Value and efficacy of early supported discharge from stroke units




Abstract


Objectives


The goal of early supported discharge (ESD) is to reduce the duration of in-patient care in stroke units (SUs) and to optimize the management of pre- and post-discharge rehabilitation. Here, we report on and discuss ESD’s effects on various outcome parameters in stroke patients.


Methods


Analysis of randomized, controlled studies and meta-analyses identified in the Medline and Cochrane databases.


Results


ESD interventions have been evaluated in more than 10 studies. Most of the included patients had suffered from mild or moderate strokes. Meta-analyses have shown that when compared with standard care, ESD has a positive effect on the risk of death or institutionalisation, death or dependence and participation in instrumental activities of daily living (iADL). In-patient hospitalization in the SU and the overall cost of care were significantly lower. Individual studies showed variability in the inclusion criteria, type of care, comparisons performed and conclusions drawn. ESD’s superiority in terms of the risk of death or dependency was mainly reported in a Norwegian study and that in terms of iADL was reported in a Swedish study. There was no specific effect on functional impairment and personal ADL (pADL).


Discussion


This technique reduces the length of the in-patient stay and the overall cost of care while lowering the risk of death or institutionalisation and promoting participation in iADL. However, studies on this topic are heterogeneous.


Résumé


Objectifs


Les objectifs de la sortie précoce et accompagnée (SPA) sont de réduire la durée d’hospitalisation dans l’unité neurovasculaire (UNV) et de gérer la rééducation pendant le séjour puis au domicile. Ici, nous avons présenté et discuté son efficacité chez les patients victimes d’un accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC).


Méthodes


Analyse des études comparatives randomisées et des méta-analyses à partir des bases de données Medline et Cochrane.


Résultats


L’effet de la SPA a été évalué dans plus de dix études ayant inclus des patients ayant généralement un AVC de sévérité légère ou moyenne. Les méta-analyses ont montré un effet positif, en comparaison avec la prise en charge usuelle, sur le risque de décès ou d’institutionnalisation et de décès ou de dépendance, et la participation aux activités de vie quotidienne instrumentales (AVQi). La durée d’hospitalisation en UNV et le coût global de la prise en charge étaient significativement réduits. Les études individuelles montraient une variabilité dans les critères d’inclusion, le type de prise en charge, les comparaisons effectuées et les résultats. La supériorité sur le risque de décès ou de dépendance était principalement décrite dans une étude norvégienne, celle sur la participation aux AVQi dans une étude suédoise. Il n’y avait pas d’effet spécifique sur les fonctions déficitaires et les AVQ personnelles.


Discussion


Cette technique diminue la durée d’hospitalisation et le coût global, tout en réduisant le risque de décès ou d’institutionnalisation et en favorisant la participation aux AVQi. Les études sur le sujet ne sont cependant pas équivalentes.



English version



Introduction


Although dedicated stroke units (SUs) have been introduced only recently in France (in comparison with other European countries), the process has been highly formalized . Many randomized and controlled trials have shown that SUs can improve patient prognosis, with a positive effect on three distinct risks: death, death or institutionalization and death or dependency . Efficacy factors notably include the early implementation (i.e. within 24 hours of the stroke) of rehabilitation measures such as physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy .


Care in the SU is not solely dedicated to the treatment of brain damage and its immediate anatomical and functional consequences; it also involves discharge support and educational measures for the patient and his/her carers. Several services have been developed with the two-fold aim of accelerating and supporting home or institutional discharge. Indeed, the efficacy of early supported discharge (ESD) relative to conventional techniques was examined in several studies. Knowledge of this efficacy and of any related limitations is important, since it could help shape the efficiency measures to be implemented in French SUs. This type of support is also in phase with the needs and preference expressed by the patients’ families and carers. Studies on caregiver needs have underlined the fact that the family’s main concern following a stroke is to not have continuity of care after discharge from hospital .


