Fig. 23.1
(a) Anteroposterior and (b) lateral radiographs showing extra-articular tibial and femoral fractures resulting in coronal and sagittal plane deformities
Although primary total knee replacement is not infrequently performed for posttraumatic osteoarthritis secondary to fracture, the technical challenges to these clinical cases present demand techniques that are more frequently required during revision total knee replacement. The only significant difference between primary total knee replacement for arthritis involving an intra-articular or extra-articular fracture and revision surgery is that the surgeon may have more bone stock at his or her disposal when performing the reconstruction. Only in severe intra-articular tibial plateau or femoral condylar fractures could there be extenuating circumstances in which there is extraordinary bone loss secondary to the severity of the fracture.
Epidemiology
It has been estimated that posttraumatic arthritis accounts for over $3 billion in annual health-care costs in the United States and that posttraumatic arthritis comprises approximately 9.8% of all cases of knee arthritis [16]. Patients who have undergone previous knee surgery receive total knee replacement at a significantly younger age than patients with primary osteoarthritis [17]. Yet, nearly one half of periarticular knee fractures occur in the patients older than 50 years [18, 19]. In particular, distal femoral fractures are more common in the older patients than in younger patients [18], with an annual incidence of approximately 20 cases per 100,000 persons over 50 years old [19].
The frequency of conversion from prior internal fixation to arthroplasty is less than 10%, although progression of preexisting arthritis occurs in up to 60% of cases [1, 18, 20, 21]. Lower extremity malalignment after fracture fixation increases the likelihood of arthroplasty [22]. Approximately 7% of patients requiring operative management of tibial plateau fractures will require total knee replacement within 10 years of fracture fixation, which corresponds to a 5.3 times increased risk of requiring total knee replacement compared to patients having not suffered an operative tibial plateau fracture [20]. Older patients, patients with bicondylar fractures, and those patients with more comorbidities are also more likely to require total knee replacement after open reduction and fixation of tibial plateau fractures [20]. Yet, it is noteworthy that only 11% of bicondylar fractures will require total knee replacement within 10 years [20]. The majority of conversion knee arthroplasty patients have suffered a split-depression fracture of the lateral plateau, probably reflecting the frequency of this fracture pattern, and the commonest modes of failure necessitating arthroplasty are valgus collapse and nonunion [23]. Less is known about the frequency of conversion from open reduction and internal fixation of distal femur fractures and patella fractures to arthroplasty.
Preoperative Considerations
A careful preoperative assessment is necessary for all patients presenting with persistent complaints after fracture treatment about the knee. A detailed history and physical exam should focus on the location and quality of pain, presence of instability and collateral ligament incompetency, extensor mechanism function, presence of prior surgical scars, skin grafts and flaps, magnitude of associated deformities, and range of motion [1]. Preoperative range of motion should guide patient expectations regarding postoperative range of motion, since they are closely correlated, and preoperative stiffness is common in the posttraumatic knee [24].
Infection Risk
Knee arthroplasty after fracture about the knee has been shown to carry a higher risk of infection [3–5, 25–27]. This may be due to a damaged soft tissue envelope resulting from the original injury and/or open reduction and internal fixation exposure or to colonization of hardware, especially in the case of external fixators. Knee arthroplasty patients who have had prior infections following tibial plateau fixation are four times more likely to require additional procedures compared to patients who did not have a prior infection [27].
The preoperative work-up should include laboratory tests for markers of infection (complete blood count, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) [1]. An aspiration of the knee should be obtained and the specimen sent for Gram stain, culture, and sensitivities [28]. During the total knee replacement operation itself, intraoperative Gram stain, intraoperative frozen section, and culture may also be useful. If there is a high index of suspicion for infection at the time of surgery, it may be appropriate to perform a staged primary total knee replacement with the first stage consisting of a thorough debridement of the knee, including making the definitive bone resections for the arthroplasty. The implantation of the prosthesis is delayed until the presence of infection in the knee tissue is resolved. During the first stage, the initial distal, anterior, and posterior femoral bone resections are performed. The proximal tibial resection and posterior patellar resection are also done, and an antibiotic-impregnated acrylic spacer block is inserted . This procedure serves as an aggressive debridement since the articular surfaces are resected at this stage. Finishing resections such as femoral chamfers and tibial stem preparation are completed during the second stage when the prostheses themselves are implanted with antibiotic-impregnated cement. In the authors’ experience, considerable success has been achieved in treating patients at high risk in this way. Implantation of the knee prostheses may be done as early as 1 week after this first stage if the intraoperative culture results are negative. However, if they are positive, implantation is delayed for 6 weeks or more, while the infection is treated with an organism-specific course of parenteral antibiotics. This scenario is similar to the two-stage treatment of an infected total knee replacement. Antibiotic impregnated cement is advised for the second stage, even if there was no evidence found of an active infection .
