• Knowledge of the location and anatomical features of the muscles in a test. In addition to knowing the muscle attachments, the examiner should be able to visualize the location of the tendon and its muscle in relationship to other tendons and muscles and other structures in the same area (e.g., the tendon of the extensor carpi radialis longus lies on the radial side of the tendon of the extensor carpi radialis brevis at the wrist). • Knowledge of the direction of muscle fibers and their “line of pull” in each muscle. • Knowledge of the function of the participating muscles (e.g., synergist, prime mover, agonist, and antagonist). • Consistent use of a standardized method for each different test. • Consistent use of proper positioning and stabilization techniques for each test procedure. Stabilization of the proximal segment of the joint being tested is achieved in several ways. These ways include patient position (via body weight), the use of a firm surface for testing, patient muscle activation, and manual fixation by the examiner. • Ability to identify patterns of substitution in a given test and how they can be detected based on a knowledge of which other muscles can be substituted for the one(s) being tested. • Ability to detect contractile activity during both contraction and relaxation, especially in minimally active muscle. • Sensitivity to differences in contour and bulk of the muscles being tested in contrast to the contralateral side or to normal expectations based on such things as body size, occupation, or leisure work. • Awareness of any deviation from normal values for range of motion and the presence of any joint laxity or deformity. • Understanding that the muscle belly must not be grasped at any time during a manual muscle test except specifically to assess muscle mass. • Ability to identify muscles with the same innervation that will ensure a comprehensive muscle evaluation and accurate interpretation of test results (because weakness of one muscle in a myotome should require examination of all). • Relating the diagnosis to the sequence and extent of the test (e.g., the patient with C7 complete tetraplegia will require definitive muscle testing of the upper extremity but only confirmatory tests in the lower extremities). • Ability to modify test procedures when necessary while not compromising the test result and understanding the influence of the modification on the result. • Knowledge of fatigue on the test results, especially muscles tested late in a long testing session, and a sensitivity to fatigue in certain diagnostic conditions such as myasthenia gravis or multiple sclerosis. • Understanding of the effect of sensory and perceptual loss on movement. • The patient with open wounds or other conditions requiring gloves, which may blunt palpation skills. • The patient who must be evaluated under difficult conditions such as in an intensive care unit with multiple tubes and monitors or immediately after surgery, the patient in traction, the patient for whom turning is contraindicated, the patient on a ventilator, and the patient in shackles or restraints. • The patient cannot assume test positions, such as the prone position. • The therapist must avoid the temptation to use shortcuts or “tricks of the trade” before mastering the basic procedures lest such shortcuts become an inexact personal standard. One such pitfall for the novice tester is to inaccurately assign a muscle grade from one test position that the patient could not perform successfully to a lower grade without actually testing in the position required for the lower grade. • There may be variation in the assessment of the true effort expended by a patient in a given test (reflecting the patient’s desire to do well or to seem more impaired than is actually the case). • The patient’s willingness to endure discomfort or pain may vary (e.g., the stoic, the complainer, the high competitor). • The patient’s ability to understand the test requirements may be limited in some cases because of comprehension and language barriers. • The motor skills required for the test may be beyond those possessed by some patients, making it impossible for them to perform as requested. • Lassitude and depression may cause the patient to be indifferent to the test and the examiner. • Cultural, social, and gender issues may be associated with palpation and exposure of a body part for testing. • The size and noncompatibility between big and small muscles can cause considerable differences in grading, though not an individual variation (e.g., the gluteus medius versus a finger extensor). There is a huge variability in maximum torque between such muscles, and the examiner must use care not to assign a grade that is inconsistent with muscle size and architecture. Often patients seen in acute care facilities are either acutely ill or are postoperative patients. In the acutely ill patient, manual muscle testing may be used to assess the patient’s mobility status in order to inform a discharge plan. A manual strength exam performed as part of a general assessment may provide information concerning the amount of assistance the patient requires and whether the patient will need an assistive device. Assessing the patient’s strength to help ensure safe transfers from bed to chair, to a standing position, or on and off the toilet is an essential part of the acute-care patient management process. A strength assessment may also inform the therapist of the patient’s ability to follow directions and/or to verbalize concerns such as following a stroke or in the presence of delirium or other cognitive loss.1,2 Key movements that should be assessed for viability and for the strength necessary to perform transfers or gait include elbow extension, grip, shoulder depression, knee extension, hip abduction, ankle plantar, and dorsiflexion. Functional tests that might be useful in assessing the patient include gait speed, chair stand, timed transfer, or the timed up-and-go test (see Chapter 9). Strength assessment in the acute rehabilitation setting may be performed as a baseline assessment to determine progress over time and to identify key impairments that affect the patient’s mobility-related and other functional goals. Knowledge of community-based norms for mobility such as chair stands, distance walked, stair climbing speed, floor transfer ability, and gait speed will inform the therapist’s clinical decision-making. (See Chapter 9 for a more complete description of these tests.) A standard manual muscle test and/or a 10-repetition maximum (10-RM) strength assessment are other methods used to assess relevant strength abilities.
Relevance and Limitations of Manual Muscle Testing
Relevance and Limitations
Introduction
The Examiner and the Value of the Muscle Test
Influence of the Patient on the Test
Use of Manual Muscle Testing in Various Clinical Settings
Acute Care Facilities
Acute Rehabilitation Facilities
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree