Surgery for Lumbar Disk Herniations



Fig. 18.1
(a) Conventional vs. modified minimally invasive speculum retractor; (b) conventional (bottom left) vs. miniaturized rongeurs; (c) miniaturized speculum retractor in situ; (d) the speculum-counter-retractor system can be docked to a self-holding arm; (e) expandable tubular retractor with holding arm; (f) close-up view of an exiting nerve root through the tubular retractor






18.3 Surgical Techniques



18.3.1 Primary Disk Herniations



18.3.1.1 Interlaminar Approach [22, 23]



Indications





  • All contained disk herniations (DHs) and extruded fragments between the midline and the medial border of the pedicle. In relation to the disk space, the fragments may be caudally or cranially extruded. In the latter case, the translaminar approach is preferred.


  • DH combined with central/recess stenosis or with asymptomatic segmental instability.


  • Recurrent DH.


Contraindications





  • Foraminal or far lateral DHs which are located lateral to the lateral border of the pedicle


Preoperative Planning





  • Biplanar plain radiographs

    Optional in first surgery cases, provided that the MRI investigation encloses a coronal slice (scoliosis!). Mandatory (1) in recurrent DHs cases to evaluate bony defects and (2) whenever MRI leads to suspect a bony abnormality (spina bifida, pars interarticularis defects)


  • MRI

    Sagittal slices: Contained disk herniation (DH) or extruded fragment? Caudal or cranial (suitable for translaminar approach) fragment dislocation? Mid-vertebral body herniation (halfway between two disk spaces)? Foraminal slice: Black neuroforamen? Extraforaminal slice: Disk fragment still apparent? Axial slices: Axillary disk fragment? How much of the DH is underneath the thecal sac, intraforaminal or extraforaminal (Fig. 18.2)? Pseudomeningocele in recurrent disk surgery? Coronal slices: Which approach for combined intra- and extraforaminal DH? Gadolinium-enhanced slices: Amount of scar tissue on the way to and into the spinal canal? Differentiation between recurrent DH and scar tissue?

    A314055_1_En_18_Fig2_HTML.gif


    Fig. 18.2
    Teaching case: A 64-year-old lady presented with mild low back pain and severe left-sided L5 pain requiring opioids since 3 weeks. The examination demonstrated a left-sided foot dorsiflexion weakness. (a) Because the sagittal MRI slices were not performed lateral enough, the L5/S1 disk was reported as normal. Conservative therapy was advised. (b) MRI was repeated with appropriate lateral slicing. The small intraforaminal disk herniation squeezing the left-sided L5 root (bottom right) was removed surgically


  • CT scan

    Second choice whenever MRI contraindicated or not available. DiskoCT (diskography + CT): helpful in suspected extraforaminal DH. CMenhanced CT: indicated for recurrent disk and differentiation between intraforaminal DH and neurinoma


Positioning

We recognize that several positioning could provide good clinical results, especially with experienced operating room personnel (ORP). The features of our preferred positioning technique are described below:



  • The patient is placed prone on the Wilson frame. Advantages: Hip and knee joints are only moderately flexed, especially important in obese patients. The lordosis of the lumbar spine should be reduced as required by increasing the height of the arches. The distance between the laminae can be adjusted according to the size of the patient in order to allow a free-hanging abdomen to reduce bleeding (Fig. 18.3).

    A314055_1_En_18_Fig3_HTML.gif


    Fig. 18.3
    Positioning for open lumbar disk surgery: (a) The face is embedded in anatomically tailored foam. (b) The mirror enables a continuous monitoring of the eyes and of the tube. (c) The lumbar spine is parallel to the floor. The belts secure the patient during tilting the table 30° away from the surgeon, as required in extraforaminal disk surgery. (d) The Wilson frame can be adjusted according to the size of the patient and may open up the interlaminar window by decreasing the lumbar lordosis


  • The head is positioned into a ProneView mask (Manufacturer: Dupaco Inc, Oceanside, California, USA). Eyes, nose, and chin are protected: The anesthesiologist is able to check them intraoperatively by use of a mirror (Fig. 18.3).


  • For safety reasons the patient is secured with a belt on the gluteal area: This becomes helpful when the OR table has to be tilted away from the surgeon, e.g., in dealing with extraforaminal or far lateral disk herniations (EFDHs).


  • The OR table is tilted until the lumbar spine is parallel to the floor.