Imaging
In addition to a routine series of radiographs of the knee, it may be necessary to obtain additional imaging such as a full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph or CT scan to clearly define any deformity resulting from the fracture [7]. A technetium diphosphonate bone scan, gallium scan, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be useful for localizing infection if there is a high suspicion for its presence. These scans are particularly suggested in cases in which numerous operative procedures were performed or cases in which the patient had a prolonged, complicated course of treatment. The value of preoperative MRI is controversial. However, metal artifact reduction sequences can minimize the effects of retained hardware on image quality. MRI scans can evaluate the extent of intra-articular injury for acute fractures, and they can assess both acute and chronic injuries to periarticular ligaments [1, 29]. CT scans are useful in the setting of acute fracture to define the degree of intra-articular comminution and to assist making the decision between internal fixation and immediate arthroplasty.
Full-length standing radiographs are important for preoperative planning to determine the possible need for corrective osteotomy [7]. This is particularly important if there is a significant malunion present that may affect the overall alignment of the knee, and the deformity can be multiplanar (Fig. 23.1). Cross-sectional imaging may best define the deformity in all three planes and identify nonunions. Biplanar slot radiography is a new imaging modality that produces simultaneous orthogonal radiographs. Compared to CT, the images are acquired with the patient standing, the radiation dose is significantly reduced, and three-dimensional surface models (versus volumetric rendering) of bony anatomy can be created [30, 31].
Exposure
Soft Tissue Envelope
The soft tissue envelope may be compromised either as a result of the initial injury or as a result of subsequent surgeries. An effort should be made to incorporate old incisions and to avoid large subcutaneous tissue flaps, if possible. If tissue flaps must be created, they should be thick and deep to the fascial plane. In the case of multiple incisions, the most lateral incision that is practical should be used [3], since the vascular supply to the skin anterior to the knee is primarily derived from the medial side [1]. If there are old incisions that cannot be used practically, then it may be necessary to adjust the incision medially or laterally to increase the width of the skin bridge; the minimum recommended skin bridge is 6 cm. Hockey stick incisions and transverse incisions may present a particular concern. In general, an incision can be crossed at right angles but should not be crossed acutely (≤60°). Incisions older than 10 years probably can be ignored.
If there are particular concerns about the soft tissue envelope, the surgeon may perform a delay procedure, in which only the skin incision and soft tissue dissection is performed, and the wound is closed. The healing of this incision is then monitored for 2 weeks to determine the presence of eschar formation and to permit neovascularization of the soft tissue flaps . If skin necrosis develops, then separate vascularized soft tissue coverage grafts would be needed prior to or at the time of the knee replacement stage [3, 32]. Similarly, if the soft tissue envelope over the tibial tubercle or patellar tendon appears tenuous, preemptive flap coverage may be considered, and total knee arthroplasty can be performed after flap maturation and recovery of knee range of motion [1]. A gastrocnemius muscle flap or vascularized free myocutaneous flap may be used in this situation to obtain healthy soft tissue coverage [4]. If a patient has received prior soft tissue coverage procedures (e.g., skin grafting or muscle flap transfer) or vascular repair, respective consultations with a plastic surgeon or vascular surgeon may be prudent [1]. Intraoperative angiography can be used to plan the surgical incision and to assess wound closure, which may help mitigate the risk of wound necrosis and other wound-related complication [33].
In situations in which the skin is adherent to the underlying extensor mechanism, tissue expanders may be inserted to stretch the skin and create neovascularized environment before the primary total knee replacement [34]. As in revision situations, it may be necessary to extend the original incision proximally and distally to more clearly define the subcutaneous tissue planes. This enables the surgeon to find the proper depth of the plane between the extensor mechanism and subcutaneous adipose tissue or scar.
