Total Ankle Replacement
Mansur M. Halai, MBChB, MRCA, MRCS, FRCS (Edin)
Timothy R. Daniels, MD, FRCSC
Dr. Daniels or an immediate family member has received royalties from Integra; is a member of a speakers’ bureau or has made paid presentations on behalf of Integra, Stryker, and Wright Medical Technology, Inc.; serves as a paid consultant to or is an employee of Integra, Stryker, and Wright Medical Technology, Inc.; has received research or institutional support from Integra and Wright Medical Technology, Inc.; and serves as a board member, owner, officer, or committee member of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society and the Canadian Orthopaedic Association. Neither Dr. Halai nor any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this chapter.
PATIENT SELECTION
Indications
Like any arthroplasty, patient selection for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is critical in order to achieve a successful outcome. A thorough history and examination is mandatory before a patient-centered decision is made. TAA is indicated for end-stage degeneration of the tibiotalar joint caused by osteoarthritis, trauma, or inflammatory disease, after nonsurgical management has been exhausted. Another special indication for TAA, with promising results for the experienced surgeon, is for the salvage of a painful ankle arthrodesis.1 Adjacent subtalar or talonavicular joint arthritis would theoretically be served better with TAA, rather than an ankle arthrodesis, to lessen the strain on the triple joint complex. Traditionally, TAA was reserved for older patients (>60 years) with low physical demands, but this age limit is becoming increasingly controversial as implants improve and survivorship is improving. Recent analysis from the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) multicenter database suggests that patients with significant deformity or ipsilateral peritalar arthritis who receive an arthroplasty have statistically improved outcomes when compared with ankle fusions.2
Contraindications
Active infection, severe soft-tissue compromise, distal neuropathy, and diminished arterial vascular supply are contraindications for TAA. Poor peripheral bone stock, for example, more than 50% of osteonecrosis of the talus or multiple large talar cysts, are also contraindications. However, as design and technique refinements continue to progress with TAA, these limits have been successfully challenged and now there is a larger group of “relative” contraindications. These include coronal plane deformity of >15°, obesity, diabetes mellitus, history of ankle sepsis, or smoking. These factors have to be accounted for when making a holistic decision so the benefits outweigh the risks. One must remember that a poor surgical candidate for TAA would similarly be a poor candidate for ankle arthrodesis. In fact, a large analysis has shown a higher incidence of surgical complications in arthrodesis compared with arthroplasty.3 Major complications following an ankle fusion are generally easier to manage than a major complication following a TAA. This factor influences the decision pathway and should be communicated to the patient.4,5
PREOPERATIVE IMAGING
Standing radiographs of the foot and ankle are a minimum prerequisite. These include full-length, orthogonal, weight-bearing radiographs of the tibia and AP and lateral hindfoot views. Although not essential, maximal dorsiflexion and plantar-flexion views of the ankle, as well as lateral and oblique views of the foot, are optional and are useful for research. In addition, lateral dorsiflexion and plantar-flexion views of the hindfoot can help the surgeon determine the correctability of deformities, especially pes planus (Figure 1). When examining the AP radiograph, one evaluates the coronal plane talar deformity (Figure 2), ankle joint congruity, posttraumatic changes, and the orientation of the malleoli. Congruent deformities are characteristically more rigid and may require extra-articular correction such as a supramalleolar osteotomy. In talar varus deformities, the medial malleolus may be dysplastic because of long-term talar malalignment (Figure 3, A). This is important to recognize, as the medial malleolus may require a translational osteotomy or a prophylactic screw to prevent a postoperative fracture (Figure 3, B). In a talar valgus deformity, the fibula can be dysplastic because of excessive lateral directed forces from talus and calcaneus impingement or malaligned because of stress fracture (Figure 4, A). If this is significant, fibular realignment may be required, which is often a lateral opening wedge osteotomy (Figure 4, B). On the lateral weight-bearing ankle view, the position of the talus is noted. Classically, it is anteriorly translated in varus deformities (Figure 5, A) and posteriorly translated in valgus alignment (Figure 5, B).
The authors recommend a hindfoot alignment radiograph because clinical evaluation of this can be unreliable (Figure 6). This view is taken at a 20° angle to the ground, with the foot placed with its medial border parallel to the radiographic beam.6 This radiograph is particularly useful to predict whether additional procedures would be required to balance the TAA over a plantar-grade foot. In the presence of a talar valgus or varus deformity, the hindfoot alignment view allows assessment of the position of the calcaneus. If the axis of the calcaneus is parallel to the tibia, then there has been compensation through the subtalar joint to maintain a plantigrade foot. This influences what type of ancillary procedures are required once the ankle joint prosthesis has been inserted. For example, in a talar valgus deformity with compensation through the subtalar joint, once the TAA has been performed, ancillary procedures for a cavovarus deformity may be required to balance the hindfoot (ie, lengthening the posterior tibial tendon, talonavicular capsular release). If the longitudinal axis of the calcaneus is in line with the talar deformity, then compensation has not occurred through the subtalar joint and pes planus procedures would be required to balance the foot after the TAA (ie, medial translation osteotomy of the calcaneus, Cotton osteotomy, etc). CT is indicated when there are concerns about bone quality, cystic voids, or rotational malalignment. Special attention should be paid to large anteromedial and inferolateral talar osteophytes that can prevent reduction of the talus into the ankle mortise. In talar varus deformities, there are often large anterior fibular osteophytes that also require resection. MRI is rarely required but can be useful in assessment of cases of evaluation of osteonecrosis or ligamentous damage.
PROCEDURE
Room Setup/Patient Positioning
The patient should be placed supine on a radiolucent operating table with all pressure points protected (especially the contralateral fibular head because of internal
rotation of the operating side). The patient’s heels should be at the end of the bed. A small sandbag should be placed under the ipsilateral buttock to internally rotate the operated leg so that the patella and second toe are pointing to the ceiling. An above-knee tourniquet should be placed as proximal as possible. Standard skin preparation and draping can then proceed to the upper thigh, making sure the patella is clearly visible to judge rotation. Specifically, the interdigital spaces need to be cleansed thoroughly with a separate sponge and then the toes should be covered with an adhesive dressing or a glove.
rotation of the operating side). The patient’s heels should be at the end of the bed. A small sandbag should be placed under the ipsilateral buttock to internally rotate the operated leg so that the patella and second toe are pointing to the ceiling. An above-knee tourniquet should be placed as proximal as possible. Standard skin preparation and draping can then proceed to the upper thigh, making sure the patella is clearly visible to judge rotation. Specifically, the interdigital spaces need to be cleansed thoroughly with a separate sponge and then the toes should be covered with an adhesive dressing or a glove.
FIGURE 5 Lateral radiographs showing the classic anterior translation of the talus in a varus deformity (A), and the posterior talar translation in a valgus deformity (B). |
The foot end of the table should be in the middle of the operating room with the bed pushed as far toward the anesthetist as possible. This will allow the surgeon to stand at the bottom of the bed and the mini C-arm image intensifier to be situated lateral to the patient’s operated ankle. The scrub nurse should be on the opposite side of patient (adjacent to the contralateral leg). If only one surgical assistant is available, then he or she should stand lateral to the patient’s operated ankle, to assist with moving the patient’s leg to the C-arm. All preoperative radiographs should be visible to the surgeon during the case. A summary of the operating room setup is illustrated in Figure 7.