  • X-ray localization: A 2 cm skin incision does not allow a “seek and find” surgery. Therefore the correct X-ray localization of the surgical target area is of paramount importance. The needle is always inserted contralateral to the intended surgical side in order to avoid subcutaneous or intramuscular hematoma and off the midline in order to prevent inadvertent CSF leakage. The needle is perpendicular to the target area (and to the floor): Soft tissue dissection is easier straightforward down. Even small oblique deviations can lead to the wrong level, especially in obese patients. The needle should point to the equator of the target disk. With increasing experience, the surgical field may be narrowed further to only the extruded disk fragment.


Soft-Tissue Approach

The interlaminar space can be approached via a subperiosteal (SP) or a transmuscular or paramedian (TM) route. Although the use of the microscope “from skin to skin” is optional, its advantages will be appreciated in dealing with a miniaturized surgical corridor. The most relevant steps are described below:



  • Prophylactic antibiotic coverage (e.g., cephazoline 2 g) 30 min before skin incision


  • Skin: 2 cm incision, 5 mm (SP), or 10 mm (TM) off the midline


  • Fascia: (SP) Slightly semicircular incision toward the midline. Five holding sutures on the medial lip secured to a clamp with weights. (TM) Straight incision with one holding suture on each side.


  • Muscle: (SP) Paramedian retraction of the paravertebral muscles from the interspinous ligament. Sharp dissection of the rotators from the lower rim of the superior lamina and from the facet joint capsule. Insertion of a miniaturized speculum-counter-retractor system (Fig. 18.1c; manufacturer: Medicon, Tuttlingen, Germany).

    (TM) Blunt splitting with the index finger until the lamino-facet junction can be palpated. Opening of the muscular corridor with miniaturized muscle retractors or with a dilator. Insertion of an expandable tubular retractor (Fig. 18.1e; manufacturer: Medicon, Tuttlingen, Germany) of 15 mm or 18 mm diameter. Both the speculum and the tube may be secured to the OR table with a self-holding arm nicknamed the “snake” (Fig. 18.1e).


  • Interlaminar space: From this step onward, the surgical technique is identical. The lower rim of the cranial lamina, the medial border of the facet joint, and the yellow ligament are the area of interest. Radiographic confirmation of the level is performed. Following a lateral flavectomy or flavotomy with suspension sutures, the epidural fat is exposed. The medial border of the inferior articular process is undercut or drilled off until the shoulder of the root is palpated.


  • Epidural dissection: Up-down dissection of the epidural fat performed with a microdissector and a flat sucker along with careful bipolar coagulation of veins which opens access to the root-DH complex.


Exposure of the Herniated Disk





  • Management of the DH: The local anatomy will dictate the necessary steps. Usually, a gentle dissection between root and disk material is accomplished first. In our experience the root retraction is performed intermittently with a flat sucker rather than with a conventional root retractor. Free disk fragments are removed with miniaturized forceps (Fig. 18.1b, manufacturer: Medicon, Tuttlingen, Germany). If indicated, the annulus is split bluntly with the dissector or with a scalpel and further disk material is removed. In the authors’ experience, additional diskectomy is performed in 20–30 % of the cases.


Closure





  • The disk space, when opened, is rinsed with normal saline. The opening of the annulus is closed with a collagen sponge coated with fibrinogen and thrombin (Tachosil®, manufacturer: Behring, Marburg, Germany). The epidural fat is mobilized in order to cover the root. Careful hemostasis goes along with closure by layers.


18.3.1.2 Translaminar Approach [2428]



Indications





  • Cranially extruded disk fragments pushing the exiting root against the lower rim of the pedicle. Usually they are located within the root canal between two lines marking the medial and lateral border of the superior facet.


  • Recurrent cranially extruded disk fragments of DH previously removed via an interlaminar approach.


Contraindication





  • Lack of an adequate bony lamina, e.g., severe spinal canal stenosis and spina bifida


Preoperative Planning





  • MRI (sagittal slices): Measure the distance between the upper border of the disk space and the lower rim of the cephalad pedicle. The translaminar hole will be centered on the halfway of this distance. Axial slices: Look at how much of the bulk of the DH is underneath the thecal sac and how much is lateral of it or even intraforaminal. The translaminar hole is centered on the lateral border of the dural sac.


Positioning





  • Basically the same as for the interlaminar approach.


