The Utility of Increased Constraint in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty for Obese Patients




Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for obese patient entails more preoperative comorbidities and complications, and shorter longevity. This article is a retrospective review comparing longevity of the constrained implant with a standard prosthesis. Patient-specific data, Knee Society Scores, complications, and revisions were recorded and compared. No statistical differences were found. The constrained condylar knee for obese patients improves the intramedullary alignment of the prosthesis and supports the surrounding soft tissues. The clinical results are similar to a standard implant in the nonobese with similar longevity at midterm follow-up.





  • The constrained condylar knee for obese patients facilitates the operative procedure by improving the intramedullary alignment of the prosthesis and supporting the surrounding soft tissues. The clinical results are similar to standard implants in the nonobese with similar longevity at midterm follow-up.





  • The constrained condylar knee for obese patients facilitates the operative procedure by improving the intramedullary alignment of the prosthesis and supporting the surrounding soft tissues. The clinical results are similar to standard implants in the nonobese with similar longevity at midterm follow-up.








  • Table 1 summarizes the results. There were 3 reoperations in the obese group: 1 prosthetic loosening, 1 incision and drainage for a superficial infection, and 1 proximal realignment for a dislocating patella without component malalignment. There was 1 revision for loosening in the control group and 1 manipulation for decreased range of motion.



    Table 1

    Comparison of 100 obese patients who underwent primary TKA with a constrained condylar prosthesis with 100 nonobese patients who underwent primary TKA with a standard knee prosthesis



































































































    Obese Nonobese P Value<.05 Significant
    BMI 40.7 (Range 31–55) 26.4 (Range 22–30) <0.001
    Average Age 59 y (Range 45–70) 65 y (Range 45–75) <0.001
    Comorbidities 2.3 0.9 <0.001
    Preoperative ROM 113° 117° <0.001
    Change in ROM +6.1° +2.4° 0.013
    Surgical Time 96.min 79.min 0.015
    Knee Society Preoperative Pain 39 43 0.004
    Knee Society Postoperative Pain 96 96
    Change in Knee Society Pain 57 53 0.005
    Knee Society Preoperative Function 33 39 <0.001
    Knee Society Postoperative Function 79 83 0.03
    Change in Knee Society Function 46 44 0.49
    Average Length of Follow-up 6.9 y 6.1 y 0.02
    Complications 8 8
    Reoperations 3 2
    Average Preoperative Radiograph Varus 6.3° 5.6° 0.15
    Average Preoperative Radiograph Valgus 11.2° 8.3° <0.001
    Average Postoperative Valgus Alignment All 3°–7° All 3°–7°

    Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

    Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

    Feb 23, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on The Utility of Increased Constraint in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty for Obese Patients

    Full access? Get Clinical Tree

    Get Clinical Tree app for offline access