Osteoporosis

Chapter 194 Osteoporosis






image General Considerations


Osteoporosis is the most common bone disease in humans and poses a serious health threat for postmenopausal women. It is characterized by diminished bone strength, which leads to an increased risk of fracture. Bone mineral density (BMD) is a major determinant of bone strength and is the most commonly measured quality of bone. Osteoporosis is determined by bone densitometry and, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), is defined by a a BMD T-score less than or equal to -2.5 at the total hip, femoral neck, or lumbar spine (with at least two vertebral levels in the posteroanterior position) in a postmenopausal woman or a man over age 50.1,2 Most other organizations support this description. The presence of a fragility fracture also justifies a clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis.


Osteoporosis most commonly occurs in postmenopausal women, and the risk increases with age. Although the prevalence is 4% in women between 50 and 59 years of age, it rises to 52% in women age 80 and above.3 Osteoporosis of the hip occurs in 13% to 18% of white American women and another 37% to 50% have low bone mass (often called osteopenia) of the hip.4


Osteoporosis is responsible for approximately 90% of all hip and spine fractures in white American women ages 65 to 84.5


However, most postmenopausal women who have fractures at any site do not actually have a diagnosis of osteoporosis.6


Hip fractures occur at age 82 on average and cause up to a 25% increase in mortality within 1 year of the fracture; an additional 25% of such patients require long-term care after a hip fracture and 50% will have some long-term loss of mobility.


The hip is not the only site where fractures result in serious morbidity. Vertebral fractures occur in a woman’s mid-70s and cause significant pain as well as loss of height and an exaggerated kyphosis or deformity of the thoracic spine. In addition to pain, restricted range of motion, changes in posture, restricted lung function, and digestive problems can all be caused by vertebral fractures of the thoracic or lumbar region or both. Other tolls can accumulate because of osteoporosis. Depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, changed body image, and loss of independence are other burdens of this disease. Once a vertebral fracture has occurred, there is at least a five- to sevenfold increase in the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures.7,8


Economically, osteoporosis imposes enormous costs—estimated at $14 billion annually—on the health care system. Hip fractures are the most costly owing to the expense of initial hospital care, first-year postfracture care, and long-term treatment.


Although not commonly recognized, men are also at risk of osteoporosis as they age. Hip fractures in men account for one third of all hip fractures and have a higher mortality than those in women.9




image Risk Factors


Risk factors for osteoporosis are distinguished from risk factors for osteoporotic fracture. Major risk factors for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women are advanced age, genetics, lifestyle issues (low calcium, low vitamin D intake, and smoking), thinness, and menopausal status. The most common risk factors are as follows:




Genetic Factors


The level of peak bone mass is greatly influenced by genetic factors. Earlier studies suggest that up to 80% of the determination of peak bone mass might be due to genetic factors.1012 Young daughters of women with osteoporotic fractures have lower bone mass compared with other children their age, and first-degree relatives of women with osteoporosis tend to have lower bone mass when compared with other women who do not have such a family history.13 A history of fracture in a first-degree relative also increases fracture risk. A family history of fracture was found to be associated with a significant increase in osteoporotic fractures at any site.14 In this same meta-analysis, hip fractures were almost 50% higher if a family had a history of fractures and 127% higher if a hip fracture had occurred in a parent. The greater bone mass of black women compared with white women also suggests a genetic influence.


One key genetic factor now being recognized is polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor site. Some of these polymorphisms significantly increase the need for vitamin D.




Lifestyle


Calcium and vitamin D intake, exercise, age at menarche, menstrual regularity, and alcohol and tobacco use also affect peak bone mass. All women lose bone mass in menopause, but several lifestyle factors affect the risk of developing osteoporosis, including physical activity, animal protein intake, acid-base homeostasis, calcium and vitamin D intake, smoking, and alcohol consumption. In order for a woman to achieve her genetically determined peak bone mass, she requires a balanced diet including adequate calories, protein, and calcium.16 Good nutrition throughout life is necessary to maintain bone mass and strength. Adequate calcium and vitamin D have crucial roles in maintaining bone mass in older women. Calcium requirements change with age; during and after menopause, the need for calcium increases. After age 65, women absorb 50% less calcium than younger women. The renal enzymatic activity that produces vitamin D metabolites and thus controls calcium absorption also decreases.



