TABLE 14.1 From Li X, Eichinger JK, Hartshorn T, et al. A comparison of the lateral decubitus and beach-chair positions for shoulder surgery: Advantages and complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23:18–28. TABLE 14.2 From Rains DD, Rooke GA, Wohl CJ. Pathomechanisms and complications related to patient positioning and anesthesia during shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:532–541.
Transitioning From Open to Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Pearls for Success
Introduction
Procedure
Strategies for Transitioning
Surgical Technique Setup
Positioning
Pearls
Pitfalls
Equipment
Cannulas
70-Degree Scope
Position
Advantages
Disadvantages
Lateral decubitus
Traction increases space in the glenohumeral joint and subacromial space
Nonanatomic orientation (i.e., glenoid is parallel to the floor)
Traction accentuates labral tears
Must reach around arm for anterior portal
Operating room table and/or patient’s head not in the way of posterior and superior shoulder
May need to reposition and redrape to convert to open procedure
Cautery bubbles move laterally out of view
Not ideal for patients who cannot tolerate regional anesthesia
No increased risk of hypotension/bradycardia
Traction can cause neurovascular and soft-tissue injury
Better cerebral perfusion
Increased risk of injury to axillary and musculocutaneous nerves when placing anteroinferior portal
Beach chair
Upright, anatomic position
Potential mechanical blocks (e.g., the head) to the use of arthroscope in posterior or superior portals
Ease of examination under anesthesia and ability to stabilize the scapula
Increased risk of hypotension/bradycardia causing cardiovascular complications (i.e., cerebral ischemia)
Arm not in the way of anterior portal
Cautery bubbles obscure view in the subacromial space
No need to reposition or redrape to covert to open procedure
Fluid can fog camera if there is a leak in the attachment or in certain cameras
Can use regional anesthesia with sedation
Theoretically increased risk of air embolus/pneumothorax
Mobility of surgical arm and ability to set up arm holder to the operating room table
Expensive equipment if using beach chair attachment with or without mechanical arm holder
Beach chair
Lateral decubitus
Reference systolic pressures at level of brain
Use of safe shoulder positions when arm is placed in traction
Attentive care to intraoperative head positioning
45 degrees of forward flexion with 90 degrees of abduction
Consider use of hypotensive bradycardic episode prophylactic measure when using interscalene block
45 degrees of forward flexion with 0 degrees of abduction
Proper padding of the common peroneal nerves
Placement of anterior inferior portal out of traction
Suture-Passing Instruments
Retrograde Devices
Antegrade Devices
Shuttling Devices
Anchors/Sutures
Knot Pusher
Surgical Exposure/Portals
Visualization
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Transitioning From Open to Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Pearls for Success
Chapter 14
Abdullah Foad, and George Sanchez
The goal of any rotator cuff repair technique is to relieve pain, improve strength, increase range of motion, and restore function. An arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can be demanding and requires a sound understanding of biomechanics and tear patterns as well as attention to details. Yet, the credibility of the arthroscopic technique for rotator cuff repair has advanced so dramatically over the past two decades that it is now considered to be the new “gold standard” by most shoulder surgeons in the developed world. The evolution and increase in popularity of the arthroscopic technique has paralleled modern advancements in arthroscopic technology, fixation methods, instrumentation, and surgeon experience.
With advances in arthroscopic techniques and instrumentation, the learning curve for an all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has been and continues to be gradually shortened. A direct leap to an all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair may be inappropriate and frustrating for the inexperienced surgeon (especially concurrent with an inexperienced team), with added risk for otherwise avoidable complications. A candid discussion regarding the possibility of converting to an open or a mini-open repair should be held with the patient before surgery. It is important to recognize that success and patient satisfaction rates in rotator cuff surgery are higher in patients with intact repairs.
The traditional mini-open technique is a logical approach to transitioning in a systematic and incremental fashion while circumnavigating issues regarding deltoid takedown. The transitioning surgeon should work at his or her pace and comfort level, not become frustrated or overwhelmed, and have a low threshold for converting to a mini-open repair (Fig. 14.3). Multiple studies have shown good to excellent outcomes with the mini-open technique.
The surgeon can begin with simple arthroscopic subacromial decompression and gain experience with visualization, control of bleeding, and removal of the subacromial bursal veil that covers the rotator cuff tendon when transitioning to the all-arthroscopic technique. The next step in the transition may include debridement of tendon edges, recognition of tear patterns, and lysis of adhesions from both the articular surface (superior to the glenoid labrum) and the bursal surface (bursal leaders). At a more advanced level, release of adhesions at the base of the coracoid with mobilization of the superior glenohumeral and coracohumeral ligament complex may need to be done. However, this is performed for large or massive retracted tears. The first author recommends that the transitioning surgeon begin with a small (1–2 cm in length) single-tendon (supraspinatus), nonretracted, mobile, crescent-shaped tear (Fig. 14.4).
The subsequent step in the transition involves placing sutures through the tendon to assess mobility. If difficulties are encountered in this step, one can convert to the mini-open approach by extending the portal 2–3 cm to gain access for a stable tendon–bone fixation. With more experience, sutures can be incorporated with the suture anchors. At the same time, the greater tuberosity footprint is prepared, and bone tunnels are made for anatomic placement of the anchors.
Consider use of general anesthesia for longer cases
Proper padding of the common peroneal nerves