Fig. 15.1
The patient is positioned on a standard operating table in the 45° beach-chair position. A simple arm support is used to keep the arm in neutral position of forearm rotation
To simplify an appropriate intraoperative fluoroscopy, the patient needs to be positioned in a sufficiently lateral position on the operating table and the arm needs to be dropped freely downwards aside of the table. The entire shoulder, including the scapula, should be in a sufficiently lateral position on the operating table to allow for a complete extension of the humerus and external rotation of the arm up to 90°. The operating table may be turned into the room to facilitate the access to the anterior, lateral, and posterior aspects of the shoulder.
As standard, a simple arm support is used to keep the arm (90° flexion elbow joint) in a neutral position regarding forearm rotation during the surgical approach (Fig. 15.1). In this position the arm can be moved in any direction by the surgeon. However, the arm has to be secured by the assistant surgeon during surgery. Alternatively, a commercially available positioner system for arm support can be used to relieve the operating team and to allow the assistant to fully concentrate on the procedure. Therefore, the patient’s arm is secured at a padded arm rest using sterile straps. Before surgery, it has to be made sure that the assist system allows for the patient’s arm being accurately positioned and exactly fixed where it is needed (Fig. 15.2).
Fig. 15.2
The patient is placed in the beach-chair position and the arm is fixed using an assist system (TRIMANO 3D support arm, MAQUET GmbH & Co. KG, Rastatt, Germany) (a). This sterile-covered arm support system can be connected to every operating table and allows to move and securely fix the arm at any position during operation. After covering, the image amplifier (sterile-covered C-arm) is integrated in the operating set-up for intraoperative fluoroscopy (b)
Moreover, the surgeon should evaluate the range of motion of the shoulder including internal and external rotation under general anesthesia. The hand and the forearm should be wrapped in a sterile stockinette. To warrant the sterile field the axilla should be separated by self-adhesive surgical drapes. After covering, the image intensifier fluoroscopy (C-arm) is placed for intraoperative radiographs in a.p and axial direction (Fig. 15.2).
During patient’s positioning care has to be taken to prevent excessive traction. In terms of neurologic complications, the brachial plexus and the axillary nerve are mostly affected [19, 22, 31, 33]. Thus, positions of extreme extension and abduction should be avoided to not stretch the nerval structures. Moreover, cerebral ischemia and vasovagal episodes are reported related to beach chair positioning [14, 32].
Surgical Approach
Functional outcome after surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures was evaluated in many studies over the last decade [2, 5, 16, 17, 27, 29]. Nevertheless, the discussion about the surgical approach with special respect to the delto-pectoral and deltoid-splitting approach is still controversial.
Hepp et al. [11] were the only ones who reported on approach-related results following proximal humeral plating. In 39 patients with an anterolateral deltoid-splitting approach, the authors observed less pain and higher activity levels of daily living scores the early follow-up. On the other hand, the 44 patients treated by a deltopectoral approach obtained higher Constant scores after 12 months of follow-up. Based on their findings, Hepp and colleagues [11] concluded that the choice of surgical approach may influence the functional shoulder outcome.
Deltopectoral Approach
For proximal humeral fractures, most upper extremity surgeons recommend the delto-pectoral approach, especially in cases of comminuted or dislocated fracture types.
A 10–12 cm skin incision is made starting from the coracoid process to the distal insertion of the deltoid muscle (Fig. 15.3). The deltopectoral interval is blunt dissected from medially to the cephalic vein, followed by a blunt dissection of the subdeltoid and subpectoral spaces. Superiorly, the incision reaches the clavicle and a Hohmann-retractor can be placed above the acromiohumeral ligament for a wider exposition, if necessary. The deltopectoral groove is opened distally until the insertion of the pectoralis muscle. The clavipectoral fascia is split vertically just lateral to the conjoined tendons and up to the coracoacromial ligament to expose the fracture by internal and external rotation. One must consider that the coracoacromial ligament remains intact to avoid cranial glenohumeral instability. The upper insertion of the pectoralis major muscle can be cut for about 1–2 cm to allow better exposure of the metaphyseal region of the humerus or the inferior aspect of the glenohumeral joint. While putting the arm in abduction and internal rotation, a partial release of the deep surface of the deltoid can be performed to facilitate drilling and plate positioning [10]. Medially, the conjoint tendon is freed and retracted using a self-retaining, symmetric retractor that simultaneously retracts the deltoid muscle at the lateral side (Fig. 15.4). If the arm is anteverted with the elbow flexed during this procedure the conjoint tendon is relaxed, and thereby, the placement of the retractor is facilitated. Alternatively, a Hohmann-retractor can be placed around the humeral shaft to retract the deltoid muscle. After resection of the subdeltoid bursa, the subscapularis muscle is exposed, and following the anterior humeral circumflex vessels (at the inferior border of the subscapularis muscle) as well as the axillary nerve, both should be palpated in an effort to prevent iatrogenic injury during further preparation.
Fig. 15.3
Deltopectoral approach (arrow)
Fig. 15.4
View to the deltopectoral interval. The conjoint tendons (CT) and the deltoid muscle (DM) is retracted by a self-retaining, symmetric retractor
Several surgeons, however, note that this approach may not be the appropriate method for angular stable plate fixaton of proximal humeral fractures [4, 6, 28]. They note that it is difficult to gain the correct drill angle, possibly leading to slight anterior plate placement, and subsequently criticize the substantial soft tissue dissection, the retraction of the deltoid muscle as well as the humeral manipulation to access the lateral aspect of the humerus. To obtain the correct drill angle using a standard deltopectoral appraoch, the partial release of the humeral insertion of the deltoid muscle is described [10]. Certainly, this procedure has to be carefully considered because a release of more than one fifth of the deltoid insertion is reported to probably deteriorate anterior deltoid function [3, 15]. Furthermore, this approach may negatively influence postoperative outcomes due to devascularization of fracture fragments during dissection and plating or disruption of the critical blood supply to the humeral head [5, 7, 18]. According to Hertel et al. [12], the most relevant predictors of humeral head ischemia are the length of the dorsomedial metaphyseal extension, the integrity of the medial hinge, and the basic fracture type itself. Therefore, care must be taken with the deltopectorial approach to not deteriorate the initial situation of blood supply preventing an avascular necrosis of the humeral head.
Deltoid-Splitting Approach
In recent years the originally developed for rotator cuff surgery and intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures deltoid-splitting (antero-lateral) approach has become more and more popular for plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus [5, 9, 24, 25, 29].
The first skin incision of this less-invasive approach starts from the antero-lateral tip of the acromion extending 5 cm distally in line with the arm. For superficial dissection, the deltoid muscle is split in line with its fibers (in the avascular raphe between the anterior and middle head) no more than 5 cm distal to the acromion to protect the axillary nerve. The subacromial bursa should be resected to reveal the underlying rotator cuff and the proximal humerus. Then, the axillary nerve is identified by palpation and consequently protected during the further procedure. After fracture reduction, the plating implant is inserted along the humeral shaft and positioned at the upper end of the greater tuberosity and approximately 2 mm posterior to the bicipital groove. Using the antero-lateral approach the lateral plating zone can be directly accessed with minimized muscle retraction. Then, the second skin incision is performed over the distal 3 holes of the plate following fluoroscopic control. After blunt dissection, the distal ending of the plate is displayed for fixation to the humeral shaft.