: low).
  • MRI is the most useful diagnostic imaging modality. Consideration should be given to imaging the entire spine in cases of VO/SEA (grade of recommendation: low).
  • Patients with delay in presentation, concomitant area of infection outside the spine, and ESR >95 are at high risk of having skip lesions (grade of recommendation: low).

Question 2: What is the evidence for operative compared to nonoperative management for patients with VO/epidural abscess?


Case clarification


MRI of the cervical spine reveals a large, loculated SEA from C4 to T1 (Figure 119.1) with VO at C5 and C6. The patient expresses a desire to avoid any surgery.

Photo depicts Sagittal T-2 weighted MRI image of a patient with a spinal epidural abscess at C4-T1 and vertebral discitis/osteomyelitis at C5 and C6. The patient was treated with a C6 corpectomy, abscess evacuation and C5-7 reconstruction with instrumentation and a titanium cage.

Figure 119.1 Sagittal T‐2 weighted MRI image of a patient with a spinal epidural abscess at C4–T1 and vertebral discitis/osteomyelitis at C5 and C6. The patient was treated with a C6 corpectomy, abscess evacuation and C5–7 reconstruction with instrumentation and a titanium cage.


Rationale


Both nonoperative and operative management options exist for the treatment of patients with VO and SEA. Operative management is not without inherent risk and potential complications.


Clinical comment


Historically, SEA has been thought of as a surgical emergency due to the risk of precipitous neurologic decline.10,13,20,21 More recently, success has been reported with medical management of SEAs.22,23 Traditionally, medical management has been the mainstay of treatment for VO, with surgery more generally playing a role in diagnosis through biopsy,1 unless medical treatment fails or fracture/instability is impending.2,24,25 It is generally accepted that urgent surgical management is necessary in cases of acute or progressive neurological deficit, but it is unclear how best to manage patients without neurologic symptoms.5,15 Which patients might be successfully treated medically, and in what fashion, remains a subject of great controversy.


Available literature and quality of the evidence

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 28, 2021 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Spinal Infections

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access