Percutaneous Fixation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis



Percutaneous Fixation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis


Randall T. Loder



INTRODUCTION

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is defined as a posterior and inferior slip of the proximal femoral epiphysis relative to the metaphysis. However, the relationship between the epiphysis and its articular surface relative to the acetabulum is unchanged; rather the slip is better described as anterior and superior displacement of the proximal femoral metaphysis to the epiphysis. The technique of percutaneous screw fixation is markedly dependent upon an understanding of this concept.

Most (>95%) SCFEs are stable (1), which is defined as the ability to walk, with or without crutches. An unstable SCFE is defined as the inability to walk, with or without crutches. The differentiation between these two types is very important regarding the prognosis for avascular necrosis (AVN). The risk of AVN in a stable SCFE approaches zero. The risk in a child with an unstable SCFE may be up to 50%. The techniques of percutaneous fixation for both types of SCFEs are described in this chapter.


THE STABLE SCFE

A child with a stable SCFE has a history of intermittent limp for several weeks to months. It may or may not be associated with thigh, knee, or groin pain. Hip pain is variably present, often resulting in diagnostic delay (2). Physical examination will show loss of internal rotation and spontaneous external rotation with hip flexion (Drehmann sign) in the more severe SCFE. Abduction and flexion are usually decreased, especially in the severe case. Shortening of the lower extremity with varying degrees of thigh atrophy is noted in the long-standing case. Parents often describe the child’s gait as being progressively outtoed; concomitantly, they note increasing limp due to a slowly progressive limb-length discrepancy and abductor disadvantage due to a decreasing articulotrochanteric distance.


Indication for Percutaneous Fixation of SCFE

Stabilization is needed for any child with a stable SCFE and an open physis; without stabilization, progression nearly always occurs. The goals of treatment are to (a) prevent further slipping until physeal closure; (b) avoid complications, primarily those of AVN and chondrolysis; and (c) maintain adequate hip function. Presently most authors advocate a percutaneous in situ fixation with a single screw for mild or moderate SCFEs. Treatment of the severe SCFE is more controversial; primary osteotomy and/or surgical dislocation with a modified Dunn procedure have been advocated by some in an attempt to improve joint mechanics, improve motion, and prolong hip function
compared to an in situ fixation (3). However, the incidence of complications is higher with osteotomy than in situ fixation. It is safe to say that most surgeons today still recommend in situ fixation as the primary treatment for a severe SCFE. Later secondary procedures addressing femoroacetabular impingement may be necessary, such as osteochondroplasty (either arthroscopic or via open surgical dislocation) and/or proximal femoral realignment osteotomy.






FIGURE 19-1 Preoperative AP (A) and frog lateral (B) radiographs of a mild right SCFE in a 9-year, 11-month-old girl.


Preoperative Preparation

The diagnosis is confirmed with an AP and lateral pelvis radiograph (Fig. 19-1); both views are mandatory as an early SCFE is often seen only on the lateral view. Both hips should always be visualized, as the incidence of simultaneous bilaterally may approach 20%. Either frog lateral or cross-table lateral radiographs may be used. Proponents of the cross-table lateral view argue that the variability with frog positioning due to limitation of hip motion inaccurately represents the SCFE. The frog view can also theoretically convert a stable SCFE to an unstable SCFE. Proponents of the frog lateral view argue that the lateral epiphyseal-shaft angle, a commonly used method to assess slip magnitude, can only be measured on that view. Comparisons between literature series are also possible with this view due to its common use.

Slip magnitude is frequently measured with the epiphyseal-shaft angle (4) on the frog lateral pelvis radiograph (Fig. 19-2). The first line is drawn between the anterior and posterior tips of the
epiphysis at the physeal level; the second line is perpendicular to this epiphyseal line. A third line is drawn along the mid-axis of the femoral shaft. The epiphyseal-shaft angle is the angle formed by the intersection of lines 2 and 3. It is measured for both hips, and the magnitude of slip displacement is the angle of the involved hip minus the angle of the contralateral normal hip. In the case of bilateral SCFEs, 10 to 12 degrees is used as the normal hip angle. SCFEs are classified as mild (<30 degrees), moderate (30 to 50 degrees), or severe (>50 degrees).






FIGURE 19-2 The lateral epiphyseal-shaft angle of Southwick angle measured on the frog lateral radiograph. A. The frog lateral radiographs of a 13-year, 11-month-old boy with a left SCFE. B. Line 1 is drawn between the anterior and posterior physis; line 2 is the perpendicular to line 1; and line 3 is an axial line along the shaft of the femur. The angle defined by the intersection of lines 2 and 3 is the lateral epiphyseal shaft angle (θ). The slip angle is calculated by subtracting the lateral epiphyseal shaft angle of the normal hip from the slip side. In this case, the left hip angle (θ1) is 20 degrees, the right hip angle (θ2) is 8 degrees, and the magnitude of the SCFE is 12 degrees (a mild SCFE).






FIGURE 19-3 AP (A) and frog lateral (B) radiographs of a 13-year, 1-month-old boy with known hypothyroidism and a very early, mild left SCFE. Fixation of the SCFE as well as prophylactic fixation of the opposite right hip was performed.

In a child with a unilateral SCFE, the question of prophylactic fixation of the opposite hip arises. This is controversial. However, when the patient’s triradiate cartilage is still open, there is a much higher incidence of a contralateral SCFE, and prophylactic fixation should at least be considered (5). In children with atypical SCFEs (associated with an endocrinopathy, renal osteodystrophy), prophylactic fixation should be very strongly considered (Fig. 19-3).