Anteroposterior, lateral, and patellar view of a 66-year-old patient with left knee pain that is recalcitrant to nonoperative measures. There is lateral joint space narrowing, preserved medial compartment, and minimal disease in the patellofemoral compartment
After a discussion about the risks and benefits of surgery, shared decision making with the patient led us to recommend a lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. We reached this conclusion with this particular patient because she prioritized her active lifestyle and a quick recovery in our discussions. The patient was then scheduled for preoperative optimization, teaching, and finally outpatient surgery.
Technique
Preoperative Planning
In preparation for a lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty, the surgeon must plan the approach to the knee. A lateral arthrotomy allows for a smaller incision and less soft tissue disruption, but the surgeon should be comfortable performing a total knee arthroplasty through this approach should it be required. An alternative is to perform an arthroscopy prior to incision to determine whether lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty is an option. Lastly, if the surgeon is not comfortable with a lateral arthrotomy , a medial arthrotomy with a larger dissection may be chosen.
The lateral side of the knee has increased translation and overall laxity than the medial side. For this reason, it is universally accepted that a fixed bearing implant be used. Mobile bearing implants have a propensity to dissociate when used for lateral UKA [5]. Secondly, it is important to identify whether the chosen system has implants specific to the lateral side of the knee or if the system has “left lateral, right medial” implants. In addition, the surgeon should be sure that the bone loss on the lateral side can be managed with the available polyethylene thicknesses for the chosen system. Finally, should there be undiagnosed osteoarthritis within the medial or patellofemoral joints, or an incompetent ACL, a TKA system should be readily available as should the necessary retractors to perform the case for the chosen approach.
Exposure
Adequate exposure can be achieved from either a medial or lateral approach to the knee. The benefits of a medial approach include familiarity, ease of creating the vertical tibial cut adequately medial, and ease of conversion to a total knee arthroplasty. Lateral UKA from the lateral side minimizes incision length, soft tissue dissection, and allows for greater visualization.
A medial arthrotomy to the knee is also a viable option for surgeons who prefer familiar anatomy and the ability to convert to a TKA. The trade-offs include larger incision and dissection, added difficulty of accessing the lateral aspect of the lateral compartment, and finally, the need to work around the patella and keep it protected throughout the case.
Osseous Preparation and Soft Tissue Balancing
The authors prefer first preparing the tibia in unicompartmental arthroplasty; this then allows the flexion and extension gaps to be balanced as part of the femoral preparation. An extramedullary tibial cutting is placed perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the tibia. Care should be taken, based on implant system, to match the tibial slope, adjusting the slope of the guide in conjunction with the built-in slope of the cutting slot. Angulation of the cutting guide should be set by placing the distal aspect of the guide 5–10 mm lateral to the center of the ankle, allowing the guide to be parallel to the long axis of the tibia. Depth of resection should be approximately 1–2 mm off of the deepest aspect of the lateral plateau. Careful measurement of the depth of resection is important on the lateral side of the knee because lateral degeneration often creates more bone loss; overresection of the tibia can result in needing a large polyethylene insert, which may not be offered in the unicompartmental system.