Scar tissue and bone deformity or overgrowth may make exposure of the knee quite difficult. In general, the surgical approach should protect the patellar tendon and collateral ligaments. Adhesions in the suprapatellar pouch, medial and lateral gutters, and around the extensor mechanism are excised first. A standard medial soft tissue peel is performed off the proximal medial tibia, extending posteriorly past the mid-coronal plane. The patella does not need to be everted but can be retracted laterally. Knee flexion, cruciate ligament release, release of the anterior horns of both menisci, and external rotation of the tibia should be attempted next. If these steps do not provide adequate exposure, the surgeon may need to consider techniques such as a quadriceps snip, lateral retinacular release, V-Y quadriceps turndown, or tibial tubercle osteotomy to facilitate exposure [1, 25, 35]. The quadriceps snip is generally the preferred choice due to its relative simplicity and ability to be extended. Furthermore, it does not alter postoperative rehabilitation. It is performed by extending proximally and laterally at a 45-degree angle from the standard medial arthrotomy that is performed during most primary replacement surgeries. Early lateral retinacular release is performed when there is difficulty with lateral exposure or in cases in which there is considerable scarring from a previous lateral incision or adherent scar along the lateral femoral gutter. A V-Y turndown can be created by extending the lateral retinacular release proximally into the medial parapatellar arthrotomy. A turndown risks patella and patellar tendon devascularization and a postoperative extensor lag. Thus, it should be employed judiciously, if ever, and tibial tubercle osteotomy is typically preferred over a V-Y turndown [36]. This technique is particularly recommended if a previous tibial tubercle osteotomy was used during the initial approach for open reduction and internal fixation of a tibial plateau fracture. The osteotomy should include the entire patellar tendon insertion, and the fragment is typically 8–9 cm long, 2 cm wide, and 5–10 mm deep. A lateral soft tissue “hinge” should be preserved to protect the blood supply to the fragment, and fixation can be performed with screws or wires [1].
In rare situations, skeletonization of the distal femur may be required if there is substantial preoperative ankylosis. In these latter situations, the surgeon should be prepared to use prostheses with further built-in constraint, such as a constrained condylar knee, or total condylar III implant. In extraordinary cases of severe distal femoral malunion or severe proximal tibial condyle disruption and bone loss, constrained rotating hinge designs may be required .
Intraoperatively, careful attention should be paid to implant sizing, since oversized implants can lead to pressure necrosis of the overlying skin. If soft tissue coverage seems marginal during surgery, postoperative range of motion should be delayed several days in order to monitor the wound. At-risk wounds with persistent drainage or marginal necrosis may require early operative debridement and possible myocutaneous flap coverage [1].
Fixed flexion and valgus deformities place the peroneal nerve at risk for neuropraxia postoperatively, and at least one large study has confirmed that posttraumatic arthritis patients are at increased risk for peroneal nerve palsy after knee arthroplasty [37]. Maintaining the knee in slight flexion postoperatively may mitigate the risk for peroneal palsy in these cases. For severe, chronic deformities, primary peroneal neurolysis may be considered [1].
Removing Hardware
Removal of hardware is not mandatory unless the presence of the hardware interferes with instrumentation, placement, or function of the arthroplasty (Fig. 23.2). A longer incision and greater exposure are usually required to remove hardware. It is only necessary to use the original medial or lateral incision if it is clear that the implant is not reachable by the standard midline incision that will be used during the replacement. Often, buttress plates affixed to the lateral tibial plateau may be simply removed by entering the anterolateral muscle compartment through an extended midline incision. The soft tissue envelope should be assessed preoperatively to determine the likelihood of success. Obese patients may have enough adipose tissue coverage to permit easy access to the lateral side of the joint by further lateral dissection through the midline incision. A separate incision may be necessary, if instrumentation cannot be easily applied to the implants through the midline incision. The use of a single midline incision simplifies the exposure and decreases the risk of skin flap necrosis that may arise as a result of the presence of two freshly made incisions.
