Sports-Related Injury Patterns Among Athletes with Intellectual Disabilities

We present a scoping review regarding sports-related injury patterns in athletes with intellectual disabilities. We examined studies published through February 1, 2025 that were retrieved through librarian performed literature searches. The search resulted 646 articles of which 12 articles were selected. The majority of relevant studies are reports of injuries at individual Special Olympics games and do not address detailed injury specifics. Quality of data improved over time. Little literature exists investigating injury patterns in athletes with intellectual disability; however, there has been an increase in the number and quality of studies starting in 2022. Further research is recommended.

Key points

  • Historically, academic literature for athletes with intellectual disabilities has focused on safety for sports participation, not on injury epidemiology.

  • Although still limited, there has been an increase in the number and quality of research on injury epidemiology in athletes with intellectual disability.

  • More research is needed in the area of injury epidemiology in athletes with intellectual disabilities in order to draw formal conclusions.

Abbreviations

AAIDD American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
IOC International Olympic Committee
IRB institutional review board
PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Introduction

Intellectual disability is defined by the American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) as a disability with onset any time before the age of 22 that significantly impacts intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior. Intellectual functioning is an individual’s mental capacity, often tested by intelligence quotient testing. Adaptive behavior is characterized by functional skills relevant to daily life, including conceptual skills (i.e. language, math skills), social skills (i.e. interpersonal skills, social problem solving), and practical skills (i.e. personal hygiene care, money management).

The population of athletes with disabilities can represent athletes with intellectual disabilities participating in a general sport setting/group/organization-or- in a sports setting/group/organization specifically for individuals with disabilities, specifically for individuals with intellectual disabilities, integrated for individuals with and without disabilities, or integrated for individuals with and without intellectual disabilities.

Perhaps the most well-known sports organization for individuals with intellectual disabilities is the Special Olympics. Special Olympics provides global novice through elite Olympic-style sports for athletes with intellectual disabilities, ages 8 and older. ,,,

Athletes with intellectual disabilities represent a unique athlete population. Academic literature surrounding this population generally addresses sports participation or pre-participation screening. ,, There has been a particular focus on screening for atlantoaxial instability in Down syndrome and the possible risk of secondary cervical spinal cord injury. ,, The authors have noticed there has been less emphasis on epidemiologic information regarding sports-related injuries in this population.

The purpose of this article was to comprehensively review and critically appraise the available literature regarding injury patterns in athletes with intellectual disabilities.

Methods

Data Sources and Search

The scoping review occurred through an initial search in 2021 and then later through a search in 2025 to add articles between 2021 and 2025. In the 2021 search, studies published through April 1, 2021, were retrieved through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, a systematic search was initiated by a clinical librarian utilizing both keyword and controlled vocabulary combinations of the following terms: sports injury, athletic injury, sports trauma, intellectual disability, intellectual disability disorder, learning disability, learning disorder, mental retardation, and mental deficiency. No studies were excluded based on publication date, language, or study type.

Using the same search methods as utilized in 2021, in 2025 a literature search occurred retrieving studies published April 2, 2021 through February 1, 2025 through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL studies. Following PRISMA protocols, a systematic search was initiated by a clinical librarian utilizing both keyword and controlled vocabulary combinations of the following terms: sports injury, athletic injury, sports trauma, intellectual disability, intellectual disability disorder, learning disability, learning disorder, mental retardation, and mental deficiency. No studies were excluded based on publication date, language, or study type.

Study selection

Inclusion Criteria

Using Rayyan, a web-based application built for systematic reviews, 2 authors (MD, PC in 2021; MD, PP in 2025) reviewed the search results independently and included studies based on the following criteria. All conflicts were settled to gain consensus at each step of the study selection process (title, abstract, and paper). All clinical research study designs were included, as well as cross-over and case-control studies. Included studies were studies of which full text was available in English and of which epidemiologic information regarding sports-related injuries was reported in individuals with intellectual disabilities. The AAIDD’s definition of intellectual disability was followed.

Exclusion Criteria

Published abstracts (i.e. from academic conferences) without accompanying full text articles were excluded. Qualitative studies, which did not include quantitative epidemiologic data regarding sports-related injuries, were excluded. Animal and observational studies were excluded, as were case reports and case series.

