Cervical Laminoplasty



Cervical Laminoplasty


Steven K. Leckie

James S. Kercher

S. Tim Yoon





ANATOMY



  • The cervical spine is composed of seven vertebrae normally arranged in lordotic alignment. The occiput-C1 articulation is responsible for 50% of neck flexion and extension and the C1-C2 atlantoaxial articulation is responsible for 50% of total rotation. Lateral bending below the C2-C3 level is coupled with rotation due to the 45-degree inclination of the cervical facet joints.


  • The subaxial vertebral segments of C3-C7 are similar to each other and distinct from C1 (atlas) and C2 (axis). The subaxial vertebrae articulate via zygapophyseal (facet) joints posteriorly and uncovertebral joints of Luschka laterally.


  • Intervertebral discs are located between the vertebral bodies of C2-C7. The discs are composed of an inner nucleus pulposus and an outer annulus fibrosus.


  • Anteriorly, the spinal canal is bounded by the vertebral bodies, the intervertebral discs, and the posterior longitudinal ligament. The pedicles form the lateral boundary of the spinal canal. Posteriorly, the ligamentum flavum runs from the anterior surface of the superior lamina to the posterior surface of the inferior lamina (FIG 1).


PATHOGENESIS



  • Cervical spondylotic changes are the most common reason for cervical myelopathy.


  • Spondylosis is characterized by intervertebral disc desiccation and height loss, which leads to annular bulging and osteophyte formation around the uncovertebral and facet joints. In the dorsal spinal canal, thickening or buckling of the ligamentum flavum further decreases canal and foraminal cross-sectional area.


  • Circumferential spinal cord compression causes derangement at a cellular level, which leads to clinical deficits. In addition to static spinal cord compression, instability leads to motion that may aggravate myelopathy.


NATURAL HISTORY



  • There is a paucity of recent literature that documents the true natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy because modern practice is to perform a surgical decompression once significant myelopathy has been diagnosed. Early studies described a stepwise decline in neurologic function punctuated by stable periods, although some patients exhibited a continuous functional decline or no decline at all.


  • The clinical course may wax and wane over a period of years. Sensory symptoms may be transient, but motor symptoms tend to persist and progress. Although surgical intervention may relieve symptoms and halt progression, neurologic deficits may be permanent.


PATIENT HISTORY AND PHYSICAL FINDINGS



  • The diagnosis of cervical myelopathy may be difficult secondary to the variability in clinical findings. Pain is frequently not a significant complaint in myelopathic patients unless it is associated with root compression or facet arthrosis. Patients may present with subtle findings or profound neurologic deficits.


  • Patients commonly present with the insidious onset of gait disturbance, trouble with balance, and hand clumsiness. They may report burning pain in the upper extremities, difficulty with handwriting and fine motor control, diffuse
    numbness, or weakness of grasp. Advanced cases can present with flaccid weakness or bowel and bladder dysfunction.


  • The physical examination should begin with an assessment of gait, which may be wide-based, hesitant, stiff, or spastic. Patients may be unable to walk heel-to-toe or may have poor balance during toe raise.


  • Sensory findings may be variable. Pain, temperature, vibratory, and light touch sensation may be decreased.


  • Mixed upper and lower motor neuron findings may be present depending on the degree of cord compression, concomitant nerve root compression, or peripheral nerve dysfunction.


  • The Lhermitte sign is positive when extreme neck flexion or extension results in electrical sensation down the arms or body and is a sign of spinal cord compression. Pathologic reflexes include the scapulohumeral reflex (indicating compression above the C3 level) or inverted radial reflex (indicating compression at C5 or C6). Other findings include the Hoffman sign, clonus (>3 beats), Babinski sign, slow grip and release, unsteady Romberg (posterior column), and abnormal finger escape (T1 level).






FIG 1 • Anatomy of cervical vertebrae.


IMAGING AND OTHER DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES



  • Plain anteroposterior (AP) and lateral standing radiographs of the cervical spine are useful for initial evaluation of sagittal alignment and the extent of spondylotic changes (such as disc space narrowing, osteophytes, kyphosis, joint subluxation, and spinal canal stenosis; FIG 2A).



    • Flexion and extension views provide information about possible spinal instability.


  • Typically, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing spinal cord compression. It can visualize the spinal cord and canal dimensions without any ionizing radiation. The spinal cord parenchyma can be visualized to help evaluate the extent of spinal cord damage. MRI is also useful for visualization of compressive soft tissue such as ligamentum hypertrophy and disc herniation (FIG 2B). Because it is usually obtained supine, MRI is less reliable than standing x-ray for evaluation of sagittal alignment.


  • Computed tomography (CT) is superior to MRI for defining bony anatomy and is useful for evaluating OPLL (FIG 2C,D). The addition of contrast dye myelogram combined with the CT (CT-myelogram) can improve the ability to assess spinal cord compression in the setting of previous hardware placement that would obscure an MRI with scatter artifact.






FIG 2A. Preoperative lateral cervical spine radiograph demonstrating spondylotic changes: diffuse disc height loss and osteophyte formation. B. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI showing multilevel cervical disc protrusions and circumferential stenosis at C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6, resulting in cord deformation. Cord signal changes can be seen at C3-C4 and C4-C5, indicative of cord damage. C. Sagittal CT reconstruction showing large ossified posterior longitudinal ligament extending from C2 to C6. There is evidence of failed anterior decompression by an outside facility. D. Axial CT image demonstrating a large ossified posterior longitudinal ligament.


DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS



  • Stroke


  • Peripheral compression neuropathy (ie, carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel)


  • Parkinson disease


  • Muscular dystrophy or dystonia


  • Syringomyelia


  • Tumor


  • Vascular disease


  • Autoimmune disorders


  • Epidural abscess


  • Nerve injury


  • Drug intoxication



  • Multiple sclerosis


  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis


  • Cerebellar dysfunction


  • Idiopathic movement disorder


  • Peripheral neuropathy (B12 deficiency)


SURGICAL MANAGEMENT

Jul 24, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Cervical Laminoplasty

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access