Dietary Protein


Not all studies have been consistent regarding whether or not excess dietary protein contributes to osteoporosis. The Nurses’ Health Study showed that a high intake of animal protein but not plant protein was associated with an increased risk of forearm fracture.17 Diets high in red meat are acid producing, and salts from bone may be mobilized to balance the acid and maintain the acid-base homeostasis the body requires. Diets high in fruits, vegetables, and plant proteins are alkaline forming.



Smoking


Female smokers tend to lose bone more rapidly and have a lower bone mass than those who do not smoke.18,19 Some studies show that smokers also have a higher fracture rate.20,21 In addition, female smokers reach menopause up to 2 years earlier than nonsmokers. It may be that smoking interferes with estrogen metabolism, although the mechanism is not clearly known.




Physical Activity


The effect of physical activity on the risk of osteoporosis cannot be overlooked. Highly active individuals have higher bone mass,24 and those who have undergone prolonged bed rest or are confined to a wheelchair experience a rapid and dramatic loss of bone. Exercise functions primarily to reduce osteoporosis risk by stimulating osteoblasts.



Hormonal Factors


A woman’s hormonal status clearly influences bone mass and the rate of bone resorption. At menopause, all women lose bone, and this loss is especially accelerated in the first 5 years. The drop in estrogen production that comes with menopause, no matter the age, increases the rate of bone resorption. The earlier that occurs before the average age of menopause (51 years), the sooner the bones lose the protective effect of endogenous estrogen.


Women who have premature menopause (before age 40), late onset of menarche in adolescence, surgical menopause, or experienced periods of amenorrhea due to low estrogen levels in their reproductive years (ex/hypothalamic amenorrhea), are at greater risk of osteoporosis if they have not taken longer term estrogen replacement therapy. Women who had missed up to half of their expected menstrual periods had 12% less vertebral bone mass than did those with normal menstrual cycles; those who missed more than half had 31% less bone mass than healthy controls.25


The concentration of calcium in the blood is strictly maintained within narrow limits. If levels start to decrease, there is an increase in the secretion of parathyroid hormone by the parathyroid glands and a decrease in the secretion of calcitonin by the thyroid and parathyroids. If calcium levels in the blood start to increase, there is a decrease in the secretion of parathyroid hormone and an increase in the secretion of calcitonin. An understanding of how these hormones increase (parathyroid hormone) and decrease (calcitonin) serum calcium levels is necessary in order to understand osteoporosis.


Parathyroid hormone increases serum calcium levels primarily by increasing the activity of the osteoclast catabolism of bone, although it also decreases the excretion of calcium by the kidneys and increases the absorption of calcium in the intestines. In the kidneys, parathyroid hormone increases the conversion of 25-(OH)D3 to 1,25-(OH)2D3.



Additional Factors


No one risk factor or combination of risk factors will accurately predict which patients will or will not experience osteoporosis or osteoporotic fractures. The more risk factors present, the greater the potential for lower bone mass and the higher the risk of fracture. Risk factors alone do not provide adequate assessment of low bone mass but rather are important guides in the clinical assessment of osteoporosis and fracture risks, and these contribute to optimal preventive strategies. Ultimately, an individual woman’s risk of fracture is the most relevant parameter for her future with regard to osteoporosis. Various medical conditions and medications can interrupt normal bone physiology and lead to osteoporosis. Endocrine disorders, malignancies, and collagen metabolism disorders can have a direct effect on the ability of bones to remodel.




image Diagnostic Considerations


All postmenopausal women should be assessed for risk factors associated with osteoporosis. This assessment requires a history, physical examination, and diagnostic tests. The more recent World Health Organizations (WHO) FRAX risk factors (personal history of fracture after age 40, history of hip fracture in a parent, current cigarette smoking, excess alcohol consumption, glucocorticoid use, rheumatoid arthritis or other secondary causes of osteoporosis), bone density testing and the FRAX risk calculator are tools used to establish risk of fracture. The FRAX risk calculator is used for postmenopausal women who have low bone density but not osteoporosis. It determines the 10-year probability of any osteoporotic fracture and 10-year probability of a hip fracture. The FRAX risk calculator is available online. The goals of evaluation should be to identify those women at risk for osteoporosis or fracture; establish a diagnosis of osteoporosis, determine the severity of the diagnosis, or both; rule out secondary causes of bone loss in patients with osteoporosis; and identifying risk factors for falls and injuries.


