Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Jones Fractures



Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Jones Fractures


Scott J. Koenig

Steven D. K. Ross





ANATOMY



  • Stability of the proximal fifth metatarsal is provided by the lateral Lisfranc complex, capsular ligaments, lateral band of the plantar aponeurosis, and the peroneus brevis.19


  • There are two major motor insertions onto the fifth metatarsal:



    • The peroneus brevis inserts onto the dorsal aspect of the fifth metatarsal tubercle.


    • The peroneus tertius inserts onto the dorsal aspect of the metatarsal at the proximal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction.


  • The plantar fascia has a strong insertion along the plantar aspect of the fifth metatarsal tubercle.


  • The proximal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction represents a watershed vascular supply.


  • The shaft is supplied by a single nutrient artery that enters from the medial cortex at the junction of the proximal and middle thirds of the diaphysis. The base and tuberosity are supplied by secondary epiphyseal and metaphyseal arteries (FIG 2).21, 22


PATHOGENESIS



  • Acute Jones fractures are the result of an adduction force applied to the forefoot while the ankle is in plantar flexion.


  • Tensile forces along the lateral border of the metatarsal result in a transverse fracture.


  • They are typically the result of athletic events, with many instances described in football and basketball players.


  • This should not be confused with a tuberosity avulsion or diaphyseal stress fracture.


  • Fracture occurs in the area between the peroneus brevis and tertius tendons2 and propagates to the fourth-fifth metatarsal articulation.


  • This fracture is often associated with patients that have a varus foot posture.


NATURAL HISTORY



  • The Jones fracture was originally described in 1902 by Sir Robert Jones, who described a series of transverse fractures at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction in four individuals, including his own injury.9


  • The natural history and outcomes of nonoperative and operative treatment are difficult to determine because many published reports include a mixture of acute Jones fractures and diaphyseal stress fractures.


  • Various studies have examined nonoperative versus operative treatment.


  • There is an increased risk of delayed or nonunion due to the watershed blood supply at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction.


  • Operative treatments have included internal fixation with or without bone grafting and bone grafting alone. Various fixation techniques have been examined.


  • Treatment options vary based on the functional demands of the patient.



    • Operative fixation is typically reserved for elite athletes or delayed unions and established nonunions in nonathletes.


PATIENT HISTORY AND PHYSICAL FINDINGS



  • The patient may describe participation in an athletic event where, after a particular maneuver, there is an acute onset of pain over the lateral border of the foot.


  • The patient may have swelling and ecchymosis over the lateral border of the foot.


  • Pain will be elicited with direct palpation over the base of the fifth metatarsal.


  • Physical examination should include the following:



    • Direct palpation over the base of the fifth metatarsal: Pain in this region increases suspicion of injury.


    • Direct palpation over the tarsometatarsal joint complex: Pain indicates possible injury to the Lisfranc complex.


    • Passive dorsiflexion-plantarflexion of individual metatarsal heads: Pain indicates possible injury to the Lisfranc complex.


    • Attempted single-limb heel lift: Pain indicates possible injury to the Lisfranc complex.


    • Examination of the lateral ankle ligamentous complex for instability.


IMAGING AND OTHER DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES



  • Radiographs of the affected foot, including anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique views, are sufficient to diagnose an acute Jones fracture.



    • Location of fracture is used to distinguish between tuberosity avulsions, Jones fractures, and diaphyseal stress fracture.


    • Sclerotic changes delineate between acute injury and chronic stress injury.


    • Weight-bearing radiographs of the affected foot are obtained to rule out a Lisfranc injury.


  • Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are typically unnecessary.







FIG 1 • Acute Jones fracture. The fracture line is at the junction of Zones 1 and 2; there is no cortical hypertrophy or periosteal reaction.




NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT



  • Nonoperative management is preferred treatment for all patients other than elite athletes.


  • Non-weight bearing in a short-leg cast for 6 to 8 weeks, followed by weight bearing in a walker boot for an additional 6 weeks17


  • Non-weight bearing compliance is critical for healing.17


  • Torg et al’s24 series of 15 patients demonstrated a 93% union rate at an average of 6.5 weeks.


  • Clapper1 reported union in 72% of acute Jones fractures treated with a non-weight-bearing short-leg cast for 8 weeks followed by weight bearing in a cast or walker boot.



    • Time to union reported as long as 21.2 weeks.1


  • Low-pulsed ultrasound or pulsed electromagnetic stimulation may be considered as an adjunct to augment healing.8, 23







FIG 3 • Torg type II diaphyseal stress fracture. Widening of the fracture line and periosteal bone formation are shown.


SURGICAL MANAGEMENT

Jul 22, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Jones Fractures

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access