Triple Arthrodesis



Fig. 5.1
(a) Forefoot varus exists when the calcaneus is held vertical and the medial border of the foot is raised relative to the lateral border. (b) Forefoot valgus exists when the calcaneus is held vertical and the lateral border of the foot is raised (Adapted with permission from Wapner [4])



Weight-bearing radiographs of the foot and ankle are necessary to evaluate alignment of the ankle and hindfoot as well as to assess arthritis at subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints. Weight-bearing ankle radiographs are important to ensure there is no pre-existing instability, deformity, or arthrosis at the ankle that would hinder the recovery or affect function after triple arthrodesis. If adjacent joint arthritis is suspected or there is substantial deformity, then a standard or weight-bearing CT scan can also be helpful to assess joint status and alignment. A triple arthrodesis puts additional strain on the ankle and can exacerbate pre-existing ankle arthrosis. In this setting, its benefit may be limited unless an appropriate long-term plan is made for the ankle (e.g., arthroplasty, arthroscopic or open debridement, or bracing). A hindfoot alignment view can also be a helpful radiographic tool in quantifying hindfoot varus and valgus to facilitate preoperative planning for correction at the time of surgery.

The initial treatment of most hindfoot conditions is non-operative. Options include shoe modifications and orthoses, as well as bracing (e.g., ankle-foot orthosis) to improve hindfoot alignment and provide stability. Many patients experience adequate relief for many years with a well-made and maintained brace . However, when non-operative modalities fail or are no longer tolerated, surgical options should be considered.

Preoperative assessment should ensure that the surgery fuses only the degenerative or unstable joints and spares healthy joints. This will maintain flexibility and minimize the risk of adjacent joint arthrosis. The joints selected for fusion in the hindfoot complex have a large impact on the residual motion of those joints that are spared. Astion and Deland showed in a cadaveric study that fusion of the talonavicular joint has the greatest effect on the triple joint complex, limiting subtalar and calcaneocuboid joint motion to 2° of residual motion at each joint. By contrast, fusion of the calcaneocuboid joint alone has the least effect on the remaining joints, leaving the talonavicular and subtalar joints with 67% and 73% of their native motion, respectively. Subtalar joint fusion yielded a mean of 26% of talonavicular joint motion and 56% of calcaneocuboid joint motion [5].



Contraindications


When considering triple arthrodesis, attention must be paid to preoperative risk stratification and optimization of modifiable factors must be considered in order to maximize the chances of a successful outcome. Specifically, attention must be paid to the soft tissue envelope, perfusion, bone quality, and comorbid conditions such as diabetes and hypovitaminosis D. Avoiding preventable non-union is paramount as union rates decline with each additional attempt at fusion. O’Connor et al. performed a retrospective review of revision foot and ankle arthrodeses and showed that the fusion rate of revision for non-union was 77%, with the rate of non-union increasing with each subsequent revision [6].


Pearls and Pitfalls






  • Achieve appropriate position of the arthrodesis as position drives patient pain relief and function.


  • When possible, perform joint-preserving surgeries and save fusions for end-stage disease.


  • Avoid residual forefoot varus following flatfoot reconstruction.


  • Avoid residual equinus with preoperative and intraoperative assessment of gastrocnemius-soleus tightness.


  • Check and plan for any concomitant ankle arthritis or deformity to ensure that these conditions are not likely to be exacerbated by triple arthrodesis.


Approaches and Techniques


The most common approach for triple arthrodesis is a dual incision approach that utilizes a medial or dorsal incision for preparation of the talonavicular joint and a sinus tarsi incision with distal extension to access the subtalar and calcaneocuboid joints. In general, this approach works very well and provides excellent visualization of all joints.

However, in cases of more severe deformity correction, the dual approach may lead to difficulties with wound closure and tension. In severe cavus or varus deformity, a single incision lateral approach has also been described [7]. In severe valgus deformity and especially in patients with a compromised soft tissue envelope, such as those with rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic scarring, the lateral incision may gap open or be under significant tension after correction. This can lead to lateral wound compromise which can be a complex problem as there is little deep tissue to cover the underlying bone. Some concern has been raised that a single incision medial approach may compromise talar blood supply due to disruption of the deltoid arterial branches as well as the sinus tarsi branches. This could potentially impact the healing of the arthrodesis and as well affect the tibiotalar articulation.


Dual Incision


The traditional sinus tarsi approach extends approximately 7–8 cm starting from the tip of the fibula to the base of the fourth metatarsal. This is extended through the skin and subcutaneous tissue down to the extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) fascia distally and sinus tarsi proximally. Care should be taken to observe and protect sensory branches of the superficial peroneal nerve dorsally and the sural nerve plantarly. The sinus tarsi fat may then be excised sharply or elevated superiorly to expose the anterior aspect of the subtalar posterior facet. The EDB muscle may be either split or dissected off the calcaneus and reflected anteriorly and superiorly. Inferiorly are the peroneal tendons, which should be protected throughout the procedure. In severe valgus deformity, these tendons may be contracted and require either lengthening or release. At this point, there should be excellent visualization of the subtalar and calcaneocuboid joints. If the joints are tight, then the use of a Cobb elevator will help to mobilize the joints and free up adhesions or capsular contractures. Following this, the use of a smooth tip lamina spreader will help to open up the subtalar joint from the lateral aspect. Once adequate mobility is achieved, a toothed lamina spreader may be placed more anterior in the sinus tarsi to allow easier access to the entire posterior facet for debridement with curettes and rongeurs down to the subchondral bone (Fig. 5.2). The calcaneocuboid joint is easily accessed by the use of a pin spreader with pins placed in the calcaneus and cuboid (Fig. 5.3). Because of the fairly flat configuration of the calcaneocuboid joint, a sharp osteotome is helpful to debride the remaining cartilage on both sides of the joint.