Studies involving individuals with various disabilities, without data separated for individuals with intellectual disabilities, were excluded. Studies with an emphasis on the pediatric/adolescent population were excluded. As this article was focused on sports-related injuries in organized sports, studies that reported injuries related to physical education or non-organized physical activity was excluded. Studies were excluded if injury data were reported aggregately among athletes and non-athletes (i.e. coaches, fans; etc) with injury data not able to be specifically isolated for athletes. Likewise, studies were excluded if sports-related medical incidents were recorded in a way in which medical illness and sports-related injury data were not at all able to be separated. Studies in which sports-related injuries were not a primary outcome were also excluded.

Data Extraction

The lead author (MD) performed basic data extractions of all included studies, focusing on information highlighted by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Injury and Illness Epidemiology Consensus Group as important components to include in sports medicine injury epidemiology research and following a similar structure to the work by Weiler and colleagues. , A standardized appraisal process utilized a 10-point scale created for and used specifically by prior sports injury outcomes systematic reviews. This scale was created to assess key points important for assessing the quality and validity of sports-injury related clinical research studies. The 10-point scale, based on the work of Van Gent and colleagues, Hoy and colleagues, Bahr, and Lopes and colleagues with wording by Weiler and colleagues is shown in Box 1 . ,,,, Each reviewer (MD, PC in 2021; MD, PP in 2025) independently scored the included articles using this scale. All conflicts in scoring were resolved to reach consensus.

Box 1

The 10-point scale to assess quality of sports-related injury research, based on the work of Van Gent and colleagues, Hoy and colleagues, Bahr, and Lopes and colleagues with specific question wording by Weiler and colleagues ,,,,

  • 1.

    Definition of injury described in each study (yes/no).

  • 2.

    Studies with prospective designs that presented incidence or prevalence data (yes/no).

  • 3.

    Description of the population of athletes (eg, sport, disability, classification) or the player positions (eg, goalkeepers or forward players) that participated in the study (yes/no).

  • 4.

    Was the process of inclusion of athletes in the stydy at random (ie, not by convenience) or was data collection performed with the entire target population (yes/no).

  • 5.

    Data analysis was performed with at least 80% of the athletes included in the study (‘yes’ or “no”).

  • 6.

    Were data regarding the injuries reported by a healthcare professional (yes/no).

  • 7.

    Was the same mode of data collection (e-mail, telephone, interview, etc.) used (yes/no).

  • 8.

    Was the diagnosis conducted by medical doctors (yes/no).

  • 9.

    Was there a follow-up period of at least 6 mo for prospective studies (assessed by ‘yes’ or ‘no’).

  • 10.

    Were the incidence or prevalence rates of injury expressed by a ratio that represents both the number of injuries, as well as the exposure to sport (e.g. IR/1000 h of sport exposure, and this criterion was assessed by ‘yes’ or ‘no’).

Results

The literature search yielded 646 search results, of which 12 total articles were included for analysis. ,,,,,,,,,,, Fig. 1 includes the full PRISMA diagram. Table 1 presents basic data extraction, performed by lead author (MD), of key information from all included studies. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Table 2 presents 10-point scale scoring consensus by 2 authors (MD, PC in 2021; MD, PP in 2025).

Fig. 1

PRISMA Flowchart for this systematic review, based on Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 . http://www.prisma-statement.org/ .

( From Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 )

