Use of Constrained Implants





CASE STUDY


An 85-year-old man presented with a painful knee 5 years after a total knee arthroplasty was performed through a limited medial incision; the posterior-stabilized prosthesis used had a modified tibial component designed for the approach with an abbreviated intramedullary stem. The laboratory workup included a culture of the joint fluid and was negative for infection. The preoperative radiographs ( Fig. 18.1 ) showed a loosened tibial tray, which was confirmed on a technetium scintigraphic study ( Fig. 18.2 ). The patient was taken to the operating room for revision. The tibial tray was loose at the time of surgery and was removed with simple manual extraction ( Fig. 18.3 ). The posterior and anterior cruciate ligaments were absent. The tibiofemoral components were revised to a constrained, posterior-stabilized design, and the original polyethylene patella was left in place. The patient had a benign postoperative course and recovered without incident.




FIGURE 18.1


Anteroposterior ( A ) and lateral ( B ) radiographs of the right knee show a loosened tibial tray.



FIGURE 18.2


A bone scan of the right knee shows increased uptake around the loosened tibial tray.



FIGURE 18.3


The removal of the loosened tray ( A ) and the undersurface showing minimal bone loss ( B ).




Algorithm


An algorith for the use of constrained implants is provided. ( CCK, Constrained condylar knee; CR, cruciate retaining; PS, posterior stabilized; TKA, total knee arthroplasty.)








Chapter Preview


Chapter Synopsis


Constraint in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a balance between the stability that is present from the existing soft tissues and the stability that is afforded to the knee by the prosthetic device. The soft tissues may be lax in the preexisting knee, or they may become lax as a result of the releases that are necessary in the operating room to establish appropriate ligament balance. In the revision setting, the prosthesis must address the defects that are present due to removal of the original device and must also complement the soft tissues to produce a stable postoperative construct. Excessive constraint may lead to subsequent loosening, but laxity can lead to dislocation.


Important Points


The knee that is presented for revision may include a simple unicondylar knee that has developed patellofemoral arthritis without any significant loosening, or it may be a hinge knee arthroplasty that is now loosened with significant bone loss on both sides of the joint. The choice of prosthesis for the revision must consider both the bone loss and the ligament balancing. If the collateral ligamentous structures are intact to clinical examination, a less constrained prosthesis will be adequate. If one of the collaterals is incompetent, a constrained implant will certainly be required, and if both collaterals are incompetent, a hinge will be necessary.


Clinical/Surgical Pearls


If the supporting collateral ligamentous structures are competent, it may be possible to implant a standard cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA (if the posterior cruciate ligament [PCL] is intact) or a posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. In general, the PS TKA is easier to implant in the revision setting and can be used in most revision cases. As the bone loss and ligamentous support become more compromised, it is also easier to change the PS tibial insert to a constrained design.


Clinical/Surgical Pitfalls


It is imperative to have all of the correct prostheses available at the start of the operative procedure. The knee must be stable at the end of the revision, most especially in 90 degrees of flexion. The preoperative radiograph can be misleading as to the extent of the bone loss in a case of polyethylene disease. During the procedure, the PCL or the collateral ligament complex may become incompetent, and a simple CR or PS TKA may no longer afford proper stability. A constrained PS TKA implant should always be available for the revision. It is not as imperative to have a hinge knee available, and the physical examination before the operation should indicate whether the collateral support is compromised on either the medial or the lateral side.




Introduction


The choice of constraint for the revision TKA must consider both the soft tissue balance and the bone loss at the time of surgery. Constraint adds stability but may lead to loosening because of excessive forces delivered to the prosthesis–bone interfaces. As the constraint is increased, it is important to consider the addition of intramedullary stems to augment the fixation and distribute some of the forces away from the interfaces.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 29, 2019 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Use of Constrained Implants

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access