The history and physical examination should focus on identifying the woman’s risk factors. There can be physical signs of osteoporosis. Loss of height greater than 1.5 inches may be associated with compression of vertebrae due to fractures on the anterior vertebral body. Measurement of height annually is the simplest of procedures that can be used to identify the risk of osteoporosis. Excessive kyphosis of the thoracic spine, dowager’s hump, dental caries, tooth loss, receding gums, and back pain should raise suspicion of osteoporosis. Weight should also be recorded to identify women with low BMI and thus increased risk for low bone density. Other aspects of evaluation should including the solicitation of acute or chronic back pain, signs of percussion tenderness on exam, and bone density testing. The risk of falls should be assessed and is increased by the following: medications that affect balance and coordination, muscle weakness, impaired vision, a history of falls/fainting or loss of consciousness, difficulty standing or walking, arthritis of the lower extremities, and neuropathy of the lower extremities.



Bone Mineral Density Testing


BMD testing is the optimal method to establish a diagnosis of osteoporosis. There are several techniques to measure BMD, but the gold standard is dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).26 Other methods of assessing bone mass include computed tomography (CT), ultrasounds of the heel, and radiographs, none of which is as useful for diagnosis and follow-up as the DEXA scan. The tests that measure BMD and their relative accuracy are shown in Table 194-1.


TABLE 194-1 Comparison of Tests Measuring Bone Density
























METHOD SITE AND ACCURACY
DEXA Hip, spine, total body: 90%-99%
PDXA Forearm, finger, heel: 90%-99%
SXA Heel: 98%-99%
QUS Heel, shin: not available
QCT Spine: 95%-97%
PQTC Forearm: 92%-98%

DEXA, Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; PDXA, peripheral dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; PQTC, peripheral quantitative computed tomography; QCT, quantitated computed tomography; QUS, quantitative ultrasound; SXA, single-energy x-ray absorptiometry.


Data from Jergas M, Genant HK. Current methods and recent advances in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum 1993;36:1649-1662.


In addition to providing the most reliable measurement of BMD, the DEXA scan requires less radiation exposure than a conventional radiograph or CT scan. Usually the DEXA scan is used to measure the density of both the hip and the lumbar spine. The hip is the preferred site for BMD testing, especially in women above age 60, because—owing to extraosseous ossification—the spinal measurements can be unreliable. The spine is useful in early postmenopausal women because the rates of bone loss then are greater because of lower estrogen levels. Although peripheral DEXA sites are accurate, they may be less useful because they may not correlate as well with fracture risk and BMD at the hip and spine. The use of DEXA testing in a postmenopausal woman should be based on her risk profile. Testing is not indicated unless the test results will influence management. The North American Menopause Society has established the following guidelines to determine for indications for BMD testing:



Results of BMD tests are reported as standard deviations—either a Z-score or a T-score. A Z-score is based on the standard deviation from the mean BMD of women in the same age group. A T-score is based on the mean peak BMD of a normal young woman. The WHO criteria for the diagnosis of osteoporosis are based on T-scores, as shown in Table 194-2.


TABLE 194-2 Interpretation of Bone Mineral Density Score



















STATUS T-SCORE INTERPRETATION
Normal Above -1 BMD within 1 SD of a young normal adult’s T-score
Osteopenia Between -1 and -2.5 BMD between 1 and 2.5 SD below a young normal adult’s T-score
Osteoporosis Below -2.5 BMD 2.5 SD or more below a young normal adult’s T-score

BMD, Bone mineral density; SD, standard deviation.



Laboratory Tests of Bone Metabolism


Biochemical markers of bone turnover appeal to some practitioners. A urine test measures the breakdown products of bone, such as cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen or deoxypyridium. These tests measure bone turnover and can be correlated with the rate of bone loss, but they are not intended to be used for the diagnosis of osteoporosis or monitoring of bone loss. Such tests may be used to monitor the success (or failure) of therapy. They provide quicker feedback compared with DEXA, with which it can take up to 2 years to detect a therapeutic response. The DEXA test is best used to measure bone density, whereas urinary bone resorption assessments can be used to measure the rate of bone turnover. The reduction of urinary levels of these markers of bone breakdown over a 2-year period has produced increases in bone density measurements,27 but the value of these markers in clinical practice has yet to be definitively confirmed.