Table 1

Basic data extracted by lead author (MD) from 12 included articles ,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Article Conflicts of Interest Declared by Authors Ethics Board/Institutional Review Board Approval Study Design Sports Setting Study Participants Study Outcome(s) Length of Athletic Exposure (days) Definition of Sports-Related Injury Number, Age, and Sex of Athletes Disability Characteristics of Study Subjects Number of Sports-Related Injuries , Sports Injury Patterns Noted Calculated Injury Incidence per 1000 Athlete Hours Other Incidence Reports by Athletic Exposure
Lead Author: Birrer
Title: The Special Olympics: An Injury Overview
Journal: The Physician and Sportsmedicine
Year: 1984
Not reported Not reported Not reported, but prospective cohort study implied New Jersey State Special Olympics:July 1980 & July 1981 Special Olympics athletes (track and field, martial arts, badminton, weight lifting, and dancing); non-athletes (data separated) Medical incidents recorded by health care personnel (injury, illness) Not reported Not reported n: 2056
Age: Not reported
Sex: 1191 M, 865 F
Athletes with intellectual disability (referred to as handicapped athletes in the article) , further disability information not described 40 , Lacerations/abrasions: 15
Contusions: 13
Mild strains: 8
Mild sprains: 4
Information not available to calculate Not reported
Lead Author: McCormick
Title: Injury and illness surveillance at local Special Olympics games
Journal: British Journal of Sports Medicine
Year: 1990
Not reported Institutional Review Board approved Not reported, but prospective cohort study implied Special Olympics Spring Games: Galveston, Texas (19 teams);
Additional second local competition (24 teams)
Special Olympics athletes (track and field, gymnastics, equestrian, soccer, swimming, diving) Medical incidents recorded by health care personnel (injury, illness) 3 “An injury resulting directly from participation in a sports event”. n: 541
Age: Not reported
Sex: Not reported
Athletes with intellectual disability. Athletes with Down syndrome (162), without Down syndrome (615) 4 Track and field: Leg muscle strains: 2; Patellar subluxation: 1
Diving: Hand injury: 1
Calculated by 2 methods (Based on author’s calculations and adjusted for 1000 athlete hours):
Method 1 (using event time): 0.4 injuries per 1000 athlete hours
Method 2 (using measured activity time): 70 injuries per 1000 athlete h
Calculated by 2 methods:
Method 1 (using event time): 0.0004 injuries per participant hour
Method 2 (using measured activity time): 0.07 injuries per participant hour
Lead Author: Robson
Title: The Special Olympics Games for the mentally handicapped- United Kingdom 1989
Journal: British Journal of Sports Medicine
Year: 1990
Not reported Not reported Not reported, but prospective cohort study implied Special Olympics Games in Leicester, UK 8/19/1989–8/26/1989:
18 UK regional teams;
French and German teams
Special Olympics athletes (track and field, cycling, equestrian, swimming, lawn bowling, soccer, gymnastics, basketball, netball, and table tennis); non-athletes (data separated) Medical incidents recorded by health care personnel (injury, illness) 8 Not reported n: 1512
Age: Not reported
Sex: 942 M, 570 F
Athletes with intellectual disability. Athletes with Down syndrome (417), Cerebral Palsy, and other conditions as listed in article Not able to be calculated Knee/back/orthopedic: 42
Ankle/foot: 29
Bruising/muscle strains: 15
Others as in article
Information not available to calculate Not reported
Lead Author: Perlman
Title: Special Olympics athletes and the incidence of sports-related injuries
Journal: Journal of the Massachusetts Dental Society
Year: 1994
Not reported Not reported Not reported, but retrospective chart review implied Special Olympics World Games data 1989 (Nevada), 1990 (Scotland), 1991 (Minnesota), 1993 (Austria) (although the World Games Data do not appear to be presented in the Injury Section of the Report)
Special Olympics Chapter data July 1992-October 1993: Florida/Miami, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia
Special olympics athletes (basketball, track and field, softball, alpine skiing, soccer, bowling, rollerskating, aquatics, cross country skiing, volleyball, others in article);volleyball, others in article); non-athletes (data separated Medical incidents as recorded by insurance claims Not reported Not reported n: 389,000- it is implied that this number is the number for the combined data from Chapter and World Games but not directly stated.
Age/Sex: Chapter: 22.2% 12 and under, 40.8% 13–20, 27.1% 21–39, 10.0% 40 and over, 62.1% male
World: 4.2% 12 and under, 46.7% 13–20, 45.0% 21–39, 4.1% 40 and over, 68.1% male
Athletes with intellectual disability. Athletes with Down syndrome (World Games: 14.3%; Chapters: 14h.1%) Not able to be calculated Chapter data: Basketball: 25 sprains, 16 fractures, 13 bruises, 1 concussion; Softball: 15 sprains, 10 fractures, 7 bruises, 1 concussion; track and field: 9 sprains, 6 fractures, 9 bruises, 1 concussion, soccer: 3 sprains, 5 fractures, 1 bruise, 0 concussions, alpine skiing 4 sprains, 1 fracture, 2 bruises, 0 concussions; others reported in article. Information not available to calculate Not reported
Lead Author: Batts
Title: The Medical Demands of the Special Athlete