A426848_1_En_5_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 5.2
Exposure of the subtalar joint with use of a lamina spreader


A426848_1_En_5_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 5.3
Exposure of the calcaneocuboid joint with use of a pin spreader

The most common approach to the talonavicular joint is a dorsomedial incision between the anterior and posterior tibial tendons. This is a safe approach, although one should take care to avoid injury to the saphenous vein and nerve. However, many prefer a more dorsal approach between the anterior tibial tendon and extensor hallucis longus tendons, which has been shown to provide easier, more complete access to the entire joint. Higgs et al. showed in a cadaveric study that the direct dorsal approach provided access to 92% of the talonavicular joint as opposed to 71% as provided by the traditional dorsomedial approach [8]. In most cases , the authors utilize the dorsomedial approach.

With the dorsomedial approach to the talonavicular joint, the incision extends from the medial malleolus toward the medial cuneiform. The subcutaneous tissues are bluntly divided in order to identify any crossing veins, which are commonly present and often sizable. Dissection can then be carried sharply over the dorsomedial aspect of the joint capsule, which can then be elevated dorsolateral and plantarmedial to expose the joint. If needed, this incision is extensile to the navicular-cuneiform joint and medial cuneiform; however, this access is limited by the anterior tibial tendon crossing over the medial cuneiform. A pin spreader is useful to distract the joint. The pin in the navicular should be aimed somewhat distal to avoid penetrating the joint which will inhibit access (Fig. 5.4). As noted previously, a Cobb elevator can be helpful to release the capsule laterally and allow better mobility of the joint. The joint can then be debrided with curettes and rongeurs. Take care to preserve the shape of the talar head as the underlying bone is often soft and it can be easy to over-resect.

A426848_1_En_5_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 5.4
Exposure of the talonavicular joint with use of a pin spreader

The direct dorsal approach to the talonavicular joint exploits the interval between the anterior tibial and extensor hallucis longus tendons. Care should be taken to identify and mark the neurovascular bundle prior to exsanguination to avoid inadvertent injury. The incision is carried sharply through the skin, and attention should be paid to identifying a branch of the superficial peroneal nerve, which may cross directly over the talonavicular joint. Sharp dissection can then be carried down to the bone and capsule elevated medial and laterally. The use of a pin distractor provides excellent access to the joint. One additional benefit of this approach is that it is relatively easy to place a dorsal to plantar screw for the subtalar arthrodesis fixation .


Single Incision Technique


A single incision, all medial technique, was described and popularized by Myerson and others for patients with severe pes planovalgus deformity. The purpose of this approach is to avoid the lateral incision and potential soft tissue compromise due to tension on surgical incision after correcting the deformity [9, 10]. When utilized for correction of a severe planovalgus deformity, this approach begins with a percutaneous release of the contracted peroneal tendons 10 cm above the tip of lateral malleolus. A medial-based incision is then performed beginning from the undersurface of medial malleolus, extending to the medial cuneiform, centered over the talonavicular joint. Dissection is carried through the skin and subcutaneous tissue with care taken to avoid injury to the deltoid ligament proximally, saphenous vein, and tibialis anterior tendon insertion distally. The talonavicular joint capsule is then incised sharply and dissected dorsally and plantarly providing access to the joint. Releasing the remnant of the posterior tibial tendon from the navicular will improve access. The subtalar joint is accessed by opening the posterior tibial tendon sheath and resecting the posterior tibial tendon. Opening the floor of the tendon sheath will give one access to the posterior facet of the subtalar joint. Placing a lamina spreader on the talar neck and medial calcaneus will allow access to the subtalar joint, which can be prepared with curettes and osteotomes. The talonavicular joint can then be accessed similar to the dorsomedial approach with utilization of a pin distractor and a Cobb elevator to develop capsular flaps dorsally and plantarly. As dissection is carried inferiorly, it is necessary to retract the flexor hallucis longus, flexor digitorum longus, and neurovascular bundle inferiorly in order to gain access to the calcaneocuboid joint. Preparation of the calcaneocuboid joint is the most challenging aspect of the single incision medial approach. This requires sharp release of the joint capsule and bifurcate ligament by feel after isolating the joint fluoroscopically. Distraction with a pin spreader or lamina spreader in the talonavicular joint allows access to calcaneocuboid joint . Preparation can then be carried out in standard fashion.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 8, 2018 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Triple Arthrodesis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access