Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion



Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion


Oliver O. Tannous, MD

Kelley Banagan, MD

Steven C. Ludwig, MD


Dr. Banagan or an immediate family member serves as a paid consultant to or is an employee of Spinal Dimensions. Dr. Ludwig or an immediate family member has received royalties from DePuy and Globus Medical; is a member of a speakers’ bureau or has made paid presentations on behalf of DePuy and Synthes; serves as a paid consultant to or is an employee of DePuy, Globus Medical, and Synthes; has stock or stock options held in Globus Medical and Alphatec Spine; and serves as a board member, owner, officer, or committee member of the Cervical Spine Research Society. Neither Dr. Tannous nor any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this chapter.



INTRODUCTION

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) was first described by Harms and Rolinger1 in 1982. The approach they introduced allows the surgeon to access the intervertebral disk space with relative ease and safety. Similar to posterior lumbar interbody fusion, TLIF provides the surgeon with the ability to fuse a spinal segment anteriorly and posteriorly through a single posterior procedure.2 This approach eliminates the morbidity and potential complications of anterior fusion, including iliac vessel damage, deep vein thrombosis secondary to vessel retraction, and retrograde ejaculation from hypogastric plexus injury.3

The transforaminal approach also provides several advantages over the direct posterior approach. TLIF allows the surgeon to access the disk space through a single unilateral posterior approach. This allows preservation of the contralateral lamina and spinous process, which creates a larger surface area to achieve a concomitant posterolateral fusion. Additionally, a transforaminal approach to the disk space exposes the neural foramen for direct decompression and eliminates the need to retract the thecal sac, reducing the risk of incidental durotomy, permitting access to more cephalad lumbar levels, and minimizing risk of injury to the conus medullaris and spinal cord. This approach is also favored in revision cases in which epidural fibrosis is sometimes present.

The intervertebral disk space is an ideal environment for obtaining bony fusion, largely because of the compressive forces of the anterior column and the abundant blood supply provided by the surgically prepared end plates. In the human spine, 80% of the mechanical load is transmitted through the vertebral body and 20% is transmitted through the posterior elements. With a standard posterolateral fusion, the fusion bed is placed under tensile forces as compared with the interbody fusion, in which the forces are under compression, thus rendering interbody fusion advantageous in many clinical scenarios. TLIF combined with posterolateral instrumentation and fusion, however, achieves fusion rates greater than 90% and clinical outcomes comparable to those achieved with anterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterolateral instrumentation and fusion.3,4,5 With a combined TLIF and posterolateral technique, patients benefit from results similar to those achieved through a single unilateral approach, with less blood loss and avoidance of the morbidity associated with the anterior approach.


PATIENT SELECTION




PREOPERATIVE IMAGING

Figure 1, A and B shows preoperative AP and lateral radiographs, respectively, of a 54-year-old woman with a history of intractable left-greater-than-right lower extremity radiculopathy. At the time of initial evaluation, radiographs
revealed an L4-L5 spondylolisthesis. Figure 1, C shows a preoperative sagittal CT scan of the same patient. The patient underwent posterior decompression, fusion, and TLIF at the L4-L5 level.






FIGURE 1 Preoperative images of a 54-year-old woman who presented with reports of worsening back pain and lower extremity radiculopathy reveal L4-L5 spondylolisthesis. A, AP radiograph. B, Lateral radiograph. C, Sagittal CT scan.




SURGICAL TECHNIQUE


Open TLIF

Once the patient is positioned and prepared in a sterile fashion, the lumbar level or levels of interest are marked with the use of fluoroscopic visualization. The surgeon can choose to perform the TLIF on the side with the greatest clinical and/or radiographic pathologic abnormality. A standard midline incision is created through the skin and subcutaneous tissues. The dissection is continued in a standard subperiosteal manner, which might include the transverse process of the involved levels (Figure 2, A). Once dissection is achieved, pedicle screws are placed at the indicated level or levels (Figure 2, B). Next, a window is created to access the disk space (Figure 3). The inferior articular facet of the cephalad vertebra and the superior articular facet of the caudal vertebra are resected. To achieve resection, a straight osteotome is used to create a partial laminotomy in the inferior lamina of the cephalad vertebra (Figure 4, A); the pars interarticularis is then transected and the inferior facet of the vertebra above is removed (Figure 4, B). Kerrison and Leksell rongeurs are used to resect the superior articular facet of the caudal vertebra (Figure 4, C). This bone is saved to be used as local autologous bone graft.

Once the working window is created, the exiting nerve root is decompressed, and completion of the facetectomy allows for the traversing nerve root to be visualized and freed up. Bipolar cautery is applied to bleeding epidural vessels, and a nerve root retractor is placed medially to protect the dural sac. The advantage of the transforaminal approach is that minimal retraction of the dural sac
is needed. Exposure of the disk space is achieved with a Penfield dissector. A large box-cut annulotomy is created in the disk space to begin a thorough and complete diskectomy.






FIGURE 2 Intraoperative photographs of a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. A, A standard midline dissection is made through the skin and subcutaneous tissues, exposing the transverse processes of the involved level. B, Pedicle screws are placed at the indicated levels (arrows) prior to creating a working transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion window.

The diskectomy is initiated with straight pituitary rongeurs and curets (Figure 5, A) and is continued with angled pituitaries and curets (Figure 5, B) to access the contralateral disk space. Disk and cartilage material is carefully removed from the superior and inferior end plates with straight and angled curets. Sequential dilators and shavers can be used to open up the disk space and facilitate a complete diskectomy (Figure 6).






FIGURE 3 Intraoperative photograph shows the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion window created to access the disk space.

Once the end plates are prepared, a lamina spreader can be used to help distract at the spinous processes. Alternatively, additional distraction force can be applied to the pedicle screws (Figure 7). Once serial dilation has achieved the desired fit, a trial implant is inserted and tamped anteriorly and medially. The fit of the trial implant is confirmed with tactile feedback and radiographically. The trial is then removed, and the implant is tamped into the anterocentral aspect of the disk space (Figure 8). This positioning optimizes the load-sharing capacity of the implant and helps restore lumbar lordosis.

If pedicle screws were not inserted at the start of the procedure, they are inserted at this point. Rods are then placed, and compression is applied to compress the interbody graft and to improve the lumbar lordosis. Final tightening of the implants is performed, and radiographic confirmation of appropriate implant and graft placement is assessed (Figure 9). The surrounding bone is decorticated with a high-speed burr to form a fusion bed. Depending on the clinical scenario, the surgeon might choose to perform an intertransverse process fusion. The foramen and canal are probed to verify that no free bone is present. The wound is irrigated, and bone graft is placed meticulously about the fusion bed. Finally, wound drains are placed and the wound is closed.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 2, 2020 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access