  • Important: The target lamina should be parallel to the floor! This may require the surgeon to tilt the OR table in a reverse-Trendelenburg position. The advantages of a horizontal target lamina are twofold: The placement of the retractor blade and the drilling of the hole become easier (see Figs. 18.6 and 18.7).


  • Radiographic localization: The needle should point to the largest portion of the DH which is usually halfway between the upper border of the target disk and the lower rim of the cranial pedicle. At the beginning of the learning curve, these landmarks may be labeled on the skin incision centered in between.


Soft-Tissue Approach





  • The lamina can be approached via a subperiosteal (SP) or a transmuscular (TM) route. The soft tissue approach mirrors the interlaminar approach. Remember: The width and the overlapping of the lamina in relation to the disk space increase in the caudal-cranial direction, whereas the width of the isthmus decreases. This means that the translaminar hole will be more medially and more oval-shaped in the upper lumbar levels (Figs. 18.4 and 18.5).

    A314055_1_En_18_Fig4_HTML.jpg


    Fig. 18.4
    The up-down length of the lamina (white figures) increases, whereas the width of the isthmus (black figures in mm) decreases in the caudal-cranial direction. That means that the overlap of the disk by the lamina increases also in the upper lumbar levels. Furthermore, there the translaminar hole becomes more paramedian and oval-shaped


    A314055_1_En_18_Fig5_HTML.gif


    Fig. 18.5
    Clinical case: (a) The sagittal MRI shows cranially extruded disk herniations at the level L3/l4 and L4/L5. (b) The DH encroaches the root L3 and (c) L4 on the right side. (d) Because the 28-year-old lady complained about a three-fifth weakness of the m. quadriceps, both DHs were removed via translaminar holes. Note that the L3 hole is more medial and more oval-shaped due to the narrower pars. Clearing of the disk spaces was not necessary


  • Lamina: Irrespective of the type of retractor used, the lateral border of the lamina should be visible underneath the retractor valve. A dissector is placed onto the lamina where the bulk of the DH is suspected and a fluoroscopic localization is performed. At this point the lamina should have been tilted parallel to the floor, so that the high-speed cutting burr can be held easily perpendicular to the lamina. With slow circular movements, a round (L5) or oval-shaped (L4 and cranially) hole of about 10 mm in diameter is performed (Figs. 18.6 and 18.7). Three layers “white” (outer cortical bone), “red” (spongy bone), and “white” (inner cortical bone) will be drilled off. For the sake of safety, the inner cortical bone should be drilled with a diamond burr. Remarks: (1) At least 3 mm of the lateral border should be spared in order to avoid a fracture of the pars interarticularis (Fig. 18.6); (2) usually the translaminar hole is located just cephalad to the cranial insertion of the yellow ligament. So, after removal of the thin shell of inner cortical bone with small patches, epidural fat will appear.

    A314055_1_En_18_Fig6_HTML.gif


    Fig. 18.6
    (a) The 3-D CT shows a translaminar hole at L3 on the left side. Note: The facet joint L3/L4 is intact and a sufficient lateral rim (5 mm, arrow) of the pars is maintained where the bone is strongest. (b) Intraoperative view: The internal lamina is drilled off inferomedially where the upper rim of the yellow ligament (star) appears. The lateral rim of the pars (arrow) is the lateral boundary


    A314055_1_En_18_Fig7_HTML.gif


    Fig. 18.7
    (a) A right-sided 10 mm translaminar hole at L4 with an intact inner cortical bone is seen through the expandable tubular retractor (15 mm Ø); (b) following dissection of the epidural fat, a large extruded disk fragment appears in the axilla of the exiting L4 nerve root; (c) after the removal of the disk fragments, the L4 nerve root slips back into the visible field


  • Epidural dissection: Up and down dissection of the fat along the lateral border of the dura. That should be continued cranial up to the axilla of the exiting root.


Exposure of the Herniated Disk

Usually an extruded or subligamentous disk fragment(s) can be mobilized. After decompression, the root slips caudally into the visible field (Fig. 18.7). The foramen is then probed with a double-angled hook or blunt probe. If an extensive annular perforation is detected, the disk space should be cleared. In our experience that was required in merely 20 % of the cases. The rate of recurrence was 7 %.


Closure





  • Gelfoam soaked with a long-acting steroid to fill in the hole is optional, but should be avoided if the disk space has been cleared.

May 4, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Surgery for Lumbar Disk Herniations

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access