Fig. 23.2
(a) Anteroposterior and (b) lateral radiographs of a left knee with intramedullary femoral implant and medial plate that will interfere with the total knee replacement. Femoral screws could be removed through percutaneous lateral incisions, and the rest of the hardware could be removed through the midline incision used at the time of total knee replacement. Alternatively, these implants could be removed as a separate procedure
Nevertheless, as a general rule, only hardware that is symptomatic or that interferes with the knee reconstruction should be removed. Otherwise unnecessary hardware removal places the operative site in danger of necrosis or additional bone loss if implant extraction is difficult. Hardware removal can usually be performed at the time of joint reconstruction. A separate removal stage is generally reserved for large implants that may extend far away from the knee joint itself. This strategy allows for the soft tissues to heal prior to definitive reconstruction. When there are large implants, such as long tibial plates, it may be preferred to selectively remove only part of the hardware preventing implantation of a knee arthroplasty. This obviates extensive soft tissue damage and the need to bypass potential stress risers either proximal or distal to the knee joint [1]. However, if there is a suspicion of infection, the hardware should be removed as part of a staged treatment plan, and a sample of deep tissue should be obtained and sent for frozen section, routine pathology, culture, and sensitivity .
Proximal intramedullary femoral nails that extend to the distal metaphysis interfere with the use of intramedullary alignment instrumentation. In this case, extramedullary alignment instruments or advanced technologies, such as patient-specific cutting guides, should be considered. The nail should only be removed if there is little risk of disrupting the proximal aspect of the femur.
Advanced Technology
Several advanced technologies purport improved component alignment for total knee arthroplasty. All systems require some type of signaling technology, whether infrared, electromagnetic, or gyroscopic, that directs the placement of surgical instrumentation intraoperatively to perform accurate bone resections. Image-guided systems require preoperative axial imaging or intraoperative fluoroscopy, while imageless systems rely on registration of bony landmarks intraoperatively. Patient-specific instrumentation uses preoperative CT or MR imaging to create single-use custom cutting blocks that conform to the unique topography of a patient’s articular surfaces and set the alignment and resection depth of the bone cuts based on a virtual, preoperative plan. All of these technologies may be particularly useful in the setting of posttraumatic arthritis with concomitant deformity. Additionally, instrumentation of the intramedullary canal can often be avoided, which is particularly useful if there is intramedullary hardware and/or deformities affecting the femoral diaphysis, making access difficult and resections based off intramedullary cutting guides unreliable.
Arguably, the most appropriate use for these tools are posttraumatic knees with substantial deformity, and they have been used successfully in several series to achieve neutral mechanical alignment in total knee replacements performed in patients with post-fracture malunion. These techniques can be used for acute [8] and chronic fracture deformities [9–13, 38]. They permit the surgeon to plan and execute bone cuts precisely, and previously implanted hardware can often be retained. However, the learning curve associated with these technologies requires the surgeon to become proficient with them during routine knee arthroplasty prior to applying them to complex cases. If patient-specific instrumentation is used, a system that utilizes axial imaging and long-leg radiographs may be more accurate than those that rely on axial imaging of the knee alone [39].
Bone Loss
Bone loss in the posttraumatic knee is addressed similarly to bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. Contained defects of the tibial plateau or femoral condyles can be filled with morsellized bone graft that can usually be obtained from autogenous resected bone [3]. Frequently, it may be necessary to combine grafting with the use of metal augmentation. Large metaphyseal deficiencies can be managed with sleeves, cones, or impaction grafting. However, it may be necessary to add a stem to the component to add stability to the construct if there is still proximal discontinuity that mandates additional fixation [40]. If there is an uncontained tibial or femoral defect, then augments and an intramedullary stem extension should be added to the component. Hybrid fixation, with long uncemented stems and cement around the tibial baseplate or femoral resurfacing component, is preferred. Short, uncemented stems have demonstrated a higher risk for failure. Therefore, short stems, if used, should be fully cemented.
Larger defects may require the use of a distal femoral or proximal tibial replacement that is used for the treatment of tumor excisions in this area. Bulk allografts may be also used in these situations, and the surgeon must weigh the risk and benefits of allograft incorporation, stability, and long-term survivorship. This decision-making process is somewhat age dependent, as allograft usage would be considered in the younger patient with better bone stock and large constrained, distal femoral or proximal tibial replacements are better suited for the older patient with more compromised bone stock .
