Case: You are consulted by your hospital urologist: “A 19-year-old male presents with a 3.0-cm firm asymptomatic testicular mass of concern. By exam, this does not appear to be a hernia, hydrocele, or varicocele. Please evaluate.”
The urologist seeing a patient with an asymptomatic scrotal mass directs the physical examination toward differentiating the benign from the malignant causes. An inguinal hernia can be invaginated at the inguinal ring. A hydrocele will have a cystic consistency. A varicocele will often feel like a “bag of worms.” These benign conditions result in relatively soft, compressible masses of the scrotum. A malignant mass, however, palpates as a firm lump with a “woody” or heavy consistency. Almost all scrotal masses should be imaged to further define anatomic features. If the suspicion is high for malignancy, the next step is to obtain an ultrasonogram. A trans-scrotal biopsy should never be performed, because it can disrupt the lymphatic channels and lead to metastases or obscure the anatomy during future inguinal orchiectomy. If a malignant tumor is suspected on exam and imaging, surgical intervention must be instituted quickly (ideally within 48 hours due to the rapid tumor doubling time).
The medical oncologist consulted on this patient with a possible testicular cancer suggested by physical exam and ultrasonography should order testing for the preoperative tumor markers α-fetoprotein (AFP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and the β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG). Metastatic workup for a testicular tumor should include a chest radiograph and a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis, and occasionally a CT scan of the chest.
→ Ultrasonography: For clinically suspicious masses or when unsure of the diagnosis, ultrasonography is the imaging modality of choice for the majority of scrotal masses. It can differentiate solid from cystic masses and testicular from paratesticular masses.
$96
→ MRI: If the diagnosis is still uncertain, an MRI scan is appropriate and effective. MRI has been reported to have a negative predictive value of 100% and a positive predictive value of 71%.
$534
→ CT scan: If the mass is found to be malignant, the next step is to obtain a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (with IV contrast) and a chest radiograph (posteroanterior and lateral views) to evaluate for metastatic disease. In the event of a positive abdominal CT scan or an abnormal chest radiograph, a chest CT scan would be indicated. These images will differentiate clinical stages I, II, and III.