In the present article, we review studies on ESD. These studies have already been examined in meta-analysis and systematic reviews . Our main objective was to analyze the influence of ESD on the handicap’s various components, while bearing in mind that not all the techniques described in the literature are suited to the situation in France and that they mainly apply to patients with mild or moderate functional impairments rather than severe impairments.



Literature analysis methods


We performed a literature search within the Medline and Cochrane databases by using the keywords “early supported discharge”, “discharge” and “stroke” and then a step-by-step approach.


We selected randomized, controlled studies and meta-analyses on ESD in stroke patients. The goal of ESD is to improve support and enable rehabilitation at home on one hand and to reduce the length of stay in the SU or neurology department on the other.


We sought to distinguish between the overall effects of ESD (as described in the meta-analyses) from the specific effects reported in each randomized trial. Indeed, the objectives, methods and context of these various trials were often different. Furthermore, some effects have been described in only a small number of studies. The various effects were grouped together on the basis of the components of the International classification of functioning and handicap (ICFH), i.e. functions, activities (functional tests), participation in personal activities of daily living (pADL: grooming, dressing, transfers, etc.) and instrumental activities of daily living (iADL: domestic and social activities) and the patient’s environment, including relatives/carers. We considered health economic aspects separately.



Results


The selected studies are presented in Table 1 ; most had already been examined in reviews and one meta-analysis .



Table 1

Presentation of the 11 randomized studies in the literature.
















































































































References First publication City Country Inclusion criteria Patients included Follow-up Type of care
1997 Newcastle UK Barthel Index (BI) at D3 from 5 to 19 out of 20, living at home 92 out of 402 = 22.9% 3 months Type 1
1997 London UK Independent transfers if living alone, or with assistance if living with a willing career 331 out of 660 = 50.1% 1 year Type 1
1998 Stockholm Sweden Continent and independent in feeding 1 week after a stroke, and expected hospitalization time of 4 weeks 83 out of 220 = 37.7% 3 and 6 months, 1 and 5 years Type 1
1998 Akershus Norway A Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) score between 12 and 52; participation in rehabilitation; living at home 251 out of 550 = 45.6% 7 months Type 3
2000 Adelaide Australia Sufficient physical and cognitive function for active participation in rehabilitation; suitable home environment; caregiver participating 86 out of 398 = 21.6% 6 months Type 1
2000 Montreal Canada Caregivers willing and able to provide live-in care after discharge; walking with < 1 person; no definite cognitive impairment 114 out of 1542 = 7.4% 3 months Type 1
2000 Trondheim Norway A SSS score between 2 and 57 320 out of 468 = 68.4% 3 months Type 2
2002 Oslo Norway BI between 5 and 19 at 72 hours post-stroke, living at home 82 out of 435 = 18.9% 3 and 6 months Type 2
2002 Bangkok Thailand Admitted to hospital within 48 hours of the stroke, exclusion if altered consciousness, NIHSS >20, extended infarction, embolic cause, aphasia 102 6 months Type 3
2004 Belfast UK Potentially able to benefit from rehabilitation; no prior disability 113 out of 896 = 12.6% 1 year Type 1
2004 Trondheim Norway SSS >2 and <58 62 out of 89 = 69.7% 6 months and 1 year Type 2



Overall organization and quality of care


Understanding the results and efficacy of ESD first requires an idea of the system’s organizational status and of what is provided.


In fact, ESD is not a uniform system and the intersystem differences are sometimes large. Three different types of services can be described, depending on the ESD team’s degree of involvement in the management after discharge from the SU :




  • type 1: coordination and performance by the ESD team;



  • type 2: coordination by the ESD team;



  • type 3: no involvement of the ESD team outside the hospital.



