Clinical methods of history taking and examination

1 Clinical methods of history taking and examination


As in other fields of medicine and surgery, diagnosis of orthopaedic disorders depends first upon an accurate determination of all the abnormal features from:






Secondly, it depends upon a correct interpretation of the findings.



HISTORY TAKING


In the diagnosis of orthopaedic conditions the history is often of first importance. In cases of torn meniscus in the knee, for instance, the clinical diagnosis sometimes depends upon the history alone. Except in the most obvious conditions, a detailed history is always required.


First the exact nature of the patient’s complaint is determined. Then the development of the symptoms is traced step by step from their earliest beginning up to the time of the consultation. The patient’s own views on the cause of the symptoms are always worth recording: often they prove to be correct. Enquiry is made into activities that have been found to improve the symptoms or to make them worse, and into the effect of any previous treatment. Facts that often have an important bearing on the condition are the age and present occupation of the patient, previous occupations, hobbies and recreational activities, and previous injuries.


When a full history of the local symptoms has been obtained, do not omit to enquire whether there have been symptoms in other parts of the body, and whether the general health is affected. Ask also about previous illnesses.


Finally, in cases that seem trivial, a tactful enquiry as to why the patient decided to seek advice, and to what extent he is worried by his disability, will often give a valuable clue to the underlying problem. It should be remembered that very often patients seek advice not because they are handicapped by a disability (which is often insignificant) but because they fear the development of some serious disease such as cancer, paralysis, or progressive crippling deformity.



CLINICAL EXAMINATION


The part complained of is examined according to a rigid routine which should become habitual. If this is done, familiarity with the routine will ensure that no step in the examination is forgotten. Accuracy of observation is essential: it can be acquired only by much practice and by diligent attention to detail.


The examination of the part complained of does not complete the clinical examination. It sometimes happens that symptoms felt in one part have their origin in another. For example, pain in the leg is often caused by a lesion in the spine, and pain in the knee may have its origin in the hip. The possibility of a distant lesion must therefore be considered and an examination made of any region under suspicion.


Finally, localised symptoms may be the first or only manifestation of a generalised or widespread disorder. A brief examination is therefore made of the rest of the body with this possibility in mind.


Thus the clinical examination may be considered under three headings:






1 EXAMINATION OF THE PART COMPLAINED OF


The following description of the steps in the clinical examination is intended only as a guide. The technique of examination will naturally be varied according to individual preference. Nevertheless, it is useful to stick to a particular routine, for a familiarity with it will ensure that no step in the examination is forgotten.



Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 5, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Clinical methods of history taking and examination

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access