Evidence-Based Treatment for Metatarsus Adductus



Fig. 18.1
Clinical photographs of a child with metatarsus adductus. There is no hindfoot equinus; an important differentiating sign from a clubfoot



Bleck’s clinical classification [3] is widely used for diagnosis and classification of MA. He advised the use of the heel bisector axis (HBA), which is a line drawn along the middle of the weight-bearing plantar surface of the heel and normally crosses the second toe. MA is categorised as “mild” if the HBA crosses the third toe, “moderate” when it crosses the fourth toe and “severe” when it crosses lateral to the fourth toe (Fig. 18.2). HBA also serves as the reference for forefoot flexibility. MA is termed “flexible” when the foot is correctable beyond the HBA, “partially flexible” when the foot is correctable up to the HBA and “rigid” when it is not correctable. However, Bleck did not find any correlation between the severity and flexibility of MA at diagnosis and the eventual outcome. Radiological assessment can be performed in the older child by measuring the MA angle (MAA). The MAA is the angle formed by the longitudinal axis of the metatarsals and that of the lesser tarsus. The axis of the second metatarsal is considered to be the axis of the metatarsal.

A328329_1_En_18_Fig2_HTML.gif


Fig. 18.2
Bleck’s classification of metatarsus adductus



What Is the Natural History of Metatarsus Adductus?


Ponseti and Becker [4] found that nearly 90 % of patients with MA achieve spontaneous resolution with time. The authors advised that passively correctable MA did not require any treatment but recommended casting for feet that were not passively correctable. They reported good results from casting of semi-rigid or rigid feet. Rushforth [5] followed 130 MA of all grades of severity for a mean follow up of 7 years and found 86 % were normal or mildly deformed but fully mobile; 10 % were still moderately deformed but were asymptomatic and 4 % remained deformed and stiff. It was not possible to detect these resistant cases before the age of 3 years, but the low failure rate would seem to justify a policy of expectant treatment. Ghali et al. [6] presented a small series of both untreated (31) and surgically treated (38) MA at a median follow-up of 4 years. Surgical treatment involved antero-medial release. Patients were assessed both clinically and radiologically. He reported “excellent” results in both groups. [7] presented a follow up study of 243 feet with MA. It is not clear what the length of follow up was. He treated flexible feet with stretching and semi-rigid or rigid feet with casting. He found a favourable outcome and commented that children with residual deformity had “no difficulties with function or shoe wear”. However Bohne also offered surgery to 9 feet with “severe residual deformity”. The Scandinavian series of [8] reported on 76 patients with MA at 6 years follow-up and found that 13 % of children had a persistent MA. Widhe subsequently published a longer follow up of the same cohort at 16 years [9]. Those with persistent MA at 6 years continued to improve and only three patients had a persistent MA deformity at 16 years. All of them were asymptomatic despite the deformity. The initial grade of severity of the MA patients in this series is not known. Widhe also compared gait analysis and dynamic foot pressure at 16 years between those with normal feet at birth and those with MA and found no difference between the two groups. Ponseti’s group published a 32-year follow up of patients with MA [10]. The cohort included 16 passively correctable feet that had no treatment. The rest had semi-rigid or rigid deformity and were treated with serial manipulation and casting. The authors used a functional rating system to assess functional outcome and also performed radiological assessment. No one had poor results and none required subsequent surgery. All the feet that were initially passively correctable went on to achieve spontaneous resolution. There was only a single case of hallux valgus at final follow up. The authors advised against surgical treatment of rigid MA.

Evidence from the published literature appears to suggest a favourable outcome for untreated MA. Most will resolve without treatment by early childhood and those that persist are likely to improve with age. A small minority of MA may persist but are unlikely to give any functional problem. There is enough evidence to suggest that passively correctable MA deformity does not require any treatment apart from parental reassurances. Manipulation and casting is an option in feet that do not correct passively although no treatment is probably equally feasible.


What Is the Role of Serial Casting?


Given the favourable natural history of MA, it is difficult to ascertain the value of manipulation and serial casting. Widhe [9] showed that MA continues to improve to adulthood. There has been no comparative study of serial casting with control. Although it has been recommended for metatarsus adductus of intermediate severity, there is strong evidence that these deformities will self-correct over time without intervention with very few exceptions [4, 5, 8, 9].


Is There a Role for Orthotics?


Pentz and Weiner [11] published their experience with 795 patients treated for MA over a 13-year period with a straight metal bar and attached reverse last shoe protocol. Nearly uniform excellent results were encountered, with a 99 % likelihood of obtaining a fully corrected foot. Surgical intervention was deemed necessary in less than 1 % of cases. Lack of control seriously undermines this paper. As stated earlier that numerous reports of high rate of natural resolution, it is not unreasonable to assume that the high success rate of 99% full correction attributed to natural history of MA and not due to orthotic support. Herzenberg and Burghardt [12] conducted a randomised trial of casting versus Bebax orthosis in 27 infants (43 feet) and found orthosis to be equally effective but cheaper [13]. However, the inclusion criterion was “infants who failed home stretching”. The age range was 3–9 months and it is not clear if these patients required any treatment at all.


Is There an Association Between Metatarsus Adductus and Hallux Valgus?


Long term follow up studies of untreated MA report a low rate of hallux valgus deformity in this population [5, 8, 9]. However other studies investigating patients with hallux valgus deformity undergoing surgery have found a higher prevalence of MA. The reported prevalence is around 30 % [13]. Ferrari and Malone-Lee [14] randomly reviewed 100 x-rays and found a higher prevalence of MA in feet with hallux valgus (55 %) compared to those without (19 %). However, retrospective studies of this nature are contaminated by selection bias and are unlikely to be representative of the true association.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 7, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Evidence-Based Treatment for Metatarsus Adductus

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access