In the first type (as described by Anderson et al. ), the mobile team includes a part-time physician, a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist and a nurse. Other personnel can potentially include a speech therapist, a social worker and a secretary . According to the originators of this ESD system, it optimizes:




  • systematic evaluation of the patient and his/her needs;



  • a home visit with the patient, as soon as the latter’s condition is stable;



  • discharge planning (including technical aids, human assistance and rehabilitation) and, after assessment of rehabilitation needs, a discharge meeting with the patient, his/her family or carers, his/her physician and a member of the mobile team;



  • follow-up visits as necessary, with patients being cared for at home or in the out-patient rehabilitation unit;



  • an education meeting with the patient and his/her family or carers 3 months after discharge.



The length of home rehabilitation for ESD patients varied extensively, with periods of one to 19 weeks (median = 5) , 4 weeks , about 1 month and 3 to 4 months . Furthermore, in some of the studies, patients included in the control groups received little or no home rehabilitation . The ESD groups displayed a slightly higher number of visits. For example, in a 12-month study in the United Kingdom (UK) , ESD patients received significantly more 20-minute visits (compared with controls) for physiotherapy (22.4 vs. 15), speech therapy (13.7 vs. 5.8) and occupational therapy (29 vs. 23.8). In northern European countries, the number of rehabilitation meetings was often similar in both systems .



The overall effects of ESD


The overall effect of ESD corresponds to the results of the meta-analyses of 10 randomized, controlled studies from six countries (Australia, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Thailand and the UK), plus an unpublished trial.



Patient characteristics


The average patient age ranged from 66 to 78 years and the Barthel Index (BI) on inclusion ranged from 10 to 17 out of 20 – showing that the most severely affected patients were excluded.



Patient outcomes


Outcomes were assessed after a 3- to 12-month period (median = 6). Some trials had been extended up to a total length of 5 years. However, authors did not take late-stage information into account, in order to maintain the homogeneity of the results.


Overall, ESD did not reduce the death rate alone. However, there was a decrease in the risk of death or institutionalization (which was equivalent to five additional patients living at home for each group of 100 patients treated) and the risk of death or dependency (which was equivalent to six additional patients regaining independence for each group of 100 patients treated).


Participation in pADL (washing, dressing, etc.) was not affected. Conversely, participation in iADL (domestic activities, outings…) was increased in survivors having undergone the ESD and this result (seen in nine trials and a total of 1051 patients) depended on the quality of the home care (ESD type 1).


There was no specific effect on health status and subjective mood (in 10 trials and a total of 1154 patients), although patients receiving care more frequently reported greater levels of satisfaction with the support services.



Caregiver outcomes


There was no effect of ESD on the subjective health status, mood and satisfaction levels of relatives/carers, although this type of information was only provided in a limited number of trials (two to four).



Resource use


ESD reduced the duration of initial in-patient hospitalization by about 8 days. Readmissions were not affected. The overall cost of care (available in four of the 11 trials) was 9 to 20% lower in the ESD groups.



Analysis by subgroups


Subgroup analysis was possible in nine of the 11 trials. The effects were not related to age (relatively high) or gender. There was an interaction with the initial severity of the stroke, due to a decrease in death or dependency and death or institutionalization in patients with moderate stroke (initial BI >9 out of 20) but not in those with more severe strokes. Conversely, the reduction in the length of hospital stay was greater for severe stroke than for moderate stroke.


There was also an interaction with the type of care. The intervention of a multidisciplinary, coordinated care team (type 1) resulted in a lower risk of death or dependency than less sophisticated teams. Moreover, the reduction in hospital stay was greater when the ESD team was based within a hospital.



Specific effects on the components of handicap


Specific effects correspond to the description of randomized studies which were included in the meta-analysis described in Table 1 . Several findings differed from those of the meta-analysis, because the studied varied in terms of the implemented measures, the patient selection criteria and (especially) the medical team size.



Deaths


A moderate difference was reported in one study, with institutional rehabilitation producing better results than ESD. This difference was even more marked for the association of death or dependency . However, in the other series, there were no differences at 6 months or 1 year after the stroke.