Journal: Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine
Year: 1998
Not reported Not reported Prospective Cohort Study Special Olympics Hawaii Summer
Games: 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996
Special Olympics athletes (aquatics, tee ball, softball, softball throw, powerlifting, shot put, wheelchair and developmental athletics, standing long jump, running long jump, high jump, track and relay, victory dance) Medical incidents recorded by health care personnel (injury, illness) 12 Not reported n: 2326
Age: 8–76
Sex: Not reported
Athletes with intellectual disability , further disability information not described 52 16 abrasions, 14 strains (muscle or tendon), 8 sprains (joint or ligament), 7 contusions, 4 lacerations, 2 blisters, 1 nail avulsion Information not available to calculate Not reported
Lead Author: Galena
Title: Connecticutt State Special Olympics: Observations and Recommendations
Journal: Connecticut Medicine
Year: 1998
Not reported Not reported Retrospective Chart Review Special Olympics Connecticut State
Summer Games: 1994, 1995, 1996
Special Olympics athletes (summer sports; specifics not reported) Medical incidents recorded by health care personnel (injury, illness) Not reported Not reported n: Unclear from reporting
Age: Age range 8–76; Mean ages from pooled samples of 100 athletes: 30.1 in 1994, 31.3 in 1995, 30.8 in 1996
Sex: numbers not indicated but reported as fairly equivalent
Athletes with intellectual disability, Down syndrome (13 of a pooled sample of 100), Traumatic brain injury (6 of a pooled sample of 100), Cerebral palsy (1 out of a pooled sample of 100) 375 traumatic injuries though details of only 153 are described Head and neck: 19
Upper extremity: 29
Chest: 7
Lower extremity: 103
Information not available to calculate Not reported
Lead Author: Wheeler
Title: A report of the medical team activity at the 2009 Special Olympics GB
Journal: British Journal of Sports Medicine
Year: 2012
None Not reported Prospective Cohort Study Special Olympics Summer Games Great Britain 2009 Special Olympics athletes (athletics, cycling, equestrian, judo, kayaking, football, swimming, sailing, basketball, badminton, bowling, boccia, ten-pin bowling, gymnastics, golf, Kwik cricket, netball, powerlifting, table tennis, tennis, and Motor Activities Training Program); nonathletes (data separated) Medical incidents recorded by health care personnel (event medical team records, Red Cross team records, St. John’s Ambulance crew records) 7 Not reported n: 2414
Age: Only reported for those having medical consultation- mean age 28.2 (range 6–78)
Sex: Only reported for those having medical consultation- 63% male
Athletes with intellectual disability (referred to as learning disability in the article) , further disability information not described Not able to be calculated Musculoskeletal injuries: 56.7% of medical consultations for athletes
Head injuries: 1.6% of medical consultations for athletes
Information not available to calculate Study reported number of medical consultations by athlete hours, but this reflects illnesses and injuries, not sports-related injuries alone.
Lead Author: Galdieri
Title: Descriptive epidemiology of orthopedic injury and illness during the Special Olympics of Pennsylvania Summer Games from 2008 to 2017
Journal: Orthopedic Reviews
Year: 2022
Not reporte Institional Review Board approved Retrospective chart review Special Olympics Pennsylvania Summer Games 2008–2017 Special Olympics athletes (aquatics, athletics, basketball, bowling, equestrian, golf, gymnastics, softball, tennis, no sport listed) Medical incidents (categorized as illnesses, injuries, or first aid) as recorded in logs from medical staff members at Special Olympics Pennsylvania Summer Games 2008–2017 30 Games, most often musculoskeletal and included dental injury, lacerations, or an eye injury. An orthopedic injury often required the athlete to stop, limit, or modify participation following the incident. , Sex: Only reported for those having medical consultation- 58.2% male Special Olympics athletes, further disability information not described 453 (455 minus 2 infections reported in the injury section of the paper and removed from injury category by our author team) Pains, Sprains, Strains (lower leg sprain most common)- 202, Contusions (thigh contusion most common) 142, Lacerations 31, Fractures/Avulsion 19, Concussions 14, Ligament/Tendon 14, Unspecified 10, Other 9, Dislocations/Subluxations 5, Neurologic 5, Swelling 2 Information not available to calculate Information not available to calculate
Lead Author: Kons
Title: Injuries in Judo Athletes With Disabilities: Prevalence, Magnitude, and Sport-Related Mechanisms.
Journal: Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Year: 2022
Not reported Human Research Ethics Committee Approved Cross-sectional study Brazilian Judo athletes with various disabilities were recruited to complete a questionnaire regarding previous sports-related injuries Brazilian Judo athletes with various disabilities Self-reported historic sports-related injuries N/A Not reported n: 51
Age: mean 34.6 (standard deviation 11.7)
Sex: 70.6% male
Physical disability 17, intellectual disability 10 (10 with Down Syndrome, 1 with autism), visual condition 24 100% of athletes (including 100% of athletes with intellectual disability) reported an injury in the prior 2 y. Further details regarding sports-related injury specifics in Brazilian Judo athletes with intellectual disability was not reported. Information not available to calculate Information not available to calculate