Additional tests may be used to determine secondary causes of bone loss. These include serum calcium, 24-hour urinary calcium, parathyroid hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine level, serum albumin, serum alkaline phosphatase, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, complete blood cell count, and 25(OH)D3 levels.




image Therapeutic Considerations


Osteoporosis is a complex condition involving medical, genetic, hormonal, lifestyle, nutritional, and environmental factors. A comprehensive plan that addresses these factors offers the greatest protection.


The primary goals in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis are as follows:



The primary role of alternative therapies is to prevent osteoporosis and, fortunately, osteoporosis is largely a preventable disease. Pharmacologic therapy reduces the risk of vertebral and hip fractures by about 50%. According to the North American Menopause Society and their 2010 position statement on osteoporosis, the following guidelines are indications for pharmacologic therapy28:



Individuals with secondary causes of bone loss require individualized management. Older postmenopausal women with a history of a previous nontraumatic nonpathologic vertebral fracture are at high risk of having another spine or hip fracture. These women in particular are candidates for treatment with proved conventional pharmacologic treatments regardless of their bone density.


Many pharmacologic therapies are available for osteoporosis treatment, including bisphosphonates, the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), raloxifene, parathyroid hormone, estrogens, and calcitonin. There are currently no prospective studies comparing these therapies for anti fracture efficacy. All of the therapies mentioned above except estrogen have been studied for their effect on fracture only in patients with either a clinical or BMD diagnosis of osteoporosis. With all of these therapies, the absolute reduction in fracture risk is greatest in women who are at high risk for a fracture.



Pharmacologic Therapy



Hormone Replacement Therapy


As estrogen levels decline, bone remodeling increases and bone resorption outpaces bone formation. Both estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) with estrogen only and hormone replacement therapy (HRT), with estrogen and progestogen, reduce the rate of bone turnover and resorption.29


ERT can return the high resorption rates in postmenopausal women to those of the rates in premenopausal women. Long-term data on the effects of ERT and HRT on bone density and fracture risk come mainly from observational and epidemiologic studies. Epidemiologic research found a 54% reduction in risk of fractures in current users of ERT/HRT compared with those who never used it.30 Researchers also found that ERT/HRT is more effective in reducing the fracture risk if it is begun within 5 years of menopause. If it was used more than 10 years earlier, it produced an even greater risk reduction—75% for wrist fractures and 73% for hip fractures.


A 2002 meta-analysis of 57 randomized clinical trials of systemic oral or transdermal estrogen and estrogen/progestogen at standard doses found BMD increases at all sites in postmenopausal women.31 In trials of 2 years in length, the average difference in BMD after estrogen or estrogen/progestogen was 6.8% at the lumbar spine and 4.1% at the femoral neck.


The two largest and best-controlled trials are the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) trials and the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). In the PEPI trials, 0.625-mg daily doses of conjugated equine estrogens with or without a progestogen (either medroxyprogesterone acetate or oral micronized progesterone) for 3 years significantly increased spinal BMD by 3.5% to 5.0%; there was also a 1.7% increase in hip BMD.32 In the 5-year randomized controlled trial, the WHI HRT significantly increased spine BMD by 4.5% and total hip BMD by 3.7% in comparison with placebo; it also reduced the risk of hip fractures (34%), vertebral fractures (34%), and total body fractures (24%).33


Doses even lower than the standard dosages of estrogen have produced significant increased in spine and hip BMD in the range of 1% to 3%,3438 as has systemic estrogen via a vaginal ring (the Femring).39


In addition to increases in BMD, randomized trials and observational studies have indicated that standard doses of estrogen or estrogen/progestogen reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Two meta-analyses found up to a 27% reduction in fracture risk.40,41 Two large observational studies, the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment study42 of over 200,000 women and the Million Women Study43 of over 138,000 women both reported significantly reduced risks for fractures. Despite these studies and more, estrogen-only or estrogen-plus-progestogen products are approved for prevention but not treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.


Now more than ever, it is important to individualize treatment options and more clearly identify the risk:benefit ratio. Generally, ERT/HRT is believed to work best during the first 5 to 10 years after menopause. The optimal duration and maximal duration have not yet been clearly determined and for this reason, in the face of the studies that show slight increases in risk of breast cancer and other potential issues, ERT/HRT will not be seen as a primary long-term treatment for osteoporosis except in those who do not tolerate bisphosphonates or who have menopausal symptoms that are not responding to other therapies.