Stroke recurrence


No differences in stroke recurrence at 1 year were described .



Functional parameters


Whatever the post-stroke time point, there were generally no between-group differences in motor activities, balance and mobility , language tests and the Mini Mental State examination (MMSe) . Only one study reported an effect on the Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) in the most dependent patients (i.e. those with a BI below 50 out of 100). Anxiety and depression were not affected .



Motor activities


Concerning the legs, no differences were reported in terms of gait speed or times or the Berg Balance Scale score . Concerning the arms, there were no differences in Peg tests .



Participation


Most studies did not show greater efficacy of ESD in pADL, as evaluated by the BI . A Norwegian study reported a positive effect (on the Rankin scale) at Weeks 26 and 52 . Conversely, another study reported that in-patient rehabilitation was more effective than ESD .


In terms of iADL, a Canadian study reported the slight superiority of ESD at 3 months. In fact, the overall finding of greater efficacy comes essentially from a Swedish study: benefit was absent at 3 months , appeared at 6 months and was maintained up to 1 and 5 years . Superiority of ESD was not reported in the other series .



Subjective health status and quality of life


Two Norwegian studies have reported a relatively long-lasting effect of ESD on subjective health status . However, the other selected studies did not observe any significant effect of ESD on this parameter and on quality of life .



Satisfaction


One trial described a greater effect of ESD on patient satisfaction with hospital care but not on satisfaction with home rehabilitation and care . Another trial reported a positive effect on overall patient satisfaction . Conversely, in another trial , there was no effect on satisfaction with recovery, rehabilitation, home discharge, information at the time of initial disease, communication with the team, understanding why stroke occurred and current support.



Subgroup analyses


Greater benefit (on the BI and Rankin scale) at 6 months in moderate to severe stroke (SSS <52) has been reported . Conversely, ESD was less effective than care in a specialized rehabilitation centre for patients with a BI below 50 out of 100 .



Family/caregivers


No advantage of ESD has been reported in terms of the stress , overall health status and satisfaction with care and overall satisfaction of the family and caregivers. One study even reported less involvement in household maintenance . However, one positive feature was a partial reduction in workload at 3 months and 1 year .



Health economic aspects



Duration of stay in the acute neurology unit


In most trials, ESD significantly reduced the duration of stay in the acute neurology service from 18 to 12 , 30 to 15 , 12.4 to 9.8. , 22 to 13 , 31 to 22 and 29 to 14 days . Only two studies found no difference but one of these compared ESD with institutional rehabilitation .



Readmissions


Most studies described no differences in readmission rates, regardless of the time interval since the stroke . Only one study suggested that readmission rates were lower in the ESD group .



Place of domicile


There were no institutionalization rate differences in any of the studies . Home help was assessed in some reports and there was no difference in the cost of home and special equipment in the Australian study .



Cost


In studies, which presented this type of information, the ESD groups had a lower initial hospital cost and an often higher homecare cost. However, the overall cost of care fell by 10% to 20% or even 35% in Canada (due to the decrease in readmissions, in this latter study).



Discussion


Our review of the literature suggests that ESD partially reduces the risk of death or dependency and the risk of death or institutionalization and may have a positive effect on participation in iADL, in comparison with the various countries’ conventional discharge systems. In addition, ESD reduces the total duration of hospitalization in the SU and the overall cost of care without decreasing efficacy (except in comparison with specialized neurological rehabilitation ). However, the studies performed in cities across Europe, Canada and Australia show a number of disparities, which depend on the respective healthcare systems.