Bone Deformity
Malunion or nonunion may result in deformity of either the tibia or the femur (Fig. 23.3). This may be in the coronal plane (varus/valgus), the sagittal plane (flexion/extension), the axial plane (rotation), or any combination of these. If the deformity is not corrected, the altered mechanics that may have caused the arthritis could also lead to early failure of the device [9, 10]. For example, sagittal plane malunions may cause the femoral component to be placed in hyperextension. If this occurs, particularly with a posterior stabilized total knee replacement, excessive cam-post impingement can occur, leading to early failure. Despite known complications associated with implant malposition and residual deformity, optimal component position is achieved in fewer than 50% of patients in some series [41]. Further, preoperative malunion and nonunion increase the risk of postoperative complications after knee arthroplasty [37].
Fig. 23.3
(a) Anteroposterior and (b) lateral X-ray of a proximal tibial malunion
Intra-articular deformity (deformity within the collateral ligaments) may be corrected with the bone cuts or may require augments; however, extra-articular deformity (deformity proximal to the femoral origin of the collateral ligaments or distal to the tibial insertion) may need to be corrected by osteotomy [7, 42]. A good rule for handling malunion situations is to mark out a line on the standing radiograph of the planned resection that would provide the correct mechanical axis. If there is the risk of violating the collateral ligament insertions on the femur, then a corrective osteotomy should be contemplated. If osteotomy is required, it is usually performed at the site of the original malunion. Otherwise, a swan-neck or curved bow deformity would be obtained due to the malunion site and osteotomy site being too close together.
As a general guide, if extra-articular deformities are <10° in the coronal plane and <20° in the sagittal plane, they can be addressed using modified bone cuts at the level of the joint, along with selective soft tissue releases, as long as neither the osteotomies or soft tissue releases compromise the collateral ligaments (Fig. 23.4). The closer the center of the deformity is to the joint, the more it contributes to the overall bone prosthesis configuration. Compared to tibial deformities, femoral deformities are more challenging to correct with intra-articular resections [43]. Larger deformities may require extra-articular osteotomies that can be performed simultaneously with the total knee replacement or in staged fashion [1, 43–46].
Fig. 23.4
Lateral X-ray of a total knee replacement in the setting of distal femoral and proximal tibial fracture malunions
Malunion may make it difficult or impossible to use intramedullary instrumentation to gain appropriate alignment of the distal femoral or proximal tibial resection. Hence, extramedullary alignment guides or advanced technology, such as computer-assisted surgical techniques, should be used to obtain correctly aligned resections. If osteotomies are performed simultaneously with arthroplasty, care should be taken to avoid intrusion of cement into the osteotomy site, and osteotomies should be bridged with intramedullary stems [46]. Large axial plane deformities affecting the femur should be corrected with a derotational osteotomy, since proper rotational alignment is critical for total knee longevity and proper patellofemoral mechanics. A derotational osteotomy fixed with a retrograde intramedullary nail allows visualization of the epicondylar axis during the correction and facilitates hardware removal at the time of total knee replacement [1]. When there is translational deformity, offset stems can be used to prevent implant malposition. Multilevel lower limb deformities may require osteotomies and arthrodesis of other joints in addition to knee arthroplasty [44]. The surgeon should have constrained implant designs available, if needed to provide intrinsic stability in cases were ligament balancing is difficult to achieve by conventional methods.
Nonunion
Distal femoral nonunions occur more frequently than proximal tibial nonunions. Revision open reduction and internal fixation of nonunited fragments with bone graft may be possible at the time of arthroplasty [3]. If implant stability is compromised, a stem may be added to a femoral or tibial component. Long-stemmed prosthesis may be appropriate to span a transverse nonunion. Uncemented, press-fit, diaphyseal-engaging stems are preferred to bypass the nonunion site and provide implant stability. Alternatively, intramedullary nail fixation can be performed simultaneously with total knee replacement. Autogenous bone graft obtained from the normally resected bone, allogeneic bone graft, bone graft substitutes, and adjuvants should be considered to augment local biology and promote fracture union.