Lead Author: Newman
Title: Injury Trends in Special Olympics Athletes From the 2018 USA Games
Journal: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Year: 2022
None Deemed Exempt by Institutional Review Board Retrospective chart review Special Olympics United States of America (USA) Games 2018 in Seattle, Washington (Summer sports) Special Olympics athletes (athletics, basketball, bocce, bowling, flag football, golf, gymnastics, powerlifting, soccer, softball, stand-up paddleboard, swimming, tennis, volleyball) Medical incidents (categorized as MSK, non-MSK, or minor) as recorded in mobile application from medical staff members at Special Olympics USA Games 2018 6 Overall definition of sports-related injury not defined. Categories of injuries defined: “MSK (MSK: sprain, strain, and bony injury), non-MSK (neurologic, dermatologic, psychological, abdominal, cardiorespiratory, allergic, dental, and other extertional-related issues), and minor (including ice, bandaging, and massage)”. n: 2,251
Age: not reported
Sex: not reported
Special Olympics athletes, further disability information not described 744 Musculoskeletal injuries were the most common types of injuries for gymnastics, tennis, powerlifting, softball, volleyball, and basketball.
Non-musculoskeletal injuries were the most common injuries for standup paddleboarding, athletics, bocce, swimming, bowling, and golf
Minor injuries were the most common injuries for soccer and flag football
Information not available to calculate Individual sports = injuries/1000 exposures: Gymnastics (routine) = 48.1, Tennis (match) = 43.2, Standup paddleboard (race) = 142.9, Athletics (race, throw, jump) = 53.7, Powerlifting (lift) = 24.9, Bocce (match) = 20.6, Swimming (race) = 34.7, Bowling (match) = 17.6, Golf (9 holes) = 31.5
Team Sports: Injuries per Game: Softball = 1.9, Soccer = 1.7, Flag football = 1.6, Volleyball = 0.8, Basketball = 0.8
Lead Author: Garcia-Carrillo
Title: Prevalence of sports injuries in Para Athletics throwers-a retrospective cohort study
Journal: Advances in Rehabilitation
Year: 2024
None Ethics Board approved Cross-sectional study Para Athlete Throwers 18+ with at least 1 y of training in Para athletics were recruited to complete a questionnaire regarding previous sports-related injuries in the past 12 mo Para athlete throwers 18+ Self-reported historic sports-related injuries 365 “Any condition that reduces an athlete’s normal state of full health, irrespective of its consequences for the athlete’s sports participation or performance or whether the athlete sought medical attention” , n: 4 athletes reporting the intellectual impairment sports class
Age: Only reported for all athletes together and not for athletes reporting the intellectual impairment sports class (overall mean 31) (overall range 18–55)
Sex: Only reported for all athletes together and not for athletes reporting the intellectual impairment sports class (overall 70% male)
4 Para athlete throwers reporting a sports class of intellectual impairment. Further disability characteristics of this group were not provided. 3 of the 4 athletes with intellectual impairment reported an injury in the prior 12 mo Injury patterns for athletes with intellectual impairment were not specified. Injury patterns were presented for the overall group of Para athletes only and not further presented by disability type. Information not available to calculate Information not available to calculate
Lead Author: Morales
Title: Injury Risk Analysis among Judo Athletes with Intellectual Disabilities Age: mean 20.79 (± 3.44) Journal: International Journal of Sports Medicine
Year: 2024
None Institional Review Board approved Cross-sectional study Judo athletes with intellectual disability were recruited to complete a questionnaire regarding sports-related injuries in the past year Judo athletes with intellectual disability Self-reported historic sports-related injury “Any new musculoskeletal pain or injury that has caused changes in normal training or competition in terms of mode, duration, intensity or frequency, whether or not training or competition time has been missed.” , n: 182
Age: mean 20.79 (± 3.44)
Sex: 64.8% male
Level 1: 6.0% Level 2: 20.9% Level 3: 27.5% Level 4: 31.9%
Level 5: 13.7%
20 Injuries by anatomic site: Feet/toes (35%) Knees (15%) Shoulders (15%) Lower legs (10%) Head/face (10%) Elbow/arm (5%) Back (5%) Hand (5%) Injury incidence calculated per 1000 athlete hours overall and by sex, age, weight class, and sport divisioning and was presented in a figure.
Based on the figure, overall injury incidence was between 1.0 and 1.1 injuries/1000 athlete hours.
Injury burden was also calculated by dividing the number of missed days from injury by the number of hours of judo and multiplying by 1000 and was presented in a figure.
Based on the figure, the injury burden was between 22.5 and 25.0 d missed per 1000 athlete hours.
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 12, 2026 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on Sports-Related Injury Patterns Among Athletes with Intellectual Disabilities

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access