When evaluating the efficacy of ESD, there are advantages and disadvantages in considering only the results of meta-analyses. The most obvious advantage is that the recent meta-analysis featured a high total number of patients (over 1000) and analyzed the raw data provided by the investigating centres in which the randomized studies had been performed. This explains why the greater efficacy appeared more clearly – especially for the participation in iADL, which is a major challenge in any type of home care. However, a number of disadvantages and drawbacks should be noted. The first is that this kind of study does not take account of the differences between the conventional health systems which are being compared with ESD. In this respect, one can note that the Norwegian and Swedish systems involve both relatively intense community rehabilitation care (including physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy) and social care . This could help explain why some studies did not show any (or only minor) differences between ESD and standard care. In contrast, the systems in the UK, Canada and Australia often provide less support for rehabilitation at home and thus comparative studies could more easily favour ESD. A second point is that the respective patient profiles were relatively heterogeneous. Several trials excluded patients with serious disorders and/or those who had not recovered complete or even partial autonomy for transfers, walking or food intake during the initial hospitalization in the SU or the neurology unit . In contrast, other studies (mainly those in Norway) included more severely affected patients . Variability in the inclusion criteria explains why the ratio between included patients and examined patients was, in some cases, very low (see Table 1 ) and prompts caution in generalizing conclusions drawn in the corresponding investigations. Another problem is that two of the studies included in the meta-analysis aimed at comparing ESD with institutional neurological rehabilitation, which differs in nature from standard care in the community. A last point is that certain authors have combined the risk of death with that of dependency or institutionalization to show a positive effect of ESD. This technique has been frequently used to evaluate the effectiveness of healthcare systems, especially after a stroke . There is indeed a spectrum between good recovery, poor recovery and death, which is used in outcome scales (such as the Rankin scale). However, one can gain the impression that the ESD’s efficacy is relatively poor on each parameter. The lack of an overall effect on pADL reinforces this impression. These misgivings explain our decision to provide a detailed analysis of the results of each study for the different components of handicap.


An important point to consider is the definition of patients who are eligible for ESD. As mentioned above, the studies’ inclusion criteria were highly variable. The technique is certainly applicable to patients having suffered a “mild” or “moderate” stroke. Indeed, all studies have included these types of patients and one can easily imagine that relatively early home discharge does not pose too many practical problems and that the family circle/carers (when present) can adapt to the new situation. However, for severe stroke patients who are still dependent at the time of discharge from the SU, ESD is not the most appropriate solution. Indeed, ESD is less effective than institutional rehabilitation in patients with a BI below 50 . Moreover, the early home discharge of severely dependent patients poses important logistic and human problems, which cannot be rapidly solved.


ESD has not demonstrated any efficacy in terms of the various motor, perceptual and cognitive impairments. However, such an effect is difficult to demonstrate in rehabilitation settings. With one exception , there are no data indicating increased participation in pADL, as assessed by the BI. Only one (Norwegian) study has suggested that there might be an effect on the Rankin scale, which considers the severity of impairment, personal autonomy and death. Conversely, an important observation relates to the benefit suggested by the meta-analysis and the Swedish study in terms of participation in iADL. It could be that ESD directly acts on the person’s life context and enables optimal adaptation to their environment. Another interesting result is that the ESD is sometimes associated with a more favourable outcome in subjective health status and quality of life, in the first months and even up to 1 year .


One essential aspect relates to ESD’s ability to reduce the duration of the initial stay in the SU and thus to lower the overall cost of care. This is an important observation, which shows that organisational improvement can yield gains in both efficacy and overall cost. Indeed, this may help optimize the resources dedicated to stroke patients. However, the overall cost of care after discharge from the SU also depends on the health system in the country in question.


The two studies which compared ESD with institutional rehabilitation care must be considered separately. In fact, their results were divergent. The most convincing study (performed in Norway ) found that specialized rehabilitation was more effective than ESD, with the same number of care sessions and cost in both systems. Although the second study (performed in Belfast, Northern Ireland) found in favour of ESD-based care, the level of rehabilitation activity in the “specialized” rehabilitation unit was very low.


