target id=”page511″/>Tibia and fibula, shaft—introduction
Introduction
Incidence
Tibial shaft fractures are among the most common fractures. The risk of having a tibial shaft fracture is 1–2 per 125,000 population [ 1], with a reported annual occurrence of 492,000 cases in the USA. Twenty-five percent of these injuries present as open fractures. Traditionally, these fractures have been treated nonoperatively with great success by casting [ 2], but due to improvements in implants and fracture care operative management has become the most popular method of treatment. Closed intramedullary nailing is considered the standard of care for closed and some open tibial shaft fractures. Classical open plating was a successful technique in the early 1960s [ 3, 4] but its popularity has since declined mainly due to the relatively high incidence of soft-tissue complications and the increased complexity of trauma seen in modern-day practice. Today, plating techniques have evolved into a minimally invasive approach using indirect reduction and percutaneous plating and good results have been obtained especially in fractures not amenable to intramedullary nailing.
Current methods of treatment
Nonoperative treatment
The use of nonoperative treatment is largely limited to un-displaced tibial shaft fractures. Applying a long-leg cast for the first 2 weeks and afterwards a Sarmiento cast or a fracture brace can lead to good results in these injuries [2, 5].
Intramedullary nailing
Intramedullary nailing is the gold standard in treating closed midshaft tibial fractures as well as open grade I and II fractures. The technique is also used, more controversially, in grade III open fractures [ 6, 7]. The application of locking screws has expanded the indications of intramedullary nailing to the fixation of unstable fracture patterns and this has led to recommend nailing of most tibial shaft fractures, including proximal-third and distal-third fractures. As may have been predicted, very favorable results have been seen in midshaft tibial fractures with healing rates of up to 99% [ 8]. The results in proximal-third and distal-third tibial shaft fractures [ 9] have not been that promising.
Contraindications to intramedullary nailing include:
Small (< 8mm) or deformed canals
Previous surgeries with implants in place
Gross contamination of the intramedullary canal
Severe soft-tissue injury at the site of nail entry
Compartment syndrome, which means fixation must be delayed and muscle necrosis is inevitable
Vascular injury requiring repair
Diaphyseal fractures with articular extensions
Proximal-third or distal-third extraarticular fractures (relative)
Periprosthetic fractures
Plating
Plating is indicated when intramedullary nailing is not a suitable option. Conventional plate fixation with formal surgical approaches leads to more wound complications than intramedullary nailing. Modern and soft-tissue-friendly plating techniques result in fewer complications and have shifted surgical practice back to plating tibial shaft fractures when nailing is contraindicated. There is some evidence that the results of plating proximal-third and distal-third tibial shaft fractures are comparable to intramedullary nailing in terms of union and complications. Plating achieves better results when alignment is used as the criterion [ 10, 11].
External fixation
External fixation is mainly used when there is a severe open or closed soft-tissue injury, gross contamination, or bone defect. It can be used as a temporary or definitive treatment; nowadays it is mainly a temporary stabilization method used in polytrauma, multiple-fracture patients, open fractures, and closed fractures with severe soft-tissue injury. The external fixator is applied so that the proper alignment is maintained and the fixator can be used as a reduction tool either for intramedullary nailing or percutaneous plating. In case of bone defect the external fixator can be applied as a definitive treatment and used for bone transport and deformities correction ( Fig 20.1-1 ).
