TABLE 23.1 A Articular surface B Bursal surface C Complete tear, connecting A and B sides 0 Normal cuff, with smooth coverings of synovium and bursa I Minimal superficial bursal or synovial irritation or slight capsular fraying in a small localized area, usually <1 cm II Actual fraying or failure of some rotator cuff fibers in addition to synovial, bursal, or capsular injury, usually <2 cm in size III More severe rotator cuff injury, including fraying and fragmentation of tendon fibers, often involving the whole surface of a cuff tendon (most often the supraspinatus), usually <3 cm in size IV Very severe partial rotator cuff tear that usually contains, in addition to fraying and fragmentation of tendon tissue, a sizable flap tear, usually larger in size than grades I–III and often encompassing more than a single tendon From Snyder SJ. Evaluation and treatment of the rotator cuff. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:173–192.
When and How to Use Patches
Introduction
Brief Description of Procedure
Patient History
Patient Examination
Imaging
Treatment Options
Surgical Anatomy
Classification of Rotator Cuff Tears
Location of tear
Surgical Indications
Surgical Technique Setup
Positioning
Equipment
Establishing Surgical Portals
Brief Description of Surgical Portals and Optimizing Visualization
Procedure
Pearls
Pitfalls
Step-By-Step Guide to Surgical Technique: Rotator Cuff Augmentation Using Dermal Allograft
Step 1: Back Table Preparation
Step 2: Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
When and How to Use Patches
Chapter 23
Kent P. Sheridan, Brian D. Dierckman, Joseph P. Burns, and Stephen J. Snyder
Symptomatic large and massive rotator cuff tears are common with advancing age. Among those who undergo rotator cuff repair surgery, reasonable clinical outcomes have been reported in the majority of patients; however, complete tendon-to-bone healing is uncommon, with retear rates ranging from 40% to over 90%. In order to improve healing rates, various scaffolds have been investigated to augment these tears at high risk of retearing. In addition, some tears are not fully repairable, and grafts have been used to bridge the defect in the cuff tendon. In this chapter, we describe the use of human dermal allograft as both an augmented graft and an interposition graft because of its favorable biologic and mechanical properties.
A dermal allograft patch can be used either to bridge a defect greater than 1 cm in size (interposition) or to augment a complete repair (augmentation). We prefer to use an arthroscopic technique over an open technique, largely owing to improved visualization and preservation of the deltoid attachment. Sutures are passed through the graft outside the shoulder, and knots are tied on one end of the suture; the other end of the suture is shuttled into the joint through the native cuff tissue and out another cannula. These medial ends are then slowly pulled, which draws the graft into the joint. The suture ends are then tied together, firmly fixing the graft to the native tissue.
One or more of the above risk factors warrants preparation for the use of dermal allograft. There are few absolute contraindications to using a graft, but patient bias against using an allograft must be respected. Cost, additional time requirement, and surgeon’s comfort level are relative contraindications.
Note: Use of patches is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only as an augmentation with less than 1-cm defect; therefore interposition is currently an “off-label” use, and patients should be informed of the FDA status.
Preparation for dermal graft includes a complete examination of the joint followed by bursoscopy and subacromial decompression. Anterior midglenoid portal (AMGP) and posterior midglenoid portal (PMGP) cannulas are placed with a larger midlateral subacromial portal (MLSAP) to allow passage of the graft. An optional posterolateral portal (PLP) can aid in speed and convenience but has the disadvantage of creating an additional incision. If individual patient physiology allows, controlled hypotensive anesthesia (goal systolic blood pressure ∼90 mm Hg) in the lateral decubitus position can minimize bleeding and improve visualization. Fluid extravasation into the soft tissues can be minimized by maintaining the deltoid fascia where practical, as well as by keeping the pump pressure as close to 35 mm Hg as possible. A debridement that allows excellent visualization with identification of the scapular spine is crucial. The scapular spine is used as a midline reference point when placing medial sutures. The final decision whether to perform an augmentation or interposition graft will ultimately depend on the ability to reduce the cuff to the medial footprint in a low-tension fashion. To a certain extent, this depends on the “feel” of cuff tension. If the cuff can be reasonably reduced to the medial footprint using a looped forceps, it is likely a good candidate for augmentation. If not, an interposition graft is more appropriate.