In conclusion, ESD is a useful technique for stroke patients with slight or moderate levels of handicap. It reduces the length of hospitalization in the SU and the overall cost of care, while helping to reduce the risk of death or institutionalization and improving participation in the iADL. ESD could be introduced in the French system, especially in order to provide patients with rehabilitation care under free-living conditions. Lastly, the ESD technique has been rightfully included in the Stroke Unit Discharge Guideline .





Version française



Introduction


En comparaison avec d’autres pays européens, l’introduction en France des unités neurovasculaires (UNV) est récente mais très systématisée . De nombreux essais randomisés et contrôlés ont montré qu’elles permettent d’améliorer le devenir des patients, avec un effet positif sur trois risques distincts : décès isolé, décès ou institutionnalisation et décès ou dépendance . Parmi les facteurs d’efficacité, il faut citer la mise en place précoce (24 premières heures) de la réadaptation en kinésithérapie, ergothérapie et orthophonie .


Les processus de soins en UNV ne doivent pas être dédiés uniquement à l’atteinte cérébrale et à ses conséquences anatomiques et fonctionnelles immédiates. Ils impliquent aussi des mesures d’accompagnement de la sortie et d’éducation du patient et de son entourage. Un certain nombre de services se sont développés dont le double objectif a été d’accompagner et d’accélérer la sortie vers le domicile ou d’autres structures d’accueil. Cette sortie précoce accompagnée (SPA) appelée early supported discharge a fait l’objet de plusieurs études ayant comparé son efficacité à celle des techniques conventionnelles. La connaissance de cette efficacité et de ses limites est importante, car elle devrait permettre d’orienter les mesures à mettre en œuvre dans les UNV françaises pour accroître leur efficience. Cet accompagnement va d’ailleurs dans le sens des demandes des proches. Les études des besoins des aidants ont souligné que la principale crainte de la famille après un accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) était de ne pas avoir une continuité de la prise en charge après la sortie de l’hôpital .


Ici, nous avons donc réévalué ces travaux sur la SPA, qui ont déjà fait l’objet de méta-analyses et revues globales . Notre objectif principal était d’analyser l’influence de la SPA sur les différentes composantes de la situation de handicap, tout en sachant que les techniques décrites ne sont pas toutes adaptées à la situation française et qu’elles s’appliquent essentiellement aux patients présentant des déficiences et un défaut de participation de sévérité moyenne ou modérée et non à ceux ayant des difficultés sévères.



Méthodes d’analyse de la littérature


Nous avons effectué une recherche bibliographique à partir des systèmes Medline et Cochrane avec les mots clefs early supported discharge , discharge , stroke , puis une recherche de proche en proche.


Seules ont été retenus les études comparatives randomisées et les méta-analyses sur la SPA des patients AVC. L’objectif de la SPA est, d’une part, d’améliorer l’accompagnement pendant le séjour en UNV et de gérer la rééducation et les problèmes sociaux après le retour au domicile, d’autre part, de raccourcir la durée d’hospitalisation dans les UNV ou les services spécialisés de neurologie.


Nous avons voulu distinguer les effets globaux de cette prise en charge, tels qu’ils ont été décrits dans les méta-analyses, des effets spécifiques rapportés dans chaque essai randomisé. Effectivement, les objectifs, les méthodes et le contexte de ces essais étaient souvent différents. De plus, certains effets ont été décrits dans un nombre limité d’études. Ces effets spécifiques ont été regroupés en se fondant sur les composantes de la Classification internationale du fonctionnement et du handicap (ICFH), c’est-à-dire les fonctions, les activités (tests fonctionnels), la participation aux activités de vie quotidienne personnelles (AVQp : toilette, habillage, transferts…) et instrumentales (AVQi : domestiques et sociales) et l’environnement, notamment les proches. Nous avons envisagé séparément les aspects médico-économiques.



Résultats


Les études retenues ont été présentées dans le Tableau 1 . La plupart d’entre elles ont fait l’objet de deux méta-analyses .


Apr 23, 2017 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on Value and efficacy of early supported discharge from stroke units

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access