Problems associated with external fixation include:
Pin-track infection
Patient discomfort
Delayed union
Malunion
Indications and contraindications for MIPO
Indications
Minimally invasive plating is indicated for closed and open (grade I and II) tibial shaft fractures in which intramedullary nailing is not a suitable treatment alternative. It is indicated for:
Fractures extending to the articular surface of the tibia
Proximal- and distal-third shaft fractures
Some segmental fractures
Small medullary canals (< 8 mm)
Canal occupied by implants
Periprosthetic fractures
Deformed canals
Open growth plates
After bone transport, to decrease external fixation time
Absence of adequate equipment for intramedullary nailing (C-arm)
Contraindications
Minimally invasive plating is contraindicated when the patient presents with:
Severe soft-tissue injuries (open grade III)
Skin problems (diabetes, peripheral vascular disease
Associated vascular injuries
Compartment syndrome
Pathological fracture
Active infection
Delayed reconstruction
Surgical anatomy
In MIPO of the tibial shaft, the plate may be placed either on the medial or on the lateral surface of the bone. The medial surface is easily palpable and it is straightforward to prepare the subcutaneous tunnel. It is possible to apply the plate from the most post proximal to the most distal part of the tibia from the medial side. However, in patients whose skin and subcutaneous tissues are thin, such as the elderly, the problems of hardware prominence, neuroma formation, or skin necrosis must be considered. The lateral surface is within the anterior compartment, and placing a plate there may compromise the blood supply to the mid and distal parts of the shaft. The posterior surface of the tibia is deep and is not suitable for MIPO.
Blood supply of the tibial shaft
Borrelli et al [ 12] studied blood supply of the tibial shaft in cadavers. Findings showed that primarily branches of the anterior and posterior tibial arteries provide the extraosseous blood supply of the tibia ( Fig 20.1-2 ). Percutaneously applied plates caused less disruption of the extraosseous blood supply than open plating techniques.
Structures at risk
Medial surface of the tibia
There are two structures to be particularly aware of:
Saphenous nerve (including its infrapatellar branch)
Saphenous vein
The saphenous nerve emerges from between the gracilis and sartorius muscles and runs down the leg with the long saphenous vein ( Fig 20.1-3 ). At the posteromedial aspect of the knee, it gives off its infrapatellar branch, which runs across to the anterior aspect of the proximal tibia. If the infrapatellar branch is cut, its ends should be buried in the subcutaneous fat to minimize the chance of forming a painful neuroma.
The saphenous nerve and the long saphenous vein run along the posteromedial border of the tibia and then cross the distal tibia to lie anterior to the medial malleolus.
When carrying out MIPO incisions on the medial side of the tibia injury to the saphenous nerve and vein should be avoided by using blunt dissection. They should be identified if they are situated along the path of the incision. Tunneling should be performed deep to the plane of the saphenous nerve and vein, especially in the distal tibia.
Lateral surface of the tibia
There are three structures to be aware of:
Anterior tibial vessels
Superficial and deep branches of the peroneal nerve
Superior and inferior syndesmosis
In the proximal and midshaft of the tibia, there are no structures at risk and it is safe to perform tunneling and plating. In the distal tibia, however, the deep peroneal nerve, along with the anterior tibial vessels, lie superficially over the anterior aspect of the distal tibia. Therefore, these important structures must be identified and protected before tunneling and plate fixation. It is advisable to prepare the tunnel right against the bone from the distal tibia to the midshaft to avoid injury to the deep peroneal nerve and anterior tibial vessels. When inserting screws in the distal third, a sleeve is of paramount importance to avoid damaging the abovementioned neurovascular structures.
Cross-sectional anatomy
At the level of the proximal tibial shaft ( Fig 20.1-3a ), the bone is triangular in shape and flat on its anteromedial surface. The anterior tibial vessels and deep peroneal nerve lie anterior to the interosseous membrane while the posterior tibial vessels and nerve lie posterior to the interosseous membrane. These neurovascular structures lie close to the posterolateral corner of the tibia. The long saphenous vein lies along the posteromedial crest of the tibia.
At the level of the midshaft of the tibia ( Fig 20.1-3b ), the bone is triangular in shape. The deep peroneal nerve and anteri or tibial vessels move closer to the posterolateral corner of the bone while the posterior tibial vessels and nerve move to lie over the posterior aspect of the tibia. The long saphenous vein still lies along the posteromedial aspect of the tibia.
At the level of the distal tibia ( Fig 20.1-3c ), the bone is circular in shape and the posterior aspect is slightly flat. The anterior tibial vessels with the deep peroneal nerve move onto the anterolateral surface of the tibia and run close to the bone. The posterior tibial vessels and nerve move close to the posteromedial part of the tibia. The long saphenous vein moves from the posteromedial to the medial surface of the distal tibia.