Bisphosphonates


This class of drugs is thought to work by inhibiting osteoclast activity, thereby reducing bone resorption. Clinical trials demonstrate that bisphosphonates can significantly increase BMD at the spine and hip in postmenopausal women no matter their age. Bisphosphonates have been shown to reduce the risk of vertebral fractures in women with osteoporosis, by 40% to 70% and to reduce the incidence of hip fracture and other nonvertebral fractures by about half of this.44,45 Most of the bisphosphonates available in the United States (alendronate, ibandronate, and risedronate) are intended for use in daily or intermittent oral doses. Zoledronic acid is available as an intravenous injection. Clinical trials that have demonstrated BMD responses show similar results for weekly oral dosing regimens of alendronate and risedronate, monthly oral dosing of ibandronate and risedronate, and intravenous dosing every 3 months of ibandronate.4649


Bisphosphonates are not without problems and they should only be used with careful consideration—both for their potential benefit in women who have osteoporosis and are at higher risk for fracture (especially as they get older) and for their potential for serious risk. Some questions have arisen regarding the quality of the bone and possibly increased fractures with bisphosphonates in longer-term use in some individuals.50 There may be the potential for over suppression of bone turnover with long-term therapy, resulting in a more brittle bone. Individual cases and small case series with unusual, poorly healing fractures have been reported recently, as well as atypical fractures of the femur. Research is under way to determine what is unique to these rare individuals. Many clinicians are responding to these concerns by “drug holidays.” Understanding the frequency and duration of these drug holidays is under investigation in ongoing studies.


Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been observed with bisphosphonate use.51 This has occurred mainly in individuals on high-dose intravenous bisphosphonates and in those being treated with radiation for head and neck cancers. ONJ is characterized by a delay in healing of an oral lesion after surgery or extraction for more than 6 to 8 weeks. The incidence of ONJ with intravenous bisphosphonates in those without neck radiation has been reported to be as high as 12%. Oral incidence is much lower, at 0.03% to 0.06%. However, oral surgery increases the incidence sevenfold.52 Currently, there is controversy in the research on whether to discontinue bisphosphonate therapy before dental extraction. Many practitioners are recommending suspending bisphosphonate therapy until the oral lesion has healed.


Although not common, long-term bisphosphonate use is also associated with insufficiency fractures of the femoral shaft, which commonly presents with prodromal thigh pain and may be bilateral.53 This is one reason why the use bisphosphonates is now being recommended for a maximum of 5 years, which then allows bone remodeling.54 Bone density should be monitored closely to ensure stable or minimal bone loss after discontinuation. It appears that 5 years of use may provide long-term fracture protection just as effectively as the drug taken for more than 5 years.


Oral bisphosphonates may cause other problems such as upper gastrointestinal disorders, including dysphagia, esophagitis, and esophageal and gastric ulcers. All bisphosphonates carry precautions regarding hypocalcemia and renal impairment. There can also be a transient flulike illness, although infrequently, with large doses of oral or intravenous bisphosphonates. How and when to take these drugs requires careful following of the directions.


In total, this class of drugs is an important option for selected individuals—it can be life-altering in terms of relieving pain and suffering and saving lives (especially in the case of hip fractures). Clinicians should become familiar with the FRAX tool for determining fracture risk in those that have low bone density but not osteoporosis; they should also informed themselves of the full scope of benefits and risks so as to be able to advise their patients. With proper care and monitoring for potential adverse events and loss of bone remodeling, bisphosphonates can be used when truly indicated and without adequate or appropriate alternative options in the context of a holistic/integrative approach to bone health and fracture protection.


(The editors recommend using the bisphosphonates only if the natural interventions described in this chapter have not produced satisfactory results.)




Parathyroid Hormone


Parathyroid hormone is given by subcutaneous injection once daily. This anabolic agent stimulates osteoblastic bone formation and increases trabecular bone density in women with osteoporosis.5759 One medication in particular, teriparatide (Forteo) is approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Nineteen months of teriparatide treatment (20 mcg/injection per day) increased bone density in the spine by 8.6% and in the femoral neck by 3.5% compared with placebo.59 In addition, the incidence of new vertebral fractures was reduced by 65% and nonvertebral fractures by 53%.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 12, 2016 | Posted by in MANUAL THERAPIST | Comments Off on Osteoporosis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access